Space Systems Command (SSC) Resilient Missile Warning/Missile Tracking (MW/MT) Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) Epoch 2 OTA RFI

Closed Pre-Solicitation Posted

Solicitation number
FA8810-RFI-24-0002
Agency
Responses due
Set-aside
No set-aside

Opportunity facts

Place of performance
El Segundo, California 90245, United States

Notice details come from SAM.gov. Updated .

About this opportunity

The Department of the Air Force Space Command is conducting market research through a Request for Information (RFI) for the Space Systems Command (SSC) Resilient Missile Warning/Missile Tracking (MW/MT) Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) Epoch 2 program. The RFI seeks feedback from industry on the requirements to legally participate in an Other Transaction Authority (OTA) for this prototype project. Respondents are asked to provide information on their status as a Nontraditional Defense Contractor or Small Business, and how they intend to fulfill the requirements set forth in 10 U.S.C. 4022(d) regarding participation of Nontraditional Defense Contractors or small businesses. Responses should be submitted within 14 days of the posting date to the designated points of contact.

This opportunity is not set-aside for any specific business size or type. The NAICS code and PSC are not provided. The RFI does not mention any incumbent contractors or award value details. However, it notes that the current Epoch 2 Space acquisition strategy utilizes an OTA for prototype development.

Notice text

Related RFI: FA8810-RFI-24-0001

____________________________

ALCON,

BLUF: Please provide answers to below questions for Market Research purposes WRT Contractor OTA requirements. NOTE: This is for E2 Space only, NOT MEG-OI.

Requested response time: 14 days from posting. 

Please provide all responses to the POCs below with an email subject line "YOURFIRM Response to FA8810-RFI-24-0002":

Primary: Ms. Alina Grecu - alina.grecu@spaceforce.mil
Alternate: Capt Alexander Siangpipop - alexander.siangpipop.1@spaceforce.mil

The current Epoch 2 Space acqusition strategy utilizes an Other Transaction Authority (OTA). Given the usage of an OTA for prototype, there are mandatory requirements for any perspective firm to legally participate in an OTA. The Space Sensing Contracting Division would like industry feedback on this and a few of things noted below. Please provide your firm's response on a PDF file no more than two (2) pages front and back, Times New Roman 12pt, single space.

  1. Please identify if your firm intends to compete as a Prime or a Sub.
    a. If sub, please indicate the specific areas in which your firm intends to support
     
  2. Is your firm currently a Nontraditional Defense Contractor or Small Business?
    The definition of a Nontraditional Defense Contractor can be found at 10 U.S.C. §3014.
     
  3. Between options A-C, how does your firm intend to fulfill the requirements set forth in 10 U.S.C. §4022(d)?

     "(d) Appropriate Use of Authority.-(1) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that no official of an agency enters into a transaction (other than a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement) for a prototype project under the authority of this section unless one of the following conditions is met:

    (A) There is at least one nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent in the prototype project.

    (B) All significant participants in the transaction other than the Federal Government are small businesses (including small businesses participating in a program described under section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638)) or nontraditional defense contractors.

    (C) At least one third of the total cost of the prototype project is to be paid out of funds provided by sources other than the Federal Government."
     
  4. If A or B is selected with regards to the paragraph above. Please briefly provide your firms approach to meeting the criterion selected, and/or notable steps already taken to meet the criterion.
     
  5. Does your firm have any concerns of meeting these requirements set-forth in 10 U.S.C. §4022(d)?
    a. If so, what steps would your firm recommend to the Government to assist in easing those concerns?

Thank you for your time and support on this matter.

Very Respectfully,

ALEXANDER R. SIANGPIPOP, Capt, USAF
Branch Chief, Missile Track Custody Contracts
Contracts Division, Space Sensing (SNK)
Space Systems Command (SSC)

10 U.S.C. §4022(d): https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:10%20section:4022%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section4022)&f=treesort&edition=prelim&num=0&jumpTo=true

10 U.S.C. §3014 - 10 USC 3014: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:10%20section:3014%20edition:prelim)%20OR%20(granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3014)&f=treesort&num=0&edition=prelim

Similar open opportunities

Opportunity Agency Set-aside Responses due
SYSTEM DELTA 84 (SYD 84/MT) MEDIUM EARTH ORBIT MISSILE WARNING / MISSILE TRACKING EPOCH 3 and EPOCH 4, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) El Segundo, California 90245, United States · NAICS 541715 Air Force No set-aside
RFI Space Systems and Supporting Infrastructure Dahlgren, Virginia 22448, United States · NAICS 927 Air Combat Command No set-aside
Counter-Targeting Request for Information United States Space and Missile Systems Center No set-aside
Request for Information - Space Warfighting Architecture Navigator Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, United States · NAICS 541611 Air Force No set-aside
Request for Proposal (RFP) - Resilient Missile Warning Tracking (RMWT) Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Ground Entry Points (GEPs) Washington, District of Columbia 20330, United States · NAICS 541715 Air Force No set-aside

On GovTribe

Work this opportunity

  • Track it in your pipeline
  • Find teaming partners
  • Similar opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity

GovTribe for Federal Contractors