Attachment_4-_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL-ARNG STATE MEDIA Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9133l-17-R-0028
Issued by
Department of the Army National Guard

About this file

Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DRAFT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL-ARNG STATE MEDIA, newest first.
File Type Posted
DRAFT_Solicitation_for_FY17_IDIQ.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Solicitation_for_FY17_IDIQ.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Sample_TO_Media_Buy_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_-_Sample_TO_Price_Proposal_Matrix_-_State_Media.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_2_-_FY17_SMSP_SAMPLE_TASK_ORDER.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_-_Price_Proposal_Matrix_-_State_Media.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_5_Small_Business_Participation_Proposal.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR

SMSP Services

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in to award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to a person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within 3 days.

Adjectival Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact–Respondent) A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer (KO) at Patrick.r.staresina.mil@mail.mil and the Contract Specialist (KS) at neal.h.dedicatoria2.civ@mail.mil.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .