00011524 EvaluationScoreMatrix for release.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 53 KB Posted

Attached to
Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln)
Solicitation number
S-73000-00011524
Issued by
Benton County, Oregon

About this file

This evaluation score matrix from ODOT and Benton County details the proposal scoring for the Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path project between NE Merloy Ave and NW Rainwater Ln. Four firms were evaluated: Alta Planning + Design, David Evans and Associates, Harper Houf Peterson Righellis, and Parametrix. Each proposal was scored by three evaluators across six criteria: Design Philosophy and Approach (15 points), Project Management (10 points), Project Team and Qualifications (20 points), Project Samples (40 points), Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness (10 points), and Clarity of Proposal (5 points).

Parametrix received the highest combined average score of 96.00, followed by David Evans and Associates with 94.67, Harper Houf Peterson Righellis with 88.33, and Alta Planning + Design with 84.67. The scoring matrix also includes unused sections for interview scores and reference checks, suggesting these components were either not completed or not required for this evaluation process. No scoring deduction points were applied to any of the proposals.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Combined Food Provider Solicitation - 24-26.pdf PDF
00011524 Attachment C.docx DOCX document
00011524 Interview Notice.docx DOCX document
00011524 ITA.docx DOCX document
00011524 EvaluationScoreMatrix Final for release.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
00011524 RFP Final.docx DOCX document
00011524 Sample Contract Final.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Agency Proposal Scores

S-73000-00011524 Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln)
SOP SCORE DETAILS
Proposal Evaluation Detail ScoresEnter actual number of evaluators:
Evaluation Team
Maximum
Scoreevaluator 1evaluator 2evaluator 3
1Alta Planning + Design
2.2.1Proposer’s Project Management15
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management10
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20
2.2.4Project Samples40
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness10
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5
Total1000000%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)0000.00
2David Evans and Associates
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach15131415
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management108910
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20181820
2.2.4Project Samples40373740
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness1081010
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5554
TOTAL1008993990%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)89939993.67
3Harper Houf Peterson Righellis
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach15111314
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management107910
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20151820
2.2.4Project Samples40353638
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness1061010
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5255
TOTAL1007691970%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)76919788.00
4Parametrix
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach15131314
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management10888
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20181620
2.2.4Project Samples40383739
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness109910
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5553
TOTAL1009188940%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)91889491.00

ODOT Proposal Detail Scores

S-73000-00011524 Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln)
SOP SCORE DETAILS
Proposal Evaluation Detail ScoresEnter actual number of evaluators:
Evaluation Team
Maximum
Scoreevaluator 1evaluator 2evaluator 3
1Alta Planning + Design
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach1510119
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management10797
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20192018
2.2.4Project Samples40383040
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness10888
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5435
Total1008681870%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)86818784.67
2David Evans and Associates
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach15151415
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management1010109
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20181920
2.2.4Project Samples40373540
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness1010910
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5535
TOTAL1009590990%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)95909994.67
3Harper Houf Peterson Righellis
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach15131014
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management1010910
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20181920
2.2.4Project Samples40363039
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness1010510
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5435
TOTAL1009176980%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)91769888.33
4Parametrix
2.2.1Design Philosophy and Approach15151512
2.2.2Proposer’s Project Management1010108
2.2.3Project Team and Qualifications20202020
2.2.4Project Samples40373838
2.2.5Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness10101010
2.2.6Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements5555
TOTAL1009798930%
Scoring Deduction Points000
TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions)97989396.00

Interview Detail Scores

ERROR:#REF!
INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS
Enter actual number of interview evaluators:1
Evaluation Team
Maximum
Scoreevaluator 1evaluator 2evaluator 3evaluator 4evaluator 5
Firm Name
Eval criterion/question 10
Eval criterion/question 20
Eval criterion/question 30
Eval criterion/question 40
Eval criterion/question 50
Eval criterion/question 60
Eval criterion/question 70
Eval criterion/question 80
Eval criterion/question 90
TOTAL000000
Firm Name
Eval criterion/question 10
Eval criterion/question 20
Eval criterion/question 30
Eval criterion/question 40
Eval criterion/question 50
Eval criterion/question 60
Eval criterion/question 70
Eval criterion/question 80
Eval criterion/question 90
TOTAL000000
Firm Name
Eval criterion/question 10
Eval criterion/question 20
Eval criterion/question 30
Eval criterion/question 40
Eval criterion/question 50
Eval criterion/question 60
Eval criterion/question 70
Eval criterion/question 80
Eval criterion/question 90
TOTAL000000
Firm Name
Eval criterion/question 10
Eval criterion/question 20
Eval criterion/question 30
Eval criterion/question 40
Eval criterion/question 50
Eval criterion/question 60
Eval criterion/question 70
Eval criterion/question 80
Eval criterion/question 90
TOTAL000000
Firm Name
Eval criterion/question 10
Eval criterion/question 20
Eval criterion/question 30
Eval criterion/question 40
Eval criterion/question 50
Eval criterion/question 60
Eval criterion/question 70
Eval criterion/question 80
Eval criterion/question 90
TOTAL000000
Firm Name
Eval criterion/question 10
Eval criterion/question 20
Eval criterion/question 30
Eval criterion/question 40
Eval criterion/question 50
Eval criterion/question 60
Eval criterion/question 70
Eval criterion/question 80
Eval criterion/question 90
TOTAL000000

References Detail Scores

ERROR:#REF!
References Evaluation Detail Scores
Enter actual number of references scored:1
Reference Scores
Maximum
Scorereference 1reference 2reference 3reference 4reference 5
1Firm Name
Criterion/Question 10
Criterion/Question 20
Criterion/Question 30
Criterion/Question 40
Criterion/Question 50
Criterion/Question 60
Criterion/Question 70
Criterion/Question 80
Criterion/Question 90
TOTAL000000
2Firm Name
Criterion/Question 10
Criterion/Question 20
Criterion/Question 30
Criterion/Question 40
Criterion/Question 50
Criterion/Question 60
Criterion/Question 70
Criterion/Question 80
Criterion/Question 90
TOTAL000000
3Firm Name
Criterion/Question 10
Criterion/Question 20
Criterion/Question 30
Criterion/Question 40
Criterion/Question 50
Criterion/Question 60
Criterion/Question 70
Criterion/Question 80
Criterion/Question 90
TOTAL000000
4Firm Name
Criterion/Question 10
Criterion/Question 20
Criterion/Question 30
Criterion/Question 40
Criterion/Question 50
Criterion/Question 60
Criterion/Question 70
Criterion/Question 80
Criterion/Question 90
TOTAL000000
5Firm Name
Criterion/Question 10
Criterion/Question 20
Criterion/Question 30
Criterion/Question 40
Criterion/Question 50
Criterion/Question 60
Criterion/Question 70
Criterion/Question 80
Criterion/Question 90
TOTAL000000
6Firm Name
Criterion/Question 10
Criterion/Question 20
Criterion/Question 30
Criterion/Question 40
Criterion/Question 50
Criterion/Question 60
Criterion/Question 70
Criterion/Question 80
Criterion/Question 90
TOTAL000000

&"Arial,Bold"&12REFERENCES SCORE DETAIL RFP xxx (PCMS xxx) &"Arial,Bold Italic"[insert project name]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .