A07_J.1_Past_Performance-risk-Assessment-Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
High Efficiency Gas Adsorber (HEGA)
Solicitation number
W91ZLK-19-R-0083
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance risk assessment questionnaire and details for a federal contract solicitation seeking high efficiency gas adsorbers. Offerors must submit responses to the past performance questionnaire by August 8th, 2019 for evaluation. The solicitation from the Department of the Army seeks adsorbers that meet specifications in the scope of work. Proposals are due by July 1, 2019 and should include technical, past performance, price, and certification volumes. The technical proposal must demonstrate the offeror's design, manufacturing process, quality testing, and delivery approach for the adsorbers. The past performance section requires details on recent and relevant contracts to establish experience. Pricing shall be submitted in both PDF and Excel formats using the provided line item template. Offerors must also submit a sample adsorber for testing if found acceptable under the technical factor.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W91ZLK19R0083_AMD_1_7-23-2019.pdf PDF
A03_Past_Performance_Cover_letter_signed.pdf PDF
A02_HEGAIDIQSOW.pdf PDF
B08_W91ZLK-19-R-0083_Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Personnel identified in the cover letter by August 8, 2019.

Rating Definitions:

Acceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance is unknown.

Unacceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the requirement effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Acceptable

· Unacceptable (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (Technical Competence) (to include use and control of subcontractors). Assess the knowledge of, and skill in the exercise of, practices required for successful completion of the contract.

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance)

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest. Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective actions plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and the timely award and management of subcontracts.

E. General Comments. If you had a choice, would you use this company again? Provide any other relevant performance information.

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Personnel identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .