Amendment_0003.pdf

W91QVN-16-R-0022

411TH CSB, KOREA - RCO OSAN

POC: MR. HWANG, PYONG HA

TEL: 011-82-31-661-9190

PYONGHA.HWANG.LN@MAIL.MIL

APO AP 96278-2039

UNITED STATES (THE)

F3J1GR5120A001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the answ ers to vendor questions. The closing date has also been extended to 21 Dec 2015.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 32

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Dec-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91QVN-16-R-0022

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Oct-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Dec-2015

CODE

411TH CONTRACTING SUPPORT BRIGADE, KOREA

RCO OSAN, UNIT #2039

APO AP 96278-2039

UNITED STATES (THE)

W90VN6 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE W90VN6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Questions and Answers 14 December, 2015

1. Vendor Question: Can we have any analysis report of Geological study of Runway ends to refer it for the installation of structures and foundation works?

Government Answer: The Government has provided a diagram of the Boring Hole. See Attached Information.

2. Vendor Question: Can we get detailed existing drawing of Runway 09L/27R?

Government Answer: This information cannot be released to the General public. Once the contract is awarded the newly awarded vendor will have access to the data by requesting through the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

3. Vendor Question: Can we get drawings of existing AC Power cabling and communication line topology connected to existing shelters? It will be need to realistic costing for necessary trenching new power & telecom cables into each of new shelters. We assume that Government has already finalized design drawings of Osan AB existing Runway (old). It will be enough for bidders to refer for this works.

Government Answer: The Government has provided a diagram of the Power distribution line.

Please see attached diagram.

4. Vendor Question: Can we use existing Manholes for telecom line connection or get drawings of old and new manholes in Runway side?

Government Answer: The Government has no objection to the vendor using the existing manholes that has duct accessibility. No drawings are being provided at this time based on the and/or question.

5. Vendor Question: Between expected new LOC Antenna and LOC Shelter, there are paved roads for vehicles. To connect Antenna into equipment in shelter, it will be needed to dig the road then can be re-paved. Is it allowed to do so?

Government Answer: The Government has no objection to the vendor excavating the road as long as it’s returned to its original condition once work is completed.

6. Vendor Question: We would like to know avabille working hours per day. For example, availability during 8AM – 9 PM or night times or weekend at urgent case.

Government Answer: This information is listed in the original RFP under Technical Provisions - III

7. Vendor Question: Can we use crane during installation works of GS Antenna?

Government Answer: The Usage of crane will be allowed as long as the construction waiver is approved. The contractor will be required to submit the product specifications to the COR. Once the equipment approval is vetted the equipment will be deemed safe to use on the runway.

8. Vendor Question: Can we use container type office space at some place nearby GS/LOC shelter for storing devices and tools and required documents, etc.?

Government Answer: A Temporary container could be used in a designated location during the course of the project. The COR will provide the contractor with a designated area for the device once the contract is awarded, but not directly on the airfield.

9. Vendor Question: Does it mean that bidders are asked only to propose 2 Glide Slope and 2 Localizer without DME equipment?

Government Answer: The Current On-Field DME shall be utilized for the new ILS system (non-paired DME). Channel 116X

10. Vendor Question: The article l.ii of Technical Provision II states that “The FLAT will be carried out by the contractor’s flight check aircraft team” while the article l.ii.(4) describes that “FLAT duration shall not exceed 25 hours of flight time per system, flight time in excess of this will be charged to the contractor.

The latter statement clearly states that the flight time less than 25 hours per systems is free of charge to the contractor, but the former statement seemingly indicates that the contractor is in charge of the all cost of flight time regardless of flight time duration. Please clarify which interpretation is correct.

The contractor can include up to 25hrs for the FLAT as part of their initial proposal. Any additional cost shall be at the contractor’s expense.

Government Answer: ii) Flight Acceptance Test (FLAT): The FLAT will be carried out by the contractor’s flight check aircraft team.

(1) The contractor shall provide an engineer to the site to provide technical support during the FLAT.

(2) The inspection team will perform tests in accordance with ICAO Document 8071 and ICAO Annex 10.

(3) If the installed system fails the FLAT, the contractor is responsible for remedial actions.

(4) The KTR price proposal shall contain the cost associated with up to 25 hours total. Cost in excess of 25 hours will be performed at the KTRs expense.

(5) The contractor should note that the flight test could be delayed due to military operations, weather conditions, or the flight test center’s schedule at no additional cost to the government.

(6) The FLAT will utilize the on-station Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) which will be Government furnished. The contractor shall not purchase/install a DME system on this contract.

(RFP Page 11)

11. Vendor Question: In case the flight time less than 25 hours per system is free of charge to the contract, then the next question is the clarification on the term of ‘system’. Does the term refer to the systems like LLZ systems and GP systems? In this case the free of charge time amounts to 50 hours because 25 hours are for LLZ system, and additional 25 hours are for GP systems.

Government Answer: See above. Additionally: PACAF RMC allows for 2 full days per system for flight check. Each system would get 2 days, so a total of 8 days would be the average, note that if they run into problems it will take longer.

***The 25hr FLAT test is for the “whole system” of the ILS, which includes the LLZ and GS.

The contractor cannot bill for 25 hrs per “subsystem”.

12. Vendor Question: The paragraph 2.2.7 reads that VHF antennas should be furnished with each shelter, but it does not have any comment on the transceiver. Does it mean the contractor shall not provide the transceiver?

Government Answer: The contractor shall provide a Transceiver for airborne communication. Contractor must provide a communication means for maintenance personnel to communicate with airborne MoLIT flight check aircraft that operates in the VHF spectrum.

13. Vendor Question: The paragraph 2.2.8 reads “All monitored and internally measured system parameters shall be available for display via a station RS-232 communications port.” The technical trend is that Ethernet port is becoming popular for the communication port between LLZ/GP station and RMM / LMM computers. We want to know if the RS-232 port must be used for the purpose.

Government Answer: The RS-232 is the minimum requirement, Ethernet connectivity is acceptable. The reason RS-232 was used in the original SOW was that it was based off of current AF fielded systems.

Since the AF will not maintain these systems, whatever works for them is acceptable. They both provide the same function. The primary issue is that there is a way for maintenance personnel to connect a laptop (LMM) to the equipment rack for maintenance purposes.

14. Vendor Question: In the RFP, six LMMSs and six RMMSs are required; however without DME installation, we need four-RMMS/LMMS. Could you check?

Government Answer: Yes, only 4 LMMS and 4 RMMS are needed.

15. Vendor Question: In the RFP, it said "Price analysis will be performed to determine the extent, to which it is adequate, reasonable, and realistic". However, it also said "the lowest priced" would be picked. Does that mean "The lowest price among the realistic and reasonable?" or "the lowest price?"

Government Answer: Award shall be made in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to the responsible offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer that conforms to all terms and conditions of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to make a technical acceptability determination without any discussion with the offeror. (RFP Page 58) Price analysis will be performed to determine the extent, to which it is adequate, reasonable, and realistic and complete the project described in the solicitation in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b).

(RFP Page 59)

16. Vendor Question: Could you confirm the following method?

1) Two copies need to be summited

2) First Copy: With Company information and logo on the Volume I,II,III

3) Second Copy: Without Company information and logo on the Volume I,II,III and delete prices information in the Volume I. Is that correct?

Government Answer: The vendor Format shall conform to the RFP as noted in the Instructions to Offerors:

The proposal submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. All proprietary information shall be clearly and properly marked. The offeror shall submit two copies of the proposal: One copy of the proposal which includes all pages of each index appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer (Volumes I, II, & III) and one copy of the proposal which includes all pages of each index appropriately numbered with the date and solicitation number but without the company name, logo, or price (Volume I only). (RFP Page 55)

17. Vendor Question: The proposal includes relevant experiences and past experiences of the prime contractor. Do we need to mention about the relevant experiences and past experiences of the sub-contractor?

Government Answer: Relevant Experience: The offeror shall submit evidence of minimum two (2) years prior experience within the last seven (7) years in similar or same scope, magnitude, and complexity as specified in this solicitation as a prime contractor on a turnkey contract which includes the acquisition at a minimum the following (RFP Page 56)

Past Performance: The offeror shall provide a list of all contracts and subcontracts it has held within the last three (3) years which are similar to that which is detailed in this solicitation. Offerors shall present past performance for themselves, and for any proposed division, subcontractor, or teaming contractor whose effort on this contract will significantly influence performance of the proposed effort. Please see Page 57 of the RFP.

18. Vendor Question: In the RFP pg. 56 Sub-Factor 3 about the "COMPANY INFORMATION". What is the company in this term? Our company? Or the customer?

Government Answer: COMPANY INFORMATION: a) Category of Business and Copy of License & Registration Number. This Pertains to the Prime Contractor Qualifications.

b) Company Name. This Pertains to the Prime Contractor Qualifications.

19. Vendor Question: We need ground roughness and soil condition report near the new runway, if you have.

Government Answer: The Overall surface soil conditions are distributed and classified GM (Gravel with significant amount of silt) & GP (Poorly graded gravel) by USCS (Unified Soil Classification System) .

20. Vendor Question: This is a winter season and normally it is not recommended to do civil work at the winter season in Korea because the concrete could be weaken in that season. Is that possible to adjust a beginning date for civil work?

Government Answer: Construction schedule will be restrictive due to other related projects. So KTR will determine concrete work with heat curing or placing concrete in spring time within given performance of period. The overall project construction completion date is 25 June 2015.

21. Vendor Question: Is that possible to enter the OSAN AB for work before the base pass issued? And how many people can enter for work? And working hour? (0700 ~ 1700)?? Do we need escort from the officer?

Government Answer: The Base pass process may be expedited if it seriously impact the project schedule. Also KTR will follow the daily hired escort program and all work will be done under military escort. . Work hour could be adjusted with contracting officer's approval.

22. Vendor Question: We need the Longitudinal Slope and the Transverse Slope of the new runway including estimated new LLZ/GP location? In addition, we need the exact slope of the threshold, centerline, llz location.

Government Answer: The Overall longitudinal slope of new runway is 1% and transverse is 1.0- 1.5%

23. Vendor Question: We need the Slope information of the estimated new-GP antenna.

Government Answer: We do not have available information for the slope of new GP Antenna.

24. Vendor Question: Could you provide the type of existing switch gear?

Government Answer: S&C (Manufacturer name) 4 Way switch.-

25. Vendor Question: Is there any common duct around each existing shelter?

Government Answer: No

26. Vendor Question: We need to connect high-voltage electricity to new transformer to provide all equipment. So, Can we receive high-voltage electricity from each existing shelter?

Government Answer: The Government has no objection to the contractor performing this task using existing structure upon prior approval from the Government.

27. Vendor Question: Could you provide us drawing of the new runway (09L, 27R) including current conduit for the common uses, the pipe, electrical infrastructure and network cable in detail? We need to know detailed specification of conduit, electrical infrastructure and network cable like single-mode and multi-mode. (If you have a CAD drawing, it would be best for us)

Government Answer: The drawing of the new runway cannot be released to the public. However, awarded vendor might access those information after they get the contract. The information is deemed need to know only for classification purposes.

28. Vendor Question: Could you provide us the current network drawing between previous GP/LLZ/DME and the tower?

Government Answer: The Government cannot provide this information at this time.

29. Vendor Question: Is there any spare ports in the optic-fiber network equipment in the each existing shelter?

Government Answer: There are no spare ports in the named equipment.

30. Vendor Question: We are going to use optic-fiber cable for the interface between the shelters and the tower.

We need to know current status of communication cable (e.g. fiber-optic cable) for interface. In this contractor, is there any spare optic-fiber cable for ILS? If so, could you provide drawing or CAD files of cable structure and conduit.

Government Answer: There are no spare optic – fiber cable for ILS. Therefore no drawings will be provided.

31. Vendor Question: Do you have communication or common conduit around the new runway? If so, could you provide us drawing or CAD file of infrastructure of conduit? If not, what should we consider to install conduit?

Government Answer: The Awarded vendor can survey existing conduit. Conduits exist but may not meet exact project specifications. Therefore the vendor should provide there on technical solution as part of their proposal.

32. Vendor Question: Do you have current optic-fiber network equipment and cable infrastructure? (We need the current optic-fiber network information if we can consider this option) If so, Can we share this optic-fiber network infrastructure for the ILS? And could you provide drawing of optic-fiber network equipment including all ports. If not, what should we consider to propose optic-fiber network equipment?

Government Answer: Cable infrastructure will only be provided on contract award. There is a distribution ring running around the flight line that could potentially be utilized for this project.

33. Vendor Question: In the RFP pg.9. "Osan AB Architectural Compatibility Plan" is mentioned as a reference. Could you provide this?

Government Answer: “Osan AB Architectural Compatibility Plan (Osan AB ACP)” dated 01 January 2009 by the 51st Civil Engineer Squadron. The most current version is available (for referral purposes only) at the CENMP, Engineering Flight, 51st Civil Engineer Squadron, Osan AB. (RFP Page 9)

34. Vendor Question: We founded the manhole below on the site. Could you let me know the purpose of that manhole?

Government Answer: A: No, The vendor cannot use the manhole from the provided picture.

35. Vendor Question: Fuel Tank Type?

Government Answer: The vendor cannot install a Underground type fuel tank. The vendor proposed tank should meet the specifications of a product that is: Fuel tank shall be leak detection and overflow prevention type.

36. Vendor Question: The paragraph 2.2.7 reads that VHF antennas should be furnished with each shelter, but it does not have any comment on the transceiver. Does it mean the contractor shall not provide the transceiver?

Government Answer: Contractor must provide the transceiver. All necessary items to facilitate radio communication from the shelter as required.

37. Vendor Question: The paragraph 2.2.8 reads “All monitored and internally measured system parameters shall be available for display via a station RS-232 communications port.” The technical trend is that Ethernet port is becoming popular for the communication port between LLZ/GP station and RMM / LMM computers. We want to know if the RS-232 port must be used for the purpose.

Government Answer: No, Ethernet is acceptable.

38. Vendor Question: The scope of this contract is to acquire 6 LMMS’ and 6 RMMS’ according to SOW.

Isn’t it needed to be corrected to 4 LMMS’ and 4 RMMS’? Because DME has been deleted.

Government Answer: Please see answer number 14.

39. Vendor Question: The Drawing which coordinates and level of the RWY are indicated including communication lines & electronic tracks is needed to offer the accurate installation point of ILS.

Government Answer: The Government does not understand the actual question being asked by the vendor.

40. Vendor Question: Horizontal distance information from threshold of existing RWY to existing Glide Slope is needed.

Government Answer: The answer is as follow: 344.92M for RWY27/321.87M for 09

41. Vendor Question: ICAO recommends Glide Slope is installed 120m apart from the centerline of the RWY, but the planned installation position for Glide Slope is marked on the point 450ft (137m) from the edge line of the RWY on the drawing. Are there any specific reasons?

Government Answer: Nothere is no specific reason and this should be determined by the contractor after award to meet ICAO recommendation(s).

42. Vendor Question: For installation of ILS at both sides (west/east) of new runway, is the contractor able to use the existing communication cable duct and optical cable

Government Answer: Yes, the Government has no objection to this process as proposed by the contractor.

43. Vendor Question: 1) Information and position of existing communication duct and manhole which contractor can use 2) Specification of optical cable, the number of core, route (section), connecting point of cable. * require specification: Single Mode, 4 Core (1Core x 4 Shelter: Shelter-RAPCON)

Government Answer: Each shelter has one manhole in the general location. Normally within 50 feet. Each manhole is connected by one 4" conduit and then each manhole feeds the equipment.

Each existing shelter is fed by a 12 strand single mode fiber. Glide scopes are fed by a 50 pair copper cable and the localizers are each fed by a 25 pair copper cable.

44. Vendor Question: 1) The position of each manholes which are the nearest from each of 4 shelters

Government Answer: See Government answer provided in Question 43.

45. Vendor Question: The distance and route from RAPCON to each manhole.

Government Answer: The distances are approximate. East localizer- 9715 feet. East glidescope- 7920 feet. West glidescope- 7922 feet. West localizer- 13886 feet. Actual path can be viewed in CIPS/CVC.

Actual path can be viewed in CIPS/CVC (Cyber Implementation Project System/CIPS Visualization Component). Although not necessary, CIPS access can be granted through https://cipsaf.tinker.af.mil/CIPS5/

46. Vendor Question: The distance from each Shelter to the nearest manhole.

Government Answer: See previous answer provided for this question.

47. Vendor Question: Specification for installation communication duct, manhole, optical cable

Government Answer: SCX can supply base specifications for communication infrastructure IAW EIA/TIA standards

48. Vendor Question: Material and data to specify the route from RAPCON to each of 4 Shelters.

Government Answer: The installation of TR at both sides (west/east) of new runway, is the contractor able to take the electric power from the primary of existing TR by diverging for the new TR:

49. Vendor Question: The information of electric power capacity and cable specification.

Government Answer: The capacity of TR is 13.8kV-208/120V, cable will be decide by KTR’s load calculation.

50. Vendor Question: The position of each manholes which are the nearest from each of 4 shelters

Government Answer: This question was previously answered.

51. Vendor Question: The distance from each Shelter to the nearest manhole

Government Answer: This question was previously answered.

52. Vendor Question: The information about cable duct, manhole, diverging point, cable specification for the installation of the new electric power line.

Government Answer: The vendor is responsible for proposing the type of materials to be used for this portion of the project. The materials shall conform to the specifications of the statement of work.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 15-Dec-2015 01:00 PM to 21-Dec-2015 10:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

5152.204-4032 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

(a) SUBCONTRACTING:

If the offeror contemplates subcontracting, it must obtain prior written approval of subcontractor from the PCO or ACO, and list below: (1) the names and addresses of the subcontractor(s), (2) the type of subcontracting, and (3) the estimated price for each subcontract.

(b) AFFILIATED OFFERORS:

(1) Business concerns are affiliates of each other when, either directly or indirectly, one concern controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party controls or has the power to control both.

(2) Each offeror shall furnish, below, the following information:

(i) Whether the offeror has any affiliates;

(ii) The names and addresses of all affiliates of the offeror; and

(iii) The names and addresses of all persons and concerns exercising control or ownership of the offeror and any or all of its affiliates, and whether they are common officers, directors, stockholders holding controlling interest, or otherwise.

AFFILIATED CONCERNS. : (Name, location and, in detail, controlling interest in each)

(c) PRINCIPAL OWNER(S) OR STOCKHOLDER(S):

Each offeror shall list below the name(s) and address(es) of the principal owner(s) or stockholder(s) of the company and percentage of ownership. If a major portion is publicly traded and/or otherwise widely distributed, state that, with the percentage so affected.

(d) STANDARDS OF CONDUCT CERTIFICATION:

This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, except as described below, no representative of this firm who deals with US Government employees on any aspect of this procurement is a former US Government employee, to include former US military personnel. I understand that this certification is continuing in nature and places a duty on me and my firm to notify the Contracting Officer of any additional individual(s) who fit the above description prior to the individual's assuming duties.

(i) Name ______________________________________________ Former rank/grade ____________________________________ Last US Government position ___________________________

(ii) Name ______________________________________________ Former rank/grade ____________________________________ Last US Government position ___________________________

(iii) Name ______________________________________________ Former rank/grade ____________________________________ Last US Government position ___________________________

Firm ____________________________________________________ Name _____________________________________________________ Signature __________________________________________________

Title _____________________________________________________ Date of Execution ____________________________________________

(e) TAXES:

(1) References:

(i) Contract clause entitled "FAR 52.229-06 Taxes—Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts (Jan 1991)."

(ii) US-ROK Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Articles IX and XVI.

(iii) ROK Customs Law, Law No. 1976, promulgated on 29 November 1967, as amended.

(iv) ROK Value Added Tax Law, Law No. 2934, promulgated on 22 December 1976 (effective date 1 July 1977), as amended.

(v) ROK Special Excise Tax Law, Law No. 2935, promulgated on 22 December 1976 (effective date 1 July 1977), as amended.

(2) Contractor shall state the types and estimated amount of taxes that would normally apply to such transactions but are excluded from this proposal.

(i) Customs Tax (except for ROK MND-funded contracts or delivery orders):

Name Number Cost/Unit of Item of Units w/o Tax % of Tax Tax/Unit Tax Total

This item will be imported specifically for this contract? Yes _____ No _____

(ii) Special Excise Tax:

Name Number Cost/Unit of Item of Units w/o Tax % of Tax Tax/Unit Tax Total

Name of item manufacturer

(iii) Value Added Tax (VAT):

Input VAT on materials purchased for this contract. 10% _____ Input VAT on transportation leased/rented for this contract.10% _____ Input VAT on equipment leased/rented for this contract. 10% _____

Input VAT on services purchased for this contract. 10% _____ Output VAT on total contract amount. 10% _____

(iv) Special Excise (Petroleum) Tax:

No. of U/P Liters w/o Tax Tax/Unit Total Tax Amount Regular Gasoline ________ (L) ________ w________ w_____________ Premium Gasoline ________ (L) ________ w________ w_____________ Diesel ________ (L) ________ w________ w_____________ Other ________ (L) ________ w________ w_____________

(v) Education Tax.

(3) Name of the oil company from which POL products will be purchased:

Oil Company: _________________________________________ (Name only)

(4) I certify by this submission that all supplies and services to be purchased for this contract have been proposed exclusive of Value Added Tax, applicable Customs Tax (except ROK MND-funded contracts and delivery orders), Special Excise Tax, and Education Tax.

Signed (Chop)

(f) CERTIFICATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS

By submitting an offer, each offeror agrees to be bound by all certifications and representations in this solicitation.

The Government reserves the right to require any and all certifications and representations to be completed and signed in hard copy by the successful offeror prior to contract award. Failure of an offeror to complete the certifications and representations within the time directed by the Contracting Officer may result in a determination that the contractor is not a responsible offeror for this acquisition.

The following have been modified:

BASIS OF AWARD

Award shall be made in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to the responsible offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer that conforms to all terms and conditions of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to make a technical acceptability determination without any discussion with the offeror.

The following evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used to evaluate the technical factor of the proposal: Each non-price factor or sub-factor will be rated as either acceptable or unacceptable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP. If any sub-factor is rated as unacceptable, the overall factor rating is unacceptable and the entire proposal is unacceptable.

Factor A, Technical (Volume I)

Sub-Factors 1, Conceptual Drawings: The Conceptual drawings will be evaluated to ensure the offeror understands the Government’s design intent and achieve the desired quality end-product in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Conceptual Drawings Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable The offeror submits all conceptual drawings which displays the offerors understanding of the Government’s design intent and the offerors ability to achieve the desired quality end-product in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Unacceptable The offeror fails to submit all conceptual drawings and the conceptual drawings does not display the offerors understanding of the Government’s design intent and the offerors ability to achieve the desired quality end-product in accordance with the Statement of Work.

Sub-Factor 2, Offer Breakdown: The offer breakdown must demonstrate that the offeror clearly understands the requirement in the RFP by listing an appropriate amount of materials, labor, and transportation and equipment and other resources required to perform the contract IAW the Statement of Work and drawings.

Offer Breakdown Evaluation Ratings

Acceptable The offer submits the offer breakdown in the provided format and that the offer breakdown demonstrate the offeror clearly understands the requirement in the RFP by listing an appropriate amount of materials, labor, and transportation and equipment and other resources required to perform the contract IAW the Statement of Work and drawings.

Unacceptable The offer fails submit the offer breakdown in the provided format and the offer breakdown does not demonstrate the offeror clearly understands the requirement in the RFP by listing an appropriate amount of materials, labor, and transportation and equipment and other resources required to perform the contract IAW the Statement of Work and drawings.

Sub-Factor 3, Relevant Experience: The government will evaluate the offeror's record of relevant experience to ascertain the offeror can execute the requirements as stated in this solicitation.

Relevant Experience Evaluation Ratings

Acceptable The offer submits evidence of minimum two (2) years prior experience within the last seven

(7) years in similar or same scope, magnitude, and complexity as specified in this solicitation as a prime contractor on a turnkey contract as stated in the Instruction to Offerors.

Unacceptable The offer fails to submit evidence of minimum two (2) years prior experience within the last seven (7) years in similar or same scope, magnitude, and complexity as specified in this solicitation as a prime contractor on a turnkey contract as stated in the Instruction to Offerors.

Sub-Factor 4, ILS Certification: The offeror shall provide a certificate from the Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) for an Instrument Landing System for which they were the prime contractor.

ILS Certification Evaluation Ratings

Acceptable The offeror provides a certificate from the Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) for an Instrument Landing System for which they were the prime contractor.

Unacceptable The offeror fails to provide a certificate from the Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) for an Instrument Landing System for which they were the prime contractor.

Factor B, Price (Volume II): Price analysis will be performed to determine the extent, to which it is adequate, reasonable, realistic and complete the project described in the solicitation in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b).

The offeror shall also be evaluated to determine whether 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination and 5152.204-4032, Representations and Certifications have been submitted and are complete.

Factor C, Past Performance (Volume III) - The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current Performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the solicitation Requirements. Each performance evaluation will consider the furnished or gathered data, significant achievement(s), the number and severity of problems, the effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record. The overall evaluation will be the product of the subjective judgment of the evaluator after it considers all available, relevant, and recent information.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv).

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

INSTRUCTION TO OFFEROR(S)

This solicitation is conducted under the Logistics Cost Sharing (LCS) program and will result in a contract between the Government of the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the contractor. ROK will directly pay the contractor. No appropriated funds of the United States (US) shall be obligated for payment due under this contract.

In accordance with the International Agreement between the US and ROK, titled “Amendment to the Implementing Agreement between the United States Forces Korea and the Republic of Korea Ministry of National Defense Concerning Logistics Cost Sharing” (hereinafter “International Agreement”), signed by the parties on 14 October 2015:

"The parties hereby agree that all LCS work must be accomplished in the ROK or its territorial waters and that all equipment and supplies that are to be acquired with ROK Government funds shall be manufactured in the ROK, and all LCS service work shall be carried out by Korean contractor(s), the Korea Railroad

Corporation, or the ROK military. The term ‘Korean contractor(s)’ is defined as an entity, that, including its parent, is a domestic corporation under the Korean Tax Act and whose domestic status is recorded in the Certified Copy of Register or its successor document. A parent is defined as an entity that holds more than 50/100 of the total issued and outstanding shares in another company, as reflected in the Stock Change Certificate.”

In order to establish eligibility for award under this LCS contract, the offeror shall submit the documents listed below with their proposal as Volume IV, prior to the closing date/time established in the solicitation.

The contracting officer will determine the offeror’s eligibility status as a Korean contractor solely on the basis of these documents.

1. Prime Contractor Registration: The offeror shall submit its Certified Copy of Register (등기부 등본 (유효사항)), as certified and submitted to the ROK Supreme Court (대법원). In order to qualify as a Korean Contractor, the fourth block of the offeror's Certified Copy of Register [등기부 등본 (유효사항)] must state an address that is physically located in the Republic of Korea.

2. Prime Contractor Stock Change Certification: The offeror shall submit its most recent Stock Change Certificate (주식 변동 상황 명세서), as certified and submitted to the ROK Local Tax Office (국세청). The prime contractor’s Stock Change Certificate (주식 변동 상황 명세서) will be evaluated to determine if the prime contractor has a Parent (as defined in the International Agreement extract above).

3. If the Prime Contractor has a Parent, the offeror shall submit the Parent’s Certified Copy of Register (등기부등본 (유효사항)) as certified and submitted to the ROK Supreme Court (대법원). In order for the Prime Contractor to qualify as a Korean Contractor, the fourth block of the offeror’s Parent’s Certified Copy of Register (등기부 등본 (유효사항)) must state an address that is physically located in the Republic of Korea.

To summarize the requirements stated above:

An offeror that does not have a "Parent" will submit 2 documents to establish that the offeror is a Korean Contractor: 1) Offeror's Certified Copy of Register, and 2) Offeror's Stock Change Certificate.

An offeror that does have a "Parent" will submit 3 documents to establish that the offeror is a Korean Contractor: 1) Offeror's Certified Copy of Register, 2) Offeror's Stock Change Certificate, and 3) Parent's Certified Copy of Register.

Proposals shall be prepared in accordance with the instructions in this Section. If the proposal is not prepared in accordance with this Section, it may be excluded from consideration for award.

It is the responsibility of the prime contractor to have all the appropriate registration and certifications in accordance to the local laws and guidance required by the Korean government in the performance of the statement of work. This is inclusive of all personnel and subcontractors.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FORMAT

Offerors shall submit proposals electronically by the date and time in accordance with the Request for proposal instructions through the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website (https://www.fbo.gov/). The Offerors proposal shall consist of the following sequential volumes: Volume I – Technical; Volume II –Price Schedule;

Volume III – Past Performance; Volume IV - Eligibility for Award for LCS Contract.

a) Format. The proposal submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. All proprietary information shall be clearly and properly marked. The offeror shall submit two copies of the proposal: One copy of the proposal which includes all pages of each index appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer (Volumes I, II, & III) and one copy of the proposal which includes all pages of each index appropriately numbered with the date and solicitation number but without the company name, logo, or price (Volume I only).

b) File Packaging. Files may be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled "quote.zip" using a file compression program (i.e. WinZip).

c) Content Requirements. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal and provide an adequate basis for evaluation. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details, in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal.

Factor A, Technical proposal (Volume I):

Sub-Factor 1, Conceptual Drawings: The Contractor shall submit the following conceptual drawings:

- Pad and Footings location maps with coordinates

- Electrical site plan

- Drawings for electrical infrastructure

- Site plan for ILS

- Drawings for concrete pads

- Drawings for concrete footings of localizer antenna arrays

- Drawings of ILS

- Drawings of Communication infrastructure

(Note) Ownership of Conceptual Drawings: The Government shall take full ownership of the drawings that are submitted with the proposal in above, upon contract award.

Sub-Factor 2, Offer Breakdown – The offeror shall submit an offer breakdown that identifies Materials, Labor, and Transportation and Equipment (T&E), and other resources upon which the offeror intends to rely to perform this contract in accordance with the Statement of Work. The offeror breakdown shall contain all contractor’s costs including mobilization, demobilization, overhead, profit, insurance, design fee and all other costs including but not limited to compliance with environmental laws, tax laws, protection of moving or government property, engineering services (to include survey work and drawings) and waste disposal inherent to accomplish the work requested. The offeror will submit their offer breakdown utilizing the provided excel document (Attachment 1

- Offer Breakdown).

Sub-Factor 3, Relevant Experience - The offeror shall submit evidence of minimum two (2) years prior experience within the last seven (7) years in similar or same scope, magnitude, and complexity as specified in this solicitation as a prime contractor on a turnkey contract which includes the acquisition at a minimum the following: CAT I level ILS associated system hardware and software, infrastructure design and build, of a suitable and effective Air Traffic Control and Landing System in accordance with the ICAO standards (Annex 10 and 14).

The offeror shall submit the evidence for relevant experience as listed below:

PRIME COMPANY INFORMATION

a) Category of Business and Copy of License & Registration Number

b) Company Name

PRIME COMPANY RELEVANT EXPERIENCE CONTRACTS

a) Contract Name and Number

b) Contract Type & Total dollar value

c) Contract award date & Period of Performance

d) Customer Name and Location

e) Description and Relevancy of Work

f) Name, phone numbers, e-mail addresses for contact points in contracts, program management and technical areas

g) Narrative describing performance under the contract, including successes, problems and corrective actions

h) Key management of personnel including copies of resumes and background information

Sub-Factor 4, ILS Certification - The offeror shall submit a certificate from the Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) for an Instrument Landing System for which they were the prime contractor.

Factor B, Price Schedule (Volume II) – The offeror shall submit a price schedule and shall complete and submit 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination and 5152.204-4032, Representations and Certifications.

Factor C, Prime Company Past Performance (Volume III):

(1) The offeror shall provide a list of all contracts and subcontracts it has held within the last three (3) years which are similar to that which is detailed in this solicitation. Offerors shall present past performance for themselves, and for any proposed division, subcontractor, or teaming contractor whose effort on this contract will significantly influence performance of the proposed effort. For the purpose of this solicitation, the term "offeror" includes all team or joint venture members and subcontractors performing major project functions.

(2) For each instance of past performance information, the offeror shall provide a description of significant achievement(s), the number and severity of problems, the effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record.

Contractor shall provide the list of all contracts and sub-contracts as stated above for past performance information as listed below:

PRIME COMPANY INFORMATION:

a) Category of Business

b) Company Name

c) Licenses and Certificates

PRIME COMPANY PAST PERFORMANCE CONTRACTS:

a) Contract number

b) Total dollar value

c) Contract award date

d) Procuring agency

e) Title of contract

f) Program Manager (name, address, and telephone number)

g) Description of program/product

h) Contracting Officer(name, address, e-mail address and telephone number)

i) Period of performance

j) Type of contract

k) A detail synopsis of relevant performance, segregated by areas, which occurred under each contract

Eligibility for Award for LCS Contract (Volume IV) In order to establish eligibility for award under this LCS contract, the offeror shall submit the documents listed below with their proposal prior to the closing date/time established in the solicitation. The contracting officer will determine the offeror’s eligibility status as a Korean contractor solely on the basis of these documents.

An offeror that does not have a "Parent" will submit 2 documents to establish that the offeror is a Korean Contractor: 1) Offeror's Certified Copy of Register, and 2) Offeror's Stock Change Certificate.

An offeror that does have a "Parent" will submit 3 documents to establish that the offeror is a Korean Contractor: 1) Offeror's Certified Copy of Register, 2) Offeror's Stock Change Certificate, and 3) Parent's Certified Copy of Register.

Proposals shall be prepared in accordance with the instructions in this Section. If the proposal is not prepared in accordance with this Section, it may be excluded from consideration for award.

It is the responsibility of the prime contractor to have all the appropriate registration and certifications in accordance to the local laws and guidance required by the Korean government in the performance of the statement of work. This is inclusive of all personnel and subcontractors.

All questions shall be submitted via electronic mail to the Contracting Officer; Mr. Anthony Mosley at anthony.s.mosley.civ@mail.mil and the Contract Specialist, Mr. Pyonh Hwang at pyongha.hwang.ln@mail.mil no later than 72 hours or 5:00 PM (Korean Standard Time) after the noted Site Visit date.

SOW

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR

INSTALLATION OF INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM ON RUNWAY 09L/27R AT OSAN AIR BASE

TECHNICAL PROVISIONS-I

1. GENERAL: The work to be performed for completion of this project shall be as described below and executed by the contractor

1.1 Work by Contractor: The contractor shall provide all labor, tools, equipment, supplies and any other resources necessary to accomplish the scope of work contained herein as listed below and in accordance with the drawings, sketches, OMA specifications 2014, and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards. The contractor will provide a plan including technical specifications and all the drawings showing Instrument Landing System (ILS) and associated support equipment locations.

2.1 SCOPE OF WORK (SOW): The scope of this contract is to acquire one complete integrated Instrument Landing System (ILS) with two ILS Very High Frequency (VHF) Localizers (LOC), two ILS Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Glide Slope (GS), four (4) Local Maintenance and Monitor Systems, four (4) Remote Maintenance and Monitor System, and two sets of spare Localizer/Glide Slope including acquiring, integrating, fielding, testing, and certifying a CAT I ILS at Osan Air Base. The ILS system will be installed in accordance with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards to include ICAO Annex 10 and Annex 14. This contract is considered a turn-key procurement which includes the acquisition of a CAT I ILS, associated system hardware and software, support equipment, infrastructures, operations and maintenance (O&M) training, manuals, and on-site maintenance needed to integrate the subsystems into an operationally safe, suitable and effective Instrument Landing System as determined by the government. The contractor shall provide above ground fuel tanks that include a leak detection device and overflow prevention system.

2.2 SCOPE OF ILS SYSTEM INSTALLATION

2.2.1 The installed system shall include two Localizer and…