00014444 EvaluationScoreMatrix for release.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 72 KB Posted Jul 31, 2025

Attached to: K22706 - OR6 at Wilson River Loop CA/CEI
Solicitation number: S-73000-00014444
Issued by: Tillamook County, Oregon

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Sep 8, 2025

The file is an Evaluation Score Matrix for a procurement process involving two primary firms: Consor North America and David Evans and Associates. The document details a comprehensive scoring evaluation for a proposal with five key assessment areas: Specific Experience of Key Staff, Cost Effectiveness, Project Management, Project Samples, and Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements. Each firm was evaluated by three separate evaluators, with maximum possible points of 100 per proposal. David Evans and Associates achieved the highest overall score of 88.33, ranking first, while Consor North America scored 86.33 and ranked second.

The scoring methodology demonstrates a rigorous, multi-faceted approach to vendor selection, with evaluators scoring across different performance dimensions. The evaluation considered technical competence, cost efficiency, management capabilities, and proposal quality. While the specific project details are not fully elaborated in this document, the scoring matrix suggests a structured, point-based selection process designed to comprehensively assess vendor capabilities and proposal strengths through a standardized, quantitative evaluation framework.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
00014444 Final.docx	DOCX document	Jul 31, 2025
Mini RFP Att A Cover Sheet~1.doc	DOC document	Jul 31, 2025
Mini RFP Att B References.doc	DOC document	Jul 31, 2025
00014444 ITA.docx	DOCX document	Jul 31, 2025
OregonBuys Registration Guide~19.pdf	PDF	Jul 31, 2025

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Summary Scores

RFP Number: Project Name: ____________________
EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY
	Enter data only in gray highlighted fields on Summary, Proposal, Interview and Reference Score worksheets as applicable.

SOP Evaluation Summary Scores							Number of Proposal evaluators:				3
					Evaluation Team
													Score
Firm	evaluator 1		evaluator 2		evaluator 3		evaluator 4		evaluator 5		Total	Average	Rank
Consor North America	98	1	73	2	88	1	0	1	0	1	259	86	2
David Evans and Associates	95	2	84	1	86	2	0	1	0	1	265	88	1
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3
Firm Name	0	3	0	3	0	3	0	1	0	1	0	0	3

	Statistics
High Score	98		84		88		0		0
Low Score	95	1	73	1	86	1	ERROR:#NUM!	1	ERROR:#NUM!
Range	3		11		2		ERROR:#NUM!		ERROR:#NUM!

Interview Evaluation Summary Scores							Number of interview evaluators:				1
					Evaluation Team
													Score
Firm	name1		name2		name3		name4		name5		Total	Average	Rank
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1

	Statistics
High Score	0		0		0		0		0
Low Score	ERROR:#NUM!	1	ERROR:#NUM!	1	ERROR:#NUM!	1	ERROR:#NUM!	1	ERROR:#NUM!
Range	ERROR:#NUM!		ERROR:#NUM!		ERROR:#NUM!		ERROR:#NUM!		ERROR:#NUM!

References Summary Scores							Number of references scored:				1
					References
													Score
Firm	reference1		reference2		reference3		reference4		reference5		Total	Average	Rank
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1
Firm Name	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	1	0	0	1

FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)

	Proposal		Interview		Enter	References		Final Scores
Firm	Average		Average		Cost Scores	Total			Rank
firm 1	86	2	0	1	0	0	1	86	2
firm 2	88	1	0	1	0	0	1	88	1
firm 3	0	3	0	1	0	0	1	0	3
firm 4	0	3	0	1	0	0	1	0	3
firm 5	0	3	0	1	0	0	1	0	3
firm 6	0	3	0	1	0	0	1	0	3

Ver 10/20/16

Proposal Detail Scores

RFP Number: Project Name: ____________________
SOP SCORE DETAILS
Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores			Enter actual number of evaluators:				3
					Evaluation Team
		Maximum
		Score	evaluator 1	evaluator 2	evaluator 3	evaluator 4	evaluator 5
1	Consor North America
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30	30	22	27
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15	15	12	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15	15	12	14
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30	28	18	24
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10	10	9	8
	Enter Eval Criterion 6
	Enter Eval Criterion 7
	Enter Eval Criterion 8
	Enter Eval Criterion 9							Scoring Deductions
	Total	100	98	73	88	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		98	73	88	0	0	86.33

2	David Evans and Associates
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30	27	26	25
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15	15	12	13
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15	13	11	14
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30	30	27	26
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10	10	8	8
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	95	84	86	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		95	84	86	0	0	88.33

3	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

4	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

5	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

6	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

7	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

8	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

9	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

10	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

11	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

12	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

13	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

14	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

15	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

16	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

17	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

18	Firm Name
	EVALUATION ITEM 1 – Specific Experience of Key Staff	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 2 – Cost Effectiveness	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 3 – Proposer’s Project Management	15
	EVALUATION ITEM 4 – Project Samples	30
	EVALUATION ITEM 5 – Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements	10
	Enter Eval Criterion 6	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 7	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 8	0
	Enter Eval Criterion 9	0						Scoring Deductions
	TOTAL	100	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
	Scoring Deduction Points		0	0	0	0	0
	TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)		0	0	0	0	0

Interview Detail Scores

RFP Number: Project Name: ____________________
INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS
			Enter actual number of interview evaluators:				1
					Evaluation Team
		Maximum
		Score	evaluator 1	evaluator 2	evaluator 3	evaluator 4	evaluator 5
	Firm Name
	Eval criterion/question 1	0
	Eval criterion/question 2	0
	Eval criterion/question 3	0
	Eval criterion/question 4	0
	Eval criterion/question 5	0
	Eval criterion/question 6	0
	Eval criterion/question 7	0
	Eval criterion/question 8	0
	Eval criterion/question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Firm Name
	Eval criterion/question 1	0
	Eval criterion/question 2	0
	Eval criterion/question 3	0
	Eval criterion/question 4	0
	Eval criterion/question 5	0
	Eval criterion/question 6	0
	Eval criterion/question 7	0
	Eval criterion/question 8	0
	Eval criterion/question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Firm Name
	Eval criterion/question 1	0
	Eval criterion/question 2	0
	Eval criterion/question 3	0
	Eval criterion/question 4	0
	Eval criterion/question 5	0
	Eval criterion/question 6	0
	Eval criterion/question 7	0
	Eval criterion/question 8	0
	Eval criterion/question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Firm Name
	Eval criterion/question 1	0
	Eval criterion/question 2	0
	Eval criterion/question 3	0
	Eval criterion/question 4	0
	Eval criterion/question 5	0
	Eval criterion/question 6	0
	Eval criterion/question 7	0
	Eval criterion/question 8	0
	Eval criterion/question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Firm Name
	Eval criterion/question 1	0
	Eval criterion/question 2	0
	Eval criterion/question 3	0
	Eval criterion/question 4	0
	Eval criterion/question 5	0
	Eval criterion/question 6	0
	Eval criterion/question 7	0
	Eval criterion/question 8	0
	Eval criterion/question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Firm Name
	Eval criterion/question 1	0
	Eval criterion/question 2	0
	Eval criterion/question 3	0
	Eval criterion/question 4	0
	Eval criterion/question 5	0
	Eval criterion/question 6	0
	Eval criterion/question 7	0
	Eval criterion/question 8	0
	Eval criterion/question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0

References Detail Scores

RFP Number: Project Name: ____________________
References Evaluation Detail Scores
			Enter actual number of references scored:				1
					Reference Scores
		Maximum
		Score	reference 1	reference 2	reference 3	reference 4	reference 5
1	Firm Name
	Criterion/Question 1	0
	Criterion/Question 2	0
	Criterion/Question 3	0
	Criterion/Question 4	0
	Criterion/Question 5	0
	Criterion/Question 6	0
	Criterion/Question 7	0
	Criterion/Question 8	0
	Criterion/Question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
2	Firm Name
	Criterion/Question 1	0
	Criterion/Question 2	0
	Criterion/Question 3	0
	Criterion/Question 4	0
	Criterion/Question 5	0
	Criterion/Question 6	0
	Criterion/Question 7	0
	Criterion/Question 8	0
	Criterion/Question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
3	Firm Name
	Criterion/Question 1	0
	Criterion/Question 2	0
	Criterion/Question 3	0
	Criterion/Question 4	0
	Criterion/Question 5	0
	Criterion/Question 6	0
	Criterion/Question 7	0
	Criterion/Question 8	0
	Criterion/Question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
4	Firm Name
	Criterion/Question 1	0
	Criterion/Question 2	0
	Criterion/Question 3	0
	Criterion/Question 4	0
	Criterion/Question 5	0
	Criterion/Question 6	0
	Criterion/Question 7	0
	Criterion/Question 8	0
	Criterion/Question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
5	Firm Name
	Criterion/Question 1	0
	Criterion/Question 2	0
	Criterion/Question 3	0
	Criterion/Question 4	0
	Criterion/Question 5	0
	Criterion/Question 6	0
	Criterion/Question 7	0
	Criterion/Question 8	0
	Criterion/Question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0
6	Firm Name
	Criterion/Question 1	0
	Criterion/Question 2	0
	Criterion/Question 3	0
	Criterion/Question 4	0
	Criterion/Question 5	0
	Criterion/Question 6	0
	Criterion/Question 7	0
	Criterion/Question 8	0
	Criterion/Question 9	0
	TOTAL	0	0	0	0	0	0

&"Arial,Bold"&12REFERENCES SCORE DETAIL RFP xxx (PCMS xxx) &"Arial,Bold Italic"[insert project name]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Sep 8, 2025.