Addenda to provision 52.pdf

Addenda to provision 52.212-2, Evaluation Criteria:

EVALUATION FACTORS

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

A) Technical Proposal Subfactors

a. Tree Preparation, Handling and Care

i. Evaluation Criteria: Contractor will be evaluated against

Contract Section 4.0 – Tree Handling and Care. Tree transport infrastructure will also be evaluated. The Government will evaluate

Contractor’s technical expertise based on the adequacy of the information provided in the quality control plan and how completely the submission requirements listed above were addressed in the proposal.

ii. The offeror will receive an overall rating reflecting our confidence in the offeror ability to perform the contract requirements based on above subfactors as follows:

1. High Confidence

2. Some Confidence

3. Low Confidence

b. Tree Planting

i. Evaluation Criteria: Contractor will be evaluated against Contract Section

4.0 – Tree Planting requirements. The Government will evaluate

Contractor’s technical expertise based on the adequacy of the information provided in the quality control plan and how completely the submission requirements listed above were addressed in the proposal.

as follows:

1. High Confidence

c. Artificial Shade and Animal Damage Control Treatments

i. Evaluation Criteria: Contractor will be evaluated against Contract Sections

4.0 – Artificial Shade and ADC Installation, Maintenance, and Removal. The

Government will evaluate Contractor’s technical expertise based on the adequacy of the information provided in the quality control plan and how completely the submission requirements listed above were addressed in the proposal.

as follows:

1. High Confidence

d. Sampling Methods

i. Evaluation Criteria: Contractor will be evaluated on how well they understand the different planting methods may change sampling methods for quality control.

ii. The offeror will receive an overall rating reflecting offeror understanding of changing sampling methods for different planting Methods as follows:

1. Go

2. No GO

B) Project Management

a. Workplan and Schedule

i. Evaluation Criteria: Contractor will be evaluated on crew capability, capacity, and organization to meet contract requirements.

as follows:

1. High Confidence

b. Key Personnel

i. Evaluation Criteria: Government will evaluate based on the length of experience key personnel have performed their duties.

i. The offeror will receive an overall rating reflecting our confidence in the offeror ability to perform the contract requirements based on above subfactors as follows:

1. High Confidence

c. Safety Plan

i. Evaluation Criteria: Contractors will be evaluated on personal protective equipment availability and use and their emergency medical/evacuation plan.

ii. The offeror will receive an overall rating reflecting PPE availability and emergency plan as follows:

d. Worksite Plan

i. Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate how Contractors manage refuse and leftover materials at the end of each workday.

ii. The offeror will receive an overall rating reflecting worksite cleanliness as follows:

C) Past Performance

a. Evaluation Criteria: Past performance will be based on length of experience and overall performance quality.

b. The offeror will receive an overall rating reflecting Past Performance as follows:

1. Relevant

2. Somewhat Relevant

3. Neutral

4. Not Relevant

D) Price Evaluation

a. The prices for the Schedule of Items and Task Orders will be used as the price for evaluation of the IDIQ. However, all the rates identified in the Schedule of Items and

Task Orders for the IDIQ will be evaluated for reasonableness. The importance of price may become greater as the differences between technical proposals decrease.

Where technical proposals are determined to be equal, price may control award.