J.5 2.2 - Evaluation Criteria Pagosa RD Security Upgrade.pdf
PDF 194 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pagosa RD Security Upgrade Cancelled
- Solicitation number
- 1240LT24Q0032
About this file
This document is the Evaluation Criteria section of a solicitation for the Pagosa RD Security Upgrade project. The solicitation is being issued by the Department of Agriculture Forest Service R2-Rocky Mountain Region.
The evaluation will use a best value approach, considering technical factors and price. The technical factors include: 1) Past Performance, evaluating the offeror's previous customer satisfaction and regulatory compliance; 2) Experience, assessing the firm's specialized experience similar to the project; and 3) Technical Approach, evaluating the reasonableness of the proposed approach, including the use of biobased products. Price will also be evaluated for reasonableness. The technical factors are approximately equal in weight to price.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION M--EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
M.1 PROPOSAL EVALUATION
Quotes will be evaluated using a best value approach. This process permits tradeoffs among price and non-price technical factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced quote. The government will evaluate quotes based on the technical evaluation factors specified in this solicitation.
M.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS
Factor 1. Past Performance Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the offeror (including major subcontracts) has satisfied previous customers and complied with Federal, State and Local laws and regulations. The Government will contact references to assess the quality of the contractor’s work, timely completion, project management, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data and general trends in contractor performance.
In the past performance evaluation, the Government may use information from sources other than the offeror’s technical proposal. When no information is available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.
Factor 2. Experience The Government will assess the specialized experience and skill of the firm with a focus on experience that is similar to the specified project.
Factor 3. Technical Approach to Performing the Work When evaluating the Technical Approach to Performing the Work, the government will assess the reasonableness of the contractor’s proposed approach to performing the work including the use of biobased products in project implementation.
Factor 4. Price The proposed price will be evaluated for reasonableness. The technical factors, when combined are approximately equal to cost or price.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .