REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES

HSD-RFP-26-0074

YOUTH CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAM

CITY OF PHOENIX

HUMAN SERVICES

200 W. WASHINGTON ST. 18TH FLOOR

PHOENIX, AZ

85003

RELEASE DATE: August 25, 2025

DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: September 12, 2025

RESPONSE DEADLINE: October 17, 2025, 3:00 pm

City of Phoenix

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

HSD-RFP-26-0074

Youth Crime Prevention Program

1. INTRODUCTION

2. INSTRUCTIONS

3. SCOPE OF WORK

4. EVALUATION PROCESS

5. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS

6. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

7. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION

8. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

9. SUBMITTALS

10. PRICING PROPOSAL

Attachments:

A - EXHIBIT A - Youth Crime Prevention Scope of Work FINAL

B - EXHIBIT B - (ISB) Itemized Service Budget - TEMPLATE

C - EXHIBIT B 1 - ISB Sample (1)

D - EXHIBIT C - Logic Model Sample

E - EXHIBIT C - Logic Model - TEMPLATE

F - EXHIBIT D

G - Acceptance of Offer Form 2025

Request For Proposal - Professional Services #HSD-RFP-26-0074 Title: Youth Crime Prevention Program

1. INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. Introduction

1.1.1. Contact Information

Nancy Harrison

Human Services

Email: nancy.harrison@phoenix.gov

Phone: (602) 262-4037

1.1.2. Schedule of Events

The City reserves the right to change dates, times, and locations, as necessary. The City does not always hold a Pre-Offer Conference or Site Visit. All times in the Schedule of Events are

Local Phoenix, AZ Time.

To request a reasonable accommodation or alternative format for any public meeting, please contact the Procurement Officer (Nancy Harrison) at (602) 262-4037/Voice or 711/TTY, or nancy.harrison@phoenix.gov, no later than two (2) weeks prior to the meeting.

Solicitation Issue Date: August 25, 2025

Written Inquiries Due Date: September 12, 2025, 3:00pm

Question Response Deadline: September 19, 2025, 3:00pm

Offer Due Date: October 17, 2025, 3:00pm

1.2. Description – Statement of Need

The City of Phoenix invites sealed offers for the development and implementation of a youth crime prevention program to reduce juvenile crime in the following phoenix neighborhoods:

Maryvale, South Phoenix, Alhambra and Central City. for a three-year contract commencing on or about January 1, 2026, in accordance with the specifications and provisions contained herein or the “Effective Date” which is upon award by City Council, conditioned upon signature and recording by the City Clerk’s department, as required by the Phoenix City Code, whichever is later

This solicitation is available through Arizona Relay Service 7-1-1. Please call TTY 800-367-8939 for assistance.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement will terminate upon the earliest occurrence: by reaching the end of the term including any extensions exercised, or termination pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

1.3. Minimum Qualifications

Preferred Minimum Qualifications

The City seeks qualified and responsive Offerors who ideally meet the preferred minimum qualifications outlined below. While proposals that do not meet all preferred qualifications may still be considered, Offerors who possess these qualifications will be viewed more favorably in the evaluation process.

A. A minimum of 3-5 years experience delivering youth-focused or crime prevention programming, ideally with documented outcomes.

B. Experience in operating in a high-crime or under-served neighborhood, showing cultural competency and community trust.

C. Proven track record managing grant-funded projects using city, state or federal funds.

D. Experience in developing and tracking program outcomes and submitting performance reports.

E. Staff or leadership with degree(s) in social work, criminal justice, education, counseling, psychology or youth development.

F. Established partnerships with schools, faith-based organizations, law enforcement and/or family support services.

1.4. Agreement Term and Contractual Relationship

Offerors are responsible for reading the agreement and submitting any questions about it in accordance with the process listed in this agreement. By submitting a proposal, each Offeror agrees it will be bound by the agreement. The City anticipates a three- year contract term .

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement will terminate upon the earliest occurrence of any of the following:

• reaching the end of the term and any extensions;

• completing the services set forth in the Scope of Work (the “Services”);

• payment of the maximum authorized compensation; or

• termination pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement.

1.5. Scope of Work and Special Terms and Conditions

Contractor will provide consulting services that will be in accordance with the Scope of Work as set forth in Scope of Work section, which may be supplemented with additional detail from time to time during the term of the Agreement, and that are satisfactory to the City. In performing these services, Contractor will also specifically comply with the applicable Standard and Special

Terms and Conditions that are set forth herein. Contractor will provide progress reports to “the

City” per a mutually agreed-upon schedule.

1.6. Instructions

1.6.1. Preparation of Offer

All forms provided must be completed and submitted with the Offer. The signed and completed

Conflict of Interest and Transparency form must be included or your Offer may be deemed non-responsive.

It is permissible to copy Submittal forms if necessary. Erasures, interlineations, or other modifications of the Offer must be initialed in original ink by the authorized person signing the

Offer. No offer will be altered, amended or withdrawn after the specified offer due date and time.

The City is not responsible for Offeror’s errors or omissions.

All time periods stated as a number of days will be calendar days.

It is the responsibility of all Offerors to examine the entire solicitation and seek clarification of any requirement that may not be clear and to check all responses for accuracy before submitting an offer. Negligence in preparing an offer confers no right of withdrawal after due date and time. Offerors are strongly encouraged to:

A. Consider applicable laws and/or economic conditions that may affect cost, progress, performance, or furnishing of the products or services.

B. Study and carefully correlate Offeror’s knowledge and observations with the solicitation and other related data.

C. Promptly notify the City of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Offeror has discovered in or between the solicitation and other related documents.

D. The City does not reimburse the cost of developing, presenting or providing any response to this solicitation. Offers submitted for consideration should be prepared simply and economically, providing adequate information in a straightforward and concise manner. The Offeror is responsible for all costs incurred in responding to this solicitation. All materials and documents submitted in response to this solicitation become the property of the City and will not be returned.

E. Offerors are reminded that the specifications stated in the solicitation are the minimum level required and that offers submitted must be for products or services that meet or exceed the minimum level of all features specifically listed in this solicitation. Offers offering less than any minimum specifications or criteria specified are not responsive and should not be submitted.

F. Offer responses submitted for products considered by the seller to be acceptable alternates to the brand names or manufacturer’s catalog references specified herein must be submitted with technical literature and/or detailed product brochures for the

City’s use to evaluate the products offered. Offers submitted without this product information may be considered as non-responsive and rejected. The City will be the sole judge as to the acceptability of alternate products offered.

G. Prices will be submitted on a per unit basis by line item, when applicable. In the event of a disparity between the unit price and extended price, the unit price will prevail unless obviously in error.

1.6.2. Exceptions

Offerors must not take any exceptions to any terms, conditions or material requirements of this solicitation. Offers submitted with exceptions will be deemed non-responsive and disqualified from further consideration. Offerors must conform to all the requirements specified in the solicitation. The City encourages Offerors to ask the Procurement Officer questions rather than including exception in their Offer.

1.6.3. Inquiries

All questions that arise relating to this solicitation should be directed via City’s Procurement

Portal and must be received by the due date indicated in the Schedule of Events. The City will not consider questions received after the deadline.

No informal contact initiated by Offerors on the proposed service will be allowed with members of City’s staff from date of distribution of this solicitation until after city council awards the contract. All questions concerning or issues related to this solicitation must be presented in writing.

The Procurement Officer will answer written inquiries in an addendum and publish any addenda on the City’s Procurement Portal.

1.6.4. Addenda

The City of Phoenix will not be responsible for any oral instructions made by any employees or officers of the City of Phoenix regarding this solicitation. Any changes will be in the form of an addendum. The Offeror must acknowledge receipt of any/all addenda through the City's

Procurement Portal with their submittal.

1.6.5. Licenses

If required by law for the operation of the business or work related to this Offer, Offeror must possess all valid certifications and/or licenses as required by federal, state or local laws at the time of submittal.

1.6.6. Certifications

By signature in the Offer section of the Offer and Acceptance page(s), Offeror certifies:

• The submission of the Offer did not involve collusion or other anti-competitive practices.

• The Offeror must not discriminate against any employee, or applicant for employment in violation of Federal or State Law.

• The Offeror has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted Offer.

1.6.7. Submission of Offer

Offers must be in possession of the Department on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events. Late offers will not be considered. The prevailing clock will be the

City Department’s clock.

Offers should be submitted electronically via the City’s Procurement Portal by clicking on “Draft

Response” via https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/186146. Offerors that are unable to submit electronically should contact the Procurement Officer to discuss the logistics of hard copy submittals. Offerors must be registered with OpenGov by signing up via https://procurement.opengov.com/signup. Vendor training guides can be found at: https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/article/ca6d1285-1e48-4a21-bb0d-715edb7794ed

Any original documents (such as bonds, guaranties, powers of attorney), if required by the solicitation, must be separately delivered to and received by the City on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events, with a clear indication of the Offer for which it is attributed.

It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the Offer is timely and to confirm that there are no technical reasons that any offer submitted electronically may be delayed. The date and time on the upload as received/stamped by the City’s Procurement Portal will provide proof of submission and verification whether the Offer was received on or prior to the exact time and date indicated in the Schedule of Events.

For assistance with submittals, vendors are welcome to use the OpenGov support chat (blue chat bubble in the bottom right corner) to connect with a member of OpenGov's support team who will be able to assist you with your submission.

Please DO NOT submit links to Google Docs, Dropbox Paper, or similar services. Your offer may be deemed non-responsive if your offer is supplied utilizing these services.

1.6.8. Withdrawal of Offer

At any time prior to the solicitation due date and time, an Offeror (or designated representative) may withdraw the Offer by clicking “Unsubmit Response” on the Offer submission via the City’s

Procurement Portal.

1.6.9. Offer Results

Offers will be opened on the offer due date, time and location indicated in the Schedule of

Events, at which time the name of each Offeror, and the prices may be read. Offers and other information received in response to the solicitation will be shown only to authorized City personnel having a legitimate interest in them or persons assisting the City in the evaluation.

Offers are not available for public inspection until after the City has posted the award recommendation on the City's Procurement Portal.

The City will post a preliminary offer tabulation on the City's Procurement

Portal: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/186146 within five business days of the offer opening. The City will post the information on the preliminary tabulation as it was read during the offer opening. The City makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of any information on the preliminary tabulation. Once the City has evaluated the offers, the City will post an award recommendation on the City's Procurement Portal. By signing and submitting its

Offer, each Offeror agrees that this posting of the award recommendation to the City's

Procurement Portal effectively serves as the Offeror’s receipt of that notice of award recommendation. The City has no obligation to provide any further notification to unsuccessful

Offerors.

https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/186146 https://procurement.opengov.com/signup https://opengov.my.site.com/support/s/article/ca6d1285-1e48-4a21-bb0d-715edb7794ed https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/186146

1.6.10. Pre-Award Qualifications

Offeror must have been in operation a minimum of 3 years. The Offeror’s normal business activity during the past 3 years will have been for providing the goods or services in this solicitation.

1.6.11. Award of Contract

Unless otherwise indicated, award(s) will be made to the most responsive, responsible

Offeror(s) who are regularly established in the service, or providing the goods, contained in this solicitation and who have demonstrated the ability to perform in an acceptable manner.

A. Factors that may be considered by the City include:

1. Staffing & InfrastructureThe provider demonstrates sufficient organizational capacity with dedicated, qualified staff and established infrastructure to deliver youth crime prevention programming effectively, including sound administrative and financial management systems.2. Education & TrainingKey personnel possess relevant education and training in youth development, social services, criminal justice, or related fields, ensuring expertise in engaging and supporting at-risk youth populations.3. Certifications & LicensesThe provider holds appropriate certifications and licenses for delivering youth and family services, including any professional credentials necessary for specialized interventions such as mental health support or restorative practices.4. Evidence-Based or Evidence-Informed PracticesThe program design incorporates evidence-based or evidence-informed models proven to reduce youth crime and delinquency, demonstrating a commitment to implementing practices supported by research and measurable outcomes.5. Data & Evaluation

SkillsThe provider has demonstrated capacity to collect, analyze, and report program data, using evaluation tools to track progress, measure outcomes, and make data-driven improvements throughout the program.6. Partnerships & CollaborationThe provider shows strong collaborative relationships with schools, law enforcement, community organizations, and families, leveraging partnerships to maximize impact and ensure a community-centered approach.7. Cultural CompetenceThe provider demonstrates the ability to serve diverse populations through culturally responsive programming, including bilingual or bicultural staff and strategies that reflect the cultural needs of the target communities. B.Notwithstanding any other provision of this solicitation, the City reserves the right to: (1) waive any immaterial defect or informality; or (2) reject any or all offers or portions thereof; or (3) reissue a solicitation.C.A response to a solicitation is an offer to contract with the City based upon the terms, conditions, and specifications contained in the City’s solicitation.

Offers do not become contracts until they are executed by the Chief Procurement

Officer or Department Director. A contract has its inception in the award, eliminating a formal signing of a separate contract. For that reason, all of the terms, conditions and specifications of the procurement contract are contained in the solicitation, and in any addendum or contract amendment

1.6.12. City's Right to Disqualify for Conflict of Interest

The City reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror on the basis of any real or apparent conflict of interest that is disclosed by the Offer submitted or any other data available to the City. This disqualification is at the sole discretion of the City. Any Offeror submitting an Offer herein waives any right to object now or at any future time, before anybody or agency, including but not limited to, the City Council of the City of Phoenix or any court.

1.6.13. Solicitation Transparency Policy

A. Commencing on the date and time a solicitation is published, potential or actual Offerors or respondents (including their representatives) shall only discuss matters associated with the solicitation with the Mayor, any members of City Council, the City Manager, any

Deputy City Manager, or any department director directly associated with the solicitation

(including in each case their assigned staff, except for the designated Procurement

Officer) at a public meeting, posted under Arizona Statutes, until the resulting contract(s) are awarded to all Offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the Procurement Officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or similar solicitation. As long as the solicitation is not discussed, Offerors may continue to conduct business with the City and discuss business that is unrelated to the solicitation with the City staff. Offerors may not discuss the solicitation with any City employees or evaluation panel members.

B. Offerors may discuss their proposal or the solicitation with the Mayor or one or more members of the Phoenix City Council, provided such meetings are scheduled through the Procurement Officer, and are posted as open meetings with the City Clerk at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meetings. The City Clerk will be responsible for posting the meetings. The posted notice shall identify the participants and the subject matter, as well as invite the public to participate.

C. With respect to the selection of the successful Offerors, the City Manager and/or City

Manager's Office will continue the past practice of exerting no undue influence on the process. In all solicitations of bids and proposals, any direction on the selection from the

City Manager and/or City Manager's Office and Department Head (or representative) to the proposal review panel or selecting authority must be provided in writing to all prospective Offerors.

D. This policy is intended to create a level playing field for all Offerors, assure that contracts are awarded in public, and protect the integrity of the selection process. OFFERORS

THAT VIOLATE THIS POLICY SHALL BE DISQUALIFIED. After official Notice is received by the City for disqualification, the Offeror may follow the Protest process, unless the Solicitation is cancelled without notice of intent to re-issue.

E. “To discuss” means any contact by the Offeror, regardless of whether the City responds to the contact. Offerors that violate this policy will be disqualified until the resulting contract(s) are awarded, or all Offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the Procurement Officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or a similar solicitation. The City interprets the policy as continuing through a cancellation of a solicitation until Council award of the contract, as long as the

City cancels with a statement that the City will rebid the solicitation.

1.6.14. Protest Process

A. Offeror may protest the contents of a solicitation no later than seven days before the solicitation deadline when the protest is based on an apparent alleged mistake, impropriety or defect in the solicitation. Protests filed regarding the solicitation may be addressed by an amendment to the solicitation or denied by the City. If denied, the opening and award will proceed unless the City determines that it is in the City’s best interests to set new deadlines, amend the solicitation, cancel or re-bid.

B. Therefore, unless otherwise notified by a formal amendment, the Protester must adhere to all solicitation dates and deadlines, including timely filing of an Offer, regardless of filing a protest.

C. Offeror may protest an adverse determination issued by the City regarding responsibility and responsiveness, within seven days of the date the Offeror was notified of the adverse determination.

D. Offeror may protest an award recommendation if the Offeror can establish that it had a substantial chance of being awarded the contract and will be harmed by the recommended award. The City will post recommendations on the City’s Procurement

Portal to award the contract(s) to an Offeror(s). Offeror must submit award protests within seven days after the posting of the award recommendation, with exceptions only for good cause shown, within the City’s full and final discretion.

E. All protests will be in writing, filed with the Procurement Officer identified in the solicitation and include the following:

1. Identification of the solicitation number;

2. The name, address and telephone number of the protester;

3. A detailed statement describing the legal and factual grounds for the protest, including copies of relevant documents;

4. The form of relief requested; and

5. The signature of the protester or its authorized representative.

F. The Procurement Officer will render a written decision within a reasonable period after the protest is filed. The City will not request City Council authorization to award the contract until the protest process is complete. All protests and appeals must be submitted in accordance with the City’s Procurement Code, (Phoenix City Code, Ch. 43), and administrative regulations and any protests or appeals not submitted within the time requirements will not be considered. Protests must be filed with the Procurement Officer.

1.6.15. Public Record

All Offers submitted in response to this solicitation will become the property of the City and become a matter of public record available for review pursuant to Arizona State law. If an

Offeror believes that a specific section of its Offer response is confidential, the Offeror will isolate the pages marked confidential in a specific and clearly labeled section of its Offer response. An Offeror may request specific information contained within its Offer is treated by the

Procurement Officer as confidential provided the Offeror clearly labels the information

“confidential.” To the extent necessary for the evaluation process, information marked as

“confidential” will not be treated as confidential. Once the procurement file becomes available for public inspection, the Procurement Officer will not make any information identified by the

Offerors as “confidential” available to the public unless necessary to support the evaluation process or if specifically requested in accordance with applicable public records law. When a public records request for such information is received, the Procurement Officer will notify the

Offeror in writing of any request to view any portion of its Offer marked “confidential.” The

Offeror will have the time set forth in the notice to obtain a court order enjoining such disclosure.

If the Offeror does not provide the Procurement Officer with a court order enjoining release of the information during the designated time, the Procurement Officer will make the information requested available for inspection.

1.6.16. Late Offers

Late Offers must be rejected, except for good cause. If a late Offer is submitted, the Department will document the date and time of the submittal of the late Offer, keep the Offer and notify the

Offeror that its Offer was disqualified for being a late Offer.

1.6.17. Right to Disqualify

The City reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror who fails to provide information or data requested or who provides materially inaccurate or misleading information or data. The City further reserves the right to disqualify any Offeror on the basis of any real or apparent conflict of interest that is disclosed by the Offer submitted or any other data or information available to the

City. This disqualification is at the sole discretion of the City. By submission of a solicitation response, the Offeror waives any right to object now or at any future time, before any agency or body including, but not limited to, the City Council of the City or any court as to the exercise by the City of such right to disqualify or as to any disqualification by reason of real or apparent conflict of interest determined by the City. The City reserves the right to replace the disqualified

Offeror.

1.6.18. Contract Award

The City reserves the right to award a contract by individual line items, by group, all or none, or any other combination most advantageous to the City. The City reserves the right to award multiple contracts.

1.6.19. Equal Low Offer

Contract award will be made by putting the names of the tied vendors in a cup for a blind drawing limited to those bidders with tied Offers. If time permits, the Offerors involved will be given an opportunity to attend the drawing. The drawing will be witnessed by at least three persons, and the contract file will contain the names and addresses of the witnesses.

1.6.20. Evaluation of Competitive Sealed Offers

The City will use its discretion in applying the following processes to this solicitation. Any ties in scoring will be resolved with a best and final price request and the lowest price will prevail.

1.6.21. Determining Responsiveness and Responsibility

Offers will be reviewed for documentation of minimum qualifications, completeness, and compliance with the Solicitation requirements. The City reserves sole discretion to determine responsiveness and responsibility.

Responsiveness: Non-responsive Offers will not be considered in the evaluation process. The solicitation states criteria that determine responsiveness, and the solicitation includes terms and conditions that if included or excluded from Offers (as the case may be) will render an Offer nonresponsive.

Exceptions, conditions, reservations, or understandings are presumed to be unacceptable, and an Offer that includes unacceptable exceptions, conditions, reservations, or understandings may be rejected as nonresponsive. Alternatively, the City in its sole discretion may instruct in writing that any Offeror remove the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings. If the Offeror fails to do so in writing, the City may determine the Offer to be non-responsive.

Responsibility: To obtain true economy, the City must conduct solicitations to minimize the possibility of a subsequent default by the Contractor, late deliveries, or other unsatisfactory performance that may result in additional administrative costs. It is important that the Offeror be a responsible Contractor. Responsibility includes the Offeror’s integrity, skill, capacity, experience, and facilities for conducting the work to be performed.

The Procurement Officer will review each Offer to determine if the Offeror is responsible. The

City’s determination as to whether an Offeror is responsible will be based on all information furnished by the Offeror, interviews (if any), and information received from Offeror’s references, including information about Offeror’s history, terminations for convenience or cause, contract breach lawsuits or notices of claim and any other sources the City deems appropriate. Award of the Contract resulting from the solicitation will not be made until any necessary investigation, which each Offeror agrees to permit by submitting its Offer, is made by the City as it deems necessary. A review of responsibility may occur up to contract award.

The Offeror’s unreasonable failure to promptly supply information about an inquiry with respect to responsibility may be grounds for a determination of non-responsibility with respect to such

Offeror.

1.6.22. Detailed Evaluation of Offers and Determination of Competitive Range

During deliberations, the Evaluation Panel will reach a consensus score for each evaluation criterion except price. The Procurement Officer will score the price, which will be added to the overall consensus score. The overall consensus scores will determine the Offerors’ rankings and which offers are within the Competitive Range, when appropriate.

1.6.23. Offers Not Within the Competitive Range

The City may notify Offerors of Offers that the City determined are not in the Competitive

Range.

1.6.24. Discussions with Offerors in the Competitive Range

The City will notify each Offeror whose Offer is in the Competitive Range or made the ‘short list’ and provide in writing any questions or requests for clarification to the Offeror. Each Offeror so notified may be interviewed by the City and asked to discuss answers to written or oral questions or provide clarifications to any facet of its Offer. The Offerors in the competitive range may be required to provide a demonstration of their product.

Demonstrations - Offerors in the competitive range may be invited to construct a hands-on sample or presentation of their solution at the City of Phoenix. In addition, each finalist may prepare and deliver a presentation of their proposed solution based on the script developed by the evaluation panel. The City may also require a hands-on lab demonstration designed specifically for the evaluation panel. The results of the surveys will be tabulated and delivered to the evaluation team for the final review and solution selection session(s).

If an Offer in the Competitive Range contains conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings to or about any Contract or Solicitation Scope requirement, the City may discuss or negotiate the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings during these meetings. But the City in its sole discretion may reject any and all conditions, exceptions, reservations and understandings, and the City may instruct any Offeror to remove the conditions, exceptions, reservations or understandings. If the Offeror fails to do so, the City may determine the Offer is nonresponsive, and the City may revoke its determination that the Offer is in the Competitive Range.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the City will not provide any information, financial or otherwise, to any Offeror about other Offers received in response to this solicitation. During discussions with Offerors in the Competitive Range, the City will not give Offerors specific prices or specific financial requirements that Offerors must meet to qualify for further consideration.

The City may state that proposed prices are too high with respect to the marketplace or otherwise unacceptable. Offerors will not be told of their relative rankings before Contract award.

1.6.25. Best and Final Offers (BAFO)

A BAFO is an option available for negotiations. Each Offeror in the Competitive Range, which is determined in the City’s sole discretion, may be afforded the opportunity to amend its Offer and make one BAFO.

If an Offeror’s BAFO modifies its initial Offer, the modifications must be identified in the BAFO.

The City will evaluate BAFOs based on the same requirements and criteria applicable to initial

Offers. The City will adjust appropriately the initial scores for criteria that have been affected by offer modifications made by a BAFO. Based on the criteria defined in the solicitation as weighted, the City will then perform final scoring and prepare final rankings.

The Evaluation Panel will recommend the Offer that is the best value and most advantageous to the City based on the evaluation criteria.

The City reserves the right to make an award to an Offeror whose Offer is the highest rated, best value, and most advantageous to the City based on the evaluation criteria, without conducting written or oral discussions with any Offeror, without negotiations, and without soliciting BAFOs.

1.6.26. Fixed Offer Price Period

All offers shall be firm and fixed for a period of 180 calendar days from the solicitation opening date.

1.6.27. Obtaining a Copy of the Solicitation and Addenda

Interested Offerors may download the complete solicitation and addenda from the City's

Procurement Portal: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/186146. Any interested Offerors without internet access may obtain this solicitation by emailing the

Procurement Officer at (nancy.harrison@phoenix.gov) or picking up a copy during regular business hours at the City of Phoenix, Human Services Department, 200 W. Washington Street, 18th Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to check the City's Procurement

Portal, read the entire solicitation, and verify all required information is submitted with their

Offer.

1.6.28. Certificates of Insurance

Upon notification of a recommended award, the Offeror will have 14 calendar days to submit a complete certificate of insurance in the minimum amounts and the coverages as required in the

Insurance Requirements of this solicitation. Insurance requirements are non-negotiable.

1.7. Evaluation Criteria

In accordance with the Administrative Regulation 3.10, Competitive Sealed Proposal awards shall be made to the responsive and responsible Offeror(s) whose Offer is determined in writing to be the most advantageous to the City based upon the evaluation criteria listed below.

The evaluation factors are listed in the relative order of importance and more details are provided in Scope of Work. The Weight (Points) for each Evaluation Criteria are the maximum points that may be assigned for that Criteria. The following evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate all Offers:

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Organizational Capacity and Staffing -

Technical Proposal Tab 1

Demonstrated experience serving at-risk youth and families in Phoenix

- Relevant experience in similar prevention programs

- Quality and experience of key personnel

(ED, Finance Officer, Program Manager) with resumes

Points Based 15 (15% of Total) https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix/projects/186146 mailto:nancy.harrison@phoenix.gov

2. Program Design and Methodology -

Technical Proposal Tab 2

- Clear and complete service methodology

- Program aligns with evidence-based or evidence-informed practices

- Describes outreach to at-risk youth and early intervention strategies

Points Based 20 (20% of Total)

3. Community Engagement and

Partnerships - Technical Proposal Tab 3

- Identification of local partners (schools, CBOs) and their roles

- Quality and strength of Letters of Support or MOUs

- Plan for family engagement and community collaboration

Points Based 10 (10% of Total)

4. Program Focus and Rationale -

Technical Proposal Tab 4

- Clear explanation of selected program area (e.g., Violence Prevention)

- Justification for program focus area as a community need or gap

Points Based 10 (10% of Total)

5. Program Implementation Plan -

Technical Proposal Tab 5

- Description of services in at least two targeted neighborhoods

- Realistic and detailed timeline with milestones

- Clear quarterly service targets

Points Based 10 (10% of Total)

6. Evaluation and Logic Model - Technical

Proposal Tab 6

- Submitted Logic Model aligns with goals, objectives, and outcomes

- Formative evaluation plan within 6 months of launch

- Strong outcome evaluation methods for short-, mid-, and long-term impacts

Points Based 15 (15% of Total)

7. Administrative & Reporting Readiness -

Technical Proposal Tab 7

- Demonstrated ability to meet reporting, data-sharing, and administrative requirements (Sections 6–8)

- Systems for secure data storage, quality assurance, and performance monitoring

Points Based 10 (10% of Total)

8. Geographic Provision Ability - Technical

Proposal Tab 8

Demonstrate ability to successfully service all 4 geographic areas outlined in this solicitation

Points Based 5 (5% of Total)

9. Budget and Fiscal Responsibility -

Technical Proposal Tab 9

- Budget reflects appropriate use of funds

- Cost-effectiveness and reasonableness over three-year period

- Fiscal capacity and controls in place

Points Based 5 (5% of Total)

2. AGREEMENT

2.1. Professional Services Agreement

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF PHOENIX

AND

CONTRACTOR NAME

This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this January 1, 2026, (“the Effective Date”), or as of the City Clerk date, whichever is later, by and between the City of Phoenix, Arizona, a municipal corporation of the State of Arizona (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and insert legal name of Contractor here, insert state of corporation and correct business name – Corporation, LLC, etc that you have confirmed on the Arizona Corporation Commission website, (hereinafter referred to as “ Contractor”).

RECITALS

A. The City Manager of the City of Phoenix, Arizona, is authorized by the provisions of the

City Charter to execute agreements for professional services.

B. The City desires to obtain the services that are specifically set forth in this Agreement.

C. The City procured these professional services in accordance with the Phoenix City Code and Administrative Regulation 3.10.

D. Contractor possesses the skills and expertise necessary to provide such services as desired by the City.

E. This Agreement is authorized by the City Council (Ordinance Number and Agenda

Number if applicable) Enter date.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:

2.2. Term of Agreement

A. This Agreement begins on the Effective Date in the above introductory paragraph, and upon approval by the City, for three (3) years.

B. This Agreement will terminate upon the earliest occurrence of any of the following:

1. reaching the end of the term exercised as set forth in A;

2. completing the services set forth in the Scope of Work attached as EXHIBIT A –

SCOPE OF WORK (the “Services”);

3. payment of the maximum compensation under Paragraph Payment of this

Agreement; or

4. termination pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2.3. Payment

A. The total amount to be remitted by the City to Contractor for all Services satisfactorily performed under this Agreement will not exceed $500,000 per year including reasonable and necessary travel expenses, if approved in advance by the City and included in the

Itemized Service Budget (ISB) EXHIBIT B. Under this Agreement, the City will pay for

Services at the rate(s) specified in the ISB and that comply with the requirements for

Reimbursable Expenses as outlined below, with no additional charges for overhead, benefits, local travel or administrative support. Payments will be made in proportion to the Services performed and no more than 90% of the total contract price will be paid before the work is totally completed and accepted by the City.

B. Contractor will submit monthly invoices on or before the 15th calendar day of every month. Each invoice will be accompanied with itemized receipts. The invoice will be submitted free of mathematical errors and/or missing supporting documentation. All appropriate documentation will be provided that supports the charges reflected in the monthly invoice. Upon finding of an error and/or missing documentation, the City will return the invoice to the Contractor. Contractor will promptly resubmit the revised invoice to the City. Each revised invoice will document the date that the revised invoice is submitted to the City. Requests for payment must be submitted with documentation of dates and hours worked, hourly rate charged, and a detailed description of the Services performed. Failure of City to identify an error does not waive any of the City’s rights.

C. Invoices will be submitted to: Juliana Panqueva, Accounting Supervisor at hsd.invoices@phoenix.gov

D. Contractor will demonstrate good judgment when incurring costs that are considered a

Reimbursable Expense while conducting business for the City. All Reimbursable

Expenses will be reasonable and prudent. Generally, Reimbursable Expenses include:

o Business Expenses: If applicable, receipts for business expenses must be submitted with all requests for payment. Business expenses that require receipts include, but are not limited to express mail; delivery services; messenger services; and outside printing.

o Office Expenses: If applicable, requests for reimbursement of office expenses must be submitted with a description of the task, which includes how the expense was incurred. Examples of office expenses needing documentation include, but are not limited to telephone; internal printing /copies (not to exceed 0.15 cents per page for black & white copies); postage; facsimiles (long distance charges only); and supplies.

o Travel Expenses: If applicable, travel expenses must be approved in advance by the

City and must be included in the Fee Schedule. Contractor will be held to comply with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.41 – Business, Conference and

Training Travel and Related Expenses, revised January 16, 2015, as it may be amended, as to the eligible and ineligible expenses for reimbursement and required documentation as available on the City’s website and incorporated herein as if attached.

2.4. Scope of Work and Special Terms and Conditions

Contractor will provide consulting services that will be in accordance with the Scope of Work as set forth in EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK, which may be supplemented with additional detail from time to time during the term of the Agreement, and that are satisfactory to the City. In performing these services, Contractor will also specifically comply with the applicable Standard and Special Terms and Conditions. Contractor will provide progress reports to “the City” according to a mutually agreed-upon schedule.

2.5. Exhibit A – Scope of Work

SEE EXHIBIT A

2.6. Exhibit B - Fee Schedule

SEE EXHIBIT A

2.7. Standard Terms and Conditions

2.7.1. Definition of Key Words Used in the Solicitation

Shall, Will, Must: Indicates a mandatory requirement. Failure to meet these mandatory requirements may result in the rejection of Offer as non-responsive.

Should: Indicates something that is recommended but not mandatory. If the Offeror fails to provide recommended information, the City may, at its sole option, ask the Offeror to provide the information or evaluate the Offer without the information.

May: Indicates something that is not mandatory but permissible.

For purposes of this solicitation, the following definitions will apply:

“A.R.S.” Arizona Revised Statute

“Buyer” or “Procurement Officer” City of Phoenix staff person responsible for the solicitation.

The City employee or employees who have specifically been designated to act as a contact person or persons to the Contractor, and responsible for monitoring and overseeing the

Contractor's performance under this contract.

"City" The City of Phoenix

"Contractor" The individual, partnership, or corporation who, as a result of the competitive process, is awarded a contract by the City of Phoenix.

"Contract” or “Agreement" The legal agreement executed between the City of Phoenix, AZ and the Contractor.

“Days” Means calendar days unless otherwise specified.

“Chief Procurement Officer” The contracting authority for the City of Phoenix, AZ, authorized to sign contracts and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Phoenix, AZ.

“Employer” Any individual or type of organization that transacts business in this state, that has a license issued by an agency in this state and employs one or more employees in this state.

Employer includes this state, any political subdivision of this state and self-employed persons. In the case of an independent contractor, employer means the independent contractor and does not mean the person or organization that uses contract labor. (A.R.S. 23-211).

“Offer” Means a response from a Supplier, Contractor, or Service Provider to a solicitation request that, if awarded, binds the Supplier, Contractor, or Service Provider to perform in accordance with the contract. Same as bid, proposal, quotation or tender.

“Offeror” Any Vendor, Seller or Supplier submitting a competitive offer in response to a solicitation from the City. Same as Bidder or Proposer.

“Solicitation” Means an Invitation for Bid (IFB), Request for Proposal (RFP), Request for

Quotations (RFQ), Request for Qualifications (RFQu) and request for sealed Offers, or any other type of formal procurement which the City makes public through advertising, mailings, or some other method of communication. It is the process by which the City seeks information, proposals, Offers, or quotes from suppliers.

“Suppliers” Firms, entities or individuals furnishing goods or services to the City.

“Vendor or Seller” A seller of goods or services.

2.7.2. City’s Vendor Self-Registration and Notification

Vendors must be registered in the City’s Procurement Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix to respond to solicitations and access procurement information.

Vendors must also be registered in the City’s procurePHX Self-Registration System at https://www.phoenix.gov/procure prior to contract execution.

The City may, at its sole discretion, reject any offer from an Offeror who has not registered.

2.7.3. Business in Arizona

The City will not enter contracts with Offerors (or any company(ies)) not granted authority to transact business, or not in good standing, in the state of Arizona by the Arizona Corporation

Commission, unless the Offeror asserts a statutory exception prior to entering a contract with the City.

2.7.4. Contract Interpretation

A. Applicable Law: This Contract will be governed by the law of the State of Arizona, and suits pertaining to this Contract will be brought only in Federal or State courts in

Maricopa County, State of Arizona.

B. Contract Order of Precedence: In the event of a conflict in the provisions of the

Contract, as accepted by the City and as they may be amended, the following will prevail in the order set forth below:

1. Federal terms and conditions, if any https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix https://www.phoenix.gov/procure

2. Special terms and conditions

3. Standard terms and conditions

4. Amendments

5. Statement or scope of work

6. Specifications

7. Attachments

8. Exhibits

9. Instructions to Contractors

10. Other documents referenced or included in the Solicitation

C. Organization – Employment Disclaimer: The Agreement resulting hereunder is not intended to constitute, create, give rise to or otherwise recognize a joint venture agreement or relationship, partnership or formal business organization of any kind, and the rights and obligations of the parties will be only those expressly set forth in the agreement. The parties agree that no persons supplied by the Contractor in the performance of Contractor’s obligations under the agreement are considered to be City’s employees and that no rights of City civil service, retirement or personnel rules accrue to such persons. The Contractor will have total responsibility for all salaries, wage bonuses, retirement, withholdings, workmen’s compensation, occupational disease compensation, unemployment compensation, other employee benefits and all taxes and premiums appurtenant thereto concerning such persons, and will save and hold the City harmless with respect thereto.

D. Severability: The provisions of this Contract are severable to the extent that any provision or application held to be invalid will not affect any other provision or application of the contract which may remain in effect without the invalid provision or application.

E. Non-Waiver of Liability: The City of Phoenix as a public entity supported by tax monies, in execution of its public trust, cannot agree to waive any lawful or legitimate right to recover monies lawfully due it. Therefore, any Contractor agrees that it will not insist upon or demand any statement whereby the City agrees to limit in advance or waive any right the City might have to recover actual lawful damages in any court of law under applicable Arizona law.

F. Parol Evidence: This Agreement is intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement and is intended also as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of this agreement. No course of prior dealings between the parties and no usage in the trade will be relevant to supplement or explain any term used in this Contract.

Acceptance or acquiescence in a course of performance rendered under this contract will not be relevant to determine the meaning of this Contract even though the accepting or acquiescing party has knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity to object.

2.7.5. Contract Administration and Operation

A. Records: All books, accounts, reports, files and other records relating to the contract will be subject at all reasonable times to inspection and audit by the City for five years after completion of the contract. Such records will be produced at a City of Phoenix office as designated by the City. Confidentiality will be maintained, and City will not violate any proprietary or other confidentiality agreements Contractor has in place.

B.…