W912PL21R0007_Amendment0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 26

0003 May 27, 2021

USACE-LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

CONTRACTING DIVISION, EAST REGION BRANCH

915 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 1440

LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

W912PL21R0007

Apr 16, 2021

FY21 JITC ELECTRONIC LAB-NEW FACILITY, FORT HUACHUCA, AZ

Amendment 0003 Solicitation No. W912PL21R0007, See attached Summary Sheet for changes

Proposal due date has been extended to 10 June 2021 by 2:00pm PST

INSTRUCTIONS

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code) . Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date) .

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contacting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By) . Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor) . For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Item 9, (Amendment of Solicitation No. - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order No. - Dated ). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data) .

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries.

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B . The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting offier's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13 . Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification) .

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

Total contract price increased by $

Total contract price decreased by $

Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

A reference to the letter determination; and

A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(g)

(h)

(i)

(ii)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

W912PL21R0007 Summary Amendment 3

1. Revise 00 22 16 Factor 2 deleting references to auditorium and simulator.

2. Revise 01 10 10 Par 3.3 to show MAG standards are acceptable for paving and aggregate

3. Revise 01 10 10 Par 3.8 Clarifying building & utility demolition.

4. Revise 01 10 10 Par 3.10.11 Temporary and Permanent Security Fence.

5. Revise 01 10 10 Paragraph 4.4.1 (b) regarding Demountable Walls being GFGI

6. Revise 01 10 10 Paragraph 4.5.1.1 regarding CFCI and GFGI FFE

7. Revise 01 10 10 Paragraph 9.5 clarifying what is required to support SSVEC, the privatized electric company for this project.

8. Revise 01 10 10 Par 9.6.2 to modify 6000 amp space in service panel to Per SSVEC (expected to be 2@3000 amps-DBT to confirm)

9. Delete Section 01 45 00 .00 Paragraph 3.4.1 requiring dedicated supplemental CQC and changing to provide supplemental CQC personnel as needed for specific trades. These personnel do not need to be employed directly by DBT and do not need to be full time CQC members.

10. Revise Drawing CD 100 and CU100 that requires relocation of existing sanitary sewer if it falls within the area of the new building footprint. DBT to bid assuming it requires relocation and then determine during design.

11. Revise Drawing EP 700 one Line to modify 6000 amp to state must meet SSVEC requirements expected to be 2@3000 amps-DBT to confirm.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by the offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION CALL

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See .)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 96

1442-103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) (EG)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

W912PL21R0007

X

16 APR 2021 1 OF 2

USACE, Los Angeles District Contracting Division, West Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90017

See Item 7

SANDRA OQUITA 213.452.3249

FY21 JITC ELECTRONIC LAB-NEW FACILITY, FORT HUACHUCA, AZ

This project provides for the design and construction of a new one story 40,422 SF Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) facility for the Defense Information System Agency (DISA)/Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The new facility is located adjacent to the existing JITC Building 57305 on the secure JITC compound and is replacing three temporary buildings. The facility shall function as an electronics lab to support requirements for DISA/JITC. The facility contains multiple test labs, server rooms, DISA net kiosk, lobby with central resource help desk, and a break room. Additionally, there are the typical building support functions including mechanical, electrical, fire protection and communications equipment rooms. Except for utility rooms, the entire building is a Secure facility (COSA standards). The Project also includes underground utilities, paving including access roads, storm drainage, exterior and site lighting, site improvements, landscaping, underground communications infrastructure to connect the new facility, and all applicable AT/FP (Antiterrorism/Force Protection) measures. Utility services are in the proximity of the site and shall be brought to the new facility.

The estimated magnitude of the project is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000. This is an UNRESTRICTED Design-Build(LPTA)Procurement. The NAICS code is 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building. SMALL BUSINESS GOALS: SB 13.84%, SDB 11.03%, WOSB 3.86%, VOSB 2.70%, SDVOSB 1.27%,HUBZONE 1.06%

10 * 00 73 00

X X *Section 00 73 00

X 10

0 2PM

3 JUNE 2021

X

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or greater than the minimum requirement stated in 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24.SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYCODE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and

(c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

DUNS NO.: TAX ID NO.:

CAGE CODE NO.:

( ) - ; FAX ( ) -

Tucson Resident office 5205 East Comanche Street Bldg 160 Tucson, AZ 85707

USACE, Finance Center

ATTN: CEFCO-AO-D

5722 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005

FY21 JITC Electronic Lab-New FacilityW912PL21R0007

Ft Huachuca, AZ Amendment 3

00 22 16-23

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

(LPTA)

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

IV. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

V. INITIAL EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II)

VI. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

VII. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION

VIII. DISCUSSION PROCESS

IX. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

X. DEBRIEFINGS

XI. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PREAWARD COSTS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

(LPTA)

The Government will make award to the Offeror submitting the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The

Government will first review non-cost technical proposals to determine which are acceptable to the Government.

00 22 16-23

Responses that the Offeror understands, or will comply with the specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications, and general or overly broad responses such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, will be rated unacceptable.

The objective of the Government is to award a contract to an Offeror who submits a proposal that when evaluated is determined to meet the acceptability levels established in the solicitation for each non-cost evaluation factor. Each non-cost evaluation factor will receive a rating of

Acceptable or Unacceptable. The award will be made to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated proposed price.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

FACTOR 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT, RELEVANT CONTRACTS

FACTOR 4 - MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

FACTOR 5 – SCHEDULE

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate experience on similar contracts.

Offeror and Offeror’s Designer shall identify overall experience by submitting:

- two (2) projects, each similar in scope, and complexity as the RFP, with a minimal value of

$10M and at least one project with final construction value of at least $15M.

- at least one (1) Design-Build (DB) project with a construction value of at least $15M

- at least one project each that contain large (5000 sf or greater) Sensitive Compartmentalized

Information Facilities, (SCIF, or SAP-F) facilities

- at least one (1) project that occurred at a military installation.

The two projects submitted by Offeror and by Offeror’s Designer do not need to be projects they have worked together previously. The above projects should be complete or substantially completed (70%) at the time of the proposal submission. The above requirements may be shown on separate projects or combined, if a project demonstrates the multiple requirements stated above.

Offeror shall submit projects that the Offeror and Offeror’s Designer have successfully completed or substantially completed within the past seven (7) years. Offeror shall explain how and why Offeror considers submitted projects to be similar to the RFP project. Provide a brief description of each project, describe its scope of the work, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer.

NUMBER OF PROJECTS TO

SUBMIT

Similar Project (1 must be > $10M&

1>$15M)

$15M DB

Project 5000 sf SCIF Mil Installation

Offeror 2 1 1 1

Offeror’s

Designer 2 1 1 1

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror can identify completed projects for each of the requirements noted above and that are similar in scope, magnitude and complexity and meet Factor 1 requirements.

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Proposals will be evaluated as to the Offeror’s ability to perform and to satisfy all design-build construction contract requirements. Responses to this factor must discuss the Offeror’s technical understanding of the design/build work requirements and their commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and integrated construction schedule.

NOTE: OFEEROR SHALL SUBMIT A PROPOSAL BASED ON SPECIFICATIONS AND

DRAWINGS CONTAINED IN THIS RFP. NO OFFERS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH

DEVIATIONS TO THE RFP DRAWINGS. This does not limit the successful Offeror from making changes to the RFP drawings during the design phase of the project. Deviations will be evaluated by the Government to determine if they are acceptable. The Value Engineering clause may govern depending on the proposed deviation.

Evaluation Factor: Proposals must discuss the Offeror’s technical understanding of the work requirements and their construction methods / approach to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements and schedule. The quality of the Offeror’s approach and methodology, and the workability of the approach and technical feasibility to perform successfully will all be evaluated. The construction quality control system and design quality control procedures must be presented, as well as a description of Red Zone activities for the contract. The Offeror shall demonstrate adherence to the RFP documents for the following design areas: civil/site, architectural, structural, utilities (mechanical, electrical, plumbing), communications, SCIF construction, construction and design Quality Control plans. Provide details on how energy conservation requirements and mandates will be met and earning LEED

Silver status.

00 22 16-23

Standard Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror’s narrative demonstrates a commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the solicitation requirements, including the proposed schedule. The Offeror’s narrative must address, at a minimum: their understanding of and adherence to the basic RFP requirements for civil/site, architectural, structural, utilities (mechanical, electrical plumbing), communications, SCIF construction, their construction and design Quality Control plans for the work to be performed, their understanding and implementation of Red Zone activities and warranty and third party certification using the

DoD version of Guiding Principles Compliance.

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT, RELEVANT PROJECTS

This area considers the Offeror's capabilities and past performance for successful completion of recent, relevant construction projects. Offeror(s) shall submit the following as part of their offers.

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate contractor capability to perform the proposed effort. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant and how well the contractor performed on the projects submitted for Factor 1. Past Performance documentation shall include both the Offeror and the Offeror’s designer.

For each project identified, describe the scope of the work, contract price at the time of award, project cost growth during contract performance, and contract price at the time of completion.

Include explanation of the reasons for time and cost growth. Identify and describe any warranty issues raised by the owner, and how the problems were resolved; if no warranty issues were raised, Offerors should so state. Offeror is encouraged to provide information on problems encountered on the projects and the Offeror’s corrective action. Past performance on State, local, and private/ commercial contracts will be evaluated equally with past performance on

Federal contracts. Offeror(s) are encouraged to provide information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation.

Important Note: See paragraph 5 below regarding required consent for release of subcontractor past performance information. For each project, submit the following information in the formats provided at the end of this Section:

The Offeror shall provide in their proposal a completed offeror performance evaluation whether interim or final found in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Syste (CPARS)

(www.cpars.gov). If a completed offeror performance evaluation does not existin CPARS, the

Offeror shall provide a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation. .

Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Complete PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references

00 22 16-23 http://www.cpars.gov/

00 22 16-23 to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government point of contract, Mr. Sandra Quita via email at sandra.oquita@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. The preferred method is to include with the proposal. Offerors may use previous PPQs submitted for other solicitations for this project and include these in their proposal. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will not be included in the page count limitation. Formats for the Past Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire

(PPQ) has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Sample Cover Letter and Performance

Questionnaire (PPQ).

1. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information available for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information

Retrieval System (PPIRS), included Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

Systems (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the

Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owners representatives(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System

(eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. While the

Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the

Offeror.

2. In conducting the performance risk assessment, the government may use data provided by the Offeror and data obtained from other sources, including automated databases, contacting the owner or contracting officer of the project. The “References’ Past

Performance/Quality Questionnaire” (Past Performance Reference Check in Section 00

22 00) is one of the means that may be used by the government to collect past performance information. The Government may contact references other than those identified by the Offeror. The Government may also take into consideration the Offerors performance of contracts with the Agency.

3. The evaluation will take into consideration the Offerors record of conformance to contract specifications and standards of good workmanship; the Offerors safety performance, the Offerors adherence to contract cost, the Offerors adherence to contract schedule, including the administrative aspects of performance; the Offerors history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment to customer satisfaction, and timely award and management of subcontracts;

4. The evaluation will take into account the number and severity of problems, the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record.

5. The performance record of proposed major subcontractors and proposed key personnel mailto:sandra.oquita@usace.army.mil

00 22 16-23 might also be considered.

6. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted unless all of the information required for evaluation purposes as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror(s) technical proposal. Offeror(s) that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the

Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror(s)—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

7. Release of Subcontractor Past Performance Information. Past performance information pertaining to a proposed subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the Offeror(s) by the

Government without the proposed subcontractor’s consent. Therefore, if subcontractor past performance information is being utilized by the Offeror(s), the Offeror(s) must also submit as part of its technical proposal the subcontractor’s consent to release of its past performance information by the Government to the Offeror(s). If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the prospective prime contractor can be notified, but no details can be discussed without the proposed subcontractor’s permission.

Standard of Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror has an overall satisfactory performance evaluation or higher on recent and similar contracts/completed within the past five

(5) years has been demonstrated.

FACTOR 4: MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the Offeror’s ability to satisfy all contract requirements within its Management Plan. The Government will evaluate corporate and construction management structure, experience and qualifications of the key personnel and major subcontractors proposed for the project to include the capability to staff, manage, resource and control successful projects.

Personnel will be evaluated on their overall professional education, training and experience and on specific experience on projects of similar type, scope, and complexity to the work required under this RFP.

The Government will evaluate the management structure from start to construction-complete.

Offeror should show organizational charts, level of personnel authority of the individuals involved specifically with this project. Offeror shall identify key subcontractors and provide a brief resume demonstrating experience with this type project.

The Government will evaluate the proposed Project Manager, Design Manager(s), Construction

Site Superintendent, Field Safety Officer, and Field Quality Control Manager respective qualifications, responsibilities, and authority levels. Brief resumes shall be submitted for each of these individuals. Note, it will be acceptable for the Field Quality Control Manager to have 7 years construction experience with at least 5 years functioning as a Quality Control Manager in lieu of the specified college education requirement. This must be expressly shown in the Field

00 22 16-23

CQCM resume.

The Offeror shall provide a narrative on how they plan to manage and execute this project and describes major tools or methods to accomplish this. The Offeror must demonstrate they have sufficient capacity based on on-going work load to execute this project and identify the percent of time each of the key team members will be assigned to this project.

Standard of Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror provides an organization chart that clearly shows authorities and lines of communications, the resumes provided show that the staff is qualified and meets the RFP requirements (where applicable), the present workload for the Offeror is discussed, the availability of the proposed team is discussed, and a replacement plan for key personnel is provided.

FACTOR 5: SCHEDULE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the Offeror’s ability to schedule the construction of the project.

Evaluation Factor: The Government will evaluate the proposed schedule to determine if the

Offeror’s plan assures completion within the specified time stated in Section 00 73 00 or a shorter time proposed by the Offeror. The schedule will be evaluated to determine whether it is, complete, reasonable, realistic, and achievable. A schedule proposing less time than required in

Section 00 73 00 will be considered advantageous and will become the revised contract completion time. The Schedule may be submitted on 11x 17 with each page counting as one page towards the page count. State in the narrative the total number of calendar days you have shown in your proposed schedule for project execution and acknowledge that this duration will become contractually binding should you receive the award.

This schedule shall clearly show how it compares to the number of calendar days and the sequence of construction as stated in the RFP. The schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Give special attention to the following tasks and provide a Narrative explaining the results and methodology of the Offeror’s schedule:

1. Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the design submittals and Government review. Government review time will be shown for the maximum duration stated in the RFP.

2. Show the key submittals. Include events associated with coordinating these submittals and for Government review. Government review time will be shown for the maximum duration stated in the RFP.

3. Show the construction phase for all key activities and each major feature of construction. Show any impacts including environmental and existing site/operational constraints.

00 22 16-23

4. Show any long lead materials and equipment.

5. Show proposed completion date of the project and the total proposed project duration in calendar days.

6. Fast Track design and construction may be authorized for this project, but is subject to the Contracting Officer’s discretion to approve its use. A schedule based on a Fast Track process must explain how it will be used in this project and how it will affect the schedule. Fast Track may not be used as a reason to reduce

Government review periods for design or construction submittal.

Standard of Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror provides a schedule narrative that shows completion within the RFP required time frame and discusses the major milestones for the project, and provides a bar chart schedule that is clear and logical.

IV. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

The Offeror’s adherence to prescribed page and formatting limitations prescribed will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted which exceeds the specified limit will NOT be evaluated. For example, if four pages are submitted in response to an item with a three page limitation, the information of the fourth page will not be evaluated by the Government.

The technical proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the technical specifications. Non-compliance with the technical specifications will be considered a deficiency and an Unacceptable adjectival rating will be assigned.

V. INITIAL EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II)

The Offeror’s conformance with the specified format and submission requirements will be considered during the technical evaluation. Failure to comply with the format and/or the submission requirements may be seen as indicative of the type of problems that could be expected during contract performance. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rated as unacceptable. The Offeror’s adherence to prescribed page and formatting limitations prescribed will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted which exceeds the specified limit will NOT be evaluated. Offerors may be given a chance to clarify certain aspects of their proposal and to resolve minor or clerical mistakes. However, Offerors are not given an opportunity to respond to any identified weaknesses or deficiencies or revise their proposals.

The technical proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the technical specification.

Technical proposals are given an overall rating of either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. The evaluation factors will be rated either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” based upon the standards listed within the RFP. A rating of “Unacceptable” for any evaluation factor will result in an overall rating of “Unacceptable” and the proposal will be ineligible for award

00 22 16-23

Based upon review of the initial evaluation results, the SSA will decide to either (1) approve award without discussions, or (2) enter into discussions process

VI. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

The LPTA procedure is applied to known, firm requirements, usually readily available in the commercial marketplace where a fair and reasonable price determination is based on adequate price competition. Therefore, price analysis will normally be used to determine the total evaluated price to support the selection of the lowest priced, technically acceptable Offeror.

The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it is realistic for the work to be performed, reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with the Offeror’s Technical Proposal. All offers with separately priced line items or sub line items will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

VII. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION

Offerors may be given a chance to clarify certain aspects of their proposal and to resolve minor or clerical mistakes. However, Offerors are not given an opportunity to respond to any identified weaknesses or deficiencies or revise their proposals.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and issue a Contract without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions and receive revised proposals if later determined to be necessary.

VIII. DISCUSSION PROCESS

The primary objective of discussions is to maximize the Government’s ability to obtain best value, based on the requirement and the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation.

As a minimum, during discussions, the SSEB through the PCO shall indicate to, or discuss with, each Offeror in the competitive range the following: (a) any adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not yet had an opportunity to respond, (b) significant weaknesses, and (c) any deficiencies that have been identified during the evaluation.

This is accomplished through the release of Evaluation Notices (ENs). All ENs shall clearly indicate the type of exchange being conducted (e.g. clarification, communication, etc). Any EN addressing a proposal deficiency or weakness shall clearly indicate that a deficiency/weakness exists. The PCO is encouraged to discuss other aspects of the Offeror’s proposal that could in the opinion of the PCO be altered or explained to enhance materially the proposal’s potential for award.

00 22 16-23

IX. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

At the conclusion of discussions, each Offeror still within the competitive range shall be given an opportunity to submit a Final Proposal Revision (FPR) by a common cutoff date and time.

After receipt of the FPR, the SSEB shall complete evaluation of the FPR. The evaluation criteria from the solicitation shall continue to be the basis for evaluation.

X. DEBRIEFINGS

The PCO shall ensure Offerors are debriefed, if requested, in accordance with FAR 15.505 and

FAR 15.506, as applicable.

XI. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PREAWARD COSTS

The proposal submission instructions are written to give prospective contractors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The Offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being downgraded and/or being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable. The technical proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the technical specifications and applicable building codes and regulations. Non-compliance with the technical specifications and/or applicable building codes and/or regulations will be considered a deficiency. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail, may be downgraded.

-END OF SECTION-

JOINT INTEROPERABILITY TEST COMMAND (JITC) 111067

AMENDMENT 3FORT HUACHUCA, AZ

SECTION 01 10 10 Page 12

PART 3: SITEWORK

3.1 General

The site work design required for this Project shall include but may not necessarily be limited to the items listed in PART 3 SITEWORK.

3.2 RFP Technical Documents

These RFP documents define the functional requirements of the project. It is the DBT proposal, and to provide a complete and useable facility.

The RFP drawings and specifications should be used as complementary documents. The requirements are intended to complement one another and should not be viewed as independent requirements that exclude or contradict the design as a whole.

The technical requirements in this RFP are the minimum standards for quality of construction and materials. The drawings and specifications are intended to allow the DBT to choose from a range of acceptable alternatives.

3.3 Codes and References

The design shall be in accordance with (but not limited to) the following criteria. If conflicting information is encountered the most stringent criteria shall take precedence. The latest editions in effect as of the date of this Request for Proposal are to be used. If any additions listed elsewhere in this RFP conflict with the most current edition, then the most current edition shall take precedence.

APPLICABLE REFERENCES: SITEWORK

CODE: TITLE:

AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO, 2004

ADA and ABA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities ADAAG and BAG)

Latest edition

AFM 32-1084 Civil Engineering Facility Requirements

ANSI 260.1 American Standard for Nursery Stock

AZ DOT or AMG Standards Standard Specifications for Road (MAG or ADOT) and Bridge Construction (ADOT)

EISA Section 438 Technical Guidance on Implementing the Stormwater Runoff Requirements for Federal Projects maintaining site security for the remaining portion of the JITC facility during construction.

3.8 Demolition and Removal

The proposed Project Site will not require any existing facility demolition.

All utilities will be removed under the building pad, but their may be existing utilities on site that may affect other work such as other site utilities being installed under this contract. DBT will be responsible for any conflicts and resolution at their cost. See separate information in Amendment 3 on sanitary sewer main that may be relocated at DBT expense. The proposed Project Site requires demolition of existing pavements to make roadway and sidewalk connections, and miscellaneous site features.

See drawings included in the Appendices for additional information regarding the projects demolition scope.

All demolition of site work shown on the plans is approximate. The DBT shall verify all existing conditions prior to initiating demolition work.

Demolition limits shall be determined by the DBT.

Temporary buildings 57428A, 57428B AND 57428E will be removed and all utilities within the proposed building footprint will be removed to the main line, manhole, or similar structure by others prior to construction beginning.

3.8.1 Asphalt Pavement Demolition

Asphalt pavement, including aggregate base and drainage courses (as applicable), shall be demolished and removed in their entirety where required for the proposed building footprint, site and utility features associated with the building and AT/FP requirements. It shall be the responsibility of the DBT to determine the exact thickness of existing pavement requiring demolition.

Edges of pavement to be matched with new pavement shall be sawcut full depth.

The existing surface course shall be cut and removed 6-inches back from the full depth cut to provide a step joint. Pavements to be removed to a line that will become a permanent pavement edge shall be cut full depth through all bituminous layers. surfaces, or pavements to remain are damaged, they shall be repaired as directed at no additional cost to the Government.

3.8.2 Concrete Pavement Demolition

Concrete pavement, including aggregate base and drainage courses (as applicable), shall be demolished and removed in their entirety where required for the proposed building footprint, site and utility features associated with the building and AT/FP requirements. It shall be the responsibility of the DBT to determine the exact thickness of existing pavement requiring demolition.

3.8.3 Miscellaneous Site Demolition

Existing pavements, building slabs, foundations, footings, and miscellaneous site supporting facilities shall be removed in their entirety to the maximum extent possible throughout the construction the construction site to minimize interference with the installation of the proposed new foundations, footings, utilities, and pavement sections.

SECTION 01 10 10 Page 18

SECTION 01 10 10 Page 24

DBT at their option may use the existing temp security fencing. If DBT requires relocation of sections of the fencing due to his work, this will be a DBT expense. DBT is responsible for removal of all temp security fencing at end of job and making any repairs to the existing security fence that may be needed resulting from the use/construction of the temp security fence. Any new temp or permanent security fencing shall meet the requirements of JITC.

A new vehicular gate south of the JITC Building with access to Brainard Road for emergency vehicles only, shall meet the security Requirements of Fort Huachuca and JITC and be equipped with a knox box per Fort Huachuca Fire Department.

3.10.12 Bollards

Permanent bollards shall be provided to provide protection for structures and equipment from vehicular movements, including at fire hydrants, above grade utility meters and equipment, post indicator valves, and building overhead doors. Minimum bollard diameter shall be 6-inches, 36-inches above ground, and a minimum of 30-inches below grade.

3.10.13 Equipment Pads (Mechanical and Electrical Equipment)

Concrete equipment pads shall be provided for all above grade exterior utility structures, including but not limited to transformers, switchgear, generator, and mechanical equipment. Equipment pads serving electrical functions shall have conduit windows which shall be grouted before installation of the equipment. All mechanical and electrical equipment pads shall extend 12-inches beyond the equipment silhouette or footprint and shall provide both physical support for the equipment and serve a housekeeping function. DBT shall design final pad size, thickness, and grading based on loadings and equipment.

3.10.14 Screen Walls

A screen wall enclosure will not be required for the mechanical equipment yards.

3.10.15 Trash and Recycle Dumpsters

The existing trash and recycling dumpster will be used by the JITC facility.

No additional recycling or trash enclosures or pads will be required.

3.10.16 Standard Details

Unless noted otherwise, site features shall be constructed in accordance with the standard details provided in the USACE SWD-AEIM.

3.10.17 Landscaping

All landscaping shall be in accordance with Fort Huachuca Installation Planning Standards while maintaining AT/FP standoff requirements

All landscaping and vegetation shall be low maintenance plantings with native plant materials. Fully functional temporary irrigation shall be installed for the proposed landscaping as required and removed at the end of landscape maintenance.

3.11 Borrow and Waste

FORT HUACHUCA, AZ

SECTION 01 10 10 Page 52

b) Demountable wall system with doors

Demountable walls and doors shall be provided by Government and installed by Government (GFGI). Design build contractor shall coordinate all final connections for demountable walls with connection to lights thermostats, power and data.

Demountable walls shall be from floor or raised access floor (bid option 4) to lay-in ceiling above at 10feet 0inch in height. All doors in demountable wall shall have keyed mechanical locks refer to Section 01 10 10 -4.4.2.3.1 for Keying Requirements.

4.4.1.1 General

All walls shall be constructed from true slab (below raised access floor) to roof deck above.

Walls shall extend below raised access flooring and shall be sealed to concrete slab. All penetrations below access floor shall be sealed providing sealed plenum for Under Floor Air Distribution (UFAD) system.

All walls must have metal or wood blocking to receive anchoring devices capable of sustaining forces anticipated as a result of attaching wall-mounted apparatuses. Interior walls shall be constructed using galvanized metal studs and gypsum board, and/or CMU masonry as indicated or required.

CMU masonry walls requiring a gypsum board wall finish shall be furred with minimum 2-1/2-inch deep metal furring or studs and sheathed with gypsum wall board. Gypsum shall be 5/8 inch thick minimum and meet ASTM C1396/C1396M.

Provide glass mat faced gypsum board meeting ASTM C1658/C1658M-13 for interior sides of exterior walls. Provide type ‘X’ for fire-rated assemblies and higher density core for STC acoustical rated assemblies. STC walls assembly location Refer to Section 01 10 10-4.2.6 Acoustical Design of this

RFP. Equipment service corridors and staging area shall have 5/8 inch thick abuse resistant gypsum board walls meeting ASTM C1629/C1629M. See section

4.4.7.3 Walls, for wall protection finish and see Concept Drawings in appendices for wall locations.

Server rooms and DNCC are considered to be Electronic Equipment Areas per the definition in UFC 3-600-01 Sections 2-1.8 and 4-11. When areas are considered to be Electronic Equipment Area, they are required to follow all requirements in NFPA 75.