03b. FHWA inspection reports, 4 Aug 25.pdf

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 2311-003P

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 08/22/2023

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

0 - NONE

4 - PILE BENT

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

21.5 FT (6.6 M)

18.8 FT (5.7 M)

38.3 FT (11.7 M)

36.0 FT (11 M)

0 °

N

LOCATION

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE MILE POINT: .. .00 (KM PT 0)

STATE: .............................. 020 - ALASKA LOCATION: .... Approximately 0.6 miles east of fuel depot on Quarry Road.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... QUARRY ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: FRENCH CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: M. Kreider, J. Voight

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Joshua Voight

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 09/22/2023

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This galvanized steel multi-beam bridge is in satisfactory condition overall. It should be noted that the bridge is currently gross load posted for 29 tons. While the 2021 load rating calculations indicate the bridge does not require posting for load, it is possible the posting is due to unknown factors.

The predominant issues associated with this structure primarily pertain to the approach guardrail system. In the southeast approach guardrail, the rail posts are misaligned, and the end post is fractured at its base. Furthermore, there is a lack of connection hardware in several sections of the northwest approach guardrail. Across all approach guardrails, there is evidence of collision damage, with several timber cushion blocks either rotated or split, and numerous reflectors are either damaged or missing. In addition, there have been improper installations of laps at various locations, and the northeast and northwest approach guardrails fail to meet the minimum safety height guideline of 2'-3".

Other notable issues include the misalignment of the northeast weight limit sign; deterioration of the utility

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 08/22/2023

conduits at the bridge, with the north utility conduit lacking attachment to the bridge structure; and an absence of reflective object markers at the ends of the approach guardrails. There is also a moderate accumulation of debris along both curblines, and some bearing anchors exhibit bending.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 2311-003P

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE : 08/22/2023

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recommendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.3

CORRECT LAPS IN APPROACH GUARDRAILS AS

NECESSARY. REPLACE MISSING CONNECTION

HARDWARE FROM NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL.

REALIGN CUSHION BLOCKS AS NECESSARY.

1 LS 5000 5000

58.8

REPAIR UTILITY CONDUITS AND CONNECTIONS.

ATTACH UTILITY TO NORTH SIDE OF DECK. 1 LS 5000 5000

222.3, 222.7

INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH

RAIL ENDS. INSTALL REFLECTORS ALONG APPROACH

RAILINGS AS NECESSARY.

5 EA 250 3000

58.7

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBLINES.

1 LS 2000 2000

222.7

RELOCATE AND RESET LOAD POSTING SIGNS AS

NECESSARY. 2 EA 500 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 16000

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. COST

REHAB RECONSTR

222.3 REPLACE APPROACH GUARDRAIL SYSTEM.

1 LS 40000 40000

CONTRACT COST FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC

CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES. 1 LS 25000 25000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 65000

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE : 08/22/2023

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

81000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates are based on historical data, including costs for similar projects when available. Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Consideration should be given to replacing the entire approach rail system with one that meets the minimum height safety guidelines.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 2311-003P

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 08/21/2023

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

N

G

P

G

N

F

G

N

N

N

G

G

N

G

G

N

G

G

N

G

N

2 - INSUFF

2 - MED

N

N

P

F

G

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE N

P 12 FT

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SILT

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS G

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F

5. FOUNDATIONS 05 - Piles G

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION. MINOR UNDERMINING OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANKS.

58.1 ABRASION EXPOSING AGGREGATE OF DECK SURFACE. MINOR CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE. STAY-IN-PLACE FORMS ON UNDERSIDE. SEVERAL AREAS OF LEAKAGE THROUGH FORMS; MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG FORM SEAMS AND AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT. MINOR SPALLING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF DECK.

58.7 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.

58.8 UTILITY CONDUIT ALONG NORTH SIDE OF BRIDGE; NOT ATTACHED TO BRIDGE, ONLY CONNECTED TO APPROACH RAIL POSTS.

CONDUIT SPLIT AT NORTHEAST END AND CONNECTIONS ARE SPLIT.

TWO 5" DIAMETER CONDUITS ATTACHED TO SOUTH SIDE OF BRIDGE. BOTH CONDUITS HAVE SEPARATED AT CONNECTIONS AT

BOTH BRIDGE ENDS.

58.8

222.4

SMALL UTILITY MANHOLES IN NORTH CURBLINE OF APPROACHES AT BOTH BRIDGE ENDS.

59.1 MINOR DEFORMATION OF BEARING PAD #2 AT EAST ABUTMENT AND BEARING PAD #4 AT WEST ABUTMENT; ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY SEATED AND ANCHOR BOLT MISALIGNED. SEVERAL ANCHOR NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED. MINOR BENDING OF SEVERAL

ANCHORS AT WEST BEARINGS.

59.2

59.7

GALVANIZING BEGINNING TO CHALK ON SEVERAL BEAMS; MINOR RUST FORMING ON SEVERAL BEAMS.

60.2

60.4

60.6

MINOR SURFACE RUSTING OF SHEET PILING AND PILES. UP TO 1'4" BACKWALL EXPOSURE AT CORNERS OF WEST BACKWALL.

60.3 MINOR POPOUTS AND FAILED GROUT PLUGS WITH EXPOSED REBAR THROUGHOUT. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR, DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER, ON EAST ABUTMENT CAP BETWEEN PILES #3 AND #4. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT CAPS. LOOSE SHEET PILE WALL CAP EXPOSED AT SOUTHEAST APPROACH ADJACENT TO BRIDGE DECK. MINOR SPALL WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF BEARING CAP ADJACENT TO COLUMN #2 AT WEST END.

60.3

60.4

CRACK DEVELOPING INTO SPALL AT NORTH END OF WEST BACKWALL. SPALLING OF EAST ABUTMENT AT JUNCTION BETWEEN BACKWALL AND CAP AT NORTH END. MINOR LEAKAGE ON EAST ABUTMENT AT BEAM #4. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND

MOSS GROWTH ON CAP ENDS. EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING AT SOUTHWEST CORNER.

60.6 SOUTHEAST WINGWALL MISALIGNED AND LEANING TOWARD STREAM. SOME RIPRAP IN PLACE BEHIND NORTHWEST AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.

60.11 RIPRAP PLACED ALONG TOE OF BOTH ABUTMENTS.

222.3 MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE THROUGHOUT; MODERATE AT NORTHEAST GUARDRAIL END. GUARDRAILS LAPPED INCORRECTLY AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS. NUMEROUS REFLECTORS MISSING FROM NORTHWEST GUARDRAIL AND DAMAGED ALONG SOUTH GUARDRAIL. SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL POST MISALIGNED, END POST BROKEN AT BASE. SEVERAL TIMBER CUSHION BLOCKS ROTATED. NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL MISSING CONNECTION HARDWARE AT SEVERAL LAPS. MINOR TO MODERATE CHECKING OF TIMBER GUARDRAIL POSTS. HEAVY SPLITTING OF WEST APPROACH RAIL POST. VEHICLE DAMAGE

TO NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL.

222.4

222.6

TRANSVERSE CRACKING UP TO 1/2" WIDE AT APPROACH PAVEMENT. AREAS OF MODERATE SETTLEMENT, UP TO 2", OF

APPROACHES ALONG BRIDGE ENDS.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.7 "WEIGHT LIMIT 29 TONS" SIGNS AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST GUARDRAIL ENDS; NORTHEAST SIGN MISALIGNED. "FRENCH CREEK" SIGN AT NORTHEAST BRIDGE CORNER. REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED. POSTING SIGNS ATTACHED TO

NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL END POSTS. MINOR DAMAGE TO SIGNS.

36.C NORTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL HEIGHT OF 1'-5" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM SAFETY HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF 2'-3";

NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL HEIGHT IS 2'-1".

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 2311-003P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 23 21 38 34

HS 41 37 69 63

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 54 49 90 82

TYPE 3-3 66 60 111 101

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 10/14/2021

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT CAPACITY OF BEAMS

REMARKS: CURRENTLY GROSS LOAD POSTED FOR 29 TONS. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 2311-003P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE (1) STATE:............................................ 020 - ALASKA

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............AFAKFTQW08004 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 02090 FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........2311-003 P (4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

9 - USAF(205) NPS REGION:........................ (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................ 1 8 0 00000 0

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:....... (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... FRENCH CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. (7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... QUARRY ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. AFAKFTQW08004

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes (9) LOCATION:..................................... Approximately 0.6 miles east of fuel depot on Quarry Road.

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................BASE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... (11) MILE POINT:................................. .00 (KM PT: 0 )

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:........... (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................72 - AIR FORCE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER:................................... 72 - AIR FORCE (20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............18.8 FT ( 5.7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 21.5 FT ( 6.6 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. P - POSTED FOR LOAD

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............41 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 37.2

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............69 TONS ( 62.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 08/22/2023 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 64° 39'19 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 36.0 FT ( 11 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................147°01 '32 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 38.3 FT ( 11.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 199 MI ( 199 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 40.0 FT ( 12.2 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 8 0 FT ( 2.4 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 8 0 FT ( 2.4 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............300 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2021 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................360 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 36 FT ( 11 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2041 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

REQUIRED

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 3 - SIMPLE RAIL (JOINTS AT EACH

POST)

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 58 FT ( 0.79 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 7 - COUNTERMEASURES INSTALLED

TO CORRECT SCOUR PROBLEM

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 16000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 65000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Joshua Voight Structure Number: AFAKFTQW08004

Inspection Date: 08/22/2023 Facility Carried: QUARRY ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING WEST

PHOTO 4

Description NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description FULL-WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK IN EAST APPROACH ASPHALT PAVEMENT

PHOTO 6

Description LEANING GUARDRAIL POSTS AND SPACER BLOCKS PULLED AWAY FROM GUARDRAIL

POSTS AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description SHEARED GUARDRAIL POST AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST APPROACH

PHOTO 8

Description FRACTURED UTILITY CONDUIT CASING CONNECTION JOINT AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description 3"W GAP DUE TO LOSS OF FILL AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST ABUTMENT BACKWALL

PHOTO 10

Description BROKEN UTILITY CAP AT NORTH SHOULDER OF EAST APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 12

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 13

Description GRAVEL ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTH SHOULDER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description UP TO 1'-4" OF STEEL SHEET PILE BACKWALL EXPOSED AT NORTH SIDE OF WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description UP TO 2" OF SETTLEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES, WEST APPROACH SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description VEHICLE COLLISION DAMAGE AT NORTH GUARDRAIL, WEST APPROACH; NOTE

GUARDRAILS ARE INCORRECTLY LAPPED AT JOINTS AND TIMBER SPACERS ARE

ROTATED

PHOTO 18

Description SPLIT TIMBER SPACER AT NORTH GUARDRAIL,WEST APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description SPALLING AND DELAMINATION OF NORTH FACE OF CONCRETE DECK AT EAST END

PHOTO 20

Description SPALLING AND DELAMINATION OF NORTH FACE OF WEST BACKWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 22

Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 24

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST ABUTMENT CAP BETWEEN DRILLED SHAFTS #3

AND #4

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description BENDING OF SOUTH ANCHOR BOLT OF BEAM #5 AT WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE BENT

ANCHORS AT ISOLATED BEARINGS THROUGHOUT

PHOTO 26

Description DRAINAGE OUTLET AT SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN UNDERSIDE OF WEST CAP ADJACENT TO DRILLED

SHAFT #3

PHOTO 28

Description EFFLORSCENCE AND RUST STAINING ON METAL STAY-IN-PLACE FORMS IN BAY #1 AT

WEST END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29

Description UNDERMINING AND CUTTING OF NORTH DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK

PHOTO 30

Description LOAD POSTING SIGN AT EAST APPROACH; NOTE DAMAGE TO NORTH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31

Description LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO 32

Description LOOKING DOWNSTREAM

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

AFAKFTQW08004

QUARRY ROAD OVER FRENCH CREEK

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE

LOOKING WEST TOWARD INNER LOOP

STRUCTURE NO. 2311-003P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 8/3/2021

NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 08/03/2021

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

0 - NONE

4 - PILE BENT

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

21.5 FT (6.6 M)

18.8 FT (5.7 M)

38.3 FT (11.7 M)

36.0 FT (11 M)

0 °

N

LOCATION

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE MILE POINT: .. .00 (KM PT 0)

STATE: .............................. 020 - ALASKA LOCATION: .... Approximately 0.6 miles east of fuel depot on Quarry Road.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... QUARRY ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: FRENCH CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: J. Thomas

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Joe Thomas

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 01/11/2022

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This galvanized steel multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. It should be noted that the bridge is currently gross load posted for 29 Tons. While the 2021 load rating calculations indicate the bridge does not require posting for load, it is possible the posting is due to unknown factors.

Most of the issues with this structure relate to the approach guardrail system. The rail posts in the southeast approach guardrail are misaligned; and the end post is broken at the base. The connection hardware is missing from several laps in the northwest approach guardrail. All of the approach guardrails have collision damage;

several timber cushion blocks have rotated; numerous reflectors are either damaged or missing; and laps have been installed incorrectly at several locations. In addition, the northeast and northwest approach guardrails do not meet the minimum safety height guidelines of 2'-3".

Other issues include misalignment of the northeast weight limit sign; deterioration of the utility conduits at the

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 08/03/2021

bridge, with the north utility conduit lacking attachment to the bridge; and a lack of reflective object markers at the approach guardrail ends. There is also moderate debris accumulation along both curblines.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE : 08/03/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.3

REALIGN POSTS AND REPLACE END POST IN

SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL TO HELP IMPROVE

SAFETY UNTIL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM CAN BE REPLACED

(SEE REHAB RECOMMENDATION BELOW).

1 LS 5000 5000

222.3

CORRECT LAPS IN APPROACH GUARDRAILS AS

NECESSARY. REPLACE MISSING CONNECTION

HARDWARE FROM NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL.

REALIGN CUSHION BLOCKS AS NECESSARY.

1 LS 5000 5000

58.8

REPAIR UTILITY CONDUITS AND CONNECTIONS.

ATTACH UTILITY TO NORTH SIDE OF DECK. 1 LS 5000 5000

222.3, 222.7

INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH

RAIL ENDS. INSTALL REFLECTORS ALONG APPROACH

RAILINGS AS NECESSARY.

5 EA 250 3000

58.7

REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBLINES.

1 LS 2000 2000

222.7

RELOCATE POSTING SIGNS.

2 EA 500 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 21000

Item REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

QTY. UNIT

UNIT PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

No. (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) COST

REHAB RECONSTR

222.3 REPLACE APPROACH GUARDRAIL SYSTEM.

1 LS 35000 35000

CONTRACT COST FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC

CONTROL, AND DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION

ENGINEERING.

1 LS 25000 25000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 60000

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE : 08/03/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

81000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Consideration should be given to replacing the entire approach rail system with one that meets the minimum height safety guidelines.

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 08/02/2021

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

N

G

P

G

N

G

G

N

N

N

G

G

N

G

G

N

G

G

N

G

N

2 - INSUFF

2 - MED

N

N

P

F

G

F

G

N

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS N

3. WEARING SURFACE N

P 12 FT

F

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

SILT

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS G

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS 05 - Piles G

6. WINGWALLS F

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

58.1 ABRASION EXPOSING AGGREGATE OF DECK SURFACE. MINOR CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE. STAY-IN-PLACE FORMS ON UNDERSIDE. SEVERAL AREAS OF LEAKAGE THROUGH FORMS; MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ALONG

FORM SEAMS. MINOR SPALLING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF DECK.

58.7 MODERATE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.

58.8 UTILITY CONDUIT ALONG NORTH SIDE OF BRIDGE; NOT ATTACHED TO BRIDGE, ONLY CONNECTED TO APPROACH RAIL POSTS.

CONDUIT SPLIT AT EAST END AND CONNECTIONS ARE SPLIT.

TWO 5" DIAMETER CONDUITS ATTACHED TO SOUTH SIDE OF BRIDGE. BOTH CONDUITS HAVE SEPARATED AT CONNECTIONS AT

BOTH BRIDGE ENDS.

58.8

222.4

SMALL UTILITY MANHOLES IN NORTH CURBLINE OF APPROACHES AT BOTH BRIDGE ENDS.

59.1 MINOR DEFORMATION OF BEARING PAD #2 AT EAST ABUTMENT AND BEARING PAD #4 AT WEST ABUTMENT; ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY SEATED AND ANCHOR BOLT MISALIGNED. ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY SEATED BEARING AT EAST ABUTMENT ON NORTH

SIDE.

59.2

59.7

GALVANIZING BEGINNING TO CHALK ON SEVERAL BEAMS; MINOR RUST FORMING ON SEVERAL BEAMS.

60.2

60.4

60.6

MINOR SURFACE RUSTING OF SHEET PILING AND PILES.

60.3 MINOR POPOUTS AND FAILED GROUT PLUGS WITH EXPOSED REBAR THROUGHOUT. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR, DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER, ON EAST ABUTMENT CAP BETWEEN PILES #3 AND #4. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT CAPS. LOOSE SHEET PILE WALL CAP EXPOSED AT SOUTHEAST APPROACH ADJACENT TO BRIDGE DECK.

60.3

60.4

CRACK DEVELOPING INTO SPALL AT NORTH END OF WEST BACKWALL. HAIRLINE CRACKING OF EAST ABUTMENT AT JUNCTION BETWEEN BACKWALL AND CAP AT NORTH END. MINOR LEAKAGE ON EAST ABUTMENT AT BEAM #4. MINOR DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION AND MOSS GROWTH ON CAP ENDS.

60.6 SOUTHEAST WINGWALL MISALIGNED AND LEANING TOWARD STREAM. SOME RIPRAP IN PLACE BEHIND NORTHWEST AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.

60.11 RIPRAP PLACED ALONG TOE OF BOTH ABUTMENTS.

222.3 MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE THROUGHOUT; MODERATE AT NORTHEAST GUARDRAIL END. GUARDRAILS LAPPED INCORRECTLY AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS. NUMEROUS REFLECTORS MISSING FROM NORTHWEST GUARDRAIL AND DAMAGED ALONG SOUTH GUARDRAIL. SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL POST MISALIGNED, END POST BROKEN AT BASE. SEVERAL TIMBER CUSHION BLOCKS ROTATED. NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL MISSING CONNECTION HARDWARE AT SEVERAL LAPS. MINOR TO

MODERATE CHECKING OF TIMBER GUARDRAIL POSTS.

222.4

222.6

TRANSVERSE CRACKING UP TO 1/2" WIDE OF APPROACH PAVEMENT. AREAS OF MODERATE SETTLEMENT, UP TO 2", OF

APPROACHES ALONG BRIDGE ENDS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT.

222.5 MINOR EROSION AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.7 "WEIGHT LIMIT 29 TONS" SIGNS AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST GUARDRAIL ENDS; NORTHEAST SIGN MISALIGNED. PER LOAD RATING IN 2013 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT, BRIDGE DOES NOT REQUIRE LOAD POSTING; RECOMMEND 29 TON LOAD POSTING TO REMAIN IN EFFECT. "FRENCH CREEK" SIGN AT NORTHEAST BRIDGE CORNER. REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED. POSTING SIGNS ATTACHED TO NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL END POSTS. MINOR DAMAGE

TO SIGNS.

36.C NORTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL HEIGHT OF 1'-5" DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM SAFETY HEIGHT GUIDELINES OF 2'-3";

NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL HEIGHT IS 2'-1".

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 23 21 38 34

HS 41 37 69 63

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 54 49 90 82

TYPE 3-3 66 60 111 101

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 10/14/2021

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: MOMENT CAPACITY OF BEAMS

REMARKS: CURRENTLY GROSS LOAD POSTED FOR 29 TONS. SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE (1) STATE:............................................ 020 - ALASKA

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............AFAKFTQW08004 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE:....................... 02090 FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........2311-003 P (4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

9 - USAF(205) NPS REGION:........................ (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:................ 1 8 0 00000 0

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:....... (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:.......... FRENCH CREEK

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. (7) FACILITY CARRIED:...................... QUARRY ROAD

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:.............. AFAKFTQW08004

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes (9) LOCATION:..................................... Approximately 0.6 miles east of fuel depot on Quarry Road.

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................BASE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:..... 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... (11) MILE POINT:................................. .00 (KM PT: 0 )

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:........... (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................72 - AIR FORCE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER:................................... 72 - AIR FORCE (20) TOLL:............................................ 3 - ON FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:.......... 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

GIRDER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............18.8 FT ( 5.7 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 21.5 FT ( 6.6 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. P - POSTED FOR LOAD

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............41 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 37.2

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............69 TONS ( 62.6 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 09/14/2017 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 64° 39'19 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 36.0 FT ( 11 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................147°01 '32 30" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 38.3 FT ( 11.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 199 MI ( 199 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 40.0 FT ( 12.2 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 24.0 FT ( 7.3 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 8 0 FT ( 2.4 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 8 0 FT ( 2.4 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............300 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2021 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................360 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 36 FT ( 11 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2041 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

REQUIRED

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 3 - SIMPLE RAIL (JOINTS AT EACH

POST)

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2 58 FT ( 0.79 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 7 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................7 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 7 - COUNTERMEASURES INSTALLED

TO CORRECT SCOUR PROBLEM

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 21000

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 60000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

Inspector: Joe Thomas Structure Number: AFAKFTQW08004

Inpsection Date: 08/03/2021 Facility Carried: QUARRY ROAD

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 1 Condition

Description LOOKING WEST TOWARD INNER LOOP

PHOTO 2 Condition

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3 Condition

Description LOOKING EAST TOWARD PIPELINE ACCESS ROAD

PHOTO 4 Condition

Description SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5 Condition

Description GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 6 Condition

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7 Condition

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO POSTING SIGN AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO 8 Condition

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9 Condition

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

PHOTO 10 Condition

Description MISSING AND LOOSE CONNECTION HARDWARE FROM NORTHWEST APPROACH

GUARDRAIL; NOTE COLLISION DAMAGE AND INCORRECT DIRECTIONAL LAP

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11 Condition

Description TYPICAL SPLITTING SPACER BLOCKS ALONG APPROACH RAILS, NORTHWEST

APPROACH GUARDRAIL SHOWN

PHOTO 12 Condition

Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST APPROACH; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13 Condition

Description SETTLEMENT AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO 14 Condition

Description LOOSE UTILITIES AT SOUTHWEST BRIDGE CORNER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15 Condition

Description TYPICAL ABRASION OF DECK SURFACE

PHOTO 16 Condition

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES, NORTH CURBLINE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17 Condition

Description TYPICAL EROSION HOLE AT CORNERS, SOUTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO 18 Condition

Description BROKEN UTILITY CONNECTION AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19 Condition

Description TYPICAL SPLITTING OF CONDUIT CONNECTIONS, NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO 20 Condition

Description BROKEN UTILITY CONDUIT ALONG NORTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21 Condition

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON DECK, NORTH SIDE SHOWN; NOTE DETACHED

UTILITY CONDUIT

PHOTO 22 Condition

Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23 Condition

Description POSTING SIGN AT EAST APPROACH; NOTE COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST

APPROACH GUARDRAIL

PHOTO 24 Condition

Description BROKEN POST AT SOUTHEAST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25 Condition

Description GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 26 Condition

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF DRILLED SHAFTS, #3 AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27 Condition

Description CRACK DEVELOPING INTO SPALL AT NORTH END OF WEST BACKWALL

PHOTO 28 Condition

Description TYPICAL GROUT PLUG FAILURE WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON ABUTMENT CAPS, WEST

ABUTMENT CAP SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 29 Condition

Description CRACKING AT NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT CAP OVER DRILLED SHAFT #1

PHOTO 30 Condition

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARINGS, BEARING #2 AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 31 Condition

Description GENERAL VIEW OF ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGMS, BAY #3 AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 32 Condition

Description DEFORMATION OF BEARING PAD #4 AT WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY

SEATED

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 33 Condition

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF SHEET PILE, WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO 34 Condition

Description TYPICAL LEAKAGE THROUGH STAY IN PLACE FORMS, BAY #1 NEAR EAST ABUTMENT

SHOWN; NOTE RUSTING AND EFFLORESCENCE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 35 Condition

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEAMS, BEAM #3 SHOWN; NOTE CHALKING OF GALVANIZATION

PHOTO 36 Condition

Description RUSTING OF EXTERIOR OF BEAM #1 NEAR MIDSPAN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 37 Condition

Description MISALIGNMENT OF SOUTHEAST SHEET PILE WALL

PHOTO 38 Condition

Description TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING AT EAST END OF DECK, NORTH SIDE SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 39 Condition

Description GENERAL VEIW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 40 Condition

Description CRACKING OF EAST ABUTMENT CAP AT NORTH END

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 41 Condition

Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF EAST ABUTMENT BEARINGS, BEARING #2 SHOWN; NOTE

ANCHOR NUT NOT FULLY SEATED

PHOTO 42 Condition

Description SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST ABUTMENT CAP BETWEEN DRILLED SHAFTS #3

AND #4

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 43 Condition

Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO 44 Condition

Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

AFAKFTQW08004 INSPECTION DATE: 8/28/19

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

STEEL

STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

NONE

PILE BENT

N/A

CONCRETE

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

21.5 FT (6.6 M)

18.8 FT (5.7 M)

38.3 FT (11.7 M)

36.0 FT (11.0 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

STATE: ................................. ALASKA LOCATION: Approximately 0.6 miles east of fuel depot on Quarry Road. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ QUARRY ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. FRENCH CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This galvanized steel multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. It should be noted that the bridge is currently posted for a 29 ton weight limit. While the load rating calculations included with the 2013 inspection report indicate the bridge does not require posting for load, it is possible the posting is due to unknown factors. Until additional information is available, it is recommended that traffic on the bridge continue to be restricted to the posted limit.

Most of the issues with this structure relate to the approach guardrail system. The rail posts in the southeast approach rail are misaligned; and the end post is broken at the base. The connection hardware is missing from several laps in the northwest approach rail. All of the approach rails have collision damage; several timber spacer blocks are rotated and split; numerous reflectors are either damaged or missing; and laps have been installed incorrectly at several locations. In addition, the northeast and northwest approach rails do not meet the minimum safety height guidelines of 2'-3".

Other issues include the northeast weight limit sign is not secured to the post; deterioration of the utility conduits at the bridge, with the north utility conduit lacking attachment to the bridge; and a lack of reflective object markers at the approach rail ends. There is also moderate debris accumulation along both curblines.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: B. BUMPERS, T. POWELL (VOLKERT, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

BRITT BUMPERS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/29/20

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

222.3 REALIGN POSTS AND REPLACE END POST IN SOUTHEAST APPROACH RAIL TO

HELP IMPROVE SAFETY UNTIL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM CAN BE REPLACED (SEE

REHAB RECOMMENDATION BELOW).

1 LS $5,000 $5,000

222.3 CORRECT LAPS IN APPROACH RAILS AS NECESSARY. REPLACE MISSING

CONNECTION HARDWARE FROM NORTHWEST APPROACH RAIL. REALIGN AND

REPLACE SPACER BLOCKS AS NECESSARY.

1 LS $5,000 $5,000

58.8 REPAIR UTILITY CONDUITS AND CONNECTIONS. ATTACH UTILITY TO NORTH SIDE

OF DECK.

1 LS $5,000 $5,000

222.3,7 INSTALL REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT APPROACH RAIL ENDS. SECURE

WEIGHT LIMIT SIGN AT NORTHEAST RAIL END. INSTALL REFLECTORS ALONG

APPROACH RAILINGS AS NECESSARY.

1 LS $3,000 $3,000

58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBLINES. 1 LS $2,000 $2,000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $20,000

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST

ESTIMATES

REHAB. RECONSTR.

222.3 REPLACE APPROACH GUARDRAIL SYSTEM. 1 LS $35,000 $35,000 $0

CONTRACT COST FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER.

1 LS $25,000 $25,000 $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $60,000 $0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* : ........................................... $80,000

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Consideration should be given to replacing the entire…