ESB FHA Master List

Military Sealift Command Combined Synopsis and Solicitation Notice Information

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotations are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

Solicitation number is N3220526Q7239 and is being issued as a Request for Quotes (RFQ).

The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through:

Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) Number 2026-01, effective 03/13/2026, is located at

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

DFARS Publication Notice, effective 07/31/2026, is located at https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars

4.  The associated NAICS code is 541330 – Engineering Services with a size standard of $25.5 Million. The associated PSC/FSC code is H920 for this procurement:

IS BEING SET-ASIDE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES.

5.  The table below lists the Contract Line Item Number(s) (CLIN(s)) and items, quantities and units of measure, inclusive of any applicable options:

SERVICES

See attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) for additional information

CLIN

DESCRIPTION

QUANTITY

UNIT OF

MEASURE

0001

FHA Master List Labor and Deliverables (Firm-Fixed-Price)

1

JOB

0002

Travel and Per Diem (Firm-Fixed-Price)

1

JOB

The Government intends on awarding a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Purchase Order for the aforementioned services. The procurement is 100% set-aside for small business concerns. It is expected that award will be made by no later than 11 September 2026.

The required Period of Performance is 11 September 2026 to 04 January2027 and performance location will be the contractor’s facility.

The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Services (Class Deviation RFO-2025-12) applies to this acquisition and is incorporated by reference. The provision is amended as follows:

52.212-1 (ADDENDUM) ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERICAL ITEMS

Any inconsistency between FAR Provision 52.212-1 and the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 shall be solved by giving precedence to the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1.

1. Quote Format and Page Limits

Format: The Technical Capability Statement shall be submitted in Adobe PDF or Microsoft Word format, using 11-point or 12-point Calibri or Times New Roman font.

Page Limit: The Technical Capability Statement is limited to five (5) pages. Company Data, Key Personnel Resumes, and copies of CPARS/past performance reports do not count against this 5-page limit.

Quote: Pricing quote must be submitted separately and must not be included anywhere within the Technical Capability Statement.

2. Due Date for Quotations

All quotations must be submitted no later than 08/31/2026 at 4:00 pm. EST. Late quotations will not be considered for award.

3. Due Date for Questions

Questions regarding this RFQ must be submitted in writing no later than 08/25/26 at 2:00 pm EST.  Questions received after this date may not be answered.

4. How to Submit Quotations

Quotations must be submitted electronically via email to the Government Points of Contact (POC) listed below. The email subject line must read: "RFQ N3220526Q7239 - ESB Class FHA Master List - [Quoter Company Name]".

5. Government Points of Contact (POC)

Quotes and questions shall be submitted directly to:

Contracting Officer (KO): Brandy Hernandez — Email: brandy.j.hernandez6.civ@us.navy.mil

Contract Specialist: Deborah Brett — Email: deborah.d.brett.civ@us.navy.mil

6. Technical Capability Statement Requirements

All interested Quoters are required to submit a Technical Capability Statement that addresses the following elements:

Element

Description

Core Competencies

Quoters shall provide a concise list of services and technical skills that they possess that allow them to perform the tasks set forth in PWS Section 4.0 (Specific Tasks). This must specifically include:
 

1. A description of their capability to plan and execute detailed shipboard engineering surveys at different ports (Newport News, VA and Mobile, AL).
 

2. Their ability to analyze, verify, and catalog mechanical differences across distinct ship flights (such as ESB 3-4 equipped with 48/60A engines vs. ESB 5-7 equipped with 48/60CR engines) to produce two (2) separate accurate Master Lists.
 

3. Submission of resumes for the three (3) mandatory Key Personnel roles demonstrating compliance with the minimum USCG Merchant Marine Credentials (MMC), engineering degrees, and maritime experience detailed in PWS Section 12.0.

Prior Experience

Quoters shall provide specific examples of at least two (2) previous contracts (similar in scope and complexity) that align with the engineering, inspection, or database management tasks set forth in the PWS. For each contract, include a brief narrative of the work performed, the ship class or equipment serviced, and the customer agency or company.

Past Performance

Quoters shall provide copies of Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs), or any other verifiable past performance documentation (e.g., performance evaluation letters) associated with the contracts submitted under the "Prior Experience" section above.

Company Data

Quoters shall provide the following administrative details:
• CAGE Code:
• Socio-Economic Status: [e.g., WOSB, SDVOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, Small Business]
• Primary POC’s: Name, Phone Number, and Email Address.

6A. Period of Performance Statement

The Quoter shall provide a formal, explicit statement within their Technical Capability Statement confirming that they can fully meet the overall Period of Performance window of 120 days from contract award as requested in the PWS.

6B. Terms and Conditions Statement

The Quoter shall provide an explicit statement confirming that they agree to and can meet all terms, conditions, and provisions set forth in this Request for Quote (RFQ).

7. Exhibit B — Pricing Sheet

The Quoter shall provide a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) breakdown in their price quote similarly formatted as follows:

CLIN 0001 — FHA Master List Labor and Deliverables (Firm-Fixed-Price):

Description: Complete engineering labor, project management, and quality assurance reviews required to conduct the ship checks, execute all specific tasks in PWS Section 4.0, and deliver all final contract deliverables (CDRLs 0001 through 0006) as outlined in the PWS.
 

Proposed Price: $__________________

CLIN 0002 — Travel and Per Diem (Firm-Fixed-Price):

Description: A single, comprehensive firm-fixed-price covering all travel, transportation, lodging, and per diem costs required to execute the mandatory shipboard surveys onboard ESB 4 (Newport News, VA) and ESB 7 (Mobile, AL).
 

Proposed Price: $__________________

TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE (Sum of CLIN 0001 & CLIN 0002):

$__________________

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 — EVALUATION — COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

Any inconsistency between FAR Provision 52.212-2 and the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 shall be solved by giving precedence to the Addendum to FAR 52.212-2.

(a) Basis for Award

The Government intends to award a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Purchase Order contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Quoter whose quote conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations utilizing a comparative analysis approach:
 

Technical Capability (Technical Capability Statement)

Price

(b) Evaluation Methodology (Comparative Analysis)

The Government will evaluate quotations with broad discretion in accordance with RFO 12.203(c)(1) and RFO 12.203(c)(2) by comparing one quotation to another to determine which Quoter provides the best value to the Government. No Ratings Will Be Assigned.

Comparative Tradeoff: Because past performance and proven technical capability are critical to the success of this specialized marine engineering effort, the Government may select a Quoter with a superior Technical Capability Statement (demonstrating superior core competencies, key personnel qualifications, prior experience, or exceptionally strong past performance history) over a lower-priced Quoter, provided the price premium is determined to be fair and reasonable.

(c) Evaluation Criteria

1. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (Technical Capability Statement)

The Government will comparatively evaluate the Quoter's Technical Capability Statement across the four elements outlined in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1:
 

Core Competencies: The depth and suitability of the firm's technical skills, their survey approach, and their ability to address ESB flight engine differences. This includes verifying that proposed Key Personnel resumes strictly comply with the engineering degrees, Coast Guard credentials (MMC), and maritime repair experience mandated in Section 12 of the PWS.
 

Prior Experience: The relevance, scope, and complexity of the submitted project examples to the FHA Master List requirements.
 

Past Performance: The quality of the Quoter's historical performance on similar efforts, specifically focusing on customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, and quality control as documented in CPARS or provided past performance documentation.
 

Company Data / Compliance Statements: Completeness of administrative information and affirmative statements regarding the 120-day Period of Performance and RFQ terms and conditions.

2. PRICE

The Government will evaluate proposed pricing for completeness, mathematical accuracy, and price reasonableness.
 

Total Evaluated Price: The Total Evaluated Price used in the comparative tradeoff will be calculated as the sum of the Firm-Fixed-Price proposed for CLIN 0001 (Labor and Deliverables) and the Firm-Fixed-Price proposed for CLIN 0002 (Travel).

Price Reasonableness: The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to ensure a fair and reasonable price, including, but not limited to, the methods in RFO 15.404-1 (such as comparing proposed prices received in response to the RFQ, comparing proposed prices to historical pricing for similar services, or comparison to the Independent Government Cost Estimate).