Asbestos Survey Report.pdf

PDF 14 MB Posted

Attached to
Demolition of fire damage Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12639526Q0130
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Marketing and Regulatory Programs Business Services

About this file

This is a Limited Asbestos Survey Report prepared by Texas State Environmental Consulting for the USDA Moorefield facility in Edinburg, Texas. The survey examined Building 6418 (Mexican Fruit Fly Rearing Facility & Colony Holding Rooms) for the presence of asbestos-containing building materials (ACBM) on October 13, 2025, conducted by licensed asbestos consultant Jose S. Juarez, Jr. (TDSHS License #10-5775).

The survey collected seven bulk samples of suspect asbestos materials including gray transite, dark gray transite, white transite, white coating, and black mastic, which were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) by Eurofins Houston, Texas under EPA Method 600/R-93/116. All samples tested negative for asbestos fibers with no asbestos-containing material (ACM) detected in any sampled materials. The materials are non-regulated under NESHAP (40 CFR 61, Subpart M) and comply with federal thresholds (less than 1% asbestos by weight). The report authorizes proceeding with demolition activities as planned, though it recommends that any unassessed or newly exposed materials encountered during renovation or demolition activities should be assumed suspect until further sampling verifies asbestos content. The analysis was completed October 14, 2025, and the report was prepared for Gabriel Lopez, Facilities Director at USDA Moorefield.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Demolition of fire damage, newest first.
File Type Posted
More RFIs and Responses.docx DOCX document
Site visit attendance.pdf PDF
RFIs and Responses.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2_Federal Construction Wage Rates_Hidalgo County.txt TXT text file
Attachment 1_Statement of Work.docx DOCX document
12639526Q0130.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Texas S ta te Env i ronmen ta l Consu l t i ng www.txstec.com

L IMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

Building 6418 - Mexican Fruit Fly Rearing Facility & Colony Holding Rooms

USDA Moorefield 22675 N Moorefield Rd, Edinburg, TX 78541

Prepared for:

Attn: Gabriel Lopez, Facilities Director

USDA Moorefield 22675 N Moorefield Rd.

Prepared by:

2028 E Ben White Blvd., Suite 240-2757

Austin, TX 78741 512.952.2757

Jose S. Juarez, Jr.

Individual Asbestos Consultant

TDSHS No. 10-5775

October 14, 2025

LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY

Building 6418 - Mexican Fruit Fly Rearing Facility & Colony Holding USDA Moorefield

Texas State Environmental Consult ing

INTRODUCTION

Texas State Environmental Consulting (TSEC) conducted an asbestos survey located at:

Building 6418 - Mexican Fruit Fly Rearing Facility & Colony Holding Rooms

Bulk samples of suspect Asbestos-Containing Building Materials (ACBM) were collected within these areas of the buildings. The scope of work included: Review of previous documentation (if provided), inspecting and sampling for suspect asbestos materials.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Samples were collected, and analytical tests were performed for determining whether ACBM were present within the building and/or ACM were present from the exterior of the building. The survey follows applicable state and federal regulations governing asbestos work and can be relied on for demolition activities.

TSEC conducted a visual inspection of the building materials. During the walk-through, suspect asbestos materials were noted. Their condition and friability were also noted.

Regarding asbestos, a homogeneous area (an area of material that is uniform in color and texture) shall be determined to contain asbestos if the results of at least one sample collected from it indicate that asbestos is present in an amount greater than one percent (>1%). Once a material has been found to contain asbestos, all such materials in the defined homogenous area are considered to contain asbestos.

SAMPLING

Mr. Jose S. Juarez, Jr., an individual asbestos consultant licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (TDSHS License #10-5775) conducted the site sampling survey on October 13, 2025. This survey was conducted in general accordance with the Federal NESHAP and State regulations for the presence of ACMs. The survey was characterized by a visual inspection and sampling of suspect structure components at the subject property to be impacted by demolition or renovation activities. Guidelines utilized in the asbestos survey were established by the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR §296). A total 7 Bulk samples of suspect asbestos materials were collected.

Suspect asbestos materials, which are alike in appearance and application, were sampled as a homogeneous area. Suspect homogeneous areas are divided into three classifications:

1. Surfacing materials: Spray-applied or troweled on material.

2. Thermal Systems Insulation: Pipe, boiler, tank, or flue insulation.

3. Miscellaneous: Other suspect material, including floor tile and mastic, sheet vinyl flooring, ceiling tiles, insulation mastics, cove base mastic, window caulking, and exterior siding.

Suspect materials sampled and analyzed should be considered homogeneous area if:

• They exhibit similar physical characteristics.

• The application of the sampled material can be correlated to the application of un-sampled material.

Representative sampling was based on:

• Distribution of the suspect materials throughout the homogeneous area.

• The suspect material’s physical characteristics and application.

• Random sampling patterns determined for each homogeneous area.

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Bulk samples were analyzed under polarized light microscopy (PLM), by Eurofins Houston, Texas, utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Method for the Detection of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, (Method EPA 600/R-93/116, July 1993).

Eurofins Houston, Texas, is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP# 200525- 0), participates in the NVLAP and AIHA Bulk Asbestos Sample Quality Assurance Programs and is licensed to analyze bulk asbestos samples collected in the State of Texas (TDSHS License #30-0273).

Sample

ID

Location / Material Description

Asbestos Result Constituents (Non-Asbestos) Homogeneity

913-1A Gray Transite None Detected 75% Non-Fibrous, 25% Cellulose Good

913-1B Gray Transite None Detected 75% Non-Fibrous, 25% Cellulose Good

913-1C Dark Gray Transite None Detected 85% Non-Fibrous, 15% Cellulose Good

913-2A White Transite None Detected 85% Non-Fibrous, 15% Cellulose Good

913-2B White Transite None Detected 85% Non-Fibrous, 15% Cellulose Good

913-2C White Transite None Detected 85% Non-Fibrous, 15% Cellulose Good

913 White Coating (Layer 1) None Detected 85% Non-Fibrous, 15% Glass Fibers Good

913 (L2) Black Mastic (Layer 2) None Detected 100% Non-Fibrous Material Good

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

No asbestos fibers were detected in the samples retrieved You may proceed with your demolition as planned. All samples analyzed by PLM were reported as “None Detected” for asbestos fibers. Based on EPA and TDSHS regulatory thresholds, no asbestos-containing material (ACM) was identified in the sampled materials.

The building materials tested are non-regulated under NESHAP (40 CFR 61, Subpart M) and TDSHS definitions of ACM (>1% asbestos by weight).

However, during any renovation or demolition, all unassessed materials or newly exposed materials should be assumed suspect until further sampling verifies asbestos content.

WARRANTY

The information contained in this report is based upon the data furnished by the Client, observations, and test results provided by Eurofins Built Environmental Test Central, LLC, Houston, Texas. These observations and results are time dependent, are subject to changing site conditions, and revisions to Federal, State, and local regulations. TSEC warrants that these findings have been promulgated after being prepared in general accordance with generally accepted practices in the asbestos testing and abatement industries. TSEC also recognizes that raw laboratory test data are not usually enough to make all abatement and management decisions. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

USE BY THIRD PARTIES

This report was prepared pursuant to the contract TSEC has with Client. That contractual relationship and included an exchange of information about the subject property that was unique and between TSEC and its Client and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of the communication between TSEC and its Client, reliance, or any use of this report by anyone other than Client, for whom it was prepared, is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to TSEC. Reliance or use by any such third party without explicit authorization in the report does not make said third party a third-party beneficiary to TSEC’s contract with Client. Any such unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third party’s risk. For the same reasons, no warranties, or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party. Third party reliance letters may be issued on request and upon payment of the, then current fee for such letters. All third parties relying on TSEC’s reports, by such reliance, agree to be bound by the proposal and TSEC’s General Conditions. No reliance by any party is permitted without such agreement, regardless of the content of the reliance letter itself.

UNIDENTIFIABLE CONDITIONS

This report is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work. Due to the nature of the work, there is a possibility that there may exist conditions which could not be identified within the scope of work, or which were not apparent at the time of our site work. This report is also limited to information available from the Client at the time it was conducted. The report may not represent all conditions at the subject site as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations.

APPENDIX A – LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

Approved by:

Business Unit Manager Scott Ward

Report for:

Jose Juarez Texas State Environmental Consulting 2028 E Ben White Blvd Suite 240-2757 Austin, TX 78741

Regarding:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC Project: 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Bldg. 6418-MFF Facilities; 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Bldg. 6418-MFF Facilities

EML ID: 4267409

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos PLM (Layer %): 10-14-2025

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (Layer %) (EPA 40CFR App E to Sub E of Part 763 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116, SOP EB-AS-S- 1267) NVLAP Lab Code 600120-0

EMLab ID: 4267409, Page 1 of 3Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC

Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC 5200 Mitchelldale St., Ste. E15, Houston, TX 77092

713-290-0221 www.eurofinsus.com/Built

Client: Texas State Environmental Consulting C/O: Jose Juarez Re: 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Bldg. 6418-MFF Facilities; 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Bldg. 6418-

MFF

Facilities

Date of Submittal: 10-14-2025 Date of Receipt: 10-14-2025 Date of Report: 10-14-2025

Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Appx E Sub E 40 CFR 763 / EPA 600/R-93/116

Sample ID # Lab-ID version Sample Description Asbestos

Constituents Non-Asbestos Constituents Comment

913-1A.

21350502-1

Layer 1 Gray Transite Homogeneity:Good

Not Detected 75% Non-Fibrous Material 25% Cellulose

913-1B.

21350503-1

Layer 1 Gray Transite Homogeneity:Good

Not Detected 75% Non-Fibrous Material 25% Cellulose

913-1C.

21350504-1

Layer 1 Dark Gray Transite Homogeneity:Good

Not Detected 85% Non-Fibrous Material 15% Cellulose

913-2A.

21350505-1

Layer 1 White Transite Homogeneity:Good

913-2B.

21350506-1

Layer 1 White Transite Homogeneity:Good

913-2C.

21350507-1

Layer 1 White Transite Homogeneity:Good

913.

21350508-1

Layer 1 White Coating Homogeneity:Good

15% Glass Fibers

Layer 2 Black Mastic Homogeneity:Good

Not Detected 100% Non-Fibrous Material

Comments:

Analyst(s): Anthony Mallory

EMLab ID: 4267409, Page 2 of 3Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC

The total percentage of sample components shown may be greater than 100% when some components are detected at <1%.

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers of that type were detected.

When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC 5200 Mitchelldale St., Ste. E15, Houston, TX 77092

713-290-0221 www.eurofinsus.com/Built

Client: Texas State Environmental Consulting C/O: Jose Juarez Re: 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Bldg. 6418-MFF Facilities; 22675 N. Moorefield Rd., Bldg. 6418-

MFF

Facilities

Date of Submittal: 10-14-2025 Date of Receipt: 10-14-2025 Date of Report: 10-14-2025

Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Appx E Sub E 40 CFR 763 / EPA 600/R-93/116

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT

Project Analyst

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Anthony Mallory

EMLab ID: 4267409, Page 3 of 3Eurofins Built Environment Testing Central, LLC

APPENDIX B – PERSONNEL AND LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

APPENDIX C – PHOTOS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .