Solicitation Amendment W912WJ25RA0010001.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

J 1 3

0001 13 MAR 2025 DESIGN BUILD MATOC

W912WJ

W2SD ENDIST NEW ENGLAND

KO CONTRACTING DIVISION, 696 VIRGINIA ROAD

CONCORD, MA 01742-2751

UNITED STATES

ANN ADLEY, EMAIL: ANN.M.ADLEY@USACE.ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: 978-318-8255

SCD: PAS:

W912WJ25RA001

07 MAR 2025

SEE SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

SEE SCHEDULE

ERIN E. BRADLEY

18 MAR 2025

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

QUESTION 1: On PIEE there is a note under Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

place of performance that states "throughout the six (6) New England states (ME, NH, VT, MA, CT, RI but could also include other states and districts covered by the USACE North Atlantic Division's (NAD) mission areas (NY, PA, NJ, DE, MD, VA, WV and the District of Columbia). Could the recent & relevant experience be located within the North Atlantic Division mission areas?

RESPONSE 1: There is no restriction on work location for the recent and relevant experience submitted in response to this solicitation.

QUESTION 2: In the Solicitation, page 9 & 10 of 83, states the Offeror needs to have the Past Performance Questionnaire are required to be completed & submitted as part of our proposal submission. Would the USACE consider excepting CPARS evaluations in lieu of PPQ's? In situations where we don't have a CPARS, could we use previously completed Past Performance Questionnaires?

RESPONSE 2: As stated on Page 9, paragraph #1, "For Federal Government projects with a Past Performance Information Retrieval System/Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Evaluation: provide the contract number, contract place of performance, and DUNS number. In the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Task or Delivery Order Numbers." Past Performance Questionnaire's (PPQs) are only required for "non- Federal Government projects, commercial projects, and Federal Government projects without a CPARS evaluation."

QUESTION 3: Our DOR has since moved firms after we completed projects that demonstrate relevant experience as a team; however, she was our DOR/Design Manager at the other firm and is our DOR /Design Manager at the new firm. Can we use the experience with her on the projects from the other firm however we'd be using her new firm if we were awarded a contract?

RESPONSE 3: An offeror must demonstrate the selected DOR's experience within the Factor 1 projects, but the offeror can submit projects where it used a different DOR (to demonstrate the offeror's experience). Please note that for the purpose of this RFP, a DOR is a firm or entity, not an individual within the firm. "The past performance of individuals (e.g. key personnel) will not be credited under the Past Performance factor." (RFP pg. 20) An offeror will not receive higher consideration for having previously worked with an individual.

QUESTION 4: Phase 2-On page 70 of 83 8.1, it states the Project Manager shall have at a minimum a college degree from an accredited school in architecture, engineering or construction management.

Would the USACE consider the Project Manager's 20+ years' experience in lieu of a college degree?

RESPONSE 4: The Government will not relax this requirement.

QUESTION 5: Phase 2-On page 70 or 83 8.1, it states that the PM shall have at a minimum of a Professional Engineer or Registered Architect. Would the USACE consider waiving that requirement for the PM? This is usually a requirement for the Design Manager.

RESPONSE 5: The Government will not relax this requirement.

W912WJ25RA0010001

QUESTION 6: Per Volume 1 Factor 1- Past Performance-Offerors shall submit no more than five (5) projects. Each must have been completed within the last seven (7) years, as evidence of recent and relevant experience. Does the Offeror have to submit 5 projects design build all with the same DOR? or is it considered 3 projects for the General contractor and 2 projects for the DOR? What if the offeror has many projects they have completed with DOR? Would that be experience for both the prime contractor &

DOR?

RESPONSE 6: The Government does not specify how offerors accomplish submission of up to five (5) total projects. The composition and distribution of those projects across the offeror's team are at the offeror's discretion. Yes, if the offeror has projects completed with the DOR, it would be experience for both the prime contractor and the DOR.

Section 01 00 00 - General Requirements

The Requirements text has been modified to:

Amendment 0001 is necessary to provide responses to Requests for Information (RFIs).

W912WJ25RA0010001