0002. Evaluation Factor CJLOT 2026.pdf

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

This Request for Quote (RFQ) is issued in accordance with RFO FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services, utilizing Simplified Procedures. The Government intends to award a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) purchase order for logistic support for Combined Joint Logistics Over the Shore (CJLOTS), South Korea.

1.0 EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will evaluate quotations using the following factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Capability (Acceptable/Unacceptable) Technical capability will be evaluated in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Offerors must clearly demonstrate the ability to meet all PWS requirements. Any omission, ambiguity, or failure to address a requirement will result in an Unacceptable rating.

Factor 2 – Price Offerors shall submit all CLINs listed in the RFQ (SF 1449). All proposed prices shall be Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) and all-inclusive, to include (but not limited to) fuel, delivery, installation, maintenance, materials, and demobilization, as required to support CJLOTS 2026.

Factor 3 – Past Performance (Acceptable/Unacceptable) Past performance will be evaluated for recency (within 5 years) and relevance (similar size, scope, complexity, and contract type). Offerors with no relevant past performance will receive a Neutral (Acceptable) rating.

Evaluation Standard All non-price factors will be evaluated for acceptability only. They will not be ranked or scored. A single Unacceptable rating for any factor or subfactor renders the quotation ineligible for award.

2.0 AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

In accordance with FAR 52.212-1, the Government reserves the right, based on its best interests, to:

1. Award without discussions

2. Make a single award

3. Establish a competitive range and conduct discussions

4. Make no award if no quotation is found acceptable

Offerors are strongly encouraged to submit their best terms with their initial quotation.

3.0 QUOTATION SUBMISSION

These instructions ensure the Government can properly evaluate quotations. Offerors must follow all instructions carefully. The Government may make award based on initial quotations without further communication.

Offerors must submit sufficient information for the Government to determine their capability to perform all requirements. All commitments made in the quotation become part of the resulting contract.

3.1 Submission Method

• Quotations must be received no later than 28 May 2026, 10:00 AM Korean Standard Time (KST).

• Only email submissions will be accepted.

• Subject line: W90VN9-26-Q-A040

• Submission addresses:

o Contracting Officer: MSG Jung, Sungkoo, at email:

sungkoo.jung.mil@army.mil o Contracting Officer: SFC Domenico Torello at email:

domenico.torello.mil@army.mil o Contracting Specialist: SSG Karnga, Dyukon at email:

adyukon.g.karnga.mil@army.mil

Late quotations will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) and will not be evaluated.

3.2 Quote Validity

Quotes shall remain valid for 30 calendar days.

3.3 Currency Format

All pricing must be submitted in Korean Won (KRW). Decimal pricing is not permitted;

unit prices must be rounded to the nearest whole KRW.

3.4 Questions (RFI)

• All questions must be submitted via email no later than 25 May 2026, 10:00 AM KST. Question received after this day will not be answered.

• All questions will be consolidated and answered in a single document.

• Questions and answers will be issued as a solicitation amendment.

3.5. Site Visit: 21 May 2026 at 1300 at this location:

경상북도 포항시 남구 오천읍 정몽주로 441 Myeong Jjamppong Restaurant” mailto:sungkoo.jung.mil@army.mil mailto:domenico.torello.mil@army.mil

441 Jeongmongju-ro, Ocheon-eup, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea

3.6. IMPORTANT. Because the facility (Korea Marine Corps installation) requires special access, all vendors must complete Attachment 0004 – Base Access Request.

Completed forms shall be submitted to POC: SFC Domenico Torello Email:

domenico.torello.mil@army.mail Suspense: Please submit the Base Access Request No later than (NLT) 19 May 2026 at 1300 (KST). Late submissions will not be accepted. Vendors without an approved access request will not be permitted to attend the site visit.

Full Name (이름):

Korean Resident ID Number (주민등록번호):

Phone (전화번호):

Vehicle Model and plate number (자동차 모델/번호):

3.7. IMPORTANT: The Government reserves the right to adjust the CLIN quantities or requirements at any time prior to award based on mission needs. Adjustments may include increases, decreases, or removal of individual CLINs if determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

4.0 ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

All sources may submit a quote or quote as applicable. However, the Republic of Korea (ROK)- United States (U.S.) Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), precludes the U.S.

Government from granting Invited Contractor or Technical Representative status to any offeror, for this requirement.

All sources submitting a quote or quote, as applicable, including U.S. sources, must already have, or obtain the requisite business licenses directly from the ROK Government, and conduct business in accordance with all applicable ROK laws, including but not limited to, rules and policies regarding labor, taxation, and immigration.

Any contractor not already doing business in Korea as a local source, must submit adequate verification in its initial quote or quote, that it has the requisite authorization and capacity to compete for the requirement as a local source, and to perform the contract as a local source. If an initial quote does not fully demonstrate this authorization and capacity, it will not be further considered for award. Whether an offeror qualifies as a local source shall be determined by the Contracting Officer.

mailto:domenico.torello.mil@army.mail

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 – EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL SERVICES

1.0 GENERAL

1.1 This acquisition is conducted in accordance with FAR RFO Part 12, using the procedures of FAR 12.201 and applicable Simplified Procedures. The Government intends to award one (1) Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforms to the solicitation, satisfies all terms and conditions, and represents the best value to the Government.

2.0 AWARD DECISION

Only quotations rated Acceptable under all non-price factors ( Technical Acceptability and Past Performance) will be eligible for award. Among technically acceptable quotations, the Government will determine which quotation represents the best value considering price and other factors. The Government may select other than the lowest-priced quotation if it provides a greater overall benefit to the Government.

2.1 Technical Capability and Past Performance must both be rated Acceptable for a quotation to be eligible for award. Among quotations that are Acceptable under all non-price factors, the Government will consider price in determining which quotation represents the best value. When quotations are equally Acceptable, differences in price may become the determining factor. The Government reserves the right to make award without discussion.

3.0 EVALUATION FACTORS

The following factors will be evaluated:

FACTOR I – TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY (Acceptable/Unacceptable) The Government will evaluate the offeror’s ability to meet all requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). To be rated Acceptable, the quotation must clearly demonstrate compliance with every minimum requirement.

NOTE: The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or obtaining information not included or clearly referenced in the quotation.

Technical Rating Definitions

RATING DEFINITION

ACCEPTABLE The quotation meets all minimum PWS requirements and the CLIN structure. The submission demonstrates a high level of

RATING DEFINITION

competence in understanding and meeting the requirement.

UNACCEPTABLE

The quotation fails to meet one or more minimum PWS requirements or does not follow the required CLIN structure.

Required confirmations or information are missing, unclear, or incomplete, and the submission does not demonstrate sufficient competence to meet the requirement.

If an offeror cannot comply with every requirement, the quotation will be rated Unacceptable and will not be considered for award.

FACTOR II – PRICE

Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR technical price analysis. The Government will compare quoted prices against:

• Other quotations received.

• The Independent Government Estimate (IGE)

• Historical pricing (if applicable)

FACTOR III – PAST PERFORMANCE (Acceptable/Unacceptable) Past performance will be evaluated to assess the offeror’s demonstrated record of performing same or similar services in terms of size, scope, complexity, and contract type.

Submission Requirements Offerors shall provide recent and relevant past performance:

• Recent: Within the last five (5) years

• Relevant: Same or similar services based on size, scope, complexity, and contract type

• Demonstrated Capability- If the offeror does NOT have recent and relevant past performance, the offeror shall provide its ABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM the required service.

The Government may use:

1. Contracting Officer’s personal knowledge of the vendor’s performance

2. Past performance submitted by the vendor

3. Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)

4. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)

5. COR/TPOC reports or other Government-generated documentation

6. Telephone or email interviews with points of contact

7. Any other reasonable and relevant information available

The Government reserves the right to use any information obtained from any source.

Past Performance Rating Definitions

RATING DEFINITION

ACCEPTABLE

The offeror has recent and relevant past performance demonstrating a satisfactory record, or has no relevant past performance, which is neither favorable nor unfavorable.

UNACCEPTABLE

The offeror has relevant negative past performance indicating performance problems, or fails to provide required past performance information. An Unacceptable rating renders the quotation ineligible for award.

NEUTRAL

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the record is too limited to permit a meaningful assessment. A Neutral rating is neither favorable nor unfavorable.

NOTE:

If the vendor has no recent or relevant past performance record, or if available information is too limited to permit a meaningful assessment, the vendor will receive a Neutral rating.