Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_UPDATED_6July2017.doc
DOC document 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 0004
- Solicitation number
- W91CRB-16-R-0039
About this file
Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MEMORANDUM FOR PROJECT OWNERS
FROM: Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) - W91CRB
4310 BOOTHBY HILL AVE
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21005-3013
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information, U.S. Army Security Assistance Command (USASAC) Programmatic Services, Redstone Arsenal, AL Solicitation Number W91CRB-16-R-0039.
1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours that have had firsthand experience with the offeror, and for the evaluation of their performance. Therefore, we request the attached questionnaire be completed concerning the offeror’s past and present performance.
2. The Government’s areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Because of your association with the offeror, you are urged to submit comments on Services or similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. Any additional information you think would benefit the Government in our evaluation of the offeror’s proposal would be appreciated. Please note we may contact the offeror on problems or areas of concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken. Even though the offeror was required to provide points of contact for each reference provided to the Government, the individual’s name completing this questionnaire will not be disclosed to the offeror.
3. Due to time constraints, it is imperative that the questionnaire be completed and returned not later than 10 August 2017 at 10:00 a.m.
The completed document should be marked: For Official Use Only. Please return the questionnaire by EMAIL to both of the following:
Alexandra Bryant
Thomas Marousek
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer alexandra.c.bryant.civ@mail.mil thomas.j.marousek.civ@mail.mil
4. If additional information is required, do not hesitate to contact Tom Marousek 410-306-2187 or Alexandra Bryant 410-278-5017.
Sincerely, Tom Marousek
Contracting Officer
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:* This is a non-personal services contract to provide programmatic support services. The contractor shall assist, conduct research, and provide recommendations to USASAC in the development and execution of SA programs. Efforts associated with this task encompass providing analyses, assistance, input and recommendations for the development of FMS cases to accommodate a customer’s unique requirements. The requirement is to provide advice on the implementation of that case, through the on-time delivery of an operational and supportable system. This process requires a thorough understanding of SA Management procedures. It requires a working knowledge of the weapon system, the ability to coordinate the technical task, to include the cost and schedule facets of the FMS case, while eliminating, reducing, or mitigating program risk.
Did this project include Army FMS case work*?
YES / NO
Did this project include Country Program Manager responsibilities?
Did this project include Central Case Manager responsibilities?
Did this project include CPM/Liaison Office responsibilities?
Did this project include contracting and FMS Title 22 financial reporting?
YES / NO
Did this project include Civilian Personnel Management responsibilities?
YES / NO
* Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case management process to include: PreLOR, Case Development, Case Execution, Case Closure and associated requirements.
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount *(Average cost per project/delivery order and life of contract cost):
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:*
* NOTE: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation form for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the __Prime Contractor __Sub-Contractor __ Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: ______________________________ Title: ____________________
Address: ____________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
____________________________ Fax Number: __________________________
____________________________ Email Address: ________________________
C: EMAIL FORM TO: alexandra.c.bryant.civ@mail.mil and thomas.j.marousek.civ@mail.mil.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems and initiative to solve problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Provided accurate and timely Civilian Personnel Management. |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14. |
| Provided accurate, timely Foreign Military Sales on the contract. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 24. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Note: While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .