Cover_Ltr_ _PP_Questionnaire_Programmatic_Serv_SSEB_081716.doc

DOC document 64 KB Posted

Attached to
Amendment 0004
Solicitation number
W91CRB-16-R-0039
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Exhibit_A_CDRL_A003_Presentation_Material_UPDATED_6July2017.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Cost_Element_Workbook_UPDATED_13July2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_A_CDRL_A005_Cost_Report_UPDATED_6July2017.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRL_A006_Transition_Plan_UPDATED_6July2017.pdf PDF
W91CRB-16-R-0039_Amendment_0003_18July2017.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRL_A002_Progress_Report_UPDATED_6July2017.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_DD254_Programmatic_Services.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Level_of_Effort_for_Programmatic_Support_UPDATED_6July2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W91CRB-16-R-0039_Conformed_Copy_18July2017.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRL_A004_Financial_Status_UPDATED_6July2017.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRL_A001_Technical_Status_UPDATED_6July2017.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_UPDATED_6July2017.doc DOC document
W91CRB-16-R-0039_0002.pdf PDF
CDRL_(A002)_1423-1_PROG_SERV_Progress_Report.doc DOC document
CDRL_(A003)_1423-1_PROG_SERV_Presentation_Material.doc DOC document
CDRL_(A004)_1423-1_PROG_SERV_Financial_Status.doc DOC document
DD_254_Programming_Services.pdf PDF
Cost_Element_Workbook_25_Oct_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Level_of_Effort_for_Programmatic_Support_25_Oct_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_(A001)_1423-1_PROG_SERV_Technical_Status.doc DOC document
W91CRB-16-R-0039_0001.pdf PDF
W91CRB-16-R-0039.pdf PDF
RFI-SS_PROG_SERVICES_02_June_2016.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Level_of_Effort_for_Programmatic_Support_(Base_Year_and_Option_Years)053116.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_PWS_for_Programmatic_Support_Services_Base_31_May_2016.docx DOCX document
RFI-SS_PROG_SERVICES_25_May_2016.docx DOCX document
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MEMORANDUM FOR PROJECT OWNERS

FROM: ACC - APG - W91CRB

4310 BOOTHBY HILL AVE

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21005-3013

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information, U.S. Army Security Assistance Command (USASAC) Programmatic Services, Redstone Arsenal, AL Solicitation Number W91CRB-16-R-0039.

1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours that have had firsthand experience with the offeror, and for the evaluation of their performance. Therefore, we request the attached questionnaire be completed concerning the offeror’s past and present performance.

2. The Government’s areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Because of your association with the offeror, you are urged to submit comments on Services or similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. Any additional information you think would benefit the Government in our evaluation of the offeror’s proposal would be appreciated. Please note we may contact the offeror on problems or areas of concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken. Even though the offeror was required to provide points of contact for each reference provided to the Government, the individual’s name completing this questionnaire will not be disclosed to the offeror.

3. Due to time constraints, it is imperative that the questionnaire be completed and returned not later than 01 December 2016 at 10:00 a.m. to:

ACC - APG - W91CRB

ATTN: Kevin Dunne SOLITIATION NUMBER: W91CRB-16-R-0039

4310 BOOTHBY HILL AVE

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21005-3013

The completed document should be marked: For Official Use Only. I would appreciate the questionnaire be returned by EMAIL: kevin.j.dunne4.civ@mail.mil or by FAX 301-981-1907.

4. If additional information is required, do not hesitate to contact Tom Marousek (410)306-2187 or Kevin Dunne (410)306-2667.

Tom Marousek

Contracting Officer

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

, President Project Title or Brief Description of Work:* This is a non-personal services contract to provide programmatic support services. The contractor shall assist, conduct research, and provide recommendations to USASAC in the development and execution of SA programs. Efforts associated with this task encompass providing analyses, assistance, input and recommendations for the development of FMS cases to accommodate a customer’s unique requirements. The requirement is to provide advice on the implementation of that case, through the on-time delivery of an operational and supportable system. This process requires a thorough understanding of SA Management procedures. It requires a working knowledge of the weapon system, the ability to coordinate the technical task, to include the cost and schedule facets of the FMS case, while eliminating, reducing, or mitigating program risk.

Did this project include Army FMS case work*?

YES / NO

Did this project include Country Program Manager responsibilities?

YES / NO

Did this project include Central Case Manager responsibilities?

YES / NO

Did this project include CPM/Liaison Office responsibilities?

YES / NO

Did this project include contracting and FMS Title 22 financial reporting?

YES / NO

Did this project include Civilian Personnel Management responsibilities?

YES / NO

* Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case management process to include: PreLOR, Case Development, Case Execution, Case Closure and associated requirements.

Contract Number Provided by Offeror:

Dollar Amount *(Average cost per project/delivery order and life of contract cost):

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:*

* NOTE: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation form for those contracts as well.

Contractor performed as the __Prime Contractor __Sub-Contractor __ Key Personnel

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: ______________________________ Title: ____________________

Address: ____________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

____________________________________ Fax Number: __________________________

____________________________________ Email Address: ________________________

C: EMAIL or FAX COMPLETED FORM TO: ACC - APG - W91CRB

EMAIL: kevin.j.dunne4.civ@mail.mil or by FAX 301-981-1907.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems and initiative to solve problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Provided accurate and timely Civilian Personnel Management.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided accurate, timely Foreign Military Sales on the contract.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Note: While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .