Attachment 06 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Real Estate Owned (REO) Disposition Services
- Solicitation number
- 12SAD120R0013
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for nationwide real estate owned property disposition services for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development. Services sought include legally clearing properties for sale, preserving properties during marketing and sales, finalizing sales, and providing post-closing title assessments. The incumbent will work collaboratively with the agency to market, sell, and close on a portfolio of single-family homes, condominiums, manufactured homes, and vacant lots located across all 50 states and U.S. territories. This is a total small business set-aside with a North American Industry Classification System code of 531210 and governed by Federal Acquisition Regulation provisions. Questions are due by a specified date, and interested parties should refer to the solicitation for submission instructions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 06 Past Performance Questionnaire
Solicitation: 12SAD120R0013
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
Solicitation: 12SAD120R0013
CONTRACTOR: __________________________
I. Background
The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain past performance information relative to contracts that have previously been completed within the past five years or are currently being performed by the contractor identified above. This company is a potential source for performing a Firm Fixed Priced contract.
II. Instructions
Please complete the questionnaire based on the following guidance:
A. Handwritten responses are sufficient.
B. Indicate, based on the description below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program in the assessment area. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:
| Rating |
| Description |
| SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| LIMITED CONFIDENCE |
| Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
NO
CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
| UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE |
| No recent/relevant performance record is identifiable, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. ** |
** In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned therefore resulting in an Unknown Confidence rating, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)).
Evaluators are requested to mark the appropriate box next to each corresponding rating.
C. Please provide comments for all questions in which a “No Confidence”, “Limited Confidence”, or “Satisfactory Confidence” rating is given and as appropriate for all other answers. Space for your comments is provided in each area. If more space is needed, attach additional sheets to the end of the questionnaire and reference the respective question.
D. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the offeror’s performance with the judgement of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your office has contracts with this offeror.
E. PLEASE EMAIL YOUR COMPLETE QUESTIONNAIRE WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT, BUT NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM, [September 25, 2020] TO:
REO-Acquisition@usda.gov YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EVALUATING THE CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE IS APPRECIATED. OUR GOAL IS TO SELECT THE BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT. YOUR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IS A CONSIDERATION IN DETERMINING THE BEST VALUE.
III. Program Identification:
Evaluator please complete:
A. Contractor: _______________________________________________
B. Contract Number: __________________________________________
C. Estimated contract dollar amount: _____________________________
D. Period of Performance: _____________________________________
E. Describe product acquired: ___________________________________
F. Contract Type: ____________________________________________
IV. Past Performance Evaluation:
1. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on the project?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence [ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence Comments: ___________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness and flexibility?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the contractor’s experience with the Government’s stringent standards/regulations)?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
THE CONTRACTOR:
4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments: ___________________________________________________________________
5. Effectively managed subcontractors (if used)?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments: ___________________________________________________________________
6. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
7. Cooperated with Government personnel?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
8. Met volume orders in a timely manner?
[ ] Substantial Confidence [ ] Satisfactory Confidence
[ ] Limited Confidence [ ] No Confidence [ ] Unknown Confidence
Comments:____________________________________________________________________
Put an X next to the most applicable answer:
Knowing what I know about this contractor.
____I would not enter into another contract with this contractor
____I might enter into another contract with this contractor
____I would enter into another contract with this contractor
V. Respondent Information:
The following information will assist in the analysis of the data and will be kept confidential.
A. Name of Evaluator:______________________________________
B. Office Symbol/Location:__________________________________
C. Phone:________________________________
D. Position of Title/Grade:___________________________________
E. Length of Time on Program/Contract:________________________
F. Date Questionnaire Completed:_____________________________
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .