RFI - Feasibility Study if DLD, DMV and Motor Vehicle Enforcement Merged

The State of Utah, specifically the Division of Purchasing, is issuing a Request for Information (RFI) regarding the feasibility study for a potential merger of three state agencies: the Division of Licensing and Driving (DLD), the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), and the Motor Vehicle Enforcement Division. This RFI is contingent upon the passage of Senate Bill SB0237 and is designed to solicit vendor input, comments, and suggestions regarding the cost and scope of conducting a comprehensive feasibility study examining the consolidation of these three entities. The primary objectives include obtaining vendor perspectives on the study's feasibility, determining whether to proceed with a formal invitation for bids or request for proposals, and generating interest among potential vendors. The RFI deadline is February 17, 2026, with the posting date of February 6, 2026, providing respondents with an 11-day window to submit input. Vendors must submit responses during the designated timeframe and may submit questions during a specified question-and-answer period, though the RFI explicitly prohibits direct contact with the State. This is not a procurement process and cannot be used to award contracts or enter into binding agreements; rather, it serves an informational function to assess market interest and capability.

The RFI does not specify set-aside designations, disadvantaged enterprise restrictions, or limitations on respondent eligibility based on organizational type, meaning responses are likely open to all qualified vendors. No incumbent vendors or current contractors are identified in the available documentation. Respondents may submit trade secrets and commercial financial information with confidentiality protection claims under Utah Code provisions 63G-2-305 and 63G-2-309 by completing the provided Claim of Business Confidentiality form and submitting both redacted and non-redacted versions of their proposals; however, submission of a confidentiality claim does not guarantee protected status if the State receives subsequent public records requests under GRAMA. No specific budget range or award value is disclosed in this RFI, as the primary purpose is to gather information that will inform subsequent procurement decisions. All communications must occur through RFI responses or designated question-and-answer periods, with vendors instructed to refrain from contacting the State directly outside these channels.