127EAV25Q0009 Past Performance Questionnaire Canjillon RD Janitorial Carson NF.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Canjilon RD Janitorial Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 127EAV25Q0009
About this file
This document is a Contractor Past Performance Inquiry form for a janitorial services contract (Solicitation 127EAV25Q0009) issued by the USDA Carson National Forest, Canjillon Ranger District in New Mexico. The form is designed to collect reference feedback about a contractor's previous performance, with ratings categories including customer satisfaction, quality of services, timeliness, and overall recommendation. The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside for janitorial services under NAICS code 561720, with a small business size standard of $22.0 million, resulting in a firm fixed-price contract. The reference form must be completed and returned to ellena.silva@usda.gov no later than 04/13/2025, with the goal of evaluating the contractor's past performance for a potential future contract award.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 127EAV25Q0009.pdf | ||
| APPENDIX 1.pdf | ||
| APPENDIX 3.pdf | ||
| APPENDIX 2.pdf | ||
| WD NO. 2015-5451 REV NO. 24.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
127EAV25Q0009 Canjillon RD, Carson NF
Description of work this company performed:
JANITORIAL SERVICES
Contractor Past Performance Inquiry
INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Customer:
Our firm has submitted a quote to the USDA Carson National Forest, Canjillon Ranger District NM. In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your firm has been listed as a reference for work previously performed.
Your candid response to the attached survey will assist the evaluation team in this process and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed survey as thoroughly as possible. General information regarding the responses may be released to the quoter; the FAR prohibits the release of names providing the responses.
Complete confidentiality will be maintained.
Please email the completed form NO LATER THAN 04/13/2025.
DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO OUR COMPANY, PLEASE RETURN TO: ellena.silva@usda.gov
Contractor Name:
Address:
Contract or Order No:
Total Value of Contract:
Liquidated Damages Assessed:
Contract Award Date:
Final Completion Date:
Name of person completing this form:
Phone Number:
Name of Company or Government Agency:
mailto:ellena.silva@usda.gov
Comments:
RATINGS - Summarize contractor performance and check the number that corresponds to the rating for each category.
RATING DEFINITION
E = Excellent Performance exceeded what was required by the contract VG = Very Good Performance met all the requirements of the contract S = Satisfactory Contractor met most (essentially all) of the requirements of the contract M = Marginal Contractor met some of the requirements of the contract however changes to the contractor’s processes were necessary to achieve contract requirements
U = Unsatisfactory Contractor failed to meet requirements of the contract N/A = Not Applicable Question did not apply to the contract performed for your firm.
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Was the project completed in accordance with the contract specifications?
How well did the contractor identify and correct deficient work?
Were submittals, testing, certifications, and final drawings (as-builts) completed accurately and timely?
Was work performed as scheduled?
Were delays resolved quickly and to both parties satisfaction?
QUALITY OF SERVICES
Did the contractor provide adequate oversight to sub-contractors, suppliers, employees?
Did the contractor maintain a good relationship with the owner, contracting agency, and management personnel?
If there were change orders, was the contractor reasonable in defining scope of change and controlling cost?
Did the contractor provide adequate work force (number and skills) for work being performed?
How well did the contractor manage the quality of work?
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Would you recommend the selection of this contractor again?
TIMELINESS
Did the contractor complete the project on time? If there were problems, were they addressed and resolved?
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
| JANITORIAL SERVICES |
| CUSTOMER SATISFACTION |
| TIMELINESS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .