Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants
Active
- Assistance listing
- 66.460
- Grant awards
- 2,154 $3,611,665,932 in federal obligations
Program facts
- Also known as
- 319 Program
- Assistance types
-
- Formula Grant
- Project Grant
- Cooperative Agreement
- Treasury account
-
- 68-0103-0-1-304
- More information
Program details come from SAM.gov Assistance Listings. Updated . Grant award figures come from USAspending.gov.
About this program
The Environmental Protection Agency is funding implementation of EPA-approved nonpoint source management programs under Clean Water Act Section 319 through formula grants to States, tribes, and intertribal consortia, with the most recent award to Idaho on January 1, 2026, under Assistance Listing 66.460.
The program has sustained activity across three decades, with 2,154 total awards since 1993 and an average of 47–54 awards per year over the past five years. The portfolio totals $3.61 billion in federal dollars obligated and $5.5 billion combined with non-federal cost-share. Grant awards support implementation of best management practices—including riparian restoration, stream stabilization, agricultural BMPs, erosion control, and green infrastructure—alongside watershed planning, monitoring, education, and outreach to reduce sediment, nutrient, bacterial, and thermal loading from diffuse pollution sources. Awards fund state and tribal programs to pass funding to subawardees for on-the-ground restoration and protection work.
Awards are predominantly Formula Grants, which represent 85 percent (1,823 awards), with smaller shares of Project Grants (14 percent) and Cooperative Agreements (2 percent). The Environmental Protection Agency accounts for the vast majority of funding, with its headquarters office obligating $2.64 billion across 1,703 awards. EPA regional offices—particularly Region 4 ($188.6 million), Region 5 ($174.5 million), Region 6 ($152.7 million), and Region 3 ($111 million)—distribute the remainder. Recent awards to California ($14.364 million), Florida ($10.551 million), Kansas ($9.425 million), Illinois ($12.230 million), and Ohio ($8.231 million) demonstrate multi-million-dollar federal investments typical of larger state programs.
Recent awards span state and tribal recipients. California received $14.364 million to implement coastal nonpoint source pollution control and watershed-based plans. Pennsylvania received $8.704 million for abandoned mine drainage remediation and agricultural BMPs. North Dakota received $6.490 million for nutrient reduction and farmer education in ten targeted watersheds. Tribal recipients—including Pueblo of Santa Clara, Ft. McDowell, Pawnee Nation, Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma, and Chemehuevi Indian Tribe—received smaller formula or base-grant awards ($50,000 to $268,169) for BMP implementation, water quality monitoring, and education.
A competitive grant opportunity for Indian Tribes and Intertribal Consortia (EPA-OW-OWOW-26-01) was posted August 17, 2026, with applications due November 9, 2026. It solicits on-the-ground BMP implementation projects and watershed planning under Clean Water Act Section 319, supporting federally recognized tribes and intertribal consortia with approved NPS management programs. Eligible applicants may use up to 25 percent of federal funds for nine-element watershed-based plan development; all projects must include on-the-ground BMP implementation.
Objective and description
- Objective
To assist States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands (hereinafter referred to as States), and qualified Indian Tribes and intertribal consortia in implementing EPA-approved Section 319 nonpo
- Description
To assist States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands (hereinafter referred to as States), and qualified Indian Tribes and intertribal consortia in implementing EPA-approved Section 319 nonpoint source management programs.
Eligibility
- Applicant eligibility
Eligible entities include States and qualified Indian Tribes and intertribal consortia who have approved nonpoint source assessment reports and management plans. To be qualified, Tribes must have treatment in a manner similar to a state (TAS) status for the 319 Program. Grants to States are awarded by formula. The State allotment is awarded to the agency in each State designated by the chief executive as the lead nonpoint source agency. The lead nonpoint source agency may distribute grant funds to other organizations in accordance with its work program, which is approved by EPA. Eligible Tribes are allocated a base allotment by formula; the remaining Tribal portion of the 319(h) appropriation is competed among qualified Indian Tribes and intertribal consortia. For certain competitive funding opportunities under this assistance listing, the Agency may limit eligibility to compete to a number or subset of eligible applicants consistent with the Agency's Assistance Agreement Competition Policy.
- Beneficiary eligibility
State and local governments; interstate and intrastate agencies; federally recognized Indian tribal governments; intertribal consortia; the following US territory or possessions: the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Marianas, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands; public and private nonprofit organizations and institutions. The lead nonpoint source agency may distribute grant funds to other organizations in accordance with a work program which is approved by EPA.
- Uses of assistance
Funds are provided to eligible applicants to carry out nonpoint source projects and programs pursuant to Section 319 of the Clean Water Act as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987. Requirements under Section 319(h) include: nonfederal matching funds of at least 40 percent of project cost (match is an overall grant requirement - the match requirement for an individual project may be waived and in-kind services may be used as match); maintenance of effort; grants may be used for financial assistance to individual persons in the case of demonstration projects only; annual reporting; and EPA determinations of adequate recipient progress before additional funding. Assistance agreement awards under this program may involve or relate to geospatial information. Further information regarding geospatial information may be obtained by viewing the following website: Geospatial Resources at EPA. This program makes Federal awards on a discretionary basis. A discretionary award means an award in which the Federal awarding agency, in keeping with specific statutory authority that enables the agency to exercise judgement ("discretion"), selects the recipient and/or the amount of Federal funding awarded through a competitive process or based on merit of proposals. A discretionary award may be selected on a non-competitive basis, as appropriate. For further information, please contact the Headquarters or regional office.
- Length and time phasing of assistance
As determined in accordance with Section 319 (h).
How to apply
- Preapplication coordination
This assistance listing is subject to intergovernmental review when proposed Federal financial assistance involves land use planning or implementation of nonpoint source management projects requiring construction. EPA financial assistance programs and activities subject to intergovernmental review that are subject to review under State single point of contact procedures are identified at https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-financial-assistance-programs-subject-executive-order-12372-and-section-204. Applicants for programs or activities subject to Intergovernmental Review that are not subject to State single point of contact review must provide directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local entities at least 60 days to review their application following notification by EPA that the application has been selected for funding as provided by 40 CFR 29.8(a) and (c). Preapplication coordination with the appropriate EPA Regional Office is recommended. Regarding pre-application assistance with respect to competitive funding opportunities under this program description, EPA will generally specify the nature of the pre-application assistance, if any, that will be available to applicants in the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO). For additional information, contact the individual(s) listed in the NOFO.
- Application procedure
Issuing office will provide location of application procedure details as appropriate.
- Criteria for selecting proposals
Funds are awarded to States in accordance with Clean Water Act Section 319 (h). Non-competitive applications are assessed consistent with the merit review regulations in 2 CFR 200.205. For selection processes within individual States, contact the appropriate State nonpoint source coordinators. The evaluation and selection criteria for competitive awards under this assistance listing will be described in the NOFO.
- Award procedure
Grant applications must be submitted by the State to the appropriate EPA Regional Office to determine the overall adequacy of the application to meet the statutory objectives. Funds are awarded to States by formula. Award procedure by States to subgrantees varies by State. The list of State nonpoint source contacts is available at https://www.epa.gov/nps/contacts-nonpoint-source-nps-pollution-programs. Eligible Tribes receive funding for a base grant work plan; Tribes may also compete for the rest of the tribal portion of the total 319(h) appropriation. For competitive awards, EPA will review and evaluate applications submissions in accordance with the terms, conditions, and criteria stated in the NOFO. Competitions will be conducted in accordance with EPA policies/regulations for competing assistance agreements. For non-competitive awards made under this assistance listing, EPA will conduct an administrative evaluation to determine the adequacy of the application in relation to grant regulations and to technical and program evaluation to determine the merit and relevance of the project. The Agency will then advise the applicant if funding is being considered. A final work plan will then be negotiated with the applicant.
- Deadlines
Contact the headquarters or regional location, as appropriate for application deadlines.
- Time to approval or disapproval
EPA generally awards grants to States within 60 days after the application is submitted.
- Appeals
Assistance agreement competition-related disputes will be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution procedures published in 70 FR (Federal Register) 3629, 3630 (January 26, 2005). Copies of these procedures may also be found at: https://www.epa.gov/grants/grant-competition-dispute-resolution-procedures. Disputes relating to matters other than the competitive selection of recipients will be resolved under 2 CFR 1500 Subpart E, as applicable.
Grant opportunities
Show all 13
Grant awards
Latest 10 of 2,154 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Top recipients by federal obligations
| Rank | Recipient | Federal obligations | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Of California Water Resources Control Board | $170,911,023 | 5% |
| 2 | Florida Department Of Environmental Protection | $124,384,503 | 3% |
| 3 | Illinois Environmental Protection Agency | $98,835,441 | 3% |
| 4 | The State Of Ohio Office Of Budget And Management | $97,124,045 | 3% |
| 5 | Pennsylvania Department Of Environmental Protection | $94,724,760 | 3% |
| 6 | North Carolina Department Of Environmental Quality | $74,302,973 | 2% |
| 7 | Environmental Management, Indiana Department OF. | $73,327,809 | 2% |
| 8 | Iowa Department Of Natural Resources | $72,548,100 | 2% |
| 9 | Department Of Natural Resources | $71,248,176 | 2% |
| 10 | Michigan Department Of Environment, Great Lakes, And Energy | $62,154,849 | 2% |
10 of 183 recipients listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Federal obligations by fiscal year
| Fiscal year | Federal obligations |
|---|---|
| FY2026 | $32,619,124 |
| FY2025 | $102,315,683 |
| FY2024 | $117,734,498 |
| FY2023 | $122,695,327 |
| FY2022 | $122,857,536 |
| FY2021 | $132,279,583 |
| FY2020 | $118,731,595 |
| FY2019 | $116,418,063 |
| FY2018 | $119,135,733 |
| FY2017 | $121,365,408 |
| FY2016 | $117,543,245 |
| FY2015 | $120,130,463 |
| FY2014 | $110,431,240 |
| FY2013 | $113,299,875 |
| FY2012 | $125,629,483 |
| FY2011 | $151,610,294 |
| FY2010 | $149,511,223 |
| FY2009 | $169,700,811 |
| FY2008 | $161,332,142 |
| FY2007 | $174,942,164 |
| FY2006 | $169,345,047 |
| FY2005 | $185,382,538 |
| FY2004 | $190,728,306 |
| FY2003 | $177,187,952 |
| FY2002 | $199,308,606 |
| FY2001 | $190,951,834 |
Show all 26
Quick answers
What is Assistance Listing 66.460?
Assistance Listing 66.460 is Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants, a federal grant program run by Environmental Protection Agency.
What is the CFDA number for Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants?
Its CFDA number is 66.460: Assistance Listing numbers were called CFDA numbers before 2018.
How much funding has Assistance Listing 66.460 awarded?
2,154 grant awards under 66.460 have obligated $3,611,665,932 in federal funds to 183 recipients.
Who receives the most funding from 66.460?
The recipients obligated the most under Nonpoint Source Implementation Grants are State Of California Water Resources Control Board ($170,911,023), Florida Department Of Environmental Protection ($124,384,503) and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ($98,835,441).
How much did 66.460 obligate in fiscal year 2025?
Grants under 66.460 obligated $102,315,683 in federal funds in fiscal year 2025.
Are there open grant opportunities under 66.460?
1 listed opportunity under 66.460 is open or forecasted. The latest, Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Funding Opportunity for Indian Tribes and Intertribal Consortia for Nonpoint Source Management Grants Under Clean Water Act Section 319, was posted on August 17, 2026.
On GovTribe
See this program's full record
- Every grant award and opportunity under it
- Funding by recipient, agency and assistance type
- Alerts for new opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this program