00011524 EvaluationScoreMatrix Final for release.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 69 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00011524
- Issued by
- Benton County, Oregon
About this file
This is an evaluation score matrix from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for the Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path project between NE Merloy Ave and NW Rainwater Ln. The matrix details the scoring of four firms - Alta Planning + Design, David Evans and Associates, Harper Houf Peterson Righellis, and Parametrix - across six evaluation criteria: Project Management (15 points), Project Management (10 points), Project Team and Qualifications (20 points), Project Samples (40 points), Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness (10 points), and Clarity of Proposal (5 points). Two firms, David Evans and Associates and Parametrix, advanced to the interview phase scheduled for January 13th, 2025, with Parametrix scoring highest in the interviews (140 points versus 127 points for David Evans).
The evaluation scores show that Parametrix achieved the highest overall proposal score with 96.00 points, followed by David Evans and Associates with 94.67 points, Harper Houf Peterson Righellis with 88.33 points, and Alta Planning + Design with 84.67 points. The scoring was conducted by three evaluators who assessed each firm across the established criteria. The document includes detailed breakdowns of both proposal scores and interview scores, though reference scores were not completed at the time of this evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Combined Food Provider Solicitation - 24-26.pdf | ||
| 00011524 Attachment C.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011524 Interview Notice.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011524 ITA.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011524 EvaluationScoreMatrix for release.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00011524 RFP Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00011524 Sample Contract Final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Local Agency Proposal Scores
| RFP Number:S-73000-00011524 Project Name: Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln) | ||||||
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | ||||||
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | Enter actual number of evaluators: | |||||
| Evaluation Team | ||||||
| Maximum | ||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | |||
| 1 | Alta Planning + Design | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | ||||
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | ||||
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | ||||
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | ||||
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | ||||
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | ||||
| Total | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 2 | David Evans and Associates | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 18 | 18 | 20 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 37 | 37 | 40 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |
| TOTAL | 100 | 89 | 93 | 99 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 89 | 93 | 99 | 93.67 |
| 3 | Harper Houf Peterson Righellis | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 11 | 13 | 14 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 7 | 9 | 10 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 15 | 18 | 20 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 35 | 36 | 38 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 6 | 10 | 10 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | |
| TOTAL | 100 | 76 | 91 | 97 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 76 | 91 | 97 | 88.00 |
| 4 | Parametrix | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 13 | 13 | 14 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 18 | 16 | 20 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 38 | 37 | 39 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | |
| TOTAL | 100 | 91 | 88 | 94 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 91 | 88 | 94 | 91.00 |
Summary Scores
| RFP Number:S-73000-00011524 Project Name: Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln) | |
| EVALUATION SCORE SUMMARY | |
| Enter data only in gray highlighted fields on Summary, Proposal, Interview and Reference Score worksheets as applicable. |
| SOP Evaluation Summary Scores | Number of Proposal evaluators: | ERROR:#REF! | |||||||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Alta Planning + Design | 86 | ERROR:#REF! | 81 | ERROR:#REF! | 87 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| David Evans and Associates | 95 | ERROR:#REF! | 90 | ERROR:#REF! | 99 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Harper Houf Peterson Righellis | 91 | ERROR:#REF! | 76 | ERROR:#REF! | 98 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Parametrix | 97 | ERROR:#REF! | 98 | ERROR:#REF! | 93 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Statistics | |||||||||
| High Score | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ||||
| Low Score | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Range | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| Interview Evaluation Summary Scores | Number of interview evaluators: | 1 | |||||||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | name1 | name2 | name3 | name4 | name5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| David Evans and Associates | 42 | 2 | 42 | 2 | 43 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 127 | 127 | 2 |
| Parametrix | 45 | 1 | 49 | 1 | 46 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 140 | 140 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Statistics | |||||||||
| High Score | 45 | 49 | 46 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Low Score | 42 | 1 | 42 | 1 | 43 | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! | 1 | ERROR:#NUM! |
| Range | 3 | 7 | 3 | ERROR:#NUM! | ERROR:#NUM! |
| References Summary Scores | Number of references scored: | 1 | |||||||||||
| References | |||||||||||||
| Score | |||||||||||||
| Firm | reference1 | reference2 | reference3 | reference4 | reference5 | Total | Average | Rank | |||||
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Firm Name | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
FINAL SCORES (with COST SCORES if applicable)
| Proposal | Interview | Enter | References | Final Scores | |||||
| Firm | Average | Average | Cost Scores | Total | Rank | ||||
| firm 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | 127 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| firm 2 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | 140 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| firm 3 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| firm 4 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| firm 5 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
| firm 6 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ERROR:#REF! | ERROR:#REF! |
Ver 10/20/16
Proposal Detail Scores
| RFP Number:S-73000-00011524 Project Name: Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln) | ||||||
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | ||||||
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | Enter actual number of evaluators: | |||||
| Evaluation Team | ||||||
| Maximum | ||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | |||
| 1 | Alta Planning + Design | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 10 | 11 | 9 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 7 | 9 | 7 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 19 | 20 | 18 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 38 | 30 | 40 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | |
| Total | 100 | 86 | 81 | 87 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 86 | 81 | 87 | 84.67 |
| 2 | David Evans and Associates | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 15 | 14 | 15 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 18 | 19 | 20 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 37 | 35 | 40 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | |
| TOTAL | 100 | 95 | 90 | 99 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 95 | 90 | 99 | 94.67 |
| 3 | Harper Houf Peterson Righellis | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 13 | 10 | 14 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 18 | 19 | 20 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 36 | 30 | 39 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 10 | 5 | 10 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | |
| TOTAL | 100 | 91 | 76 | 98 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 91 | 76 | 98 | 88.33 |
| 4 | Parametrix | |||||
| 2.2.1 | Proposer’s Project Management | 15 | 15 | 15 | 12 | |
| 2.2.2 | Proposer’s Project Management | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | |
| 2.2.3 | Project Team and Qualifications | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
| 2.2.4 | Project Samples | 40 | 37 | 38 | 38 | |
| 2.2.5 | Interested Parties Support & Construction Readiness | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 2.2.6 | Clarity of Proposal and Conformity with Requirements | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| TOTAL | 100 | 97 | 98 | 93 | 0% | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 97 | 98 | 93 | 96.00 |
Interview Detail Scores
| RFP Number:S-73000-00011524 Project Name: Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln) | ||||||||||
| INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS | ||||||||||
| Enter actual number of interview evaluators: | 1 | |||||||||
| Evaluation Team | ||||||||||
| Maximum | ||||||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | |||||
| David Evans and Associates | ||||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 14 | 13 | 10 | 12 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 12 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | Proposal Score | Final | ||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 50 | 42 | 42 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 42.3333333333 | 93.67 | 136 | |
| Parametrix | ||||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 14 | 12 | 14 | 13 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 12 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 13 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Proposal Score | Final | ||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 50 | 45 | 49 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 46.6666666667 | 91.00 | 137.6666666667 | |
| Firm Name | ||||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Firm Name | ||||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Firm Name | ||||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Firm Name | ||||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | |||||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
References Detail Scores
| RFP Number:S-73000-00011524 Project Name: Corvallis to Albany Shared Use Path (NE Merloy Ave to NW Rainwater Ln) | |||||||
| References Evaluation Detail Scores | |||||||
| Enter actual number of references scored: | 1 | ||||||
| Reference Scores | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | reference 1 | reference 2 | reference 3 | reference 4 | reference 5 | ||
| 1 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | Firm Name | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Criterion/Question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
&"Arial,Bold"&12REFERENCES SCORE DETAIL RFP xxx (PCMS xxx) &"Arial,Bold Italic"[insert project name]
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .