Criminal Investigation Command
Agency facts
- Acronym
-
- CID
- Organization
-
-
Parent
- CID
-
Parent
- Contract obligations
- $68,626,362 In FY2025
Agency codes and contract spending come from SAM.gov/FPDS.
Contract obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Obligated |
|---|---|
| FY2027 To date | $0 |
| FY2026 | $20,439,420 |
| FY2025 | $68,626,362 |
| FY2024 | $90,349,381 |
| FY2023 | $73,770,499 |
Top contractors by obligations
| Rank | Contractor | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ideal Innovations Incorporated | $5,816,532 | |
| 2 | Carahsoft Technology Corp | $5,636,753 | |
| 3 | DH Technologies, Inc. | $1,739,691 | |
| 4 | Life Technologies Corporation | $1,651,840 | |
| 5 | Kinly US Corporation | $701,312 | |
| 6 | Thundercat Technology, LLC | $599,886 | |
| 7 | Advanced Technology Leaders, Inc. | $545,876 | |
| 8 | Qiagen, LLC | $485,395 | |
| 9 | Jeol Usa, Inc. | $433,909 | |
| 10 | Agil3 Technology Solutions LLC | $405,396 |
Top contract vehicles by obligations
| Rank | Vehicle | Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Information Technology Enterprise Solutions-Software 2 (ITES2) | $8,677,642 | |
| 2 | Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) | $6,476,913 | |
| 3 | Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) | $234,371 |
3 of 5 vehicles listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Contracting staff
| Rank | Person | SAM.gov records, last 2 years |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'cie Hendricks | 20 |
| 2 | Ashley Scott | 18 |
| 3 | Charles T. Smith | 7 |
| 4 | Sir Ovynten Rivera | 5 |
| 5 | Madelyn Rozycke | 3 |
| 6 | Kaitlyn Lancaster | 3 |
| 7 | Cedric Ellis | 2 |
| 8 | Keosha Moss | 1 |
| 9 | Evangelina Severtson | 1 |
| 10 | Amy M. Phillips | 1 |
| 11 | Shecoriya Byrd | 1 |
| 12 | Kim Robinson-Leach | 1 |
| 13 | Kealon Wallace | 1 |
| 14 | Gwendolyn Bridges | 1 |
| 15 | Alexandra C. Bryant | 1 |
| 16 | Saba Samuels | 1 |
| 17 | Caroline R Dallas | 1 |
| 18 | William Campbell | 1 |
| 19 | Bradley Borek | 1 |
| 20 | Michelle Reaves | 1 |
About this agency
The Department of the Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID), a subordinate investigative and law-enforcement organization within the Army, procures forensic, laboratory, IT, and investigative-support services and equipment to support criminal investigations across the global Army enterprise. CID awards contracts predominantly on an unrestricted basis, with a smaller share directed to small-business set-asides. The command has issued 3,568 federal contract awards since 2001, generating a combined potential value of $1.17 billion with $1.17 billion obligated. Recent activity shows 115 awards in 2022, 120 in 2023, 115 in 2024, 90 in 2025, and 30 year-to-date in 2026, with the most recently recorded award date on 2026-07-27. Across the portfolio history, CID has transacted with 921 distinct prime contractors.
Over the last five years, the competitive landscape is highly fragmented by both award count and dollar concentration. Life Technologies Corporation leads by award count with 84 awards and $10.7 million combined potential value, followed by Qiagen, LLC at 34 awards ($2.5 million), and Carahsoft Technology Corp at 14 awards ($22.3 million). By potential value, Carahsoft ranks first at $22.3 million, but the top five primes combined represent only 4 percent of recent potential value — a sign that CID transacts across a dispersed vendor base with no single dominant prime. The top-five primes by award count hold 32 percent of recent awards; the remainder are scattered among a long tail of low-award vendors.
The set-aside mix skews heavily toward unrestricted competition: 84 percent of awards carry no set-aside designation. Small-business set-asides account for 14 percent of awards, while 8(a) sole-source awards represent 1 percent. Woman-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone, and other specialized designations together comprise fewer than 1 percent of awards.
No recent federal contract opportunities are recorded against CID in the source digest. Firms pursuing CID work should monitor the Army's contracting offices and schedule vehicles (such as NASA SEWP or GSA Schedules where CID may place task orders) for investigative support, forensic services, and laboratory equipment solicitations.
Quick answers
What is Criminal Investigation Command?
Criminal Investigation Command (CID) is part of Department of the Army, Department of Defense.
How much does Criminal Investigation Command spend on contracts?
Contracts funded by Criminal Investigation Command and its offices obligated $68,626,362 in fiscal year 2025 and $253,185,662 in fiscal years 2023 through 2027.
Who are Criminal Investigation Command's largest contractors?
The contractors Criminal Investigation Command and its offices obligated the most to in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Ideal Innovations Incorporated ($5,816,532), Carahsoft Technology Corp ($5,636,753) and DH Technologies, Inc. ($1,739,691).
Which contract vehicles does Criminal Investigation Command use most?
The contract vehicles Criminal Investigation Command and its offices obligated the most through in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 are Information Technology Enterprise Solutions-Software 2 (ITES2) ($8,677,642), Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) ($6,476,913) and Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) ($234,371). Orders through any contract vehicle obligated $15,386,079 in those years, 75% of its contract obligations.
On GovTribe
See the full record
- Federal contract awards it funded
- IDV awards it funded
- Funding analysis by contractor, NAICS and set-aside
- Contacts at this agency
- Ask GovTribe AI about this agency