W912QR21R0004_Specs-0002.pdf

CIVIL/OPS/ENVIRONMENTAL BR

ATTN: STEPHEN D RAMSEY

600 DR M L KING JR PL RM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2236

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation W912QR21R0004 for the Full Facility Restoration of an ARMY Reserve Center located in Manitow oc, WI is hereby amended as follow s:

SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR21R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-Apr-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Jun-2021

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE 964860

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR21R0004-0002

W912QR21R0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been modified:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been modified:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

ARMY Reserve Center Renovations Manitowoc, WI

W912QR21R0004

Amendment No. 0002

A. SF 1442: The proposal due date and time has been extended to 08 July 2021 at 3:00PM ET.

B. Section 00 80 00.00 06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS in Specifications Volume 1A has had the following paragraphs revised as noted:

•1.10 AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES has been replaced in its entirety.

•1.11 ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSPECTORS has been added in placeof 1.11 QUANTITY SURVEYS (NOT

USED).

•1.13 SUPERINTENDENCE OF SUBCONTRACTORS has been replaced in itsentirety.

• 1.25 GOVERNMENT FIELD OFFICE FACILITIES AND SERVICES has been replaced in its entirety.

C. Native CAD Drawings are now included with this amendment.

- END OF SUMMARY OF CHANGES -

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 06-Jul-2021 03:00 PM to 08-Jul-2021 03:00 PM.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00 22 16

SECTION 00 22 18

PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION OF OFFERS FOR PHASE TWO

1. Overview.

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select one contractor for the Design and Construction of a Full

Facility Restoration (FFR) project to renovate and repair an Army Reserve Center (ARC) located in Manitowoc, WI.

NOTE: The rating information from Phase I will not be considered in Phase II or in the final selection.

1.2 The target ceiling is $8,737,000 for the base award . The Government cannot guarantee that additional funds will be available for award. Offerors are under no obligation to approach this ceiling.

2. Submittal of Offers.

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's capability for successfully completing the solicited project. For Phase II, requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums.

Innovative, creative, or cost-saving proposals that meet or exceed the requirements are encouraged and will be rated accordingly. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.

2.2 ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH DOD SAFE. No paper copies, CD-ROMs or facsimile submissions will be accepted. Electronic Proposal Submission is required through the Army’s Electronic File Sharing Service, DOD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil). The DOD SAFE Application is used to send large files to individuals that would normally be too large to send via email. There are no user accounts for SAFE.

Authentication is handled via email. Anyone has access to DOD SAFE, and the application is available for use by anyone. The SAFE “Getting Started Guide” has information on how to utilize the system (https://safe.apps.mil/about.php). Instructions for uploading are as follows:

1. Send an email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist to receive the link to drop off your proposal. This will need to be completed five (5) business days prior to proposal due date.

a. Stephen (Dusty) Ramsey, Contract Specialist at Stephen.D.Ramsey@usace.army.mil

b. Emily Moore, Contracting Officer at Emily.A.Moore@usace.army.mil

2. You will receive an email with the link to submit your drop-off. The link will be provided no later than two (2) business days prior to the proposal due date.

3. Short Note to the Recipients: Click the Add Files or Drag and Drop your files. For file description, enter W912QR21R0004-FIRMNAME.

4. Click Upload button to send documents.

5. Guest users will need to check their email to verify their email address before the recipients will be notified. (Government-issued Common Access Cards (CACs) are not required).

File Size Limitations: Offerors are advised to follow the DOD SAFE instructions for uploading files. DOD SAFE supports delivery up to 8GB. If needed, Offerors are advised to break the files down into smaller sections in order to upload it to the system. In such cases, please divide the sections as logically as possible and be sure to clearly name the files as specified below.

File Naming Convention: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention:

W912QR21R0004-FIRMNAME-VOLUME I

W912QR21R0004-FIRMNAME-VOLUME II

Each file name shall begin with the solicitation number followed by the firm’s name and a brief file description. Please see examples above.

File Organization: Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be 11 or larger. Pages shall be letter sized (larger page sizes (such as 11x17 fold-outs, etc.) will be counted as two pages. Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors. Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented. Information pertaining to more than one evaluation factor should be repeated in the each section for each factor.

Upload Completion & Deadline: Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on the solicitation document. The time & date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion / delivery time & date recorded within DOD SAFE site. Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files (e.g. 10MB or more) will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208.

Electronic Files: Files shall be in their native format (i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text. Text and graphics portfolios of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by Microsoft Office or Adobe applications. Data submitted in a spreadsheet format shall be readable by MS Excel (all cells and formulas should be unlocked).

Any information, presented in a proposal that the Offeror wants safeguarded from disclosure to other parties must be identified and labeled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017),” subparagraph (e), which is found in 00 21 00 Instructions of the RFP. The Government will endeavor to honor the restrictions against release requested by Offerors, to the extent permitted under United States law and regulations.

2.3 The Government is using a two-phase procurement approach for this design/build project. For Phase II, offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. All proposal materials shall be submitted electronically with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I for Phase II shall be submitted electronically and include the following information:

Volume I – Factor I: Design Narrative Volume I – Factor II: Schedule Narrative Volume I – Factor III: Small Business Participation Plan

2.5 Volume II for Phase II shall be submitted electronically and shall include the following information:

Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information

Volume II – Tab E: Subcontracting Plan

3. Proposal Evaluation Process.

3.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Technical (Volume I) proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors.

Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated above.

3.2 The evaluation process for Phase II essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance / Responsibility Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete, that both a technical and price proposal were received, and that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the Phase II Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements. Factors I and II (Design Narrative, and Schedule Narrative) will be rated using Table 4 below. Factor III – Small Business Participation Plan will be rated using Table 5 below.

3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.4 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of technical proposals and compare prices. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors.

4.1 Phase II proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are considered approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

4.2 Volume I – Factor I: Design Narrative 1st

4.3 Volume I – Factor II: Schedule Narrative 2nd

4.5 Volume I – Factor III: Small Business 3rd

Participation Plan

4.6 Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information (Sealed Envelope) Tab A Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated Tab B Joint Venture Agreement Not Rated

Tab C Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Not Rated Proof of Financial Ability

Tab D Pre-Award Information Not Rated Tab E Subcontracting Plan Acceptable / Unacceptable

4.7 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

TABLE 4

Technical / Risk Assessment Ratings Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

TABLE 5

Small Business Participation Plan Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the small business objectives.

4.8 Definitions

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See

FAR 15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

7. Clarification. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation. Adverse past performance that must be addressed with Offerors includes unfavorable comments received from sources such as those received from respondents from past performance questionnaires or interviews that have not been finalized within a formal rating system.

5. Volume I – Factor I: Design Narrative

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Provide a clear and concise narrative describing your proposed design process for this project, especially with regard to sequencing of work within a renovation. Proposed narratives shall also address the design process (submittal reviews, fast-track (if utilized), etc.) and logic/rationale for the following building systems:

Mechanical Electrical Plumbing Fire Protection

NOTE: There is a limit of eight (8) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the Design Narrative factor.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 The Design Narrative will be evaluated based on the offeror’s understanding of the USACE design / build process. Projects that demonstrate a complete understanding for the design of this project’s requirements may receive additional consideration by the Government.

6. Volume I – Factor II: Schedule Narrative

6.1 Submission Requirements:

Based on the project budget and scope, provide a schedule narrative describing the construction sequence / process for successful completion of each phase of the project (Design, Construction, Commissioning and Close-Out) within the duration shown in FAR 52.211-10. Offerors may propose a shorter duration for completion, but Government review times shall not be shortened. The Schedule Narrative shall address the major construction milestones and tasks indicated below:

Design Phase / Packages Construction Phasing Fast Tracking (if utilized) Pre-Construction Submittals and Review Long Lead Items Commissioning with critical submittals Red Zone Meeting As-Builts Closeout

NOTE: There is a page limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for this factor.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The narrative will be evaluated based on the understanding of events identified in paragraph 6.1 above and the offeror’s capability to complete the schedule within the contract duration. Narratives that demonstrate a clear understanding of the schedule impacts of the major milestones and tasks and provide a thorough approach for successfully completing the contract within the contract duration may be rated more favorably by the SSEB. Schedules offering duration less than that shown in 52.211-10 may receive a higher rating if the proposed schedule is shown to be realistic and achievable while still addressing the major milestones and tasks required without reducing Government Review time.

NOTE: The SSEB will evaluate the offeror’s schedule narrative using calendar days, not dates. The Government reserves the right to accept or decline a proposed shorter duration as part of the contract award. Should the Government accept the proposed shorter duration, the contract completion stated in 52.211-10 will be replaced with the offeror’s proposed completion duration.

7.0 Volume I – Factor III: Small Business Participation Plan

7.1 Submission Requirements

ALL OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN. The Small Business Participation Plan shall be based on the offeror’s best effort and is required to address each of the following areas individually:

The extent to which the small business programs listed in FAR 19 (small business, small disadvantaged business, woman-owned small business, HubZone, service disabled veteran owned small business, etc.) are specifically identified in the Small Business Participation Plan;

The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition in %’s for the base year and for each individual option year; the extent of commitment to use such firms (for example, enforceable commitments, i.e., teaming agreements signed, are to be considered more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform on this acquisition;

The practicality of the Small Business Participation Plan, i.e., aggressive goals.

The Small Business Participation Plan shall be organized as follows:

(1) Prime Contractor type of business (check all that apply):

( ) Large ( ) Small (also check type of small business) ( ) Small Non-Disadvantaged Business ( ) Small Disadvantaged Business ( ) Woman-Owned Small Business ( ) HUBZone Small Business ( ) Veteran Owned Small Business ( ) Service Disabled, Veteran Owned Small Business

(2) Percentage of your participation as a prime contractor: __________________ %

NOTE: Small Business primes’ self-performance counts as Small Business Participation, and small business primes may achieve small business participation goals through their own performance/participation as a prime and/or through subcontracting to other small businesses.

(3) Percentage of total contract value of subcontracts planned for:

% of Total

Contract Value Large % Total Small % Small Non-Disadvantaged % Small Disadvantaged % Small Woman Owned % Small HUB Zone % Small Veteran Owned % Small Service Disabled Veteran Owned %

Each percentage above shall be accompanied by detailed supporting documentation regarding individual commitments.

NOTE: The sum of the percentages of Small Non-Disadvantaged and Small Disadvantaged should equal the entries for the Total Small; however, the sum of all of the percentages need not equal 100% since the prime is not included and individual subcontractors may be counted towards more than one category.

(4) List principal supplies/services (be specific) to be subcontracted to:

Name of Company

Type of Service/Supply

Large Small Non-Disadvantaged Small Disadvantaged Small Woman Owned Small HUB Zone Small Veteran Owned Small Service Disabled Veteran Owned

(5) Prior Performance Information: Provide any information substantiating the offeror’s track record of utilizing small business on past contracts.

(6) For Large and Small Businesses provide descriptive information for all small business categories. Any information concerning long-term relationships with Small Business subcontractors, such as mentor-protégé relationships, should be provided.

(7) Extent of Commitment: Provide documentation regarding enforceable commitments to utilize any small business category as defined in FAR Part 19 as subcontractors.

(8) Small Business Subcontracting Plan: Each Large Business Offeror shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all of the elements required by FAR Clause 52.219-9. This Plan shall be submitted separately from the Small Business Participation information required above which applies to both Large and Small Businesses. The Subcontracting Plan is not a requirement for evaluation in source selection but rather a requirement for award to a Large Business. The approved Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be incorporated into any resultant contract(s).

7.2 Evaluation Criteria:

ALL OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN.

The Small Business Participation Plan will be evaluated based on the offeror’s best efforts, the level of small business commitment that is being demonstrated for the proposed acquisition, and the prior level of commitment to utilizing small businesses in performance of prior contracts. The Small Business Participation Plan must meet the minimum Total Small Business Participation goal of Twenty percent (20%) of the total contract value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business) Pursuant to DFARS PGI 215.304(c), the following elements will be considered in evaluating an offeror’s Participation Plan:

The extent to which such firms, as defined in FAR Part 19, are specifically identified in plans;

The extent of commitment to use such firms (enforceable commitments will be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

The complexity and variety of the work such firms are to perform;

The realism of the plans;

Past performance of offerors in complying with the requirements of the Subcontracting Plan Goals for such firms and monetary targets for participation;

The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the proposed subcontracted value; and The extent to which the offeror provides detailed explanations/documentation supporting the proposed participation percentages, or lack thereof. The Department of Defense (DOD) has established small business goals to help ensure small business receives a fair proportion of DOD awards.

8.0 Volume II - Price and Proforma Information

8.1 Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

8.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442 and Section 00 10 00, Proposal Price Breakout Schedule. Both of these forms are included in Section 00 10 00 of this solicitation.

8.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The price will be evaluated on base proposal plus all options. The price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. Price will also be checked for unbalancing of line items.

Offerors are cautioned to distribute costs appropriately.

8.2 Tab B – Joint Venture Agreements

8.2.1 Submission Requirements:

If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, or the offeror listed in Block 14 is a joint venture (JV), then a signed JV agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the offeror shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a legal entity separate from the individual joint venture members. However, each member of the JV must submit its own Unique Entity Identifier (formally DUNS number) with the proposal.

Small business offerors (e.g., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB) submitting a proposal as a JV or Mentor-Protégé shall submit evidence from the offeror's SBA Servicing Agency that the offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or Business Opportunity Specialist. Joint Venture agreements and approved 8(a) Mentor-Protégé agreements must be submitted with the proposal.

8.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

Joint Venture Agreements and Mentor-Protégé agreements must comply with the relevant regulations in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations in order for an offeror to be eligible for any small business-related price preference.

8.3 Tab C – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

8.3.1 Submission Requirements:

A. Financial Capability. Submit Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities). Include the name, address, and telephone number of offeror's banking institution. If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

B. Bonding Capability. Submit information showing offeror's ability to be bonded for this project. Include the name, address, and telephone number of the offeror's bonding company.

8.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

See FAR Part 28 for information related to bonds.

8.4 Tab D – Pre-Award Information

8.4.1 Submission Requirements:

A. The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certification.

B. The offeror shall submit the following information:

a) Number of years the firm has been in business

b) Name, address, and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

8.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

8.5 Tab E - Subcontracting Plan

8.5.1 Submission Requirements:

Large business offerors shall submit a Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Clauses 52.219-8 and 52.219-9 DEV. To be acceptable, plans must adequately address the required statutory elements and provide sufficient information to enable the Contracting Officer to answer affirmatively questions A through H of Appendix DD, Part 2, AFARS 5119.705-4. The offeror may use the attached sample sub-contracting plan as a starting point. Percentage goals apply to the total amount being subcontracted.

8.5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Submitted information will be evaluated for acceptability in accordance with AFARS 5119.705-4. To be acceptable, subcontracting plans must:

(a) Adequately address the required statutory elements.

(b) Provide sufficient information to enable the Contracting Officer to answer affirmatively questions A through H of Appendix DD (AFARS 5119.705-4), a copy of which is attached.

(c) To be acceptable, subcontracting plans must meet all of the requirements outlined in Appendix DD, Part 3, AFARS 5119.705. If discussions with offerors are necessary, those areas where the plan is deficient will be reviewed with each offeror with the goal of correcting deficiencies.

(End of Summary of Changes)

H6TSDETS

Text Box

PARKING

H6TSDETS

Text Box

ROOFING KTR LAYDOWN

H6TSDETS

Text Box

ENTRANCE

H6TSDETS

Line

H6TSDETS

Polygonal Line

H6TSDETS

Text Box

ESCORT

H6TSDETS

Text Box

LAYDOWN

Repair SSG Andrew Miller ARC ***SAFETY PAYS*** W912QR-21-R-0004 Manitowoc, WI P2 #473951 AMENDMENT 0002

SECTION 00 80 00.00 0 6

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

02/20

PART 1 GENERAL

Attachments to this specification are as follows:

Construction Project Sign Details Project Submittal Register

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)

ASTM C1153 (2010 R15) Standard Practice for Location of Wet Insulation in Roofing Systems Using Infrared Imaging

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)

UFC 3-600-01 (2016; with Change 2, 2018) Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities

NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA)

NFPA 241 (2019) Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations

U.S. ARMY (DA)

AR 530-1 Operation Security

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 385-1-1 (2014) Safety and Health Requirements Manual

EP 1110-1-8 (2016) Construction Equipment Ownership and Operating Expense Schedule

ERDC/ITL TR-12-1 (2015) A/E/C Graphics Standard, Release 2.0

U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NARA)

29 CFR 1926.59 Hazard Communication

33 CFR 81 International Navigation Rules

33 CFR 84-89 Inland Navigation Rules

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 1

40 CFR 260-265 Protection of Environment, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste

40 CFR 268 Land Disposal Restrictions

1.2 SUBMITTALS

Government approval/acceptance is required for submittals with a "G" designation; submittals not having a "G" designation are for information only. When used, a designation following the "G" designation identifies the office that will review the submittal for the Government. The following shall be submitted in accordance with LRL Section 01 33 00.00 06

SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

Labor, Equipment, and Material Report ;

Daily Equipment Report ;

Radioactive Material/Equipment ;

SD-02 Shop Drawings

Mechanical/Electrical Room Layout ;

SD-04 Samples

Equipment Warranty Identification Tags ;

SD-05 Design Data

SF1413 Statement and Acknowledgement ;

Local Agency Check ;

Progress Photographs ;

SD-07 Certificates

Warranty of Construction ;

NO ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) CERTIFICATION ; G

Insurance ;

Sales and Use Tax ;

SD-11 Closeout Submittals

Preliminary (Working) As-Built Drawings ; G

Final As-Built Drawings ; G

CAD Working As-Built Drawings ; G

Contour Map ; G

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 2

Equipment-in-Place List ;

Maintenance and Parts Data ;

Warranty Management Plan ; G

Waste Test Results ;

1.3 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK

Refer to Clause 52.211-12 "LIQUIDATED DAMAGES" in Section 00 70 00 for the amount of Liquidated Damages for the project.

Refer to Clause 52.211-10 "Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work" in Section 00 70 00 for a notification of significant contract dates.

1.3.1 Additional Requirements/Clarifications of Work Included Within the Contract

a. The time stated in Clause 52.211-10 "Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work" in Section 00 70 00 for completion shall include installation of Government-furnished furniture as well as as-built drawings, O&M manuals, operational tests/reports/training/instructions, equipment lists.

b. Those areas of the building receiving Government-furnished furniture and IT/Telecom equipment shall be made available for Government installation to begin no less than 14 calendar days prior to the contractor's accepted scheduled Construction Completion Date updated in accordance with Clause 52.211-10 "Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work" in Section 00 70 00. The Contractor shall participate in a Furniture Pre-Installation Building Inspection, Daily Furniture Installation Building Inspections, and a Final Furniture Installation Building Inspection along with the furniture installation supervisor and a Government representative.

c. If the Contractor fails to meet the requirements in paragraph "Requirements for Completion of Designated Areas Prior to Furniture Installation", by the Contractor's accepted scheduled Furniture Installation Start Date,the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $2,120 for each week of the delay until the requirement is fulfilled. The liquidated damages contained in this paragraph are independent of and in addition to those references in Clause 52.211-12 "Liquidated Damages - Construction".

Changes to the Contractor's Scheduled Furniture Installation Start Date and Construction Completion Date must be received and accepted no later than forty-nine (49) calendar days prior to the Contractor's current Scheduled Furniture Installation Start Date in order to avoid liquidated damages associated with the furniture installation.

Commencement of furniture installation on or after the Contractor's scheduled Furniture Installation Start Date prior to the fulfillment of these requirements does not relieve the Contractor of their liquidated damages obligation.

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 3

1.3.2 Requirements for Completion of Designated Areas Prior to Furniture Installation

a. The Contractor is responsible for access to the building, security and ownership during the furniture and IT/Telecom equipment installation.

Facility operation and maintenance during the furniture and IT/Telecom equipment installation is the responsibility of the Contractor.

b. The Government will be installing IT/Telecom equipment, including the telephone switch and individual telephone sets, during the furniture installation period.

c. The Contractor shall be responsible for coordination with its subcontractors and the Government furniture and IT/Telecom installation contractors, as necessary, to accommodate the furniture and IT/Telecom equipment installation.

d. The exterior roads, parking areas, walks, and building entrances shall be sufficiently complete to support the delivery of furniture products by semi-tractor trailers and made available for use to the Government furniture and IT/Telecom installation contractors.

e. All interior building finishes of areas receiving furniture, including all furniture entries, pathways, staging, and storage areas shall be complete. Completed building finishes shall include all flooring materials and base, interior walls, ceilings, lighting, HVAC systems and controls, doors, doorframes, and trim. All areas are to be cleaned, vacuumed, and an initial waxing applied as appropriate for the installation of furniture.

f. All utilities and systems serving the building shall be fully operational. The HVAC system(s) must be in operation, fully balanced and commissioned. The elevator(s) shall be operable and certified for use by the approving agency prior to the delivery of the furniture package and must be made available, at no additional cost, for use by the furniture and IT/Telecom equipment installation contractors.

g. The pre-final building punch inspections shall be performed and punch list items corrected by the Contractor prior to the Government Furniture and IT/Telecom installations.

h. During installation of the furniture and IT/Telecom, the Contractor shall participate in inspections as noted above in paragraph "Additional Requirements/Clarifications of Work Included Within the Contract"(b). Repairs to any damaged areas shall be performed at no additional cost to the Government by the appropriate party as determined by the Government during these inspections.

i. The Contractor shall be responsible for the electrical hookup of the power feed(s) and phone/data wiring to-as well as providing all data/com faceplates and jacks for-all powered modular systems furniture. This work may be coordinated with the Government Furniture and IT/Telecom installation contractors to occur while they continue their installations.

j. The Contractor shall perform the final buffing and waxing of areas after the furniture and IT/Telecom installation contractors have indicated either installation in those areas is complete or that the final buffing and waxing should be performed in certain areas prior to

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 4 the placement of furniture. The final buffing and waxing of corridors shall be performed by the Contractor after the furniture and IT/Telecom installation contractors have indicated installation is complete for the building.

k. After furniture and IT/Telecom installation by the Government, the Contractor shall perform a complete final cleaning in all impacted areas. Final Inspection and Acceptance may occur only after all furniture and IT/Telecom installation by the Government is complete.

1.4 NATIVE FILES FOR PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT ON DESIGN/BUILD PROJECT

Included, in addition to the drawings that are part of the solicitation, are Native CAD files in one and only one format that contain limited preliminary notional design concepts and site characteristics that were created during the solicitation development process and are not necessarily all inclusive. They are not reference materials and are not incorporated into the solicitation directly or by reference. The files are provided only for the convenience of the contractor in his preparation of a proposal. The material is given “as is” and no explanation or clarifications will be made with regard to these materials. The Government makes no representations as to the content of the files, their completeness or their accuracy. The solicitation governs in any conflict between these files and the solicitation requirements. The Government does not represent these materials as indicating any preferences with regard to the RFP requirements, nor does it represent that the files show design or technical approaches that will meet the RFP requirements. In addition, the Government affirmatively states that it does not warrant the accuracy of files, including any site conditions represented in these materials. The offeror waives any and all claims based upon information represented in the Native CAD files.

1.5 EXCLUSION OF PERIODS IN COMPUTING COMPLETION SCHEDULES (NOT USED)

1.6 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

In addition to Clause 252.236-7001 "Contract Drawings and Specifications" in Section 00 70 00 the following will apply:

a. After Award or no later than Notice to Proceed (NTP), the Government will furnish the Contractor a compact disk containing all technical contract documents in electronic media only. This disk will include a complete set of drawing files and technical specification files which have all amendments included. The disk will contain drawing files in PDF format along with technical specifications in PDF format. These PDF files are the contract documents that represent the construction requirements of the contract, and are being provided for the Contractor's use in printing paper copies of contract documents.

b. In addition, native CAD files(this includes, but not limited to, all source files, models, custom fonts and linestyles, plot files, and images used to create the contract drawings) are provided in accordance with the "AS-BUILT DOCUMENTS" paragraph for the Contractor's use in maintaining and preparing as-built plans. If another CAD Program is used other than the Using Agency's System, all native CAD files that were generated with that software and all support files will also be included. Only native files are to be used

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 5 for As-Built preparation and information.

c. Native files are to be used for As-Built preparation only. The PDF files are the contract documents that represent the construction requirements of the contract.

1.7 AS-BUILT DOCUMENTS FOR DESIGN BID BUILD PROJECTS (NOT USED)

1.8 AS-BUILT DOCUMENTS FOR DESIGN BUILD PROJECTS

1.8.1 General

It is the scope of this section to provide guidance to the Contractor on preparing as-built drawings for design-build projects. An as-built drawing is a contract construction drawing revised to reflect the final as-built conditions of the project because of modifications, changes, corrections to the project design required during construction, submittals and extensions of design. The terms "drawings," "contract drawings," "drawing files," "working as-built drawings" and "final as-built drawings" refer to contract drawings that are revised to be used for the "RECORD

DRAWING AS-BUILTS".

1.8.2 Withholding

Maintenance of working as-builts is considered part of the value of the facilities being constructed and will not be paid for as a separate line item. All costs in conjunction with periodic as-built maintenance and final preparation shall be considered a subsidiary obligation of the Contractor.

1.8.2.1 Failure to Maintain

If the Contractor fails to maintain the working as-built drawings as specified herein, the Contracting Officer will deduct from the monthly progress payment an amount up to 10% or which, in the Contracting Officer's judgment, represents the estimated cost of bringing the as-built documents up to date. This monthly deduction will continue until an agreement can be reached between the Contracting Officer and the Contractor regarding the accuracy and completeness of working as-built documents. This includes conversion of submittals and other miscellaneous documents.

1.8.2.2 As-Builts Prepared by Contractor

The Contractor is required to prepare and provide final as-built drawings utilizing the native files provided by the Government. If translation is required, the original design models (BIM or CAD) shall be updated to As-Built conditions and then appropriately translated. Updating translated drawings will not be accepted. The contractor shall update the CAD working as-built drawings , in accordance with paragraph "Maintenance of As-Built Drawings", on a quarterly basis and submit them for independent Government review. Both paper and electronic documents shall be available at all times and shall be provided promptly to the Contracting Officer's Representatives when requested. The Contractor shall be responsible for backup of electronic files during construction and for controlling release of information.

The Contractor shall include an activity in the cost-loaded schedule for the final As-Built drawing submittal in the amount defined in the

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 6 following paragraph. See LRL Section 01 32 01.00 06 , PROJECT SCHEDULE, para "Basis for Payment and Cost Loading". This amount shall be withheld and not paid until the final As-Built drawing submittal has been accepted by the Government.

Withholding for the final as-built drawing submittal shall be in the amount of: $50,000 for contracts awarded from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000;

or $100,000 for contracts awarded greater than $10,000,000. Withholding shall be withheld until the final as-built drawing submittal has been approved and accepted by the Government.

1.8.3 Maintenance of Working As-Built Drawings

The Contractor shall revise two (2) sets of paper drawings by red-line process to show the as-built conditions during the prosecution of the project. These as-built marked drawings shall be kept current on a weekly basis and available on the jobsite at all times. Changes in the work from the contract or additional information which is uncovered in the course of construction shall be accurately and neatly recorded as they occur by means of details and notes. Changes must be reflected on all sheets that the change affects . The working as-built marked drawings will be jointly reviewed for accuracy and completeness by the Contracting Officer and the Contractor before submission of each monthly pay estimate. The working as-built drawings shall show the following information if applicable to the project, but not be limited thereto:

a. The actual location, kinds and sizes of all sub-surface utility lines. In order that the location of these lines and appurtenances may be determined in the event the surface openings or indicators become covered over or obscured, the as-built drawings shall show, by offset dimensions to two permanently fixed surface features, the end of each run including each change in direction. Valves, splice boxes and similar appurtenances shall be located by dimensioning along the utility run from a reference point. The average depth below the surface of each run shall also be recorded.

b. The location and dimensions of any changes within the building structure.

c. The correct, alignments, grade elevations, typical cross section, earthwork, structures, or utilities if any changes were made from contract plans.

d. Additional as-built information that exceeds the detail shown on the Contract Drawings. These as-built conditions include those that reflect structural details, fabrication, erection, installation plans and placing details, pipe sizes, insulation material, dimensions of equipment foundations and layouts, equipment, sizes, mechanical and electrical room layouts and other extensions of design, that were not shown in the original contract documents because the exact details were not known until after the time of approved shop drawings. It is recognized that the shop drawing submittals (revised showing as-built conditions) will serve as the as-built record without actual incorporation into the contract drawings. The final as-built construction drawing shall reference the shop drawing file that includes the as-built information. In turn, the shop drawing shall reference the applicable construction as-built drawing. All such shop drawing submittals must include the paper copy and PDF of the drawings.

DOCUMENT 00 80 00.00 06 Page 7

e. The invert elevations and grades of any drainage structures or ditches installed or affected as part of the project construction.

f. Changes or modifications which result from the final inspection.

g. Contour map of the final borrow pit or spoil area with spot elevations as necessary if: borrow material is from sources on Government property; Government property is used as a spoil area; or, if excavated soil materials are placed in approved locations other than a landfill.

h. Where contract drawings present options, only the option selected for construction shall be shown on the final as-built drawings.

i. Systems designed or enhanced by the Contractor, such as HVAC controls, fire alarms, fire sprinklers, fire protection, fire detection and irrigation systems and other related systems…