11-09. Sample Score Sheet.doc
DOC document 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- UDOT RFP- Intercity Bus Service (two routes)
- Solicitation number
- UDOT270090MP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Utah
About this file
This is a sample score sheet document prepared by the Utah Department of Transportation, Procurement Services for the evaluation of proposals submitted in response to the Request for Proposals for Intercity Bus Service covering two routes. The solicitation anticipates a single award and includes a mandatory pre-proposal conference scheduled for Monday, November 9, 2026, from 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. MST at the Calvin Rampton Complex, Summit Conference Room, 4501 South 2700 West, Taylorsville, Utah 84119. Attendance is available in-person or virtually, with the virtual link provided to those who RSVP. Interested firms should confirm attendance by contacting rebeccacollins@utah.gov. Attendance and questions raised at the conference will be recorded and posted to the bidding system.
The score sheet serves as an evaluation tool for proposal reviewers and outlines the criteria and methodology for assessing bidder responses. Contractors must comply with all standards and specifications required by the Utah Department of Transportation. Additional details regarding pricing terms, evaluation criteria, specific scoring methodology, set-asides, contract term, and renewal options would be contained within the complete RFP documents and supporting exhibits, which are not included in this particular file.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 10-01. RFP General Information.doc | DOC document | |
| 4-07. APPENDIX B- Proposed Budget and Cost Per Mile.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-11. 2026 Intercity Bus Clauses.pdf | ||
| 1-04. Submittal Form- Business Confidentiality- Yes No.doc | DOC document | |
| 9-03. Submittal Form- Vendor Set Up Form And W-9.pdf | ||
| 5-06. APPENDIX A- Proposal Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-08. Submittal Form- Certifications- Yes No.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-10. Title VI.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-05. Submittal Form- Attachment A- Agency Terms and Conditions- Yes No.docx | DOCX document | |
| 8-02. 2026 ICB SCOPE.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
ICB Bus Routes Solicitation #UDOT270090MP Proposal Evaluation Score Sheet
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Stage 1: Determination of Responsiveness:
| Mandatory Minimum Requirements |
| Pass |
| Fail |
| Notes |
A. In-kind Match
B. Interlined Ticketing and Information
C. Vehicles
D. Technology (As per Section N)
E. Vehicle Signage
F. Federal Motor Carrier Requirements
G. Drug and Alcohol Policies and Procedures
H. Pre-Service and Ongoing Requirements
I. Civil Rights - ADA and Title VI (As per Section N)
J. Federal Reporting Requirements as Listed
K. Required Tasks Before Service Initiation
L. Pre-Trip Inspection and Maintenance Records
M. Compliance with All Federal and State Requirements
N. Required Tasks before Service Initiation
Responses that fail in any of the above will not proceed on to the Technical Evaluation Stage.
Stage 2: Detailed Technical Evaluation:
Technical Evaluation (70% of Total Possible Points)
| EVALUATION CRITERIA |
| Points Possible |
| Score |
(1 - 5)
| Weight |
| Points |
PART 1: OFFEROR INFORMATION and KEY PERSONNEL
| · Information and Key Personnel |
| 25 points |
X 5
PART 2. EXPERIENCE & PAST PERFORMANCE
| · Experience and Past Performance |
| 50 points |
X 10
PART 3: FINANCIAL STATUS AND INSURANCE
| · Financial Status and Insurance |
| 25 points |
X 5
PART 4: MAINTENANCE, SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS
| · Maintenance, Safety and Emergency Response |
| 25 points |
X 5
PART 5: PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
| · Project management |
| 50 points |
X 10
Part 6: DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES-PROPOSED PROJECTS
| · Description of Services Proposed Projects |
| 25 points |
X 5
Total Technical Evaluation Points (200 points possible)
Only those Proposals that achieve 175 of the 200 possible Total Technical score points will proceed on to Stage 3: Cost Proposal Evaluation. Proposals with a score of less than the minimum required technical score will be deemed unacceptable and ineligible for further consideration.
Stage 3: Cost Proposal Evaluation:
Cost Evaluation (50 Points)
| EVALUATION CRITERIA |
| Points Possible |
| Points |
| · Appendix B- Part 1 Blanding Route |
| 50 points |
| *Inserted by Purchasing |
| · Appendix B- Part 2 Vernal Route |
| 50 points |
| *Inserted by Purchasing |
Total Cost Evaluation Points (50 points possible- Per Route)
TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS (250 POINTS POSSIBLE- Per Route)
Determination:
NR = Non Responsive. Response does not address requirement.
Scoring:
(a) Five points (Excellent): The proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP;
(b) Four points (Good): The proposal addresses all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP and, in some respects, exceeds them;
(c) Three points (Satisfactory): The proposal addresses all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner;
(d) Two points (Unsatisfactory): The proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner; or
(e) One point (Poor): The proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RTF or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information; or
(f) Zero (Fail): The proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information.
RFP Document
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .