W912QR19R0010-0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation W912QR19R0010 for the IDIQ Design Build and Design Bid Build Multiple Aw ard Task Order Contract (MATOC) to support the military construction (MILCON) and operations and maintenance (O&M) funded construction requirements for U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, Army Reserve, and Air Force Reserve nationw ide programs in the Southeast Region is hereby amended as follow s:

SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912QR19R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Jan-2021

CODE

U. S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, LOUISVILLE

600 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. PLACE

ROOM 821

LOUISVILLE KY 40202-2239

W912QR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912QR19R0010-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004 - PHASE II

General Information:

1. Only the Offerors who have been selected to continue to Phase II of this solicitation are hereby invited to submit a Phase II proposal at this time.

2. Section 01 20 00.00 06 for the sample project are hereby replaced in its entirety.

Section 00 10 00:

3. The price breakout schedule for the IDIQ MATOC – Option Year 1, Estimated Units for the Project

Manager is hereby revised from 2,176 to 2,761.

Section 00 22 18:

4. The section 00 22 18, Para. 5.1.2 is revised to remove the LEED Silver Certification requirement.

Section 00 73 00

5. General Decision Number TX20210231 dated 01/01/2021is hereby added in its entirety.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The following have been modified:

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE-MATOC

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE-

MATOC

Contract Line Item Schedule – MATOC Binding Rates

Provide the fully burdened contract rates and hours to be included on a task order basis. These rates must be utilized for all tasks awarded under the MATOC and in the sample task order.

Base Year 1:

Discipline Project Manager

Binding Rate

Unit hours x

Estimated Units 2,761

Total

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $ Site Safety Health Officer hours x 9,939 = $

Base Year 2:

Discipline Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units

Project Manager hours x 2,761 = $ Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Base Year 3:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Base Year 4:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Base Year 5:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

W912QR19R0010

Option Year 1:

Discipline Project Manager

Binding Rate

Unit hours x

Estimated Units 2,761

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Option Year 2:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Option Year 3:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Option Year 4:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

Option Year 5:

Superintendent hours x 9,939 = $ CQC Manager hours x 9,939 = $

FAR 52.217-8 Additional 6 Months

Discipline Binding Rate Unit Estimated Units Total

Project Manager hours x 322 = $ Superintendent hours x 1158 = $ CQC Manager hours x 1158 = $ Site Safety Health Officer hours x 1158 = $

TOTAL ESTIMATED MATOC PRICE $

Note No. 1: An additional six (6) months may be added to the contract following the base, should FAR 52.217- 8 be exercised. No additional capacity will be added should this option be exercised.

Note No. 2: Qualifications for each of the disciplines may be found in Specifications Volume 1 of 2.

Note No. 3: The estimated hours for each discipline are provided for price evaluation purposes only. They do not constitute a guarantee that any amount of work above the minimum guarantee will be awarded under this contract.

Note No. 4: The hourly rates proposed above are considered fully burdened rates that shall remain in effect for the entire duration of the contract. The proposed rates shall become binding upon award of the base contract.

These rates must be adhered to throughout the entire life of the contract. Adherence to these rates will be reviewed through the submittal of supporting documentation for each task order.

Note No. 5: The submitted base rates must be utilized for the development of proposal pricing for the sample project as well as any future requests for proposal. All rates will be reviewed to ensure fair and reasonable pricing.

Note No. 6: The total evaluated price to be used for evaluation for the base MATOC will be determined by adding the proposal for the sample project and the total estimated MATOC price combined.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION 00 22 18

PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTAL AND EVALUATION OF OFFERS FOR PHASE II

1. Overview

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select up to seven (7) contractors for Firm Fixed Price Multiple Award

Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) for primarily Design and Construction (D/B) projects within the Louisville District Area of Responsibility to support the U.S. Army Reserves, U.S. Air Force Reserves, U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army programs.

1.2 This is a two-phase procurement and the basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off Process. Potential offerors are invited to submit the information described in this Section 00 22 18 for review and evaluation by the Government. Following completion of the evaluation of Phase I, up to a maximum of ten (10) most highly qualified offerors will be selected to participate in Phase II. The selected offerors for Phase II will be invited to submit the information described in Section 00 22 18, Procedures for Submittal of Offers for Phase II, for review and evaluation by the Government. Price will be evaluated in Phase II through use of a sample project and binding contract rates. No seed task order will be awarded as a result of this solicitation.

Only the base MATOCs will be awarded. The basis of award is the Best Value Trade-Off process.

Following completion of the Phase II evaluation, the Contracting Officer will award up to seven (7) contracts to the responsible offerors whom the Source Selection Authority determines conform to the solicitation, are fair and reasonable, and offer the best overall value to the Government, all factors considered. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offers or to reject all offers. For Phase II submittals, requirements stated in this RFP are minimums.

1.3 The sample project has an estimated cost range between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

NOTE: The rating information from Phase I will not be considered in Phase II or in the final selection.

2. Submittal of Offers.

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's capability for successfully completing the solicited project. For Phase II, requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums.

Innovative, creative, or cost-saving proposals that meet or exceed the requirements are encouraged and will be rated accordingly. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Information provided out of sequence may not be evaluated and may result in the offeror’s disqualification from award.

2.2 Offerors shall submit their proposals electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission

Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation.

2.3 The Government is using a two-phase procurement approach for this design/build project. For Phase II, offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5 below. All proposal materials shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I for Phase II shall include the following information:

Volume I – Factor I: Design/Technical o Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings o Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative

Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

*NOTE: The complete Volume I shall be submitted electronically as outlined in Section 00 21 00.

2.5 Volume II for Phase II shall include the following information:

Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements Volume II – Tab C: Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information

NOTE: Volume II shall be submitted electronically as outlined in Section 00 21 00.

3. Proposal Evaluation Process

3.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Proposals will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value Trade-Off, as stated above.

3.2 The evaluation process for Phase II essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance / Responsibility Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete, that both a technical and price proposal were received, and that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the Phase II Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements. Factor I and Factor II will be rated using Tables 5 and 6 below. The SSEB will assign an adjectival descriptor to the Technical Factors and corresponding Sub-factors (if any). The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, significant weakness, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings (see Table 5) and risk descriptions (see Table 6) below.

3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.4 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of technical proposals and compare prices. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors

4.1 Phase II proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors and sub factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are considered approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

4.2 Volume I – Factor I: Design/Technical 1st

Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings Equal to Sub-factor 2 Sub-factor 2 – Design Narrative Equal to Sub-factor 1

4.3 Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach 2nd

4.4 Volume II – Price and Pro Forma Information

Tab A Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated Tab B Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable) Not Rated Tab C Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Not Rated Proof of Financial Ability Tab D Pre-Award Information Not Rated

4.5 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

Table 5

Technical / Risk Assessment Ratings Adjectival

Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 6 Technical Risk Description

Adjectival Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.

Normal contractor efforts and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

4.6 Definitions

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

7. Clarification. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.306(a)(1).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation.

5. Volume I – Factor I: Design / Technical

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Sub-factor 1 – Design Drawings:

Provide design drawings for the sample project.

Submit ANSI D half size scalable to fit 11” x 17” sheets. The proposed design drawings shall provide the information as follows:

BUILDING FUNCTION AND AESTHETICS

Include the following:

Floor Plans

NOTE: There is a limit of 5 (five) drawings for the Design Drawings sub-factor using 11” x 17” sheets.

All information must be clearly legible. Any information that is not clearly legible may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

5.1.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative:

Provide a clear and concise narrative describing the sample project, while specifically addressing the following site and building features:

Architectural including Roofing System Mechanical Structural Site Work / Utility Connections & Routing

ASHRAE

AT/FP

NOTE: There is a limit of ten (10) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the Design Narrative sub-factor.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 Sub factor 1 – Design Drawings:

Design Drawings will be reviewed for thoroughness, functionality, quality of materials, and an understanding of the project requirements. Drawings that exceed the minimum requirements or offer building system preferences listed in Section 01 02 00.00 06, Task Order Scope of Work, may receive additional consideration.

5.2.2 Sub factor 2 – Design Narrative:

The Design Narrative will be evaluated for completeness and thoroughness by including the building features of the RFP as outlined in Section 01 02 00.00 06, Task Order Scope of Work. Proposals that offer building system preferences or demonstrate a complete understanding of the project requirements in Section 01 02 00.00 06, Task Order Scope of Work, may receive additional consideration.

6. Volume I – Factor II: Management Approach

6.1 Submission Requirements:

6.1.1 Provide a management plan narrative for the project that describes how your labor, resources, designers, subcontractors, and material suppliers will be managed, supervised, coordinated, and used to ensure successful completion of the project. Additionally, the Management Plan shall include the following information:

Describe the duties of the key project delivery staff and how this team will work together to deliver the project, both during the design and construction phases.

A commissioning plan to include an outline of systems to be commissioned, commissioning timeline, and documents to be provided.

Provide an organizational chart for this project showing home office support, on-site management, and the responsible chain of command. JV offerors must show the respective areas of responsibility for each partner. Clearly delineate on-site from off-site personnel on the organizational chart.

NOTE: There is a page limit of eight (8) single sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides for the narrative portion of this factor.

NOTE: There is a page limit of one (1) single sided, 11” x 17” page, for the organizational chart portion of this factor. Any information that exceeds these page limits will not be evaluated.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

6.2.1 Management Plan

Management Plan narratives will be evaluated based on the level of understanding of the work and the involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed during construction of the project. Narratives that demonstrate a clear understanding of the project requirements and provide a thorough approach for successfully managing the solicited project may be rated more favorably by the SSEB. The offeror’s organizational chart will be evaluated based on the clarity, adequacy, capabilities, and strengths for successfully managing the solicited project.

7. Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information

7.1 Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

7.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442, and the Price Breakout Schedule – MATOC, and the Price Breakout Schedule – Sample Project. Each of these forms are included in Section 00 10 00 of this solicitation.

7.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The total evaluated price will be determined by multiplying the hourly rate proposed for each discipline by the estimated number of hours for each discipline found in the Price Breakout Schedule - MATOC, and adding the total estimated prices for all disciplines together to reach a total estimated MATOC price. The total estimated MATOC price will then be added to the total sample project price to calculate the total evaluated price. All proposed prices and rates will be evaluated by the SSEB and the Contracting Officer/SSA for fair and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis.

7.2 Tab B – Joint Venture Agreements

7.2.1 Submission Requirements:

If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, or the offeror listed in Block 14 is a joint venture (JV), then a signed JV agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the offeror shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a legal entity separate from the individual joint venture members. However, each member of the JV must submit its own Unique Entity Identifier (formally DUNS number) with the proposal.

Small business offerors (e.g., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB) submitting a proposal as a JV or Mentor-Protégé shall submit evidence from the offeror's SBA Servicing Agency that the offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or Business Opportunity Specialist. Joint Venture agreements and approved 8(a) Mentor-Protégé agreements must be submitted with the proposal.

7.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

Joint Venture Agreements and Mentor-Protégé agreements must comply with the relevant regulations in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations in order for an offeror to be eligible for any small business-related price preference.

7.3 Tab C – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

7.3.1 Submission Requirements:

A. Financial Capability. Submit Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities). Include the name, address, and telephone number of offeror's banking institution. If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

B. Bonding Capability. Submit information showing offeror's ability to be bonded for this project. Include the name, address, and telephone number of the offeror's bonding company.

7.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

See FAR Part 28 for information related to bonds.

7.4 Tab D – Pre-Award Information

7.4.1 Submission Requirements:

A. The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certification.

B. The offeror shall submit the following information:

a) Number of years the firm has been in business

b) Name, address, and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

7.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

SECTION 00 73 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

WAGE RATES

General Decision Number: TX20210231 01/01/2021

Superseded General Decision Number: TX20200231

State: Texas

Construction Type: Building

County: Bexar County in Texas.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family homes or apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.95 for calendar year 2021 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015.

If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.95 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2021. If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate, if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above-mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/01/2021

* ASBE0087-014 03/02/2020

Rates Fringes

ASBESTOS WORKER/HEAT & FROST

INSULATOR (Duct, Pipe and Mechanical System Insulation)....$ 23.97 10.79

BOIL0074-003 01/01/2017

Rates Fringes

BOILERMAKER......................$ 28.00 22.35

* ELEC0060-003 07/27/2020

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (Communication Technician Only).................$ 29.60 15%+5.45

* ELEC0060-004 07/27/2020

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (Excludes Low Voltage Wiring)..................$ 29.60 18%+5.45

ELEV0081-001 01/01/2020

Rates Fringes

ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 41.90 34.765

FOOTNOTES:

A. 6% under 5 years based on regular hourly rate for all hours worked. 8% over 5 years based on regular hourly rate for all hours worked.

B. Holidays: New Year's Day; Memorial Day; Independence Day;

Labor Day; Thanksgiving Day; Friday after Thanksgiving Day;

Christmas Day; and Veterans Day.

ENGI0450-002 04/01/2014

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

Cranes......................$ 34.85 9.85

IRON0066-013 06/01/2020

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL...........$ 23.45 6.83

IRON0084-011 06/01/2020

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, ORNAMENTAL...........$ 25.26 7.13

* PLUM0142-009 07/01/2020

Rates Fringes

HVAC MECHANIC (HVAC

Electrical Temperature Control Installation Only).......$ 30.25 13.36 HVAC MECHANIC (HVAC Unit Installation Only)...............$ 30.25 13.36 PIPEFITTER (Including HVAC Pipe Installation)...............$ 31.90 13.76 Including HVAC Pipe Installation PLUMBER (Excludes HVAC Pipe Installation)....................$ 31.90 13.76 Excludes HVAC Pipe Installation

SFTX0669-002 04/01/2020

Rates Fringes

SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire Sprinklers)......................$ 30.64 21.68

SHEE0067-004 07/01/2020

Rates Fringes

Sheet metal worker Excludes HVAC Duct Installation................$ 27.31 15.51 HVAC Duct Installation Only.$ 27.31 15.51

SUTX2014-006 07/21/2014

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 22.15 0.00

CARPENTER (Acoustical Ceiling Installation Only)...............$ 17.83 0.00

CARPENTER (Form Work Only).......$ 13.63 0.00

CARPENTER, Excludes Acoustical Ceiling Installation, Drywall Hanging, Form Work, and Metal Stud Installation................$ 16.86 4.17

CAULKER..........................$ 15.00 0.00

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 22.27 5.30

DRYWALL FINISHER/TAPER...........$ 13.81 0.00

DRYWALL HANGER AND METAL STUD

INSTALLER........................$ 15.18 0.00

ELECTRICIAN (Low Voltage Wiring Only).....................$ 20.39 3.04

IRONWORKER, REINFORCING..........$ 12.27 0.00

LABORER: Common or General......$ 10.75 0.00

LABORER: Mason Tender - Brick...$ 11.88 0.00

LABORER: Mason Tender - Cement/Concrete..................$ 12.00 0.00

LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 11.00 0.00

LABORER: Roof Tearoff...........$ 11.28 0.00

LABORER: Landscape and Irrigation.......................$ 8.00 0.00

OPERATOR:

Backhoe/Excavator/Trackhoe.......$ 15.98 0.00

OPERATOR: Bobcat/Skid Steer/Skid Loader................$ 14.00 0.00

OPERATOR: Bulldozer.............$ 14.00 0.00

OPERATOR: Drill.................$ 14.50 0.00

OPERATOR: Forklift..............$ 12.50 0.00

OPERATOR: Grader/Blade..........$ 23.00 5.07

OPERATOR: Loader................$ 12.79 0.00

OPERATOR: Mechanic..............$ 18.75 5.12

OPERATOR: Paver (Asphalt, Aggregate, and Concrete).........$ 16.03 0.00

OPERATOR: Roller................$ 12.00 0.00

PAINTER (Brush, Roller and Spray), Excludes Drywall Finishing/Taping.................$ 13.07 0.00

ROOFER...........................$ 12.00 0.00

TILE FINISHER....................$ 11.32 0.00

TILE SETTER......................$ 14.94 0.00

TRUCK DRIVER: Dump Truck........$ 12.39 1.18

TRUCK DRIVER: Flatbed Truck.....$ 19.65 8.57

TRUCK DRIVER: Semi-Trailer Truck............................$ 12.50 0.00

TRUCK DRIVER: Water Truck.......$ 12.00 4.11

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of ""identifiers"" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than ""SU"" or ""UAVG"" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the ""SU"" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

(End of Summary of Changes)

SECTION

01 20 00.00 06

Task Order SCOPE OF WORK

02/13

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL

Design/Build: The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, supplies, and consultant services and all site investigations, surveys, analysis, sampling, testing and verification of existing field conditions as required for design and construction of Building 900 Renovations Project at Lackland Air Force Base to result in a complete and useable Facility. Contractor shall provide complete design analysis incorporating all engineering computations, analysis, test and survey results, building code (including fire protection, life safety, environmental and accessibility) review as it pertains/affects/relates to this project, equipment and material data and documentation of existing conditions.

1.2 SCOPE OF WORK

Unless specifically noted otherwise in this Specification Section or in the base MATOC contract Volume 1 of 2 itself, all requirements of the base MATOC contract Volume 1 of 2 shall apply to this Task Order. The work includes miscellaneous renovations to Building 900, including ABA access, and minor site drainage remediation.

Design/Build: Design and construction shall comply with the requirements contained in this Task Order Request for Proposal (RFP). The design and technical criteria contained and cited in this RFP and the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) establish minimum standards for design and construction quality. The Designers of Record shall use the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) and the requirements contained in this RFP to fully develop the technical specifications and construction drawings.

The objective of this solicitation is to obtain an energy efficient, durable, maintainable and sustainable space.

Design/Build: The illustrations and exhibits included in this RFP illustrate the conceptual design of the project and are provided to define the scope of work and budget. The concepts provided shall be further developed by the Design/Build Contractor to comply with the functional needs.

All demolition required to construct the project is included as part of the work of this Contract.

Lackland Air Force Base Specification Requirements: All work shall conform to the Base Facility Standard, and specifications produced by the contractor shall utilize the standard Lackland Air Force Base boiler plate.

1.3 SITE LOCATION

This project is located at Lackland Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas.

****AMENDMENT #004****

1.4 EXISTING SITE UTILITIES

1.4.1 The contractor shall verify the capacity of all utilities serving the building. Upgrading the existing utilities, (unless noted otherwise) outside the limits of construction, is not a part of this project.

1.5 BID OPTIONS

a) Bid Option 0001: Relocate the existing security fence northeast of Building 900

b) Bid Option 0002: Provide a 2400 SF free standing metal awning adjacent to Building 900 for equipment storage. Area to have lighting and 3-phase power.

1.6 ATTACHMENTS

Design/Build: Information provided in the Attachments is intended to guide the completion of the design by establishing existing conditions, and the desired character, appearance, and function of the new construction. The following Attachments are included and shall be used and strictly adhered-to in completing the design and construction of the project.

a. ATTACHMENT 1: Building 900 Exhibits

b. ATTACHMENT 2: Building 900 Photos

c. ATTACHMENT 3: Building 900 As-Built Drawings

d. ATTACHMENT 4: Building 900 Site Drainage Exhibit/Photos

e. ATTACHMENT 5: Contractor Work Limits and Building Access

f. ATTACHMENT 6: JBSA Fire Safety Guidance

g. ATTACHMENT 7: JBSA Environmental Requirements

h. ATTACHMENT 8: Installation Security Requirements

i. ATTACHMENT 9: JBSA Hardware Specifications

j. ATTACHMENT 10: JBSA Energy Requirements

k. ATTACHMENT 11: Building 900 Asbestos, Lead, and PCB Survey Report

l. ATTACHMENT 12: Building 900 Sample Roof Warranty

m. ATTACHMENT 13: Building 900 Space Allocation Table

n. ATTACHMENT 14: JBSA DDC Requirements Statement.

1.7 PERMITS

The Contractor shall investigate and submit any permits necessary for the construction of this project. All permit applications shall be completed by the Contractor and provided to the Contracting Officer for submittal to the appropriate agency. Contractor shall pay all permit fees. Copies of all permits shall be provided to the USACE.

1.8 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

1.8.1 Environmental Compliance: The contractor shall comply with the National Environmental Protection Act and all other Air Force Environmental regulations.

1.8.2 Dust Control: Contractor shall maintain all work areas free from excess dust to such reasonable degree as to avoid causing a hazard to base personnel or surrounding facilities. Dust control shall be performed as the work proceeds and whenever a dust nuisance or hazard occurs.

1.8.3 Asbestos: No asbestos containing material shall be used.

1.8.4 MSDS Sheets: A Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is required for all building materials except for wood, glass, or steel. The MSDS will be submitted to the Contracting Officer within seven (7) calendar days after the

NOTICE TO PROCEED.

1.8.5 Hazardous Materials Management: Contractor will provide the Contracting Officer (CO) the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for chemical materials to be used during the project prior to the contract award in accordance with FAR Clause 52.223-the Contracting Officer for review prior to the contractor bringing products on the installation. The contractor must inventory all chemical materials, including but not limited to: solvents, paints, degreasers, greases, Ozone Depleting Substances, and oils, brought on base. A chemical material inventory must be maintained when used containing the nomenclature, manufacturer, part number, quantity, storage location, and the process in which the material is used. All chemical materials will be managed in accordance with federal, state, local, and Installation regulations.

1.8.6 Paint: All paints must meet Green Seal Certification and be low VOC. See the table below for additional guidance. Paint containing lead will not be used during any painting process. An MSDS will be submitted for all paint products used.

For this kind of product:

VOCs (in g/L) shall not exceed:

Flat Topcoat 50

Non-Flat Topcoat 100

Primer or Undercoat 100

Floor Paint 100

Anti Corrosive Coating 250

Reflective Wall Coating 50

Reflective Roof Coating 100

1.8.7 Plumbing Fixtures Trim: No plumbing fixture trim will be installed unless they conform to the voluntary standard NSF/ANSI Standards 24 and 61.

Products certified under these standards are tested to ensure no leaching from the fixtures exceeds 11 parts per billion of lead.

1.8.8 Potable Water: If construction or modification of a potable water system is included as a part of the task order scope of work, the contractor is responsible to insure that all potable water connections are protected adequately with anti-siphon devices in accordance with the plumbing code. An ASSE approved anti-siphon device shall be attached to the hose bib prior to mixing chemicals, etc. A backflow prevention device must be installed at each location potable water enters a facility. This includes fire suppression.

1.8.9 Waste Water: Absolutely no chemical products will be allowed to be dumped in any drainage system, storm drain, wash rack, septic system or sanitary sewer. All remaining and residual chemicals will be taken away by the contractor.

1.8.10 NOT USED

1.8.11 Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control: Soil disturbance during this project, including equipment staging areas, will require erosion control measures. For projects that disturb more than an acre, a Notice of Intent (NOI) must be approved by the applicable State EPA, DOW or DEQ prior to any soil being disturbed as well as a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) reviewed and accepted by the government. For projects that disturb less than an acre of soil, an erosion control plan is required prior to soil disturbance.

1.9 JBSA RECYCLING PROGRAM

Refer to recycling requirements outlined in Attachment 7 JBSA ENVIRONMENTAL

REQUIREMENTS.

1.10 NOT USED

1.11 NOT USED

1.12 NOT USED

1.13 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS

1.13.1 In addition to the superintendent, CQC staff and safety staff required by this section and Section 01 45 04.10 06 and 01 35 26.00 06, the contractor shall provide a full time Construction Project Manager for the entire life of this contract including both the design and construction phases. The Construction Project Manager shall have a degree in Construction Management or Engineering and shall have 10 years of relative experience in construction management.

1.13.2 The SSHO shall be assigned as SSHO, but may have duties as the CQC System Manager and the Superintendent.

a.) The SSHO and alternate(s)shall have an experience Level as follows and the Contractor must show evidence that the SSHO and alternate(s) have met these requirements. When an alternate is required for the project, the alternate shall have the same experience level and other qualifications as the SSHO. In addition, the SSHO and alternate(s) are also required to have:

(1) Completed, as a minimum, the 30-Hour OSHA Construction Industry safety class with current First Aid and CPR Training /AED.

(2) Five (5) years of Construction Industry safety experience on similar projects in supervising or managing general or industry construction

(managing safety programs or processes or conducting hazard analyses and developing controls).

(3) Maintained experience through having taken 24 hours of documented formal or on-line safety and health related coursework in the past two years.

The training must be applicable to the work being performed on the contract. Teaching is not considered the equivalent of attending training.

(4) SSHO shall be able to demonstrate training in the following areas:

personal protective equipment and clothing to include selection, use and maintenance; hazard communication; excavation; scaffolding; fall protection; and confined space.

b.) The Contractor shall identify the SSHO and alternate(s) for this project and shall submit qualifications to the Government in resume form for acceptance. A copy of the letter to the SSHO and alternate(s) signed by an authorized official of the firm describing responsibilities and delegating authority to stop work when safety or occupational health of workers is compromised must be provided to the Government.

1.13.3 The appropriate CQC personnel shall be present at the construction site as needed during work related to their areas of responsibility. In addition to the requirements of Section 01 45 04.10 06, CQC personnel resumes and site visit frequency shall be identified in the Design Quality Control Plan (DQCP) and accepted by the government.

1.13.4 CQC Personnel: Section 01 45 04.10 06 Part 3.5.3 (j) and (m) are not required for this project.

2.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

2.1 GENERAL

The Contractor shall prepare complete construction documents for all work designed as required by the RFP. The construction documents to be prepared shall include, but are not limited to, construction drawings, specifications, submittals, and design analysis as required in Section 01 21 00.00 06 DESIGN

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AFTER TASK ORDER AWARD FOR CIVIL AND MILITARY

CONSTRUCTION. Materials and equipment shall be limited to those specified except that…