1-Contract Performance Evaluation FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY.pdf
PDF 312 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AM27-11 Soldier Creek Watershed Restoration FY-27 Lop and Scatter (Pre-Qualified Contractors)
- Solicitation number
- AM27-11
- Issued by
- Utah County, Utah
About this file
This is a Contract Performance Evaluation form used by the State of Utah Division of Wildlife Resources to assess contractor performance on rangeland projects in accordance with Procurement Code 63G-6a-410(5)(e). The evaluation applies to the AM27-11 Soldier Creek Watershed Restoration FY-27 Lop and Scatter solicitation, which seeks lop and scatter services for up to 1,177 acres in Utah County. The project performance period runs from September 30, 2026, through December 30, 2026. Participation in this solicitation is limited to pre-qualified contractors only, and no mandatory site visit is required. A single contract award will be made to the lowest cost responsive and responsible vendor, determined by lowest cost per acre methodology. Vendors must guarantee pricing through project completion.
The performance evaluation framework measures contractors across three weighted categories: Quality of Product or Service (multiplied by 8), Timeliness of Performance (multiplied by 8), and Contract Management (multiplied by 4), with scores ranging from 1 to 5 and a total possible score of 100 points. To maintain pre-qualification status on the Rangeland Pre-Qualification list, contractors must achieve and maintain a minimum average performance score of 60; failure to meet this threshold results in removal from the pre-qualified list for the specific treatment and acreage category and all larger acreages within that category, though removed vendors may still bid on open solicitations and reapply at the next open Request for Sealed Quotation. Contractors receive notification of deficiencies through verbal communication or a 10-day cure letter and must complete any corrective actions or face reduced performance review scores.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Attachment B-Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9-Soldier creek lop scatter project area Basemap.pdf | ||
| Millforklopscatter2026_Layer.kmz | KMZ file | |
| 7-Attachment A-PO Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Project map DRG 07232026.pdf | ||
| 4-Soldier creek dairy fork unit.pdf | ||
| 8-Soldier Creek Mill fork unit NAIP.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - IFB Agency.pdf | ||
| Dairy Fork Lop_Scatter 2026.kmz | KMZ file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RANGELAND CONTRACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
DATE Address
Firm Name City, State & Zip Code
Firm Contact Phone Number
Solicitation Number & Name
Project Manager Contract Amount
Service Provided/# of Acres
Overall Rating
In accordance with Procurement Code 63G-6a-410(5)(e), the State of Utah has determined that it is in its best interest to conduct a contractor performance review for each rangeland project. The State agency project manager will complete a performance review according to the evaluation criteria listed.
Vendors will be aware of their performance status as they will be monitored throughout the project. Any corrective action will be communicated to the vendor verbally or through a 10-day letter to cure, depending on the issues. Vendors must complete any corrective action requested or required, if not this will be reflected in their performance review scores.
In order for a vendor to remain on the Rangeland Pre-Qualification list, they must maintain a minimum average performance score of 60. If a vendor's average performance score drops below 60, they will be removed from the pre-qualification list for that specific treatment/acreage category and all larger acreage within that same treatment category. If a vendor is removed from the pre-qualification list they may still be eligible to submit a bid on Open Bid solicitations. Once a vendor is removed from the pre-qualification list, the vendor may reapply at the next open RFSQ.
RATINGS GUIDE
Quality of Service
Timeliness of Performance Contract Management
5-Excellent Contractor has demonstrated an exceptional level in any of the above three categories that justifies adding a point to the score. Contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Good"
4-Good Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and or delivers quality product or service.
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is effective.
3-Satisfactory Minor deficiencies in meeting contract specifications have been identified.
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective.
2-Unsatisfactory Major problems have been encountered.
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues is marginally effective.
1-Fail Contractor is not in compliance & is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives.
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues is not effective.
Rate the Following Score (1 – 5)
COMMENTS
Quality of Product or Service
_____ x 8 = _____
Timeliness of Performance
_____ x 8 = _____
Contract Management _____ x 4 = _____
Overall Rating _____/100 pts
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .