122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Program Integrity Case Management (PICM) and Fraud Abuse Detection (FAD) Analytics Solution
- Solicitation number
- 122125 O3
- Issued by
- Blaine County, Nebraska
About this file
The document is an Attachment 6 Deviations Form for the State of Nebraska's Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Request for Proposal (RFP) 122125 O3 for a Program Integrity Case Management System. The RFP solicits a comprehensive cloud-based software solution to replace the current Medicaid program case management system, with proposal responses due by July 10, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. The contract will have an initial five-year term with options for two additional two-year renewal periods, and an expected implementation date no later than October 31, 2026. The system must support fraud detection, case management, advanced analytics, and predictive modeling for approximately 340,000 Medicaid recipients.
The deviations form allows bidders to document any proposed alternative approaches or inability to meet specific requirements in Sections VI(A), VI(B), VI(D), and VI(E) of the RFP. Mandatory vendor qualifications include having a current implemented Program Integrity Case Management/Fraud Analysis & Detection System contract with another State Medicaid agency. The solution must integrate with existing state systems like the Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS) and Nebraska Family Online Client User System (N-FOCUS), with security requirements including TLS encryption, AES-256 data protection, role-based access control, and HIPAA compliance. The project is eligible for enhanced federal financial participation, and the vendor will support CMS certification, data migration, training, and ongoing maintenance, with the state allocating up to 500 vendor hours annually for system modifications at no additional cost.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 6 Deviations to Section VI of the RFP 122125 O3 Program Integrity Case Management System
Important Instructions:
If Bidder has any deviations to the requirements outlined in Section (VI) of the Request for Proposal (RFP) including any attachments referenced under this section, all must be listed and included with the proposal response. Deviations to Section(VI) will be factored into the scoring. The evaluation committee will rely upon the information provided to assist in ascertaining responsiveness and/or determining whether a proposed alternative will be acceptable and discern its impact on the System. The State reserves the right to determine if proposed alternatives, individually or collectively, have a material impact on the system. Submitting deviations that do not conform to the system requirements may result in your proposal response being deemed as a “Non-Responsive Solicitation Response”.
Any deviations to requirements outlined in Section (VI) of the RFP are to be tabulated and submitted in a separate PDF file, clearly labeled “Deviations to Section (VI)(_)(_)” – see Exhibit 1 directly below for the sample format.
When submitting, use the respective Part(s) provided within this attachment for each section and attachments as labeled. There are three parts within this document and they are as follows:
i. Part I - Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a), (VI)(A)(4)(b)) , (VI)(B), (VI)(D) and (VI)(E).
ii. Part II- Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) – Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications
iii. Part III -Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) – Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications.
Additional rows may be added or deleted under the table provided in OPTION 2 - “DEVIATIONS” in all three parts of this document. Bidder must provide a signature either under OPTION 1 - “NO DEVIATIONS” or under OPTION 2 - “DEVIATIONS” in each respective Parts of deviations.
Note: Please do not include any of your acknowledgements and/or deviations to Sections II. through IV. of the RFP in Attachment 6. Acknowledgements and/or deviations to those sections are to be clearly labeled and need to be submitted in accordance with the instructions outlined in the RFP.
Exhibit 1 – Sample Format Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as listed in the RFP document]
Provide information regarding why requirement cannot be met and/or provide the proposed alternative for evaluation and approval or rejection:
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification/requirement cannot be met and your proposed alternative and/or information for consideration.]
RFP 122125 O3 Bidder’s Name: ________________________________
Part I - Deviations to Section (VI)(A) (Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a), (VI)(A)(4)(b)), (VI)(B), (VI)(D), and (VI)(E) Bidder to complete the appropriate OPTION that reflects either “NO DEVIATIONS” or “DEVIATIONS” to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) of the RFP using the format provided. OPTION 1 – NO DEVIATIONS
Our company declares that our response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) does not contain any deviations to Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D, & E) ) (Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a), (VI)(A)(4)(b) and Section (VI)(A)(4)(c)). We can meet all the requirements as outlined in the RFP for these specific sections.
[Signature of Duly Authorized Representative]
OPTION 2 – DEVIATIONS
Our company is submitting deviations to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) ) (Except Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) and (VI)(A)(4)(b)) of the RFP. The deviations for consideration are outlined in the tables below. In submitting deviations for consideration, we understand and agree that proposed deviations need to be completed in the correct format using the tables provided and any associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal. Further, we understand proposed deviations will be reviewed by the evaluation committee to determine approval or rejection and any impact on responsiveness:
(Note: To receive due consideration for approval or denial of proposed deviations, complete the tables below for any respective requirement(s) that are not being met as indicated in the RFP for the above-mentioned section.)
Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as shown in the RFP document]
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification cannot be met and include detailed information about any proposed alternative.]
RFP 122125 O3 Bidder’s Name: ________________________________
Part II - Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) Bidder to complete the appropriate OPTION that reflects either “NO DEVIATIONS” or “DEVIATIONS” to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) of the RFP using the format provided. OPTION 1 – NO DEVIATIONS
Our company declares that our response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) does not contain any deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) (Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications) .We can meet all the requirements as outlined in the RFP for these specific sections.
Our company is submitting deviations to the requirements as outlined in Section (VI)(A)(4)(a) (Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications) of the RFP. The deviations for consideration are outlined in the tables below. In submitting deviations for consideration, we understand and agree that proposed deviations need to be completed in the correct format using the tables provided and any associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal. Further, we understand proposed deviations will be reviewed by the evaluation committee to determine approval or rejection and any impact on responsiveness:
(Note: To receive due consideration for approval or denial of proposed deviations, complete the tables below for any respective requirement(s) that are not being met as indicated in the RFP for the above-mentioned section.)
Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as shown in the RFP document]
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification cannot be met and include detailed information about any proposed alternative.]
RFP 122125 O3 Bidder’s Name: ________________________________
Part III - Deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) Bidder to complete the appropriate OPTION that reflects either “NO DEVIATIONS” or “DEVIATIONS” to the requirements as outlined in Sections (VI) (A, B, C, D & E) of the RFP using the format provided. OPTION 1 – NO DEVIATIONS
Our company declares that our response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) does not contain any deviations to Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) (Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications) .We can meet all the requirements as outlined in the RFP for these specific sections.
Our company is submitting deviations to the requirements as outlined in Section (VI)(A)(4)(b) (Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications) of the RFP. The deviations for consideration are outlined in the tables below. In submitting deviations for consideration, we understand and agree that proposed deviations need to be completed in the correct format using the tables provided and any associated costs must be reflected in the Cost Proposal. Further, we understand proposed deviations will be reviewed by the evaluation committee to determine approval or rejection and any impact on responsiveness:
(Note: To receive due consideration for approval or denial of proposed deviations, complete the tables below for any respective requirement(s) that are not being met as indicated in the RFP for the above-mentioned section.)
Program Integrity Case Management System
Identify RFP Section:
Section (VI)(_)(_) Requirement Description: [Indicate the requirement as shown in the RFP document]
Bidder’s Response:
[Provide an explanation as to why the specification cannot be met and include detailed information about any proposed alternative.]
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .