W912QR10R0014_Specs_Vol1-0002.pdf

CIVIL/OPS/ENVIRONMENTAL BR

ATTN: GLENN W MOON

600 DR M L KING JR PL RM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2236

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 28

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR19R0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Nov-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

29-Jan-2020

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE 964860

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR10R0014_Specs_Vol1-0002

W912QR19R0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

IDIQ Design Build Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Building Envelope, Roof Repair and Replacement Construction in Support of U.S. Army Reserve National Roofing Program (NRP), Army, and Air Force Reserves Sections is hereby amended as follows:

a. Offerors must acknowledge all amendments.

b. Volume 1 and 2 are hereby replaced in their entirety.

c. The Price Breakout Schedules are incorporated.

d. Section 00 70 00 Fill-ins have been incorporated for the Seed Task Orders.

e. Section 00 22 18 is incorporated.

f. The following Davis Bacon wage Determinations are incorporated for the Seed Task Orders:

CA20200007 dated 01/24/2020 FL20200218 dated 01/03/2020 IL20200008 dated 01/24/2020 WV20200034 dated 01/03/2020

g. The due date and time for phase 2 responses is 02 April 2020 at 10:00 AM Eastern Time.

h. All other information remains the same.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 04-Dec-2019 01:00 PM to 02-Apr-2020 10:00 AM.

The following have been modified:

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE

SECTION 00 10 00 – PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – Estimated Base MATOC

Provide the binding contract rates and hours to be included on a Task Order basis. These rates must be utilized for all tasks awarded under the MATOCs and in the seed task orders.

Discipline Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total

Project Manager _______ hours x 2000 = $___________ Superintendent _______ hours x 2000 = $___________ CQC Manager _______ hours x 2000 = $___________ Site Safety Health Officer _______ hours x 2000 = $___________

NOTE NO. 1: As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of lowest priced offeror who is awarded one of the Base contracts.

NOTE NO. 2: As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Total Evaluated Price for the base MATOCs will be evaluated on the base proposal for all five (5) of the Seed Task Orders combined.

NOTE NO. 3: The hours provided above are estimated for price evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a guarantee that any amount of work above the minimum guarantee will be awarded under this contract.

NOTE NO. 4: The hourly rates proposed above are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the entire duration of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract. These rates must be adhered to throughout the entire life of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.

NOTE NO. 5: As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation of the base MATOCs will be determined by adding the base proposals for all five (5) of the Seed Task Orders and the total estimated base MATOC price combined.

Total Estimated Base MATOC Price $________________

SECTION 00 10 00 – PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – SEED TASK ORDER NO. 1

PROJECT: The Scope of Work (SOW) is for the design and construction services required to repair failed or failing roofs in the United States Army Reserve Command (USARC) roofing inventory under the NRP MATOC Seed Project #1

LOCATIONS:

PROPOSER’S NAME:

ITEM

NUMBER Description UNIT AMOUNT

BASE Work ForAS001 0001 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at AS001 Building VA

0002 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ design the roof at AS001 Building VA

0003 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at AS001 Building AAFES

0004 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ Design the roof at AS001 Building AAFES

0005 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at AS001 Building Warehouse

0006 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ Design the roof at AS001 Building Warehouse

TOTAL SEED TASK ORDER NO. 1 PROPOSAL $

Show that you have used the binding rates from the base MATOC in establishing the price for this Seed Task Order.

Provide the binding contract rates and hours included in job prices above for all tasks.

Project Manager _______ hours x _______ = $___________ Superintendent _______ hours x _______ = $___________ CQC Manager _______ hours x _______ = $___________ Site Safety Health Officer _______ hours x _______ = $___________

FACILITY LOCATION

AS001 Tafuna, American Samoa

NOTES FOR CONTRACT LINE ITEM (CLIN) SCHEDULE

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the CLIN Schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of lowest priced offeror who is awarded one of the Base contracts.

SECTION 00 10 00 – PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – SEED TASK ORDER NO. 2

inventory under the NRP MATOC Seed Project #2

NUMBER Description UNIT AMOUNT

BASE Work ForCA150 0001 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at CA150

0002 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ design the roof at CA150A

TOTAL SEED TASK ORDER NO. 2 PROPOSAL $

Show that you have used the binding rates from the base MATOC in establishing the price for this Seed Task Order.

CQC Manager _______ hours x _______ = $___________ Site Safety Health Officer _______ hours x _______ = $___________

FACILITY LOCATION

CA150 Vallejo, CA

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the CLIN Schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of

SECTION 00 10 00 – PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – SEED TASK ORDER NO. 3

inventory under the NRP MATOC Seed Project #3

NUMBER Description UNIT AMOUNT

BASE Work ForFL125 0001 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at FL125

0002 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ design the roof at FL125

TOTAL SEED TASK ORDER NO. 3 PROPOSAL $

Show that you have used the binding rates from the base MATOC in establishing the price for this Seed Task Order.

FL125 Orlando, FL

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the CLIN Schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of

SECTION 00 10 00 – PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – SEED TASK ORDER NO. 4

inventory under the NRP FY 20 MATOC Seed Project #4

NUMBER Description UNIT AMOUNT

BASE Work For IL079 JT001 OMS MB 0001 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at IL079 Building JT001 OMS MB

0002 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ design the roof at IL079 Building JT001

OMS MB

TOTAL SEED TASK ORDER NO. 4 PROPOSAL $

Show that you have used the binding rates from the base MATOC in establishing the price for this Seed Task Order.

IL079 Elwood, IL

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the CLIN Schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of

SECTION 00 10 00 – PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE –SEED TASK ORDER NO. 5

inventory under the NRP MATOC Seed Project #5

NUMBER Description UNIT AMOUNT

BASE Work ForWV026 0001 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at WV026 USARC Building

0002 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ design the roof at WV026 USARC Building

0003 Construction: All work, materials, and labor JOB $___________ required to replace the roof at WV026 OMS Building

0004 Design: All work and labor required to JOB $___________ Design the roof at WV026 OMS Building

TOTAL SEED TASK ORDER NO. 5 PROPOSAL $

Show that you have used the binding rates from the base MATOC in establishing the price for this Seed Task Order.

WV026 Martinsburg, WV

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items of the CLIN Schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of

Seed Task Description UNIT AMOUNT Order

TO #1 Work for AS001 1 JOB $___________

TO #2 Work for CA150 1 JOB $____________

TO #3 Work for FL125 1 JOB $___________

TO #4 Work for IL079 1 JOB $___________

TO #5 Work for WV0026 1 JOB $___________

TOTAL ALL SEED TASK ORDERS $

TOTAL ESTIMATED BASE MATOC PRICE $ ____________

TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE $ ____________

NOTE NO. 1: As outlined in section 00 22 18, para 7.1.2, The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation of the base MATOCs will be determined by adding the base proposals for all five (5) of the Seed Task Orders and the total estimated base MATOC price combined.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

SECTION 00 22 18

PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION OF OFFERS FOR PHASE TWO

1. Overview

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select up to ten (10) contractors for Design Build Multiple Award Task

Order Contracts for building envelope and roof repair and replacement within the Louisville District’s Area of Responsibility. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible offeror, whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government, all factors considered.

1.2 This is a two-phase procurement. Following completion of the evaluation of Phase I, up to a maximum of fifteen (15) most highly qualified offerors will be selected to participate in Phase II. The offerors selected for Phase II will be invited to submit a proposal in accordance with the information described in this Section 00 22 18, Procedures for Submittal and Evaluation of Offers for Phase Two.

1.3 The basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off process. The Contracting Officer will award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible offeror whom the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable and offers the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer and the right to reject all offers. For Phase II submittals, requirements stated in this RFP are minimums.

NOTE: The rating information from Phase I and Phase II will be utilized in the final selection. The ratings for Phase I and Phase II will be considered approximately equal in making the final selection.

2. Submittal of Offers

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's technical information, and management capabilities necessary for successful completion of the project. For the Phase II submittals, requirements stated in this RFP are minimums. Innovative, creative or cost-saving proposals that meet or exceed the requirements are encouraged and will be rated accordingly. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.

2.2 Offerors shall submit their proposals to the US Army Corps of Engineers, 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Place, Room 821, Louisville, KY 40202-2267 no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

2.3 The Government is using a two-phase procurement approach for this design/build project. For Phase II, offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. All proposal materials shall be submitted in binders with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers. Phase II proposal sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I for Phase II shall be submitted in a Three-Ring Binder and include the following information:

Volume I – Factor I: Design / Technical o Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings (CLEARLY DELINEATED FOR EACH SEED

PROJECT)

o Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative (CLEARLY DELINEATED FOR EACH SEED

PROJECT)

Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

NOTE: Volume I shall be submitted in original and six (6) paper copies and one (1) electronic copy on CD. The paper version of the proposal shall be used for evaluation and will control any conflicts or discrepancies between the two media. Offeror is responsible for ensuring the paper copy is consistent with the electronic copy of the proposal. Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab (factor or sub-factor) may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information. Any specified page limits will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted which exceeds the specified limit will not be evaluated.

2.5 Volume II for Phase II shall be submitted in a Three-Ring binder (placed in a separate envelope) and include the following information:

Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information

NOTE: Volume II, with the final price breakout schedule shall be submitted in original and one (1) electronic copy on CD. The paper version of the proposal shall be used for evaluation and will control any conflicts or discrepancies between the two media. Offeror is responsible for ensuring the paper copy is consistent with the electronic copy of the proposal. Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab (factor or sub-factor) may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

3. Proposal Evaluation Process

3.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Technical/quality proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors will not be revealed to anyone who is not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated in paragraph 1.3 above.

3.2 The evaluation process for Phase II essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and cost/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete and that both a technical and price proposal were received.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the proposals against the Phase II RFP requirements. The factors will be rated using an adjectival-based system.

3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation.

The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.4 Cost/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations and reviews are complete, the SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of Phase I and Phase II technical proposals and compare prices. The SSA will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Phase II Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors

4.1 Phase II proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors and sub-factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All technical evaluation factors and sub-factors, other than cost or price, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price. Phase I ratings are considered approximately equal in importance to Phase II ratings. Offerors are reminded to include their best technical approach in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interest of the Government.

4.2 Volume I – Factor I: Design / Technical 1st

Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings equal to sub-factor 2 Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative equal to sub-factor 1

4.3 Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach 2nd

4.4 Volume II – Price and Pro Forma Information

Tab A Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated

Tab B Joint Venture Agreements Not Rated

Tab C Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Not Rated

Proof of Financial Ability

Tab D Pre-Award Information Not Rated

4.5 Ratings:

Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

Technical Assessment Ratings Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable.

Proposal is un-awardable.

4.6 Definitions:

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offerors’ proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offerors’ proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See

FAR 15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).

7. Clarification. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating from sources where the information is from other than formal rating systems such as “PPIRS” or

“FAPPIS.”

5. Volume I – Factor I: Design / Technical

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings

For each seed project, provide design drawings developed to a 35% concept level. Submit design drawings on ANSI D half size scalable to fit 11” x 17” sheets. The design drawings for each seed project must be packaged separately and must be clearly delineated. The proposed design drawings shall be developed to a 35% concept level. After award the successful contractor for each project shall be required to complete the design process to include review meetings for each project as required by the specifications. The design drawings for each seed project shall contain the following:

BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS

Include the following:

Roof Plan Roof System Installation Details Other Details (Penetrations, flashings, and any unique details required for each site.)

NOTE: There is a limit of 5 pages each project, 25 pages total for drawings of the Design Drawings sub-factor using 11” x 17” sheets. All information must be clearly legible. Any information that is not clearly legible may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

5.1.2 Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative

For each seed project, provide a clear and concise narrative describing your design approach. An individual project narrative must be provided for each seed project, and must be clearly delineated. Each seed project design narrative shall include the following site and building features:

Roofing System to include description of system components from the deck to the surface membrane.

Proposed attachment methods for each roof system component Structural Implications if applicable Handling of Mechanical & Electrical and/or other appurtenances or features if applicable Building Envelope Issues if applicable.

Site Work w/r to lay down, protection of grounds and existing site features.

ASHRAE

NOTE: There is a limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the Design Narrative sub-factor.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings

Design Drawings will be reviewed for thoroughness, functionality, quality of materials, and an understanding of the project requirements. Drawings that exceed the minimum requirements may receive additional consideration.

5.2.2 Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative:

The Design Narrative will be evaluated for completeness and thoroughness, by including the building features of the RFP as outlined in Paragraph 5.1.2 for each seed project.. Proposals that demonstrate a complete understanding of the project requirements for each location , may receive additional consideration.

6. Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

6.1 Submission Requirements:

6.1.1 Management Approach

Provide a Management Approach narrative that describes how your labor, resources, designers, subcontractors and material suppliers will be managed, supervised, coordinated and used to ensure successful completion of the project. The Management Approach shall include, at a minimum, the following categories – Organization, Collaborative Approach to Design-Build, Planning and Scheduling, and Quality Control. The Management Approach shall address all elements listed in the below descriptions for each category.

6.1.1.1 Organization: Describe the firms that compose the offeror’s Design-Build team, their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Present a matrix of responsibilities for each firm in executing the key design and construction activities for each major feature of the effort. Describe the proposed management structure for the Design-Build team, explaining how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the Design-Build team.

6.1.1.2 Collaborative Approach for Design-Build: Describe interactions and communications within the Design-

Build team and with the Corps of Engineers during the design. Describe the role of the construction team members during design. Describe the role and interaction of the design team with the construction team during construction, addressing, at a minimum:

design during construction, including control and approval of revisions to the accepted design;

requests for information;

shop drawing and submittal reviews and approvals;

progress meetings;

site visits, if any;

contract completion, closeout, as-built and completion documentation

6.1.1.3 Planning and Scheduling: Describe the offeror’s schedule control capabilities and any systems the offeror will use to plan design and construction activities. Explain how the schedule will be used to manage design and construction. Discuss internal procedures for handling delays to minimize time growth or “schedule creep.” Include any consideration of fast-tracking design and construction. Discuss how you plan to streamline construction, manage labor and any other resource constraints to reduce cost and achieve project completion within the project duration.

6.1.1.4 Quality Control: Describe the Design-Build team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the design and construction.

Describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan.

Provide specific information on how you will manage design quality control, track design evolution and changes during design to meet the schedule and to facilitate Government reviews.

Provide information on how you will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, submittal reviews, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation.

In addition to the required designer-of-record roles specified within the RFP for maintaining integrity of the design, describe any other DOR involvement in the quality control process, if any.

There is no need to submit a quality control plan as the successful offeror will provide that after award. Describe the offeror’s system to control and track revisions to the design.

NOTE: There is a page limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the Management Approach factor.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

6.2.1 Management Approach

Management Approach will be evaluated based on the level of understanding of the work and the involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed during construction of the project. A Management Approach that demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements and provides a thorough approach for successfully managing both individual and simultaneous project execution may be rated more favorably by the SSEB.

6.2.3 Organization: The Government will evaluate clarity and strength of the overall organization, the structure and staffing to execute the entire scope of work.

6.2.4 Collaborative Approach for Design-Build: The Government will evaluate the integration of the design and construction firms during design and construction. Proposals demonstrating that construction personnel will be actively involved in the design process may be viewed more favorably by the SSEB. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the design process and the roles of the designers of record and the Government reviewers. The Government will evaluate the role of the designer in maintaining design integrity throughout the process, including its key roles during construction.

6.2.5 Planning and Scheduling: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of and ability to manage an integrated design-build schedule with overlapping locations that may be located at disperse locations within both CONUS and OCONUS US States and Territories. Offerors that propose effective methods to streamline construction, minimize delays, and to manage labor and other resource constraints may be viewed more favorably by the SSEB.

6.2.6 Quality Control: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s capabilities and understanding of the contractually required quality control processes for both design and construction. The Government places value upon continued participation by the designers of record during the construction quality control process. The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the staffing plan to cover all required tasks and responsibilities. The Government will evaluate the strength of the offeror’s proposed system to control and track revisions to the design.

7. Volume II – Price and Proforma Information (Submit in a separate envelope).

7.1 Tab A – Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

7.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442 and Section 00 10 00, Proposal Price Breakout Schedule. Both of these forms are included in Section 00 10 00 of this solicitation.

7.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation of the base MATOCs will be determined by adding the base proposals for all five (5) of the Seed Task Orders and the total estimated base MATOC price combined. Offerors must complete all of the price breakout information for each seed task order for the purpose of evaluation. The prices for each Seed Task Order, as well as the binding rates that make up the estimated base MATOC price, will be reviewed by the SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis. Price will also be checked for unbalancing of line items.

Offerors are cautioned to distribute costs appropriately. The SSEB and Contracting Officer/ SSA will also confirm that the proposed binding rates are used for each seed task order. Proposed prices that do not utilize the proposed binding rates will be considered Unacceptable. The Seed Task Orders will be awarded on the basis of lowest price offeror who is awarded one of the Base contracts.

7.2 Tab B – Joint Venture and Mentor-Protégé Agreements

7.2.1 Submission Requirements:

Small business offerors (e.g., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSBC, etc.) submitting a proposal as a Joint Venture or Mentor-Protégé Joint Venture shall submit evidence from the Offeror's SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or Business Opportunity Specialist. Joint Venture agreements and approved 8(a) Mentor-Protégé agreements must be submitted with the proposal.

7.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Joint Venture Agreements and Mentor-Protégé agreements must comply with the relevant regulations in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

7.3 Tab C – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

7.3.1 Submission Requirements:

A. Financial Capability. Submit Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities). Include the name, address and telephone number of firm's banking institution.

B. Bonding Capability. Submit information showing offeror's ability to be bonded for this project. Include the name, address and telephone number of the firm's bonding company.

7.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

7.4 Tab D – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

7.4.1 Submission Requirements:

A. The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certification.

B. The offeror shall submit the following information:

a) Number of years the firm has been in business

b) Name, address and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

C. The offeror shall submit the name, address, and DUNS number for any A-E subcontractor identified in the proposal.

7.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

Section 00 70 00 Fill-ins

52.211-10 Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work (Apr 1984) The Contractor shall be required to

(a) commence work under this contract within 10 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed,

(b) prosecute the work diligently, and

(c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than AS001 = 360, CA150 = 270; FL125 = 270; IL079 = 360;

WV026 = 360 calendar days from Notice to Proceed. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of Clause)

52.211-12 Liquidated Damages -- Construction (Sept 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $1,279.00 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor’s right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

52.211-13 Time Extensions (Sept 2000)

Time extensions for contract changes will depend upon the extent, if any, by which the changes cause delay in the completion of the various elements of construction. The change order granting the time extension may provide that the contract completion date will be extended only for those specific elements related to the changed work and that the remaining contract completion dates for all other portions of the work will not be altered. The change order also may provide an equitable readjustment of liquidated damages under the new completion schedule.

(End of Clause)

52.217-5 Evaluation of Options (Jul 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government’s best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(End of Provision)

52.217-7 Option for Increased Quantity -- Separately Priced Line Item (Mar 1989)

The Government may require the delivery of the numbered line item, identified in the Schedule as an option item, in the quantity and at the price stated in the Schedule. The Contracting Officer may exercise the option reference Price Breakout Schedule. Delivery of added items shall continue at the same rate that like items are called for under the contract, unless the parties otherwise agree.

(End of Clause)

52.222-23 Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction (Feb 1999)

(a) The offeror’s attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor’s aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for Minority Participation for Each Trade Goals for Female Participation for Each Trade

Not applicable for territories (Tafuna, AS AS001) 6.9%

25.6% (Vallejo, CA CA150) 6.9%

15.5% (Orlando, FL FL125) 6.9%

19.6% (Elwood, IL IL079) 6.9%

25.2% (Martinsburg, WV WV026) 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor’s construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor’s compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on

(1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause,

(2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled “Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,’’ and

(3) its efforts to meet the goals.

The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor’s goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer’s identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the “covered area” is the state of Florida, Orange County and city Orlando, state of Illinois, Will and Kendall County and city Elwood, state of West Virginia, Berkley County and city Martinsburg, and state of California, Solana County and city Vallejo.

(End of Provision)

52.232-18 Availability of Funds

Funds are not presently available for this contract. The Government’s obligation under this contract is contingent upon the availability of funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for this contract and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

52.236-4 Physical Data (Apr 1984)

Data and information furnished or referred to below is for the Contractor’s information. The Government shall not be responsible for any interpretation of or conclusion drawn from the data or information by the Contractor.

(a) The indications of physical conditions on the drawings and in the specifications are the result of site investigations by Surveys.

(b) Weather conditions: The Contractor shall make his own investigations as to weather conditions at the site. Data may be obtained from various National Weather Service offices located generally at airports of principal cities, the nearest to these projects are as follows: AS001 = Tafuna, AS; CA150 = San Fancisco, CA; FL125 = Orlando, FL;

IL079= Joliet, IL; WV026=Martinsburg, WV.

(c) Transportation facilities: Access ways shall be investigated by the Contractor to satisfy himself as to their existence and allowable use.

(d) Historical data for all areas may be obtained from:

U. S. Department of Commerce National Climatic Center Federal Building Asheville, NC 28801

FAR 52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction) (Feb 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:

POC for site Visit Tim McClellan 3 work days prior. timothy.m.mcclellan@usace.army.mil

FL125 Feb 10-11; WV026 Feb 13-14

IL079 Mar 9-10; CA150 Mar 11-12

(End of Provision)

52.246-21 Warranty of Construction (Mar 1994)

(a) In addition to any other warranties in this contract, the Contractor warrants, except as provided in paragraph (i) of this clause, that work performed under this contract conforms to the contract requirements and is free of any defect in equipment, material, or design furnished, or workmanship performed by the Contractor or any subcontractor or supplier at any tier.

(b) This warranty shall continue for a period of 1 year from the date of final acceptance of the work. If the Government takes possession of any part of the work before final acceptance, this warranty shall continue for a period of 1 year from the date the Government takes possession.

(c) The Contractor shall remedy at the Contractor’s expense any failure to conform, or any defect. In addition, the Contractor shall remedy at the Contractor’s expense any damage to Government-owned or controlled real or personal property, when that damage is the result of --

(1) The Contractor’s failure to conform to contract requirements; or

(2) Any defect of equipment, material, workmanship, or design furnished.

(d) The Contractor shall restore any work damaged in fulfilling the terms and conditions of this clause. The Contractor’s warranty with respect to work repaired or replaced will run for 1 year from the date of repair or replacement.

(e) The Contracting Officer shall notify the Contractor, in writing, within a reasonable time after the discovery of any failure, defect, or damage.

(f) If the Contractor fails to remedy any failure, defect, or damage within a reasonable time after receipt of notice, the Government shall have the right to replace, repair, or otherwise remedy the failure, defect, or damage at the Contractor’s expense.

(g) With respect to all warranties, express or implied, from subcontractors, manufacturers, or suppliers for work performed and materials furnished under this contract, the Contractor shall --

(1) Obtain all warranties that would be given in normal commercial practice;

(2) Require all warranties to be executed, in writing, for the benefit of the Government, if directed by the Contracting Officer; and

(3) Enforce all warranties for the benefit of the Government, if directed by the Contracting Officer.

(h) In the event the Contractor’s warranty under paragraph (b) of this clause has expired, the Government may bring suit at its expense to enforce a subcontractor’s, manufacturer’s, or supplier’s warranty.

(i) Unless a defect is caused by the negligence of the Contractor or subcontractor or supplier at any tier, the Contractor shall not be liable for the repair of any defects of material or design furnished by the Government nor for the repair of any damage that results from any defect in Government-furnished material or design.

(j) This warranty shall not limit the Government’s rights under the Inspection and Acceptance clause of this contract with respect to latent defects, gross mistakes, or fraud.

252.236-7001 Contract Drawings and Specifications (AUG 2000)

(a) The Government will provide to the Contractor, without charge, one set of contract drawings and specifications, except publications incorporated into the technical provisions by reference, in electronic or paper media as chosen by the Contracting Officer.

(b) The Contractor shall—

(1) Check all drawings furnished immediately upon receipt;

(2) Compare all drawings and verify the figures before laying out the work;

(3) Promptly notify the Contracting Officer of any discrepancies;

(4) Be responsible for any errors that might have been avoided by complying with this paragraph (b); and

(5) Reproduce and print contract drawings and specifications as needed.

(c) In general--

(1) Large-scale drawings shall govern small-scale drawings; and

(2) The Contractor shall follow figures marked on drawings in preference to scale measurements.

(d) Omissions from the drawings or specifications or the misdescription of details of work that are manifestly necessary to carry out the intent of the drawings and specifications, or that are customarily performed, shall not relieve the Contractor from performing such omitted or misdescribed details of the work. The Contractor shall perform such details as if fully and correctly set forth and described in the drawings and specifications.

(e) The work shall conform to the specifications and the contract drawings identified on the following index of drawings:

See Drawing Index.

(End of clause)

SECTION 00 73 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

The following have been added by full text:

WAGE RATES FOR SEED PROJECTS

The Davis-Bacon Act is not applicable to contract work performed in American…