030ADV24R0051 0002.pdf

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Type or print) (Type or print)

(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

(If other than Item 6)

(Specify type of modification and authority)

(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

1 3

Contracts and Grants Directorate Library of Congress

101 Independence Ave. SE LA 325 Washington DC 20540-9411

Contracts & Grants Directorate Library of Congress

LA 325

101 Independence Av SE Washington DC 20540-9411

To all Offerors/Bidders

030ADV24R0051

X

See CONTINUATION Page

The purpose of Amendment 0002 is to update Section M to clarify past performance and price evaluation criteria.

Refer to the attached continuation pages where updates are identified by strikethrough and underlined text.

Leonard, David

CONTINUATION PAGE

A.1 LC52.215-4 EVALUATION – LOW PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (JUL 2016)

The Government will award a single award IDIQ as a result of this solicitation to the lowest priced, technically acceptable (LPTA) Offeror. Technical acceptability will be evaluated based on whether the offeror's proposal meets the terms and conditions of this solicitation. The evaluation criteria consist of three (3) evaluation factors: Technical Approach, Past Performance and Price. Each Factor (except price), will be rated using Technically Acceptable /Technically Unacceptable.

A “Technically Unacceptable” rating will not be considered for award. The Library will evaluate the acceptability of the technical proposal and will be evaluated with respect to the factors listed below.

Evaluation Factors

1. Technical Approach

a. Offerors shall be evaluated to determine if the proposed Technical Approach is technically acceptable in accordance with Section L of the solicitation and the requirements in Section C.

b. Offerors shall be ineligible for award if proof of National Association for Information Destruction (NAID)

Certification is not provided.

2. Key Personnel

a. The Offeror will be evaluated to determine the extent of demonstrated specialized experience in performing relevant contracts similar in complexity, dollar value, and magnitude to the RFP.

3. Past Performance

a. Offerors will be evaluated to confirm that determine the degree to which past performance reflects a trend of satisfactory or better performance considering. The Government will not pay more for higher rated past performance based on the LPTA nature of the solicitation.

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks

- A pattern of deliverables/task completion that are timely and of good quality

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.)

- Tasks that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand (i.e. relevant to the requirements of this solicitation).

- Demonstrated success in mitigating delays and cost impacts on projects

4. Price

a. The offeror’s proposed IDIQ prices on Attachment J-1 – Price Sheet shall be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness. The Library will review all proposals to determine if pricing reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with the Offeror’s technical proposal.

b. The offeror’s proposed USCO Task Order (1 and 2) prices shall be evaluated to ensure the pricing is reasonable and consistent with the proposed IDIQ price schedule. The total evaluated price that is used in the LPTA determination shall be the sum of the total FFP for Task Orders 1 and 2.

(End of Provision)

A.1 LC52.215-4 EVALUATION – LOW PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (JUL 2016)