Vendor Q and A 260417.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
R09 Dam Early Warning System Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12445526Q0029
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service

About this file

This is a Vendor Questions and Answers document addressing inquiries related to the R09 Dam Early Warning System RFQ (Solicitation 12445526Q0029).

The document clarifies critical technical and logistical requirements across multiple categories. Regarding site documentation, photos are not currently available, and as-built drawings or equipment diagrams are unavailable; contractors must coordinate with the existing equipment manufacturer, American Millenium Corporation, Inc. (AMCI), which assembled all currently installed EWS units. For repaired equipment at Tipsaw, contractors work with the EWS manufacturer and can have units shipped to the Forest. Government-furnished water level sensors will be on-site at time of work for Indian, Celina, and Saddle sites. Contractors must include equipment replacement costs in their pricing if existing equipment is not repairable. Infrastructure varies by site; existing conduits may be present, but new EWS installations will require new conduit installation, with clarification needed regarding trenching requirements on dams.

Data transmission will utilize the existing AMCI SatAlarm service and web portal for all sites, with the AMCI SatAlarm system serving as the basis of design for remote monitoring equipment at sites permitting satellite or cellular communications. Contractors must verify alarm systems measure and transmit accurate reservoir level elevations with alarm levels provided by USFS before on-site work. For Mark Twain sites using Adcon RG1 gauges, contractors will coordinate calibration with onsite Forest Service staff. Site restoration at Tecumseh should match neighboring undisturbed areas. The solicitation encompasses 18 total sites, including five Mark Twain rain gauge service sites across seven National Forests (Hoosier, Huron-Manistee, Mark Twain, Monongahela, Shawnee, Wayne, and White Mountain).

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Vendor Q and A Photos & Site Documentation Q The Hoosier National Forest section mentions "photos are attached in the contract package" — where can we find these? Are they available for all sites or just Hoosier?

A This is an error. Photos are not available currently.

Q Are as-built drawings or equipment diagrams available for the existing EWS stations (especially those being repaired or upgraded)?

A No, as-built drawing and equipment diagrams are not available.

Q What are the brands, make, model, etc. (and cable lengths if appropriate) of the currently installed EWS components?

A All currently installed EWS were assembled by American Millenium Corporation, Inc (AMCI).

Sensors & Equipment Q For the "repaired EWS" at Tipsaw (Hoosier) — who is responsible for making the repair, and will the repaired unit be shipped to Contractor or is it already on-site?

A The contractor will work with the EWS manufacturer for repair. Repaired unit can be shipped to the Forest.

Q For Indian, Celina, and Saddle (Hoosier) — the water level sensors are listed as "government-furnished." Will GFE be on-site at time of work, or does Contractor need to coordinate receipt/delivery logistics?

A Yes, the water sensor levels will be on-site at time of work.

Q What is the make/model of the existing EWS at all upgrade/repair sites (Deer Creek, Springs Valley, Timber Ridge, Vesuvius, Lake Sherwood)?

A The current EWS units were assembled by AMCI.

Q What type of water level sensor is expected at new installs (Wakeley, Dutchman, Campton)?

A Contractor should work with the EWS assembler/manufacturer to determine the appropriate sensor for the application.

Q For specific sites, the solicitation states the Contractor is responsible for repairing EWS equipment. If the equipment is not repairable, will there be a change order allowed to cover the cost of replacement equipment or are those costs expected to be included in our pricing?

A Costs should be included in pricing submitted.

Q What infrastructure (e.g. conduit runs from gauging station to water) is in place for sensor installations and is any such in need of repairs/replacing?

A Varies. Conduit for existing EWS may be present. New EWS will require installation.

Q What requirements are there if trenching on the dam is required to install conduit runs?

A More clarification is requested.

Q What data logger/RTU is expected?

A Contractor should work with the EWS assembler to determine the appropriate data logger for the application.

Data Transmission Q For sites specifying "satellite communications" — what satellite platform is in use? GOES DCP, Iridium, or other?

A The existing EWS communicate with the AMCI SatAlarm service.

Q Many of the sites require “Verification of satellite communications” and “Calibration with the service provider while on-site”. Who is the service provider and where is this data being reported to and collected?

A The current service provider is AMCI. Monitoring data can be viewed on the AMCI SatAlarm web portal.

Q For sites that allow "satellite or cellular" (Wakeley, Campton) — is there a preferred vendor or existing account the USFS wants to use?

A AMCI remote monitoring equipment is the basis of design for EWS.

Q For the Dutchman site the Solicitation states “collect and transmit water level data and rainfall data via satellite or cellular communications” and then “shall be available for remote monitoring at any time and provide real time data to the Forest Service”. First, where does the data need to be transmitted to, and secondly, does a remote connection to the station, being able to view real time data, count as adequate or must the data be delivered to some receiving platform (e.g. computer/webpage system) for processing and display in real time?

A The data must be viewable in the AMCI SatAlarm web system.

Q For Mark Twain sites — the Adcon RG1 gauges use their own telemetry network. Who manages the Adcon base station, and will Contractor need to log into the Adcon system for calibration?

A Contractor will need to work with the onsite Forest Service staff for calibration.

Alarm System Q What constitutes "confirmation that the alarm system is working correctly"? Is Contractor expected to trigger a test alarm through the service provider, or simply verify threshold configuration?

A The alarm system shall measure and transit accurate and precise reservoir level elevations.

Q Who sets the alarm parameters — will USFS provide these before Contractor arrives on-site, or is Contractor just confirming the capability exists?

A The alarm levels will be provided by the USFS. Contractor should work with the remote sensing service provider to very the alarm levels are recorded.

Site Access & Coordination Q For Wayne National Forest (Tecumseh relocation to Sand Run) — is Sand Run Dam in any permitting or environmental review status that could affect installation timing?

A No Scope Clarity Q For "site restoration" at Tecumseh — is there a standard USFS spec for backfill/grading, or is contractor judgment acceptable?

A The site will be restored to match neighboring, undisturbed areas.

Q The SOW mentions 18 dams, but the table only lists work for 18 sites including 5 Mark Twain rain gauge services. Are the Mark Twain sites counted among the 18, or is this 18 dams + 5 service sites?

A Yes, the 5 Mark Twain sites are counted among the 18.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .