122125 O3 Alivia Analytics - Proprietary Redaction Justification Matrix File 4 of 4.docx

DOCX document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
Program Integrity Case Management (PICM) and Fraud Abuse Detection (FAD) Analytics Solution
Solicitation number
122125 O3
Issued by
Blaine County, Nebraska

About this file

This document is a Redaction Justification Matrix submitted by Alivia Analytics in response to Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Request for Proposal #122125 for a Program Integrity Case Management (PICM) and Fraud Abuse Detection (FAD) Analytics Solution. The proposal contains sensitive technical specifications and functional details that Alivia considers trade secrets and proprietary intellectual property. The company is requesting protection from disclosure for two specific attachments: Technical Specifications and Functional Specifications, which detail their end-to-end FWA/PICM platform's processes, architecture, and application functionality.

Alivia argues that disclosure of these materials would provide an unfair competitive advantage to competitors like Gainwell Technologies, PulseLight, IBM, Deloitte, Machinify, Thomson Reuters, and Performant. The redaction request is based on the potential economic harm and competitive disadvantage that would result from revealing their proprietary methods, which are not generally known or ascertainable by other firms in the technology and program integrity sector. The justification emphasizes that the withheld information has inherent economic value to Alivia and that releasing such details would serve no public purpose while potentially causing substantial injury to the company's competitive position.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
122125 O3 Alivia Analytics - Proprietary Redaction Justification Matrix File 4 of 4.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Alivia Analytics Attachment 2 - Functional Specifications_Proprietary Redacted File 3 of 4.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Alivia Analytics Attachment 3 - Technical Specifications_Proprietary Redacted File 2 of 4.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Deloitte File 8 of 9 Attachment 2 Functional Specifications (Redacted).pdf PDF
122125 O3 PICM RFP Cost Sheet.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 PICM RFP.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 PICM RFP.docx.pdf PDF
Statement of Proprietary Information_Alivia - 122125.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Alivia Analytics Attachment 2 - Functional Specifications_Proprietary Redacted File 3 of 4.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 4 - Data Integration Guidelines.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 5 - CMS Certification Outcomes and Metrics.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Deloitte File 9 of 9 Attachment 3 Technical Specifications (Redacted).pdf PDF
Addendum 1 - Attachment 2 - Functional Specifications [Use This Attachment].docx DOCX document
Addendum 2 - Question & Answers.pdf PDF
RFP 122125 O3 Alivia Analytics Cost Sheet.docx DOCX document
Statement of Proprietary Information_Deloitte - 122125.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Alivia Analytics - Proprietary Redaction Justification Matrix File 4 of 4.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 1 - Minimum Qualifications.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Deloitte File 5 of 9 Cost Sheet.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Deloitte File 8 of 9 Attachment 2 Functional Specifications (Redacted).pdf PDF
122125 O3 Deloitte File 9 of 9 Attachment 3 Technical Specifications (Redacted).pdf PDF
PICM Intent to award Final.docx DOCX document
Statement of Proprietary Information_Alivia - 122125.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Alivia Analytics Technical Narrative Response Proprietary File 1 of 4.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Deloitte File 5 of 9 Cost Sheet.pdf PDF
Addendum 2 - Question & Answers.pdf PDF
Copy of Evaluator Scoring Worksheet - Summary (Internal) Completed.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
122125 O3 Attachment 3 - Technical Specifications.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 4 - Data Integration Guidelines.docx.pdf PDF
Addendum 2 - Question & Answers.pdf PDF
Solicitation List of Respondents.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 5 - CMS Certification Outcomes and Metrics.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 PICM RFP.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 1 - Minimum Qualifications.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 4 - Data Integration Guidelines.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 PICM RFP Solicitation Evaluation Criteria.docx.pdf PDF
Addendum 2 - Question & Answers.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 6 - Deviations Form to Section VI.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 PICM RFP Solicitation Evaluation Criteria.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 PICM RFP.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 Attachment 4 - Data Integration Guidelines.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 PICM RFP.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 Attachment 4 - Data Integration Guidelines.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 PICM RFP Solicitation Evaluation Criteria.docx.pdf PDF
122125 O3 PICM RFP Cost Sheet.docx.docx DOCX document
122125 O3 PICM RFP.docx.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Response to Nebraska RFP #122125 Program Integrity Case Mgmt (PCIM) / Fraud Abuse Detection (FAD) Analytics Solution

Redaction Justification Matrix

Alivia’s proposal contains content considered trade secret, proprietary, and a significant competitive advantage which if disclosed would cause substantial injury to Alivia’s competitive position and intellectual property. Alivia goes to great lengths and has made significant investments to keep this information private and closely held. This information has inherent economic value to Alivia and is not known to others. In addition, disclosure of the information could reasonably be expected to result in unfair competitive injury to Alivia and serve no public purpose.

Therefore, Alivia requests that Nebraska DHHS protect from further disclosure or dissemination the portions of its proposal listed below and redacted in the provided copies marked “redacted”. The table below provides a written justification for each redaction to support Alivia’s request for exemption from disclosure or dissemination.

Alivia Proposal Section Number & Name
Alivia Proposal Page(s)
Redaction Justification
Attachment 3 – Technical Specifications
All Pages for this specific section
These pages illustrate the proprietary process and technical architecture that Alivia utilizes for its end-to-end FWA/PICM platform. Disclosure to other parties would cause Alivia to suffer a competitive disadvantage and provide details on technical functionality. The step-by-step techniques, processes and infrastructure from which we derive economic value are not generally ascertainable by our competitors, and disclosure of these proprietary methods will diminish and irreparably damage the competitive position of Alivia.

If released, this information would give a business advantage to all competitors, especially Gainwell Technologies, PulseLight, IBM, Deloitte, Machinify, Thomson Reuters, Performant, and any others in the technology and program integrity space. Further the release of this information would serve no public purpose.

Attachment 2 – Functional Specifications
All Pages for this specific section
These pages illustrate the proprietary process, functionality, trade secrets, and screenshots of the application that Alivia utilizes for its end-to-end FWA/PICM platform. Disclosure to other parties would cause Alivia to suffer a competitive disadvantage and provide details on technical functionality. The step-by-step techniques, processes and infrastructure from which we derive economic value are not generally ascertainable by our competitors, and disclosure of these proprietary methods will diminish and irreparably damage the competitive position of Alivia.

If released, this information would give a business advantage to all competitors, especially Gainwell Technologies, PulseLight, IBM, Deloitte, Machinify, Thomson Reuters, Performant, and any others in the technology and program integrity space. Further the release of this information would serve no public purpose.

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .