ATT_C3_PAST_PERFORMANCE_Q_4_10_19.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Property Preservation and Inspection Services
- Solicitation number
- 12SAD119R0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on a solicitation from the USDA Rural Development for property preservation and inspection services nationwide and in U.S. territories. The solicitation is for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract with an 18-month ordering period. Questions regarding the solicitation were due by May 6, 2019 and proposals were due by May 28, 2019 to the stated email address. The past performance questionnaire requests information about a contractor's performance on a prior contract, including ratings on quality, delivery, service quality, problem resolution, personnel, and whether the reference would award the contractor another contract. It seeks explanations for any cure notices, show cause notices, suspended payments, or terminated contracts.
ATT C3 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT C3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
USDA-RD Solicitation#12SAD119R0003
INFORMATION REQUEST: PAST PERFORMANCE
The Department of Agriculture, Rural Development is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract for Property Preservation and Inspection Services, nationwide and in the U.S. Territories. The Offeror specified below has provided this Questionnaire to you for a past performance reference.
After completing this questionnaire, please send via email directly to the below email address on or before solicitation closing date and time, Tuesday, May 28, 2019 4:30pm EST. INSERT in the Subject Line: PPQ12SAD119R0003 {COMPANY NAME}.:
Email(s): RD.Acquisitions@usda.gov
Contact the following individuals for questions: Carlene R. Jackson, Sr. Contract Specialist (CTR) email: carlene.jackson@wdc.usda.gov
SECTION 1: PERFORMANCE DETAILS
Offeror must complete this section prior to sending to reference point of contact.
OFFEROR Name:
COMPANY who performed this work:
Relationship to OFFEROR: |_| OFFEROR |_| PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTOR
WORK PERFORMED AS: |_| PRIME |_| SUBCONTRACTOR
CONTRACT Number:
PROJECT Title:
Section 2: REFERENCE
Name of Person Completing the Evaluation:
Telephone: E-mail:
Title:
Company/Organization:
Please rate the contractor in each of the following areas. Note: there is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation.
· Not Applicable: N/A
· 1: Performance clearly below the contract performance standard or requirement (Provide explanation/rationale)
| · 2: | Performance occasionally does not meet minimum contract performance standard or requirement (Provide Explanation/rationale) |
| · 3: | Performance that meets the minimum contract performance standard or requirement |
| · 4: | Performance that meets and occasionally exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement |
| · 5: | Performance that almost always exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement (Provide explanation/rationale). |
| 1. Overall quality/satisfaction |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Overall satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance.
| 2. Delivery performance |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Delivery performance includes delivery consistency, on time performance, and flexibility in responding to emerging issues and implementing required solutions.
| 3. Satisfaction with the quality of service delivered |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Rate the effectiveness and applicability of the plans and strategies delivered and the actual implementation of those.
| 4. Satisfaction with problem resolution |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
This includes the contractor’s ability to solve problems, the speed in which they handle problems, and their effective delivery of resolutions.
| 5. Satisfaction with the quality of contractor personnel |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Rate the quality of the contractor’s staff in executing the project work scope; and the contractor’s effective, efficient subcontracting management, if applicable.
7. Have you issued a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments or other letters directing the correction of a performance problem in the past 3 years?
|_| Yes |_| No If Yes, please explain.
8. Have you terminated this contractor for default within the past 3 years, or are there any pending termination actions? |_| Yes |_| No If Yes, please explain.
9. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you award them another contract?
|_| Yes |_| No If No, please explain.
10. Have you discussed any adverse past performance problems with the Contractor and given them an opportunity to comment? |_| Yes |_| No Please explain.
11. Do you file past performance information in a database that the Contracting Officer may search?|_| Yes |_| No Please explain.
12. If the contract had options, were those options exercised? |_| Yes |_| No Please explain.
13. What was the contract period of performance (i.e., when were services provided)?
14. What was the dollar value of the contract performed by the contractor?
15. Provide a brief description of the services provided by the contractor for this contract.
Please attach any past performance database reports or other material you deem appropriate to a full understanding of the Contractor’s past performance by the evaluator. Please provide information on any adverse performance by the contractor and the corrective actions taken.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .