C04f_FormAttachments_1284LM27Q0007.docx
DOCX document 128 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Haycamp Common Stand Exam Service Contract
- Solicitation number
- 1284LM27Q0007
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This file contains sample design specifications, data collection forms, inspection standards, and reference materials for the Haycamp Common Stand Exam Service Contract on the San Juan National Forest, Dolores Ranger District.
The contract requires contractors to perform comprehensive forest stand examinations following specified sampling methodologies. Data collection involves establishing sample plots using variable radius sampling (with Basal Area Factors of 10, 20, or 30) for large trees 5.0 inches DBH/DRC and larger, and fixed 1/100th acre plots for smaller trees. Contractors must complete multiple standardized forms including Setting Forms, Sample Design Forms, Plot Data Forms, Tree Data Forms, Vegetation Composition Forms, and Ground Surface Cover Forms, with all required fields legible and complete. The inspection standards establish accuracy thresholds for all collected data, with specific tolerance ranges for measurements such as diameter at breast height (±0.1 to ±0.5 inches depending on tree size), height (±1 foot for site trees, ±10% for general stock trees), elevation (±2 contour intervals), and aspect (±45 degrees). Pass/fail criteria require all form scores below 5.0 points and total scores below 10.0 points, with any single unacceptable field error causing block failure. Reference materials include acceptable site tree species (jack pine, ponderosa pine, aspen, bur oak, and others) and a comprehensive list of noxious and invasive species requiring documentation. The requirement is designated as a 100% small business set-aside with quotes due via email to sarah.cotton@usda.gov no later than November 27, 2026.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| C04j_Wage Determination_1284LM27Q0007.pdf | ||
| C04h_DRC Species_1284LM27Q0007.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2. Haycamp CSE PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| C04e_Contract Plots Map_1284LM27Q0007.pdf | ||
| 1284LM27Q0007.pdf | ||
| C04g_Workflow R234 1284LM27Q0007.docx | DOCX document | |
| Experience Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| C04d_Contract Area Map_1284LM27Q0007.pdf | ||
| C04i_Species Management Interest_1284LM27Q0007.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| C04c_Haycamp Stands Plot List_1284LM27Q0007.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Exhibit 1 -- SAMPLE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
The following specifies the sample design to be used. The contractor will need to include the sample design with each stand.
REGION: 02_ PROC. FOREST: 07 _ DISTRICT: 01_ LOCATION: ____ STAND NO.___________
Form
Sample Selection Method
XXX
Sample Expansion Factor
XXXXX.X
Starting Azimuth
XXX
Subpop.
Filter
XXXXXXXX
Selection Criteria Number
XX
Subpop.
Variable
XXX
Subpop.
Minimum Value
XXXX.X
Subpop.
Maximum Value
XXXX.X
| TREE |
| BAF |
| XX* |
| LIVE |
| 1 |
| DBH |
| 5.0 |
| 999.9 |
| LIVE |
| 2 |
| DRC |
| 5.0 |
| 999.9 |
| TREE |
| FRQ |
| 100 |
| LIVE |
| 3 |
| DBH |
| 0.01 |
| 4.99 |
| LIVE |
| 4 |
| HGT |
| 0.50 |
| 4.49 |
| LIVE |
| 5 |
| DRC |
| 0.01 |
| 4.99 |
| TREE |
| FRQ |
| 2 |
| DEAD |
| 8 |
| DBH |
| 6.0 |
| 999.9 |
| DEAD |
| 8 |
| HGT |
| 10.0 |
| 999.9 |
| DEAD |
| 9 |
| DRC |
| 6.0 |
| 999.9 |
| DEAD |
| 9 |
| HGT |
| 10.0 |
| 999.9 |
| VEG COMP |
| FRQ |
| 100 |
ALL
| CVR |
| 1.0 |
| 100.0 |
| GROUND |
| FRQ |
| 100 |
| SVC |
| 1.0 |
| 100.0 |
| BROWNS |
| TRN |
| 6.0 |
DOWN
| DIA |
| 0.01 |
| 0.24 |
| TRN |
| 6.0 |
DOWN
| DIA |
| 0.25 |
| 0.99 |
| TRN |
| 12.0 |
DOWN
| DIA |
| 1.00 |
| 2.99 |
| TRN |
| 50.0 |
DOWN
| DIA |
| 3.00 |
| 999.99 |
1. Using a XX* BAF, sample all LIVE standing trees, 5.0” DBH/DRC and larger. XX* BAF may be 10, 20, or 30.
2. Using a 1/100th acre plot, sample DBH of live trees between 0.01” and 4.9” DBH, DBH of live trees between 0.5’ and 4.49’ in height, and DRC of live trees between 0.01” and 4.9” DRC.
*Appropriate values shall be entered by the contractor to achieve an average of 5 large live trees per plot (range of 4-8 large live trees)
Exhibit 2 – CSE SAMPLE DATA FORMS Exhibit 2a - Setting Form
Project Name: CSE FY24 McKelvie (25 characters total)
Region*
XX
Proc.
Forest*
District*
Location*
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Stand # *
XXXX
Owner
State
County
XXX
Admin.
Forest
XX
Admin.
Region
Date*
MM/DD/YYYY
| 02 |
| 07 |
| 01 |
| USFS |
| NE |
| Cherry |
| 07 |
| 02 |
Photo ID
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Exam Level*
XXXX
Exam Purpose
Stratum
XXXXXX
Exist. Veg. Ref.
XXXX
Existing Vegetation
XXXX
Potential Veg. Ref
XXX
Potential Vegetation
XXXXXXXX
Structure
Capable Growing
XXX
n/a
| 3221 |
| SE |
| n/a |
| SAF |
Fuel Model
Elevation
XXXXX
Aspect
Slope
Slope Position
Acres
Radial Growth Interval
XX
Radial Growth Interval 2
XX
Height Growth Interval
Fuel Photo Reference n/a
| 10 |
| n/a |
| 5 |
| n/a |
Precision Protocol
XXXXXX
Examiner
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Remarks (255 characters)
| CSE |
| (initials) |
Damage Category
Damage Agent
XXX
Damage Severity
XXX
Species of Management Interest
XXXXXXXX
User Code
Exhibit 2b – Sample Design Form
REGION:__________ PROCLAIMED FOREST:__________ DISTRICT:__________
LOCATION:_______________ STAND NO.:_______________
Sample Selection Method*
XXX
Sample Expansion Factor*
XXXXX.X
Starting Azimuth
XXX
Subpop. Filter
XXXXXXXX
Selection Criteria Number*
XX
Subpop. Variable
XXX
Subpop. Min. Value
XXXX.XX
Subpop. Max. Value
XXXX.XX
Sample Design Remarks: (255 characters)
Exhibit 2c – Plot Data Form
REGION:________ PROC. FOREST:________ DISTRICT:________ LOCATION:____________________ STAND NUMBER:________
Plot # *
Lat.
DDDMMSS
Long.
DDDMMSS
Cap Grow Area
Asp
Slope
Slope Pos.
XX
Slope Horz.
Shape
XX
Slope Vert.
Shape
Elev
XXXXX
Existing Vegetation
XXXXXXXX
Potential Vegetation
XXXXXXXX
Fuel Mod
XX
Residue Desc.
Code
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dist. Seed Wall
Hist Code
Hist Year
YYYY
| n/a |
| n/a |
| n/a |
| n/a |
| n/a |
Plot Remarks (255 Characters)
Exhibit 2d – Tree Data Form
BAF:_____ FIXED PLOT SIZE: 1/100th MIN. DBH: 5.0” LOCATION:____________________ STAND NUMBER:________
Plot
XXX
Tree
XXX
Tree Status
X
Tree Class
XX
Site/
GST
X
Species
Tree Count
XXX
DRC
Stems
XXX
DBH/
DRC
XXX.X
Height
Height to Crown
XXX
Rad Grow
XX
RG
XX
HGT
Grow
XX.X
Age
Crown Ratio
XX
Crown Class
XX
Crown Width
XX
Wildl.
Use
XX
L/S Decay
X
Damage Category
XX
Damage Agent
XXX
Tree Part
XX
Damage Severity
XX
Tree Remarks
30 charact n/a n/a
Chapter 4: Collecting Data User Guide V1.7 AG-xxx Haycamp Common Stand Exam Contract 2026
4-2 05/12/2004
Exhibit 2f – Veg Comp and Ground Cover Forms
| Cover by Species: | Ground Surface Cover: | |
| Surface Cover Type |
XX
Cover %
XXX
Remarks
(30 characters)
Lifeform
Species
XXXX
Cover %
XXX
Remarks
(30 characters)
| Exhibit 3a Common Stand Exam Inspection Forms with Accuracy Standards | Side 1 |
| 1. PROJECT NAME --- CONTRACT NUMBER |
2. FOREST / UNIT
3. DATE BLOCK RECEIVED
| 4. DATE BLOCK INSPECTED |
| 5. INSPECTORS |
6. NUMBER OF
SETTINGS:
7. NUMBER OF SETTINGS
INSPECTED:
10. L.T. TREE RECORDS INSPECTED:
11. S.T. TREE RECORDS INSPECTED:
12. GSC RECORDS INSPECTED:
13. VEG. RECORDS INSPECTED:
14. DOWN WOODY RECORDS INSPECTED:
8. NUMBER OF
PLOTS:
9. NUMBER OF PLOTS
INSPECTED:
Section B. OFFICE INSPECTION
| ACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| N/A |
1. ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS RETURNED IN GOOD CONDITION
2. CORRECT NUMBER OF PLOTS COMPLETED IN EACH STAND
3. ALL REQUIRED FORMS AND FIELDS COMPLETED AND LEGIBLE
4. MIN. NO. OF SITE/GROWTH TREES COLLECTED FOR EACH SETTING
5. ALL SETTINGS MEET MINIMUM TREE PER PLOT AVERAGES
6. ALL DIGITAL PHOTOS ARE PRESENT AND IN FOCUS/LEGIBLE
7. ELECTRONIC DATA COMPLETE AND ACCEPTABLE
Section C. FIELD INSPECTION
| ACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| N/A |
1. ALL REFERENCE POINTS AND PLOT CENTERS RELOCATABLE
2. ALL PLOT LOCATIONS CORRECT AND UNBIASED
3. ALL STANDS HAVE A PLOT DISTRIBUTION THAT EQUALLY SAMPLES ALL 4PORTIONS OF THE ENTIRE STAND
4. SUFFICIENT ERRORS ACCUMULATE TO INDICATE A DISCREPANCY TREND
5. ALL INFORMATION ON SAMPLE DESIGN FORMS COMPLETE AND CORRECT
6. ALL SETTINGS AND PLOTS HAVE CORRECT SETTING ID
Section D. TOTAL FORM SCORE CALCULATION
| 1. |
| Field Verification Polygon Data Form Score |
| 2. |
| Setting Form Score |
| 3. |
| Sample Design Form Score |
| 4. |
| Plot Form Score |
| 5. |
| Total Tree Form Score |
| 6. |
| Ground Surface Cover Form Score |
| 7. |
| Vegetation Composition Form Score |
| 8. |
| Downed Woody Form Score |
| 9. |
| TOTAL SCORE (sum of all scores) |
OFFICE AND FIELD INSPECTION
-- ANY UNACCEPTABLE ITEM FAILS INSPECTION BLOCK
INSPECTION BLOCK
TOTAL FORM SCORE CALCULATION
| All form scores < 5.0 and Total Score < 10.0 |
| = pass (full payment) |
PASS
| Any Form >= 5.0 |
| = rework forms that fail for entire inspection block |
| Total Score >= 10.0 |
| = rework all forms for entire inspection block |
FAIL
Errors in any field that has a Point Value of "unacceptable" will fail the block
INSPECTION CREW SIGNATURES:
DATE
DATE
COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTION on side 2
Exhibit 3b – Common Stand Exam Inspection Forms with Accuracy Standards COMMON STAND EXAM INSPECTION FORM side 2
POINTS INSPECTED
| LOCATION/WATERSHED ALIAS) |
| STAND |
| PLOT NUMBERS |
COMMENTS -- OFFICE EDIT:
COMMENTS -- FIELD INSPECTIONS:
FOLLOW-UP ACTION:
Exhibit 4 – Setting Inspection Form
SETTING INSPECTION FORM
| A |
| B |
| C |
| FIELD NUM |
| NAME |
| ACCURACY STANDARD |
| POINT VALUE |
| # OF ERRORS |
| DEDUCTION (A X B) |
| 1 |
| Region |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 2 |
| Proclaimed Forest |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 3 |
| District |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 4 |
| Location/Watsershed Alias |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 5 |
| Stand Number |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 6 |
| Ownership |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 7 |
| State |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 8 |
| County |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 9 |
| Administrative Forest |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 10 |
| Date |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 11 |
| Photo ID |
| no errors |
| 1 |
| 12 |
| Exam Level |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 13 |
| Exam Purpose |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 14 |
| Stratum |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 15 |
| Existing Veg |
| no errors |
| 5 |
| 16 |
| Potential Veg Reference |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 17 |
| Potential Veg |
| +/- phase |
| 20 |
| 18 |
| Structure |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 19 |
| Cap. Growing Area % |
| +/- 10 units |
| 1 |
| 20 |
| Fuel Model |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 21 |
| Elevation |
| +/- 2 contour intervals |
| 3 |
| 22 |
| Aspect |
| +/- 45 degrees |
| 3 |
| 23 |
| Slope |
| +/- 10 units |
| 2 |
| 24 |
| Slope Position |
| +/- 1 class |
| 2 |
| 25 |
| Acres |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 26 |
| Radial Growth Interval |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 27 |
| Radial Growth Interval #2 |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 28 |
| Height Growth Interval |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 29 |
| Fuel Photo Reference |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 30 |
| Precision Protocol |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 31 |
| Examiner |
| no errors |
| 1 |
| 32 |
| Setting Remarks |
| complete and accurate |
| 5 |
| 33 |
| Damage Category |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 34 |
| Damage Agent |
| no errors |
| 1 |
| 35 |
| Damage Severity |
| no errors |
| 1 |
| 36 |
| Species of Mgt. Interest |
| no errors |
| 1 |
| 37 |
| Sketch Map & Traverse Notes |
| complete and accurate |
| 10 |
Total Deductions (sum of Col ‘C’)
D
Number of Stands Inspected
E
Setting Form Score (D / E)
F
Exhibit 5 – Sample Design Inspection Form
SAMPLE DESIGN INSPECTION FORM
| A |
| B |
| C |
| FIELD NUM |
| NAME |
| ACCURACY STANDARD |
| POINT VALUE |
| # OF ERRORS |
| DEDUCTION (A X B) |
| 1 |
| Selection Method Type |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 2 |
| Sample Expansion Factor |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 3 |
| Starting Azimuth |
| no errors |
| 7 |
| 4 |
| Points Installed |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 5 |
| Subpop Filter |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 6 |
| Sample/Select Remarks |
| complete and accurate |
| 5 |
| 7 |
| Selection Criteria |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 8 |
| Subpop Variable |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 9 |
| Subpop Min Value |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 10 |
| Subpop Max Value |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
Total Deductions (sum of column 'C')
D
Number of Stands Inspected
E
Sample Design Form Score (D / E)
F
Exhibit 6– Plot Inspection Form
PLOT INSPECTION FORM
| A |
| B |
| C |
| FIELD NUM |
| NAME |
| ACCURACY STANDARD |
| POINT VALUE |
| # OF ERRORS |
| DEDUCTION (A X B) |
| 1 |
| Plot Number |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 2 |
| Plot Latitude |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 3 |
| Plot Longitude |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 4 |
| Cap. Growing Area % |
| +/- 10 % |
| 2 |
| 5 |
| Plot Aspect |
| +/- 45 degrees |
| 6 |
| 6 |
| Plot Slope % |
| +/- 10 units |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| Slope Position |
| +/- 1 class |
| 6 |
| 8 |
| Slope Horizontal Shape |
| +/- 1 class |
| 2 |
| 9 |
| Slope Vertical Shape |
| +/- 1 class |
| 2 |
| 10 |
| Elevation |
| +/- 2 contour intervals |
| 6 |
| 11 |
| Existing Veg |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 12 |
| Potential Veg |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 13 |
| Plot History |
| no errors |
| 6 |
| 14 |
| Plot History Date |
| 1) |
| 2 |
| 15 |
| Fuel Model |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 16 |
| Residue Descriptive Code |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 17 |
| Distance to Seed Wall |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 18 |
| Remarks |
| complete and accurate |
| 10 |
Total Deductions (sum of column 'C')
D
Number of Plots Inspected
E
Plot Form Score (D / E)
F
1) Year required if field #13 is other than code 10 or blank
Exhibit 7 -Tree Inspection Form (1 of 2 pages)
SAMPLE PLOT for LARGE TREES (L.T.) -- Variable Radius
| A |
| B |
| C |
| FIELD NUM |
| NAME |
| ACCURACY STANDARD |
| POINT VALUE |
| # OF ERRORS |
| DEDUCTION (A X B) |
| 1 |
| Plot Number |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 2 |
| Tag ID Number |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| Tree Status |
| no errors |
| 50 |
| 4 |
| Tree Class |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 5 |
| Site Tree/GST - field correct |
| no errors |
| 50 |
| 5 |
| Site Tree -- Selection |
| no errors |
| 20 |
| 6 |
| Tree Species |
| no errors |
| 50 |
| 7 |
| Tree Count (live/dead) |
| 1) |
| 75 |
| 7 |
| Tree Count (stumps/down) |
| 2) |
| 20 |
| 8 |
| Number of Stems |
| no errors for DRC species |
| 2 |
| 9 |
| DBH/DRC |
| 3) |
| 17 |
| 10 |
| Tree Height |
| 4) |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| Height to Crown |
| +/- 10 % |
| 2 |
| 12 |
| Radial Growth |
| +/- 1/20 inch |
| 5 |
| 13 |
| Radial Growth #2 |
| +/- 1/20 inch |
| 5 |
| 14 |
| Height Growth |
| +/- 1 foot |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| Tree Age |
| +/- 10 % |
| 10 |
| 16 |
| Crown Ratio |
| +/- 10 units |
| 5 |
| 17 |
| Crown Class |
| no errors |
| 5 |
| 18 |
| Crown Width |
| +/- 20% |
| 5 |
| 19 |
| Wildlife Use |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 20 |
| Log/Snag Decay |
| no errors |
| 5 |
| 21 |
| Cone Serotiny |
| no errors for PICO, PIBA |
| 5 |
| 22 |
| Damage Category |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 23 |
| Damage Agent |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 24 |
| Damage Part |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 25 |
| Damage Severity |
| no errors |
| 5 |
| 26 |
| User Defined (Age Class) |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 27 |
| Tree Remarks |
| complete and accurate |
| 10 |
L.T. Deductions (sum of column 'C')
D
L.T. Tree Records Inspected
E
L.T. Sample Score (D / E)
F
1)Tree Count
2) Tree Count (stumps/down) Accuracy Standard
| Intensive/Extensive Exam |
| no errors |
All Exam Levels
| Quick Plot |
| +/1 tree |
Stumps/Down
| 1 - 5 |
| No Errors |
3) DBH/DRC Accuracy Standards
| 6 - 10 |
| +/- 1 tree |
Intensive/Extensive Exam Levels
| >= 11 |
| +/- 3 trees |
| a. |
| subpop min value to 13.9 inches |
| +/- 0.1 inch |
| 4) Height |
| b. |
| 14.0 inches to 23.9 inches |
| +/- 0.2 inch |
| All Exam Levels |
| c. |
| 24.0 inches - 34.9 inches |
| +/- 0.3 inch |
| Site Trees |
| +/- 3% |
| d. |
| > 35.0 inches |
| +/- 0.5 inch |
| GST |
| +/- 10% |
| e. |
| Borderline variable plot trees |
| +/- 0.1 inch |
| All other |
| +/- 10% |
Quick Plot
| a. |
| All Trees |
| +/- 1.0 inch |
(for the purpose of determining trees in or out)
SAMPLE PLOT for SMALL TREES (S.T.) -- Fixed Area Plot
| A |
| B |
| C |
| FIELD NUM |
| NAME |
| ACCURACY STANDARD |
| POINT VALUE |
| # OF ERRORS |
| DEDUCTION (A X B) |
| 1 |
| Plot Number |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 2 |
| Tag ID Number |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| Tree Status |
| no errors |
| 20 |
| 4 |
| Tree Class |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 5 |
| Site Tree/GST - field correct |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 6 |
| Tree Species |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 7 |
| Tree Count |
| 1) |
| 20 |
| 8 |
| Number of Stems |
| no errors for DRC species |
| 2 |
| 9 |
| DBH/DRC |
| 2) |
| 10 |
| 10 |
| Tree Height |
| +/- 10 % |
| 10 |
| 11 |
| Height to Crown |
| +/- 10 % |
| 2 |
| 12 |
| Radial Growth |
| +/- 1/20 inch |
| 5 |
| 13 |
| Radial Growth #2 |
| +/- 1/20 inch |
| 5 |
| 14 |
| Height Growth |
| Height > 6 ft +/- 1.0 foot |
| 5 |
Height <= 6 ft+/- 0.1 foot
| 15 |
| Tree Age |
| +/- 10 % |
| 10 |
| 16 |
| Crown Ratio |
| +/- 10 units |
| 5 |
| 17 |
| Crown Class |
| no errors |
| 5 |
| 18 |
| Crown Width |
| +/- 20% |
| 5 |
| 19 |
| Wildlife Use |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 20 |
| Log/Snag Decay |
| no errors |
| 5 |
| 21 |
| Cone Serotiny |
| no errors for PICO, PIBA |
| 5 |
| 22 |
| Damage Category |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 23 |
| Damage Agent |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 24 |
| Damage Part |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 25 |
| Damage Severity |
| +/- 10 % or +/- 1 class |
| 5 |
| 26 |
| User Defined (Age Class) |
| no errors |
| 2 |
| 27 |
| Tree Remarks |
| complete and accurate |
| 10 |
S.T. Deductions (sum of column 'C')
D
S.T. Tree Records Inspected
E
S.T. Sample Score (D / E)
F
| Total Tree Form Score |
| (Sum of L.T. score and S.T. score) |
| (ST) |
| + (LT) |
1) Tree Count Accuracy Stds:
All Exam Levels
2) DBH/DRC Accuracy Standards:
| Height |
| Diameter |
| Actual Trees |
| Accuracy |
| Intensive/Extensive Exam Level |
| Range/Grouping |
| Range/Grouping |
| On Plot |
| Standard |
| a. |
| < 0.5 inch |
| no errors |
| *All |
| All |
| 0 |
| 0 trees |
| b. |
| 0.5 inch to subpop max |
| +/- 0.1 inch |
*If non-stocked and tree is recorded, this is an error.
< 0.5 feet
| 1 - 5 |
| +/- 2 trees |
| c. |
| Estimated DRC |
| +/- 1.0 inch |
< 0.5 feet
| >= 6 |
| +/- 50% |
>= 0.5 feet - <4.5 feet
| 1 - 5 |
| +/- 1 tree |
>= 0.5 feet - <4.5 feet
| >= 6 |
| +/- 20% |
| All |
| 0.1" - subpop max dbh/drc |
| 1 - 5 |
| +/- 1 tree |
| All |
| 0.1" - subpop max dbh/drc |
| >= 6 |
| +/- 10% |
Exhibit 8 - R2 FSVEG Spatial Polygon Vegetation Attributes Inspection Form
INSPECTION FORM WITH ACCURACY STANDARDS
| A |
| B |
| C |
| FIELD NUM |
| NAME |
| ACCURACY STANDARD |
| POINT VALUE |
| # OF ERRORS |
| DEDUCTION (A X B) |
| 1 |
| Region, Forest, District |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 2 |
| Location |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 3 |
| Polygon ID |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 4 |
| Survey Method |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 5 |
| Recorder Name |
| no errors |
| 3 |
| 6 |
| EV Regen/Prev Trees |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 7 |
| Stocking Flag |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 8 |
| Survey Date |
| no errors |
| 6 |
| 9 |
| Purpose Code |
| no errors |
| unacceptable |
| 10 |
| Horizontal Diversity |
| no errors |
| 6 |
| 11 |
| Tree Condition |
| no errors |
| 6 |
| 13 |
| Tree Crown Closure |
| +/- 20% |
| 10 |
| 14 |
| Photo Project |
| no errors |
| 3 |
| 15 |
| Photo Date |
| no errors |
| 3 |
| 16 |
| Lifeform/GSC |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 17 |
| Layer |
| no errors |
| 3 |
| 18 |
| Species |
| no errors |
| 10 |
| 19 |
| Percent Cover |
| +/- 20% |
| 6 |
| 20 |
| Size Class |
| no errors |
| 6 |
| 21 |
| Percent Dead |
| +/- 20% |
| 6 |
Total Deductions (sum of column 'C')
D
Number of Polygons Inspected
E
Polygon Attribute Form Score (D / E)
F
Exhibit 9 - Sketch Map
| Project Name:____________________________ | Location:______________________ | |
| Date:_______________ | Setting:______________ |
NORTH
Notes:
Exhibit 11 - List of Acceptable Site Tree Species
| Scientific Name |
| Common Name |
| Symbol |
| Acer negundo |
| Boxelder |
| ACNE2 |
| Juniperus virginiana |
| Eastern redcedar |
| JUVI |
| Pinus banksiana |
| Jack pine |
| PIBA2 |
| Pinus nigra |
| Austrian pine |
| PINI |
| Pinus ponderosa |
| Ponderosa pine |
| PIPO |
| Populus tremuloides |
| Aspen |
| POTR5 |
| Quercus macrocarpa |
| Bur oak |
| QUMA2 |
Exhibit 12 - List of Species of Management Interest
NOXIOUS/INVASIVE SPECIES
Scientific Name
| Common Name |
| Symbol |
| Acroptilon repens |
| Russian knapweed |
| ACRE3 |
| Artemisia absinthium |
| Absinth wormwood |
| ARAB3 |
| Cardaria draba |
| Hoary cress (whitetop) |
| CADR |
| Carduus acanthoides |
| Plumeless thistle (spiny) |
| CAAC |
| Carduus nutans |
| Musk thistle (nodding plumeless) |
| CANU4 |
| Centaurea diffusa |
| Diffuse knapweed |
| CEDI3 |
| Centaurea stoebe ssp. micranthos |
| Spotted knapweed |
| CESTM |
| Cirsium arvense |
| Canada thistle |
| CIAR4 |
| Cynoglossum officinale |
| Houndstongue |
| CYOF |
| Euphorbia esula |
| Leafy spurge |
| EUESE |
| Galium verum |
| Yellow spring bedstraw |
| GAVE |
| Hyoscyamus niger |
| Black henbane |
| HYNI |
| Lespedeza cuneata |
| Sericea lespedeza |
| LECU |
| Linaria dalmatica |
| Dalmatian toadflax |
| LIDA |
| Lythrum salicaria |
| Purple loosestrife |
| LYSA2 |
| Onopordum acanthium |
| Scotch thistle |
| ONAC |
| Polygonum cuspidatum |
| Japanese knotweed |
| POCU6 |
| Polygonum sachalinense |
| Giant knotweed |
| POSA4 |
| Polygonum xbohemicum |
| Bohemian knotweed |
| POBO10 |
| Tamarix ramosissima |
| Saltcedar (tamarisk) |
| TARA |
| Verbascum thapsus |
| Common mullein |
| VETH |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .