W912QR19R0010_Phase2-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation W912QR19R0010 for the IDIQ Design Build and Design Bid Build Multiple Aw ard Task Order Contract (MATOC) to support the military construction (MILCON) and operations and maintenance (O&M) funded construction requirements for U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, Army Reserve, and Air Force Reserve nationw ide programs in the Southeast Region is hereby amended as follow s:

SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 37

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR19R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3.EFFECTIVE

DATE

16-Dec-2020

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR19R0010_Phase2-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002 - PHASE II

General Information:

1. Only the Offerors who have been selected to continue to Phase II of this solicitation are hereby invited to submit a Phase II proposal at this time.

2. The certified final design submittal specifications and drawings for the sample project are hereby issued in their entirety.

3. The due date and time for Phase II proposals submission is 1400 HRS EST on Tuesday, 19 January 2021.

Section 00 10 00:

4. The price breakout schedule for the IDIQ MATOC is hereby issued in its entirety.

5. The price breakout schedule for the sample project is hereby issued in its entirety.

Section 00 21 00:

6. The bidder inquiry key for Phase II is GNPW5I-AUZ69B.

7. The electronic proposal submission instructions are hereby added in its entirety.

Section 00 22 18:

8. The section 00 22 18 – Procedures for Submittal and Evaluation of Offers for Phase II is hereby added in its entirety.

Section 00 70 00:

9. FAR Clause 52.204-24 and 52.204-25 have been replaced in their entirety.

Section 00 72 00:

10. The General Requirements section was updated to include (2) clauses.

Section 00 73 00

11. General Decision Number TX20200231 dated 11 September 2020 is hereby added in its entirety.

Section 00 75 00:

12. Section 00 75 00 – Sample Task Order Contract Clauses are hereby added in its entirety.

The following have been modified:

PROJNET INSTRUCTIONS

OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.ProjNet.org/ProjNet. As noted below, offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet.

Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation.

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system.

The Solicitation Number is: W912QR19R0010 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: GNPW5I-AUZ69B

Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

5. Select Continue. A page will then open stating a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Select Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be emailed any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.

2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

6. Select Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.

7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety and to review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of bids/proposals.

NOTES:

1. Offerors shall not submit their proposals via ProjNet, but in accordance with the provisions stated in the solicitation. Any questions regarding acceptable means of submitting offers shall be made directly to the Contract Specialist identified in the solicitation.

2. Government responses to technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds that are submitted to ProjNet in accordance with the procedures above are not binding on the Government unless an amendment is issued on Standard Form 30. In the case of any conflicts, the solicitation governs. Any changes or revisions to the solicitation will be made by formal amendment. Government responses will be limited to: (a) Notice that an amendment will be issued; (b) Reference to an existing requirement contained in the solicitation; or (c) Notice that a response is not necessary.

3. The ability to enter technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds will be disabled five (5) days prior to the closing date stated in the solicitation. No Government responses will be entered into the ProjNet system within two (2) days prior to the closing date stated in the solicitation.

The following have been added by full text:

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE-MATOC

Contract Line Item Schedule – MATOC Binding Rates

Provide the fully burdened contract rates and hours to be included on a task order basis. These rates must be utilized for all tasks awarded under the MATOC and in the sample task order.

Binding Rate Unit

Estimated Units

Total hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Base Year 1:

Discipline

Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Base Year 2:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Base Year 3:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Base Year 4:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Base Year 5:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer hours x 9,939 = $

Project Manager hours x 2,761

W912QR19R0010

Binding Rate Unit

Estimated Units

Total hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total hours x 2,761 = $ hours x 9,939 = $ hours x 9,939 = $

Option Year 1:

Discipline

Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Option Year 2:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Option Year 3:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Option Year 4:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer

Option Year 5:

Discipline

Project Manager Superintendent CQC Manager Site Safety Health Officer hours x 9,939 = $

FAR 52.217-8 Additional 6 Months

Discipline Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total

Project Manager hours x 322 = $ Superintendent hours x 1158 = $ CQC Manager hours x 1158 = $ Site Safety Health Officer hours x 1158 = $

Project Manager hours x 2,176

TOTAL ESTIMATED MATOC PRICE $

Note No. 1: An additional six (6) months may be added to the contract following the base, should FAR 52.217- 8 be exercised. No additional capacity will be added should this option be exercised.

Note No. 2: Qualifications for each of the disciplines may be found in Specifications Volume 1 of 2.

Note No. 3: The estimated hours for each discipline are provided for price evaluation purposes only. They do not constitute a guarantee that any amount of work above the minimum guarantee will be awarded under this contract.

Note No. 4: The hourly rates proposed above are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the entire duration of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract.

These rates must be adhered to throughout the entire life of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.

Note No. 5: The submitted base rates must be utilized for the development of proposal pricing for the sample project as well as any future requests for proposal. All rates will be reviewed to ensure fair and reasonable pricing.

Note No. 6: The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation for the base MATOC will be determined by adding the proposal for the sample project and the total estimated MATOC price combined.

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE-SAMPLE

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – SAMPLE PROJECT

NOTE: This solicitation uses a sample project, and no task order will be issued based on this sample.

PROJECT: Renovate Building 900

LOCATION: Lackland Air Force Base, Texas

OFFEROR’S NAME: _______________________________________________________________________

BASE PROPOSAL

Item No. Description ___________ Unit____ Amount_______

0001 Design. All work and labor required to design JOB $_____________ renovations to existing Bldg. 900 that is not included on another line item.

0002 Construction. All work, materials, and labor required JOB $_____________ to renovate existing Bldg. 900 that is not included on another line item.

0003 Construction. All work, materials, and labor required JOB $_____________ to install new infrared heating system and insulation in high bay area.

0004 Design. All work and labor required to design JOB $_____________ new infrared heating system and insulation in high bay area.

0005 Construction. All work, materials, and labor required JOB $_____________ to add women’s restroom.

0006 Design. All work and labor required to design women’s JOB $_____________ women’s restroom.

0007 Design. All work and labor required to design JOB $_____________ improvements to parking lot drainage and provide ADA access.

0008 Construction. All work, materials, and labor required JOB $_____________ to improve parking lot drainage and provide ADA access.

TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL $_____________

OPTIONS

0009 Design – Option 1: All work and labor required to design JOB $_____________ relocation of existing fence outside of Bldg. 900.

0010 Construction – Option 1: All work, materials, and labor JOB $_____________ required to relocate existing fence outside of Bldg. 900.

0011 Design – Option 2: All work and labor required to design JOB $_____________ a covered area outside of Bldg. 900.

0012 Construction – Option 2: All work, materials, and labor JOB $_____________ required to provide a covered area outside of Bldg. 900.

TOTAL OPTIONS $_____________

TOTAL BASE + OPTION PROPOSAL $_____________

NOTES FOR PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Price Breakout Schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items including options of the Price Breakout Schedule.

Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. This is a sample project, and no task order will be issued based on this sample.

NOTE NO. 4. The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation for the base MATOC will be determined by adding the proposal for the sample project and the total estimated base MATOC price combined.

NOTE NO. 5. Item No. 0003 includes all new construction necessary to install infrared heating system and insulate the high bay area and is to be priced separately from all other renovation work.

NOTE NO. 5. Item No. 0009 and Item No. 0010, Option 1: Relocate existing fence outside of Building 900 shall be exercised at time of Award.

NOTE NO. 6. Item No. 0011 and Item No. 0012, Option 2: Provide a covered area outside of Building 900, this option may be exercised within 120 days of Notice to Proceed. All work included in this option shall be completed within the base period of performance.

--END OF PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE--

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE-TOTAL

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE – TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE

TOTAL ESTIMATED MATOC PRICE $__________

TOTAL SAMPLE PROJECT PRICE $__________

TOTAL EVALUATED PRICE $__________

NOTE NO. 1: The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation for the base MATOC will be determined by adding the proposal for the sample project and the total estimated base MATOC price combined.

NOTE NO. 2: The total estimated MATOC price is the total value of all the binding rates for the five (5) base years plus the FAR 52.217-8 Additional 6 Months.

NOTE NO. 3: The total sample project price is the total value of Item No. 0001 – 0012 on the price breakout schedule for the sample project.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTION

Proposals: ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH DOD SAFE. No paper copies, CD-ROMs or facsimile submissions will be accepted. Electronic Proposal Submission is required through the Army’s Electronic File Sharing Service, DOD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil). The DOD SAFE Application is used to send large files to individuals that would normally be too large to send via email. There are no user accounts for SAFE. Authentication is handled via email.

Anyone has access to DOD SAFE, and the application is available for use by anyone. The SAFE “Getting Started Guide” has information on how to utilize the system (https://safe.apps.mil/about.php). Instructions for uploading are as follows:

1. Send an email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist to receive the link to drop off your proposal. This will need to be completed five (5) business days prior to proposal due date.

a. Jesse Scharlow, Contract Specialist at jesse.e.scharlow@usace.army.mil

b. Emily Moore, Contracting Officer at emily.a.moore@usace.army.mil

2. You will receive an email with the link to submit your drop-off. The link will be provided no later than two

(2) business days prior to the proposal due date.

3. Short Note to the Recipients: Click the Add Files or Drag and Drop your files. For file description, enter

W912QR19R0010-FIRMNAME.

4. Click Upload button to send documents.

5. Guest users will need to check their email to verify their email address before the recipients will be notified. No additional action is required by CAC users.

File Size Limitations: Offerors are advised to follow the DOD SAFE instructions for uploading files. DOD SAFE supports delivery up to 8GB. If needed, Offerors are advised to break the files down into smaller sections in order to upload it to the system. In such cases, please divide the sections as logically as possible and be sure to clearly name the files as specified below. Volume I and Volume II should be uploaded and transferred at same time.

File Naming Convention: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention:

W912QR19R0010-FIRMNAME-VOLUME I

W912QR19R0010-FIRMNAME-VOLUME II

Each file name shall begin with the solicitation number followed by the firm’s name and a brief file description.

Please see examples above.

File Organization: Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be 11 or larger. Pages shall be letter sized (larger page sizes (such as 11x17 fold-outs, etc.) will be counted as two pages. Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors. Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented. Information pertaining to more than one evaluation factor should be repeated in the each section for each factor.

Upload Completion & Deadline: Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on the solicitation document. The time & date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion / delivery time & date recorded within DOD SAFE site. Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files (e.g. 10MB or more) will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.208.

Electronic Files: Files shall be in their native format (i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text (i.e. using the CTRL F function). Text and graphics portfolios of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by Microsoft Office or Adobe applications. Data submitted in a spreadsheet format shall be readable by MS Excel (all cells and formulas should be unlocked).

Any information, presented in a proposal that the Offeror wants safeguarded from disclosure to other parties must be identified and labeled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017),” subparagraph (e), which is found in 00 21 00 Instructions of the RFP. The Government will endeavor to honor the restrictions against release requested by Offerors, to the extent permitted under United States law and regulations.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION 00 22 18

PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION OF OFFERS FOR PHASE II

1. Overview

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select up to seven (7) contractors for Firm Fixed Price Multiple Award

Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) for primarily Design and Construction (D/B) projects within the Louisville District Area of Responsibility to support the U.S. Army Reserves, U.S. Air Force Reserves, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army programs.

1.2 This is a two-phase procurement and the basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off Process. Potential offerors are invited to submit the information described in this Section 00 22 18 for review and evaluation by the Government. Following completion of the evaluation of Phase I, up to a maximum of ten (10) most highly qualified offerors will be selected to participate in Phase II. The selected offerors for Phase II will be invited to submit the information described in Section 00 22 18, Procedures for Submittal of Offers for Phase II, for review and evaluation by the Government. Price will be evaluated in Phase II through use of a sample project and binding contract rates. No seed task order will be awarded as a result of this solicitation.

Only the base MATOCs will be awarded. The basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off process.

Following completion of the Phase II evaluation, the Contracting Officer will award up to seven (7) contracts to the responsible offerors whom the Source Selection Authority determines conform to the solicitation, are fair and reasonable, and offer the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offers or to reject all offers. For Phase II submittals, requirements stated in this RFP are minimums.

1.3 The sample project has an estimated cost range between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

NOTE: The rating information from Phase I will not be considered in Phase II or in the final selection.

2. Submittal of Offers.

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's capability for successfully completing the solicited project. For Phase II, requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums.

Innovative, creative, or cost-saving proposals that meet or exceed the requirements are encouraged and will be rated accordingly. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.

2.2 Offerors shall submit their proposals electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission

Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation.

2.3 The Government is using a two-phase procurement approach for this design/build project. For Phase II, offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. All proposal materials shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I for Phase II shall include the following information:

Volume I – Factor I: Design/Technical o Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings o Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative

Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

*NOTE: The complete Volume I shall be submitted electronically as outlined in Section 00 21 00.

2.5 Volume II for Phase II shall include the following information:

Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information

NOTE: Volume II shall be submitted electronically as outlined in Section 00 21 00.

3. Proposal Evaluation Process

3.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated above.

3.2 The evaluation process for Phase II essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance / Responsibility Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete, that both a technical and price proposal were received, and that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the Phase II Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements. Factor I and Factor II will be rated using Tables 5 and 6 below. The SSEB will assign an adjectival descriptor to the Technical Factors and corresponding Sub-factors (if any). The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weakness, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings (see Table 5) and risk descriptions (see Table 6) below.

3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.4 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of technical proposals and compare prices. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors

4.1 Phase II proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors and sub factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are considered approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

4.2 Volume I – Factor I: Design/Technical 1st

Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings Equal to Sub-factor 2 Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative Equal to Sub-factor 1

4.3 Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach 2nd

4.4 Volume II – Price and Pro Forma Information

Tab A Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated Tab B Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable) Not Rated Tab C Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Not Rated Proof of Financial Ability Tab D Pre-Award Information Not Rated

4.5 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

Table 5

Technical / Risk Assessment Ratings Adjectival

Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 6 Technical Risk Description

Adjectival Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.

Normal contractor efforts and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

4.6 Definitions

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

7. Clarification. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation.

5. Volume I – Factor I: Design / Technical

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings:

Provide design drawings for the sample project.

Submit ANSI D half size scalable to fit 11” x 17” sheets. The proposed design drawings shall provide the information as follows:

BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS

Include the following:

Floor Plans

NOTE: There is a limit of 5 (five) drawings for the Design Drawings sub-factor using 11” x 17” sheets.

All information must be clearly legible. Any information that is not clearly legible may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

5.1.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative:

Provide a clear and concise narrative describing the sample project, while specifically addressing the following site and building features:

Architectural including Roofing System Mechanical Structural Site Work / Utility Connections & Routing

ASHRAE

LEED Silver Certification

AT/FP

NOTE: There is a limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the Design Narrative sub-factor.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings:

Design Drawings will be reviewed for thoroughness, functionality, quality of materials, and an understanding of the project requirements. Drawings that exceed the minimum requirements or offer building system preferences listed in Section 01 02 00.00 06, Task Order Scope of Work, may receive additional consideration.

5.2.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative:

The Design Narrative will be evaluated for completeness and thoroughness by including the building features of the RFP as outlined in Section 01 02 00.00 06, Task Order Scope of Work. Proposals that offer building system preferences or demonstrate a complete understanding of the project requirements in Section 01 02 00.00 06, Task Order Scope of Work, may receive additional consideration.

6. Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

6.1 Submission Requirements:

6.1.1 Provide a management plan narrative for the project that describes how your labor, resources, designers, subcontractors, and material suppliers will be managed, supervised, coordinated, and used to ensure successful completion of the project. Additionally, the Management Plan shall include the following information:

Describe the duties of the key project delivery staff and how this team will work together to deliver the project, both during the design and construction phases.

A commissioning plan to include an outline of systems to be commissioned, commissioning timeline, and documents to be provided.

Provide an organizational chart for this project showing home office support, on-site management, and the responsible chain of command. JV offerors must show the respective areas of responsibility for each partner. Clearly delineate on-site from off-site personnel on the organizational chart.

NOTE: There is a page limit of eight (8) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the narrative portion of this factor.

NOTE: There is a page limit of one (1) single sided, 11” x 17” page, for the organizational chart portion of this factor. Any information that exceeds these page limits will not be evaluated.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

6.2.1 Management Plan

Management Plan narratives will be evaluated based on the level of understanding of the work and the involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed during construction of the project. Narratives that demonstrate a clear understanding of the project requirements and provide a thorough approach for successfully managing the solicited project may be rated more favorably by the SSEB. The offeror’s organizational chart will be evaluated based on the clarity, adequacy, capabilities, and strengths for successfully managing the solicited project.

7. Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information

7.1 Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

7.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442, and the Price Breakout Schedule – MATOC, and the Price Breakout Schedule – Sample Project. Each of these forms are included in Section 00 10 00 of this solicitation.

7.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The total evaluated price will be determined by multiplying the hourly rate proposed for each discipline by the estimated number of hours for each discipline found in the Price Breakout Schedule - MATOC, and adding the total estimated prices for all disciplines together to reach a total estimated MATOC price. The total estimated MATOC price will then be added to the total sample project price to calculate the total evaluated price. All proposed prices and rates will be evaluated by the SSEB and the Contracting Officer/SSA for fair and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis.

7.2 Tab B – Joint Venture Agreements

7.2.1 Submission Requirements:

If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, or the offeror listed in Block 14 is a joint venture (JV), then a signed JV agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the offeror shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a legal entity separate from the individual joint venture members. However, each member of the JV must submit its own Unique Entity Identifier (formally DUNS number) with the proposal.

Small business offerors (e.g., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB) submitting a proposal as a JV or Mentor-Protégé shall submit evidence from the offeror's SBA Servicing Agency that the offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or Business Opportunity Specialist. Joint Venture agreements and approved 8(a) Mentor-Protégé agreements must be submitted with the proposal.

7.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

Joint Venture Agreements and Mentor-Protégé agreements must comply with the relevant regulations in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations in order for an offeror to be eligible for any small business-related price preference.

7.3 Tab C – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

7.3.1 Submission Requirements:

A. Financial Capability. Submit Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities). Include the name, address, and telephone number of offeror's banking institution. If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

B. Bonding Capability. Submit information showing offeror's ability to be bonded for this project. Include the name, address, and telephone number of the offeror's bonding company.

7.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

See FAR Part 28 for information related to bonds.

7.4 Tab D – Pre-Award Information

7.4.1 Submission Requirements:

A. The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certification.

B. The offeror shall submit the following information:

a) Number of years the firm has been in business

b) Name, address, and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

7.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

SECTION 00 70 00 - CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

The following have been added by reference:

52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

AUG 2020

52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (OCT 2020)

The Offeror shall not complete the representation at paragraph (d)(1) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it "does not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services as a part of its offered products or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument" in paragraph (c)(1) in the provision at 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-- Representation, or in paragraph (v)(2)(i) of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications- Commercial Items. The Offeror shall not complete the representation in paragraph (d)(2) of this provision if the Offeror has represented that it "does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services" in paragraph (c)(2) of the provision at 52.204-26, or in paragraph (v)(2)(ii) of the provision at 52.212-3.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision-

Backhaul, covered telecommunications equipment or services, critical technology, interconnection arrangements, reasonable inquiry, roaming, and substantial or essential component have the meanings provided in the clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

(b) Prohibition.

(1) Section 889(a)(1)(A) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L.

115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2019, from procuring or obtaining, or extending or renewing a contract to procure or obtain, any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. Nothing in the prohibition shall be construed to--

(i) Prohibit the head of an executive agency from procuring with an entity to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

(ii) Cover telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or cannot permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.

(2) Section 889(a)(1)(B) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L.

115-232) prohibits the head of an executive agency on or after August 13, 2020, from entering into a contract or extending or renewing a contract with an entity that uses any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. This prohibition applies to the use of covered telecommunications equipment or services, regardless of whether that use is in performance of work under a Federal contract. Nothing in the prohibition shall be construed to--

(i) Prohibit the head of an executive agency from procuring with an entity to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third-party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements; or

(ii) Cover telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or cannot permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.

(c) Procedures. The Offeror shall review the list of excluded parties in the System for Award Management (SAM) (https://www.sam.gov) for entities excluded from receiving federal awards for "covered telecommunications equipment or services."

(d) Representations. The Offeror represents that--

(1) It [] will, [] will not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract or other contractual instrument resulting from this solicitation. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph (e)(1) of this section if the Offeror responds "will" in paragraph (d)(1) of this section; and

(2) After conducting a reasonable inquiry, for purposes of this representation, the Offeror represents that--

It [] does, [] does not use covered telecommunications equipment or services, or use any equipment, system, or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services. The Offeror shall provide the additional disclosure information required at paragraph (e)(2) of this section if the Offeror responds "does" in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.

(e) Disclosures.

(1) Disclosure for the representation in paragraph (d)(1) of this provision. If the Offeror has responded "will" in the representation in paragraph (d)(1) of this provision, the Offeror shall provide the following information as part of the offer:

(i) For covered equipment--

(A) The entity that produced the covered telecommunications equipment (include entity name, unique entity identifier, CAGE code, and whether the entity was the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or a distributor, if known);

(B) A description of all covered telecommunications equipment offered (include brand; model number, such as OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); and

(C) Explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications equipment and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.

(ii) For covered services--

(A) If the service is related to item maintenance: A description of all covered telecommunications services offered (include on the item being maintained: Brand; model number, such as OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); or

(B) If not associated with maintenance, the Product Service Code (PSC) of the service being provided; and explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications services and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.

(2) Disclosure for the representation in paragraph (d)(2) of this provision. If the Offeror has responded "does" in the representation in paragraph (d)(2) of this provision, the Offeror shall provide the following information as part of the offer:

(i) For covered equipment--

(A) The entity that produced the covered telecommunications equipment (include entity name, unique entity identifier, CAGE code, and whether the entity was the OEM or a distributor, if known);

(B) A description of all covered telecommunications equipment offered (include brand; model number, such as OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); and

(C) Explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications equipment and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision.

(ii) For covered services--

(A) If the service is related to item maintenance: A description of all covered telecommunications services offered (include on the item being maintained: Brand; model number, such as OEM number, manufacturer part number, or wholesaler number; and item description, as applicable); or

(B) If not associated with maintenance, the PSC of the service being provided; and explanation of the proposed use of covered telecommunications services and any factors relevant to determining if such use would be permissible under the prohibition in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision.

(End of provision)

The following have been deleted:

52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and

Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

DEC 2019

52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

AUG 2019

SECTION 00 72 00 - GENERAL CONDITIONS

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Veterans Employment Emphasis for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contracts In addition to complying with the requirements outlined in FAR Part 22.13, FAR Provision 52.222- 38, FAR Clause 52.222-35, FAR Clause 52.222-37, DFARS 222.13 and Department of Labor regulations, U.S.