Am5_W912PL-16-R-0025.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 2

05 6 April 2016

W912PL

U.S Army Corps of Engineers,Los Angeles Dist CESPL-CT-E, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

U.S Army Corps of Engineers,Los Angeles Dist CESPL-CT-E, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

W912PL-16-R-0025

25 Feb 2016

FY16 F35 Aircraft Maintenance Hanger (Squadron 3), Luke Air Force Base, Arizona The following are amended:

* Section 00 22 00

* Section 00 73 46

* Section 01 10 10

* Section 01 10 12

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025 Luke Air Force Base, AZ

SF-30 Cont. - 1 Amendment 0005

Front-End Revised Section 00 22 00 (Page Count) Modified Section 00 73 46

Add Site Visit Sign In Sheet

Specifications

01 10 10, 7.4.1 – Add “EMCS communication cable shall be CAT 6a.”

01 10 10, 8.3.8 – Revised to clarify smart meter communication shall be via RF transmission.

01 10 10, 8.3.22 – Delete Bridge Crane Option. Not required under this contract.

01 10 10, 8.3.51 – Delete. Correct requirement is included under 8.3.17.

01 10 10, 8.5.1 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.3 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.4 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.5 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.6 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.8 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.10 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 8.5.11.2 (d) – Add “EMCS communication cable shall be CAT 6a.”

01 10 10, 8.5.18 – Change CAT 6 to CAT 6a.

01 10 10, 5.4.6.3 – Add “All downspouts shall connect to the storm drain system.”

01 10 10, 6.12.7.2 – Revised section to clarify that all downspouts shall be connected to the storm drain.

01 10 12, 1.13.2.1 – Add “The completion time stated in Section 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS, 52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF THE WORK, includes 21 calendar days for Government review of the 60% and 100% design submittals and 14 calendar days for the corrected final design submittal review.

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

SF-30 Cont. - 2

01 10 10, 7.3.4.2 – Revised section to reference section 7.3.5.1 of 01 10 10 for Aircraft Maintenance Bay heating system.

01 10 10, 7.9.16 – Revised section to clarify that aircraft cooling air system shall be capable of delivering cooling air to three aircraft maintenance locations simultaneously.

01 10 10, 7.9.16.2 – Revised section to clarify that aircraft cooling air units shall be located in the mechanical yards.

01 10 10, 8.2.1 – Removed reference to demolition of building 941.

01 10 10, 8.2.12 – Revised to clarify that service entrance is to be sized for base bid and bid options.

01 10 10, 8.2.13 – Added requirement for hangar mounted flood lights per UFC requirements.

01 10 10, 8.2.15.1.c.1 – Clarified that new fiber is to be installed in existing and new ducts.

01 10 10, 8.3.16 – Clarified that disconnects and power circuits are to be provided for Bid Options regardless of whether Bid Option is exercised or not.

01 10 10, 8.3.42 – Clarified that UPS system required by AETC First 400 Feet Standard Guidance with Luke Supplement is to be GFGI.

01 10 10, 8.5.11.1.b– Removed requirement for breakroom data outlets and clarified that data outlet in aircraft maintenance bay shall be near janitors closet.

01 10 10, 8.5.11.1.c – Clarified that future access control data connection point is near janitor’s closet.

01 10 10, 8.5.20 – Deleted sub paragraphs “b” and “c”.

01 10 10, 8.6.3 – Added paragraph 8.6.3 for PA system provisions.

Drawings

GC001 – Revised the Enlarged Plan to clarify the General Project Limits boundary.

GC002 – Added a Phasing Note to clarify the coordination required for the demolition and site work adjacent to the flightline and aircraft movement areas.

A100 – Removed bid option from the aircraft utility pits.

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

SF-30 Cont. - 3

A100 – Added BMS magnetic switch and relocated the IDS pad.

A200 – Removed bid option from translucent fiber glass panels.

CD101 – Revised the Plan to clarify the removal of airfield pavement and high mast lighting.

CS101 – Revised the Plan to clarify the requirement for a curb and gutter and the requirement for airfield pavement work.

CU101 – Revised the Plan to remove the requirement of a post indicator valve and to clarify the requirement for the water backflow location.

CU102 – Added a note to clarify the requirement to confirm existing storm drain information.

Appendices

Appendix S (Room Data Sheets) – Aircraft Maintenance Bay - Clarified locations for future access control provisions, deleted requirement for electric vehicle charging stations.

Exterior - Added PA requirement for exterior of building.

Toilet – Updated wall, floor and ceiling finishes.

Janitor Room – Updated wall and ceiling finishes.

Vestibule- Updated wall finishes.

Building 920 As-builts

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 1

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS: …………..…………………………

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: ..……………………………………………………...2

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: ………………………………………………………………………….2

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT: ………………………………………………………………………………….2

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE: ……………………………………………………………………………2

1.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME ): …………………………..3

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET: …………………………………………………………………………5

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 2

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1.1.1. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors in Section 00 22 16.

1.1.2. Each Offeror must submit a Price Proposal, Volume I, and a Technical Proposal Volume II as separate distinct volumes. The Price Proposal, and Technical Proposal, must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

1.1.3. All information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. No proposed price information should be included in the response to the technical evaluation factors.

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1.2.1. All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” size sheets (e.g., fold-outs) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. W e e x p e c t 1 1 ” x 1 7 ” s i z e s h e e t s f o r s c h e d u l e a n d d r a w i n g s , b u t n o t h i n g e l s e . Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

1.2.2. All drawing sheets: 22” x 34” (1/2 size 11”x17”), 24" x 36" or 30" x 42" format. Full or half- size sets are acceptable, but must include a minimum of one (1) full-size set; half-size sets must be readable.

1.2.3. Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

1.2.4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

1.2.5. Offerors must provide one (1) CD Rom disk of all the following Design Technical Criteria (AutoCAD 2000 & MS WORD 2000) and Offerors Performance Capability with technical proposal. Offerors will not be required to submit electronic copies of catalog cuts.

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT:

1.3.1. Offeror(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 3

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE:

1.4.1. Offers shall be received by the Los Angeles District COE no later than the time and date specified as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

1.5. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

1.5.1. Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original only

1.5.2. Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs: The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

1.6. CONTENT FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.6.1. TAB 1 – TECHNICAL APPROACH (VOLUME II):

Factor 1: Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.2. TAB 2 – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS (VOLUME

II):

Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.3 TAB 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT PROJECTS (VOLUME II)

1.6.4. TAB 4 – MANAGEMENT PLAN (VOLUME II)

1.6.5. TAB 5 –PROPOSED SCHEDULE (VOLUME II)

TAB #1 SF 1442

TAB #2

The Completed Pricing Schedule with the Offeror’s proposed contract line item prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for the Base Bid Items. Do not round off to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission.

TAB #3 A Bid Guarantee (e.g., Standard Form 24, “Bid Bond”) TAB #4 Representations & Certifications TAB #5 Teaming Agreement or Irrevocable Subcontractor Offer (if applicable) TAB #6 Subcontracting Plan (if required)

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 4

1.6.6 TAB 6 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

Submission Requirements:

All offerors (both large and small businesses) will be evaluated on the extent of participation of small business concerns in performance of this contact opportunity.

The offeror’s Small Business Participation Plan, submitted in the Technical Proposal, must meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business participation goal of 20% based on the total contract value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). The work to be performed directly by a small business prime offeror will also be evaluated as Small Business participation.

All offerors must complete and submit the Small Business Participation Plan form.

All Offerors (both large and small businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Participation Plan to be evaluated under Small Business Participation Plan Factor. The Offeror shall articulate how the Offeror intends to meet the small business objectives described in the Small Business Participation Plan Factor.

1.6.7 DRAWINGS –

Must be submitted in accordance with Section 00120 and are included in the requirements under Factor 4, Technical Approach. All drawings shall be either full size (22" x 34") or half size (11" x 17") as described in Section 01012.

1.7. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.7.1. Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal: Submit the original and 4 additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format.

1.7.1.1. Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart. The main tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is forty-six (46) pages, or 23 pages double sided for Factors 1 through 4. P a g e s s u b m i t t e d p a s t t h i s l i m i t w i l l n o t b e e v a l u a t e d . T h e P a s t P e r f o r m a n c e Q u e s t i o n n a i r e s ( P P Q ) a n d u p t o t e n ( 1 0 ) p a g e s o f R e s u m e s ( s i n g l e s i d e d ) w i l l n o t b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e a b o v e p a g e c o u n t . P e r f o r m a n c e A s s e s s m e n t R e p o r t s ( P A R ) w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e p a g e c o u n t , h o w e v e r , a t t a c h m e n t s s u c h a s a n y l e t t e r s o f a p p r e c i a t i o n o r s i m i l a r c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w i l l n o t c o u n t a g a i n s t t h e p a g e l i m i t a t i o n . An additional 10 pages will be added for Factor 6, Small Business Participation Plan and an additional 15 pages for the Subcontracting Plan, which is required to be submitted by Large Business with the proposal.

1.7.1.2. Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Offeror(s) must submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the following volumes and tabs:

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 5

VOLUME TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VOLUME II

TAB #1

EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR DESIGN BUILD AND DESIGN BID

BUILD CONTRACTS

(Factor 1 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #2

PAST PERFORMANCE ON SIMILAR DESIGN BUILD AND

DESIGN BID BUILD PROJECTS

(Factor 2 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #3 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

(Factor 3 in Section 00 22 16)

VOLUME II TAB #4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

(Factor 4 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #5 PROPOSED SCHEDULE

(Factor 5 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #6 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

(Factor 6 in Section 00 22 16)

Instructions regarding responses to the evaluation factors are detailed in Section 00 22 16, entitled, “Supplementary Instructions to Proposers”

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 6

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Offeror)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number: Task Order (TO) Number if Applicable:

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost Reimbursement Hybrid (explain)

Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active Complete Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. LEED Certification Building Construction:

10. Warranty or other problems encountered and how resolved:

11. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable): Check one of the following blocks:

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A performance questionnaire has been sent to the reference(s) listed in Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 7

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

1.8.1. Format for the Proposal Cover Sheet: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c)(i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 22 00.

The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-15-R-0003

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Design-Build F-35 AMU/Aircraft Maintenance Hangar 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 22 00 -Page 8

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL

CONTENTS

NUMBER REQUIRED

VOLUME I

PRICE PROPOSAL/

PRO-FORMA

REQUIREMENTS

--PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

-- SF 1442 AND AMENDMENTS

--PRICING SCHEDULE

--OFFER GUARANTEE (“BID BOND”)

--REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

1 ORIGINAL ONLY

TECHNICAL

APPROACH,

METHODS

AND

PROCEDUR

ES (AS

NEEDED)

- NARRATIVES (AS NEEDED)

ORIGINAL + 4 SETS

CONSTRUCTION

EXPERIENCE ON

SIMILAR

CONTRACTS

PROJECTS OF SIMILAR TYPES, SCOPES

AND COMPLEXITY

-RECENT RELEVANT TEAMING

EXPERIENCES

VOLUME II PAST

PERFORMANCE ON

RECENT RELEVANT

CONTRACTS

-PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE

CHECK (PPQ, PAR, etc.)

-RELEVANT PROJECT SUMMARY

-RECENT RELEVANT PROJECT

INFORMATION

MANAGEMENT

PLAN

- PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

- CONSTRUCTION KEY PERSONNEL’S

RESUME

- ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

PROPOSAL

SCHEDULE

-PROJECT SCHEDULE NARRATIVE

-PROPOSED SCHEDULE

DRAWINGS

(AS NEEDED)

-CIVIL SITE PLAN,

-OVERALL FLOOR PLAN,

-EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

(AS NEEDED)

Small Business Participation Plan (Form)

(1) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime or { } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Businesses { } Woman-Owned Small Business { } HUB Zone Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business { } HBCU/MIs

(2) Submit the total combined percentage (must equal 100%) of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Sub-contractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Percentage of Total Contract Dollars/Price

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) % Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) %

(3) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of small business.

The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Gentleman Concierge (HubZone) and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB

2%; VOSB 2%);.

SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantaged Businesses % HUB Zone Small Business % Woman Owned Small Business % Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB _% Veteran Owned Small Business % HBCU/MIs _%

(4) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small:

Small Disadvantaged Businesses:

Women-Owned Small:

HUB Zone Small:

Veteran Owned Small:

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small:

HBCU/MI:

(5) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either -- written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

(6) Large Business Subcontracting Past Performance: Describe the extent to which you attained applicable goals for contracts that required you to submit a Subcontracting Plan. You may include copies of up to three ISRs (Individual Subcontracting Reports) to validate your past performance. You may also submit an explanation of your efforts, where you failed to meet goals.

Additional Important Note for Large Businesses only.

Small Business Sub-Contracting Plans (FAR 52.219-9)

Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan, large business offerors must also submit a Subcontracting Plan (Individual Contract Plan) as required by FAR 52.219-9. Large businesses will not be eligible for award if they fail to submit an acceptable Subcontracting Plan.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted.

SAMPLE COVER LETTER

(Required)

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance. you may provide the requested information by email to Sandy Oquita Sandra.Oquita@usace.army.mil. or call at (213) 452-3249.

• The Government is requesting receipt of this information by 2:00 p.m. on 12 April 2016.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance.

Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Ms. Sandy Oquita by telephone

(213) 452-3249 or Mr. Otse Adikhai (213) 452-3248.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment mailto:Sandra.Oquita@usace.army.mil.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address:DUNs Number: Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explaind ifferences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE

WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL Amendment 0005

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST

REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to

Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

(please attach additional pages if necessary):

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 1

SECTION 00 73 46

DAVIS BACON WAGE DECISION

General Decision Number: AZ160032 02/26/2016 AZ32

Superseded General Decision Number: AZ20150032

State: Arizona

Construction Type: Building

County: Maricopa County in Arizona.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include single family homes or apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.15 for calendar year 2016 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the solicitation was issued on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.15 (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2016. The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/08/2016 1 01/15/2016 2 01/22/2016 3 02/26/2016

ASBE0073-002 08/01/2015

Rates Fringes

ASBESTOS WORKER/HEAT & FROST

INSULATOR........................$ 38.61 13.07

BOIL0627-001 01/01/2013

Rates Fringes

BOILERMAKER......................$ 32.51 26.16

BRAZ0003-009 01/01/2016

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER.......................$ 24.60 6.43

ZONE PAY:

(Radius miles from the intersection of Central Ave. and

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 2

Washington St., Phoenix, AZ)

Zone A: 0-60 miles- Base Rate Zone B: 61-75 miles- Base Rate plus $2.00 per hour Zone C: 75-100 miles- Base Rate plus $3.00 per hour Zone D: 101-200 miles- Base Rate plus $3.50 per hour Zone E: Over 200 miles- Base Rate plus $6.50 per hour

CARP0408-009 09/30/2013

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER (Excludes Acoustical Ceiling Installation, Drywall Finishing/Taping, Drywall Hanging, Form Work, and Metal Stud Installation)...............$ 23.75 9.24

CARP1327-001 01/01/2014

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER (Drywall Hanging Only)............................$ 19.75 6.46

ELEC0640-005 07/01/2015

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN (Includes Low Voltage Wiring; Excludes Installation of Alarms and Sound and Communication Systems).........................$ 27.00 9.53

ENGI0428-012 06/01/2015

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

(1) Oiler...................$ 22.09 9.55

(2) Crane under 15 tons.....$ 25.36 9.55

(3) Crane,15 tons to 100 tons, Tower Crane...........$ 26.44 9.55

(4) Crane, 100 tons and over........................$ 27.47 9.55

IRON0075-011 08/01/2015

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL AND

ORNAMENTAL.......................$ 26.00 21.77

Zone 1: 0 to 50 miles from City Hall in Phoenix or Tucson Zone 2: 050 to 100 miles - Add $4.00 Zone 3: 100 to 150 miles - Add $5.00

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 3

Zone 4: 150 miles & over - Add $6.50

LABO0383-005 11/01/2013

Rates Fringes

LABORER (MASON TENDER-BRICK).....$ 18.63 4.35

PAIN0086-006 04/01/2013

Rates Fringes

DRYWALL FINISHER/TAPER

ZONE A......................$ 19.00 5.03

ZONE B......................$ 22.50 5.03

ZONE PAY:

ZONE A: Free Zone: A distance of 0 to 100 miles from the old Phoenix courthouse.

ZONE B: A distance of 101 miles and over from the old Phoenix courthouse: $3.50 per hour over ZONE A

PLAS0394-001 07/01/2014

Rates Fringes

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 22.84 8.57

* PLUM0469-002 07/01/2015

Rates Fringes

PLUMBER/PIPEFITTER

Cononino, Maricopa, and Yuma........................$ 36.45 18.45 Pima........................$ 33.95 18.45

* SFAZ0669-001 01/01/2016

Rates Fringes

SPRINKLER FITTER (Fire Sprinklers)......................$ 31.33 19.47

SHEE0359-002 07/01/2015

Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER: (HVAC

Duct Installation Only) Zone 1......................$ 31.40 17.84

SUAZ2012-020 05/30/2012

Rates Fringes

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 4

ACOUSTICAL CEILING MECHANIC......$ 21.14 3.14

CARPENTER (Form Work Only).......$ 19.67 5.45

CARPENTER (Metal Stud Installation)....................$ 16.23 0.00

CAULKER..........................$ 16.01 0.00

ELECTRICIAN (Alarm Installation)....................$ 18.31 4.68

ELECTRICIAN (Installation of Sound and Communication Systems).........................$ 17.20 2.87

FIREPROOFER......................$ 15.00 0.00

GLAZIER..........................$ 18.67 1.44

INSTALLER - SIGN.................$ 19.16 3.58

INSULATOR - BATT.................$ 11.96 3.06

IRONWORKER, REINFORCING..........$ 14.92 0.00

LABORER: Asphalt Raker..........$ 15.18 1.30

LABORER: Common or General......$ 13.80 2.24

LABORER: Concrete Saw (Hand Held/Walk Behind)................$ 21.00 7.37

LABORER: Fence Erection.........$ 19.73 0.00

LABORER: Landscape & Irrigation.......................$ 11.33 0.43

LABORER: Mason Tender - Cement/Concrete..................$ 15.24 3.90

LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 15.10 0.85

LABORER: Plaster Tender.........$ 12.00 0.00

LABORER: Power Tool Operator....$ 14.85 4.20

LATHER...........................$ 16.15 0.00

MASON - STONE....................$ 18.48 0.82

MILLWRIGHT.......................$ 20.00 2.87

OPERATOR:

Backhoe/Excavator/Trackhoe.......$ 19.20 2.47

OPERATOR: Bulldozer.............$ 21.12 6.14

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 5

OPERATOR: Drill Rig Caissons....$ 19.06 2.39

OPERATOR: Drill.................$ 19.16 0.00

OPERATOR: Forklift..............$ 17.36 0.00

OPERATOR: Grader/Blade..........$ 21.00 7.07

OPERATOR: Loader (Front End)....$ 18.55 0.95

OPERATOR: Paver (Asphalt, Aggregate, and Concrete).........$ 21.09 3.96

OPERATOR: Roller................$ 25.00 0.00

OPERATOR: Scraper...............$ 21.41 0.00

OPERATOR: Screed................$ 22.17 4.42

OPERATOR: Trencher..............$ 15.01 0.58

PAINTER: Brush, Roller, Spray and Steel..................$ 16.53 2.63

PLASTERER........................$ 16.71 0.00

ROOFER, Includes Waterproofing, and Installation of Metal Roofs......$ 16.71 1.67

SHEET METAL WORKER, Excludes HVAC Duct Installation...........$ 18.85 2.79

TERRAZZO WORKER/SETTER...........$ 21.13 0.00

TILE FINISHER....................$ 12.50 0.00

TILE SETTER......................$ 15.00 0.00

TRUCK DRIVER: Dump Trucks.......$ 15.55 1.42

TRUCK DRIVER: Pickup Truck......$ 11.00 0.87

TRUCK DRIVER: Water Truck.......$ 17.72 4.21

TRUCKDRIVER: 3 and 4 Axle.......$ 19.29 1.36

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 6

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" or "UAVG" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the "SU" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 7

08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 8

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 9

General Decision Number: AZ160008 01/08/2016 AZ8

Superseded General Decision Number: AZ20150008

State: Arizona

Construction Type: Highway

Counties: Coconino, Maricopa, Mohave, Pima, Pinal, Yavapai and Yuma Counties in Arizona.

HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.15 for calendar year 2016 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the solicitation was issued on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.15 (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2016. The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/08/2016

* CARP0408-005 10/01/2015

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER (Including Cement Form Work).......................$ 24.63 11.54

* ENGI0428-001 06/01/2015

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

Group 1.....................$ 22.59 9.34 Group 2.....................$ 25.86 9.34 Group 3.....................$ 26.94 9.34 Group 4.....................$ 27.97 9.34

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS CLASSIFICATIONS:

GROUP 1: A-frame boom truck, air compressor, Beltcrete, boring bridge and texture, brakeman, concrete mixer (skip type), conductor, conveyor, cross timing and pipe float, curing machine, dinky (under 20 tons), elevator hoist (Husky and similar), firemen, forklift, generator (all), handler, highline cableway signalman, hydrographic mulcher, joint inserter, jumbo finishing machine, Kolman belt loader, machine conveyor, multiple power concrete saw, pavement breaker, power grizzly, pressure grout machine, Design-Build F-35 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Squadron 3 W912PL-16-R-0025

00 73 46 - 10 pump, self-propelled chip spreading machine, slurry seal machine (Moto paver driver), small self-propelled compactor (with blade-backfill, ditch operation), straw blower, tractor (wheel type), tripper, tugger (single drum), welding machine, winch truck

GROUP 2:

ALL COUNTIES INCLUDING MARICOPA: Aggregate Plant, Asphalt plant Mixer, Bee Gee, Boring Machine, Concrete Pump, Concrete Mechanical Tamping-Spreading Finishing Machine, Concrete Batch Plant, Concrete Mixer (paving & mobile), Elevating Grader (except as otherwise classified), Field Equipment Serviceman, Locomotive Engineer (including Dinky 20 tons & over), Moto-Paver, Oiler-Driver, Operating Engineer Rigger, Power Jumbo Form Setter, Road Oil Mixing Machine, Self-Propelled Compactor (with blade-grade operation), Slip Form (power driven lifting device for concrete forms), Soil Cement Road Mixing Machine, Pipe-Wrapping & Cleaning Machine (stationary or traveling), Surface Heater & Planer, Trenching Machine, Tugger (2 or more drums).

MARICOPA COUNTY ONLY: Backhoe < 1 cu yd, Motor Grader (rough), Scraper (pneumatic tired), Roller (all types asphalt), Screed, Skip Loader (all types 3<6 cu yd), Tractor (dozer, pusher-all).

GROUP 3:

ALL COUNTIES INCLUDING MARICOPA: Auto Grade Machine, Barge, Boring Machine (including Mole, Badger & similar type directional/horizontal), Crane (crawler & pneumatic 15>100 tons), Crawler type Tractor with boom attachment & slope bar, Derrick, Gradall, Heavy Duty Mechanic-Welder, Helicopter Hoist or Pilot, Highline Cableway, Mechanical Hoist,…