Appendices_Final_MW_PW_Investigation_Data_Evaluation_Report-December_2006.pdf

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-1

Vibracoring Photo VC1: Vibracore barge on lake, beginning to lower core tube through moon pool

Photo VC2: Installing flexible polyethylene liner inside the 4-inch aluminum core tube

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-2

Photo VC3: Installing “finger-style” core catcher at base of core barrel

Photo VC4: “Hinged-style” core catcher

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-3

Photo VC5: Attaching 4-inch aluminum core barrel to vibracore head

Photo VC6: Extruding core at processing station

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-4

Photo VC7: Extruding the sediment-filled rigid acetate liner from the 4-inch aluminum core tube (PW05 core)

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-5

Van Veen Sampler Photo VV1: Van Veen sampler before deployment

Photo VV2: Van Veen with jaws open (ready to trigger on the lake bed)

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-6

Photo VV3: Van Veen sampler full with sediment sample (MI27 location)

Photo VV4: Van Veen sampler with rock in jaws (location MI31)

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-7

Select Sediment Core Photos Photo SC1: Top of core MI01 showing coarse-grained sediment encountered. Visible clasts of altered andesite were observed in this core.

Photo SC2: 9 to 10 foot interval of core MI05 showing red clayey sand layer that may show evidence of tailings

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-8

Photo SC3: 7 to 8 foot interval of core MI14 showing (organic rich) clay and silt

Photo SC4: 3 to 4 foot interval of core MI10 showing typical clayey sand observed further from the Waste Rock Dam.

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-9

Photo SC5: Typical (organic rich) silt with “custard” consistency, from core MI21 (2 to 3 foot interval)

Photo SC6: Red sand and gravel encountered at the southern end of the Waste Rock Dam (core MI13, 2 to 3 foot interval)

RDD/063540016 (NLH3335.DOC) A-10

Seepage Meter Installation Photo SM1: Seepage meter and seepage meter bag (not connected)

Photo SM2: Looking north from the core processing station (Waste Rock Dam on right), white spheres in water are pore water core location buoys (targeted seepage meter locations)

RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC) B-1

APPENDIX B

Data Quality Evaluation Reports

B.1 Introduction This appendix is a summary of the data quality evaluation of analytical results for sediment, pore water, and surface water samples collected from September 9 through September 20, 2005, for the SBMM Mine Waste and Pore Water Investigation. Samples were collected and analyzed to establish the extent of mine waste in Clear Lake, support the quantification of mercury discharge to Clear Lake, and evaluate water-rock interactions.

This appendix summarizes the results of the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) activities prescribed in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine Superfund Site, Clearlake Oaks, California (CH2M HILL, 2005d). The QAPP presents specific policies, organization, functions, and QA/QC activities associated with the analytical data generation and assessment that were designed to achieve data quality goals for this project. The QAPP provides comprehensive guidance for obtaining analytical data of known quality.

CH2M HILL performed a combination Tier 3 and Tier 1B review of these data as required in the QAPP. This report is intended as a general data quality assessment designed to sum-marize data issues resulting from the CH2M HILL validation review.

The monomethyl mercury, California Waste Extraction Test (CA WET) for metals, and radiological data were validated by ICF Consulting/Laboratory Data Consultants, contracted by the EPA Environmental Assistance Services Team. These data validation findings are presented in Attachments B1, B2, and B3, respectively.

B.2 Analytical Data A total of 130 native environmental sediment samples and 12 sediment field duplicates (FD), 2 native environmental surface water samples and 1 surface water FD, 5 native soil samples, and 18 native environmental pore water samples were collected. The samples were divided into 15 sample delivery groups (SDG) by the laboratories. A total of 13 methods were used to analyze the environmental samples. Potential acidity and neutralization potential analyses were performed by Columbia Analytical Services (CAS) in Redding, California. All other analyses reviewed here were performed by the EPA Region 9 Lab-oratory located in Richmond, California. Samples were collected and shipped by overnight carrier or couriered to the laboratories for analysis. Selected samples were analyzed for one or more of the following analytes/methods:

• Hardness by calculation

• Metals in pore water using Method EPA200.7 and EPA200.8

• Mercury in pore water using Method EPA245.1

• Anions using Method EPA300

• Ammonia using Method EPA350.1

0BDATA QUALITY EVALUATION REPORTS

B-2 RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC)

• Total Kjeldahl nitrogen using Method EPA351.2

• Potential acidity using Method EPA3.2.11

• Neutralization potential using Method EPA600

• Alkalinity (carbonate, bicarbonate, hydroxide, and total) using Method SM2320

• Total metals using Method SW6010B

• Total mercury using Method SW7473

• Total Organic Carbon using Method E440.1

Analytical performance was initially assessed on an SDG or analytical batch basis. Several SDGs may be associated with the same laboratory quality control (QC) samples. The association of laboratory QC samples and normal environmental samples from the same analytical batches can be determined by the laboratory lot control number. Each data package was reviewed for the following:

1. Chain-of-custody (CoC) documentation

2. Holding-time compliance

3. Required QC samples at the specified frequencies

4. Method blanks

5. Laboratory control samples (LCS)

6. Analytical spike data

7. Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) samples on a site/location basis

8. Initial and continuing calibration information

9. Other method-specific criteria as defined by the QAPP

Field samples were also reviewed to ascertain field compliance and data quality issues. This included a review of equipment blanks and FDs.

Data flags were assigned according to the QC acceptance limits defined in the QAPP. Data flags and the reason for each were entered into an electronic database and made available to the data users. As discussed below, a final flag was applied to data after evaluating all flags entered into the database and selecting the most conservative validation flag defined by the

QAPP.

The data flags listed in the QAPP are defined as follows:

• J = Analyte is present but the reported value might not be accurate or precise (estimated).

• R = The data are unusable due to deficiencies in the ability to analyze the sample and meet QC criteria.

• U = Analyte was not detected at the specified detection limit.

• UJ = Analyte was not detected, and the specified detection limit might not be accurate or precise (estimated).

RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC) B-3

In addition, the following flags, which have no QC implications and are not listed in the QAPP, were used:

• Exclude = Data not used in site assessment; more appropriate data exist for this analyte.

• None = A flag is not applied. This placeholder is for calculating QC criteria issues without flagging.

An assessment of data quality is summarized below for each analytical method. The overall summaries of the data validation findings are contained in Tables 1 through 12 (all tables are located at the end of this appendix) and summarized in the method sections that follow.

Both the method sections and the summary tables contain only the instances where QC criteria exceedances impact data qualification (resulting in a validation flag being added to the data).

The following list identifies each table and provides a summary of the contents:

• Table 1: Overall Flagging Summary. Presents the number of occurrences for each data validation reason by method.

• Table 2: Holding Times – Qualified Data. Data qualified for instances where the method holding time was exceeded.

• Table 3: Results between the Reporting Limit (RL) and the Method Detection Limit (MDL) – Qualified Data. Presents the results which are estimated because the result is between the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and the MDL.

• Table 4: MDL Exceeds RL – Qualified Data. Presents the instances where the MDL was greater than the QAPP-specified PQL.

• Table 5: Calibration Criteria – Qualified Data. Presents data qualified because initial or continuing calibration criteria were exceeded.

• Table 6: Blank Contamination – Qualified Data. Presents the data qualified because of blank contamination.

• Table 7: Field Duplicate Precision – Qualified Data. Presents the data qualified because the FD precision exceeded the sampling and analytical expectation defined in the QAPP. Analyte reproducibility may be subject to site-specific variability of contaminants.

• Table 8: Blank Spike – Qualified Data. Presents data qualified due to exceedance of LCS QAPP recovery criteria.

• Table 9: Matrix Spike Precision/Accuracy – Qualified Data. Presents the data qualified because MS/MSD criteria were exceeded.

• Table 10: Site Completeness by Analyte – Qualified Data. Presents the percent completeness by analyte, matrix, and method.

B-4 RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC)

• Table 11: Sample Summary by CoC – Data Summary. Presents the sample identifica-tions, sample dates, and SDGs sorted by CoC number.

• Table 12: Sample Chronology – Data Summary. Presents the sample identifications, methods, sample dates, received dates, extraction dates, and analysis dates sorted by SDG number.

B.2.1.1 General Comments Low-level Detects. Sample results between the MDL and the PQL have been flagged “J” and are presented in Table 3. These qualified results represent values determined at levels where the true value of the measured chemical could not be quantified with a high degree of confidence. The data user may consider these qualified results as estimates when making project decisions. Data qualified for this reason are not presented.

Overall Assessment. The number and severity of QC check or field procedure failures pre-sented is minimal considering the size of the dataset. Out of approximately 4,000 normal and FD data points, no data points were rejected due to QC exceedances. Approximately 460 detected results (about 11 percent) and 50 non-detected results (about 1.3 percent) were qualified as estimated due to QC exceedances. Approximately 20 results were affected by laboratory or field blank contamination (approximately 0.5 percent). These numbers and the overall completeness of 100 percent indicate that the completeness goals for the project were met and that the quality of the analytical program and laboratories was sufficient to meet the project data quality objectives (DQOs).

B.2.1.2 Method EPA200.8 (ICP/MS Metals) Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate. One detected manganese pore water result associated with an MSD recovery that exceeded the lower control limit (LCL) was flagged “J” to indi-cate that this result is an estimated concentration and potentially biased low. One cobalt and one thallium pore water non-detected result associated with MS and MSD recoveries below the LCL were flagged “UJ” and considered to be estimated concentrations that are potentially biased low. The affected samples are presented in Table 9.

Overall Method Assessment. The effect of these QC exceedances is negligible on data usability. Overall, this analysis meets the DQOs of the project.

B.2.1.3 Method EPA300 (Anions) Blanks. Fluoride was detected below the PQL in one laboratory blank and nitrate was detected above the PQL in two laboratory blanks. In the associated water samples where the detected concentrations were less than 10 times that of the blanks, the results were flagged “U” and considered non-detected. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 6.

Laboratory Duplicates. The sulfate results from one water laboratory duplicate pair exceeded the relative percent difference (RPD) criteria. The native result was flagged “J” and con-sidered to be an estimated concentration. This affected sample is presented in Table 9.

RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC) B-5

Holding Time. The nitrate holding time for 17 water samples was exceeded by 1 or 2 days.

The detected results were flagged “J,” and non-detected results were flagged “UJ”; both are considered to be estimated concentrations. The affected samples are presented in Table 2.

Overall Method Assessment. The effect of these QC exceedances is negligible on data usability. Overall, this analysis meets the DQOs of the project.

B.2.1.4 Method SW6010B (ICP Metals) Blanks. Zinc was detected above the PQL in two equipment blanks. In the associated sedi-ment samples where the detected concentrations were less than 10 times that of the blanks, the results were flagged “U” and considered to be non-detected. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 6.

Field Duplicates. The RPD criteria were exceeded by aluminum, boron, calcium, and/or magnesium results from three sediment FD pairs. The native and FD results were flagged “J” and considered to be estimated concentrations. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 7.

Blank Spikes. The percent recovery criteria for aluminum, antimony, or selenium were exceeded in four LCS samples. The associated sediment sample detected results were flagged “J,” and non-detected results were flagged “UJ”; both are considered to be estimated concentrations. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 8.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate. Matrix effects were demonstrated in 10 sediment samples. Multiple analytes were recovered from MS/MSDs outside the control limits, and some RPD criteria were also exceeded. Associated detected results were flagged “J,” and non-detected results were flagged “UJ”; both are considered to be estimated concentrations.

The affected samples are presented in Table 9.

Overall Method Assessment. The effect of these QC exceedances is negligible on data usability. Overall, this analysis meets the DQOs of the project.

B.2.1.5 Method SW7473 (Mercury) Laboratory Duplicates. The mercury results from six sediment laboratory duplicate pairs exceeded the RPD criteria. The native results were flagged “J” and considered to be estimated concentrations. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 9.

Field Duplicates. The mercury RPD criterion was exceeded in three sediment FD pairs. The native and FD results were flagged “J” and considered to be estimated concentrations. The project team requested re-analysis of one FD pair where the RPD was greater than 150 per-cent. A memorandum from the laboratory documenting the re-analysis is included as Attachment B4. The original results were reported for this FD pair. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 7.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate. Matrix effects were demonstrated in two sediment samples by MS recoveries greater than the upper control limit (UCL). Associated detected results were flagged “J” and considered to be estimated concentrations. The affected samples are presented in Table 9.

B-6 RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC)

Overall Method Assessment. The effect of these QC exceedances is negligible on data usability. Overall, this analysis meets the DQOs of the project.

B.2.1.6 Method E440.1 (Total Organic Carbon) Holding Time. Total organic carbon analysis was requested outside of method holding time.

The holding time for 129 soil samples was exceeded. The detected results were flagged “J” and are considered to be estimated concentrations. The affected samples are presented in Table 2.

Blank Spikes. The percent recovery criterion for total organic carbon was exceeded in several LCS samples. The associated detected results were flagged “J” and are considered to be estimated concentrations. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 8.

Field Duplicates. The RPD criteria were exceeded in one FD pair. The native and FD results were flagged “J” and are considered to be estimated concentrations. A summary of the affected samples is presented in Table 7.

Overall Method Assessment. The effect of these QC exceedances is negligible on data usability. Overall, this analysis meets the DQOs of the project.

B.2.1.7 Completeness Table 10 provides a completeness summary that lists the analytes, number of samples analyzed, and completeness calculations for the entire dataset. Completeness is the number of valid results (not flagged “R”) divided by the number of possible results from all normal and FD samples collected during the sampling event, independent of the reason for any rejected data. One hundred percent completeness was attained for this dataset.

The final activity in the data quality evaluation is an assessment of whether the data meet the DQOs. The goal of this assessment is to demonstrate that a sufficient number of representative samples was collected and the resulting analytical data can be used to support the decision-making process. The precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness, and comparability (PARCC) are addressed in the QAPP. The following summary highlights the SBMM Pore Water and Mine Waste Investigations data evaluation findings:

1. The completeness objectives were met for all method and analyte combinations.

2. Approximately 11 percent of the data was qualified as estimated because of matrix effects or laboratory QC exceedances.

3. Less than 1 percent of the data is qualified because of blank contamination; blank contamination is within reasonable method expectations.

4. The precision and accuracy of the data, as measured by field and laboratory QC indicators, suggest that the QAPP goals have been met.

5. The field crews and laboratories followed QAPP and project documents, assuring representativeness and consistency with previous studies.

RDD/060590006 (NLH3092.DOC) B-7

B.2.2 Quality Assurance Activities Evaluation of 100 percent of the chemical data was performed by using the QAPP as a guide for data quality evaluation. No systematic protocol errors were identified in the QA program setup or during the monitoring of field or laboratory efforts.

B.3 Data Management The SBMM sampling activity logs and laboratory analytical data are maintained in a project database or in project files, where appropriate. Data were collected and stored in a manner consistent with the requirements in the QAPP (CH2M HILL, 2005d) and the data manage-ment plan (CH2M HILL, 2005e). The data collected include but are not limited to the following:

• Field Data

− Daily field progress reports − Field worksheets − Daily field notebooks − Sample collection logs − CoC reports

• Laboratory Data

− Laboratory data packages grouped by SDG − Internal data evaluation reports for all data

Laboratory data were received in hardcopy and in electronic, comma-delimited, American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) format. The receipt of both data types was logged into the sample tracking program to determine completeness.

All data validation reports were generated from the electronic database. Final validation flags for global issues, such as matrix interference, are applied after the initial data vali-dation. These flags are also added to the electronic database and annotated as global flags.

The data management system was designed to maintain the usability and integrity of chemical and field operations data through a series of procedures and QC checks that began at the field site and carried through to the generation of data for the user. These data were compiled in a relational database in accordance with the QAPP and the data management plan (CH2M HILL, 2005e).

The original field data forms, the laboratory hardcopy report, and electronic data are stored in the project files and project local area network at CH2M HILL in Redding, California.

Laboratories are required to archive the analytical data as prescribed in the QAPP.

Validation Reason Validation Flag* Flag Type Number of

Affected AnalytesMethod Matrix

Overall Flagging Summary Table

E200.8 Water

Matrix spike duplicate recovery criteria less than lower limitMatrixCategory =

J Other 1 UJ Other 2

Matrix spike recovery less than lower limitMatrixCategory =

UJ Other 2 E300 Water

Laboratory blank contamination greater than the RLBlankCategory =

U Protocol 9 Laboratory blank contamination less than the RLBlankCategory =

U Protocol 8 Holding time exceededHoldingTimeCategory =

J Protocol 16 UJ Protocol 1

Lab duplicate exceeds RPD criteriaMatrixCategory =

J Other 1 E440.1 Soil

Field duplicate exceeds RPD criteriaFieldDuplicateCategory =

J Other 2 Holding time exceededHoldingTimeCategory =

J Protocol 129 LCS recovery greater than upper control limitLaboratoryControlSampleCategory =

J Protocol 41 SW6010B Soil

Equipment blank concentration greater than the RLBlankCategory =

U Protocol 3 Field duplicate exceeds RPD criteriaFieldDuplicateCategory =

J Other 8 LCS recovery greater than upper control limitLaboratoryControlSampleCategory =

J Protocol 17

August 2006 Page 1 of 21Table

Validation Reason Validation Flag* Flag Type Number of

Affected AnalytesMethod Matrix

Overall Flagging Summary Table

LCS recovery less than lower control limitLaboratoryControlSampleCategory =

UJ Protocol 34 J Protocol 4

Matrix spike duplicate recovery criteria greater than upper limitMatrixCategory =

J Other 2 Matrix spike duplicate recovery criteria less than lower limitMatrixCategory =

J Other 10 UJ Other 11

Matrix spike recovery greater than upper limitMatrixCategory =

J Other 5 Matrix spike recovery less than lower limitMatrixCategory =

J Other 16 UJ Other 11

Matrix spike RPD criteria exceedanceMatrixCategory =

J Other 8 SW7473 Soil

Field duplicate exceeds RPD criteriaFieldDuplicateCategory =

J Other 6 Lab duplicate exceeds RPD criteriaMatrixCategory =

J Other 6 Matrix spike recovery greater than upper limitMatrixCategory =

J Other 2

Qualifier Description:

J = The result is an estimated concentration.

U = Analyte not detected above quantitation limit.

UJ = Analyte not detected,quantitation limit estimated.

Flag Type: Protocol = Flagging due to contractor/laboratory protocol violations Other = Flagging due to sample, matrix, or field issues not related to QAPP or SAP protocol

* The most severe flag for each analyte becomes the final validation flag

August 2006 Page 2 of 21Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result Holding Time QualifierSample ID Final Flag*Holding Time

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E300 Water PW01SDa0905

0.94 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW01SDb0905

0.2 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW01SDc0905

0.71 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW02SDa0905

0.46 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW02SDb0905

7.3 MG/L JNitrate as N J4 Days

E300 Water PW02SDc0905

0.11 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW03SDa0905

0.13 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW03SDb0905

0.28 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW03SDc0905

0.22 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW04SDb0905

2.3 MG/L JNitrate as N J4 Days

E300 Water PW04SDc0905

0.32 MG/L JNitrate as N U4 Days

E300 Water PW05SDa0905

4.4 MG/L JNitrate as N J3 Days

E300 Water PW05SDb0905

4.1 MG/L JNitrate as N J3 Days

August 2006 Page 1 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E300 Water PW05SDc0905

0.84 MG/L JNitrate as N J3 Days

E300 Water PW06SDa0905

3.1 MG/L JNitrate as N J4 Days

E300 Water PW06SDb0905

1.9 MG/L JNitrate as N J4 Days

E300 Water PW06SDc0905

0.05 MG/L UJNitrate as N UJ4 Days

E440.1 Soil MI01SDb0905

0.47 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J258 Days

E440.1 Soil MI01SDc0905

0.17 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI01SDd0905

0.12 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI02SDa0905

0.64 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI02SDb0905

2.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI02SDc0905

1.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI02SDd0905

0.49 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI02SDe0905

0.74 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI03SDa0905

0.42 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J157 Days

August 2006 Page 2 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI03SDb0905

0.36 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J157 Days

E440.1 Soil MI03SDc0905

0.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J157 Days

E440.1 Soil MI03SDd0905

6.4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J158 Days

E440.1 Soil MI03SDe0905

0.4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J158 Days

E440.1 Soil MI04SDa0905

0.53 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J158 Days

E440.1 Soil MI04SDb0905

0.52 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J158 Days

E440.1 Soil MI04SDc0905

2.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI04SDd0905

3.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI04SDe0905

1.8 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J159 Days

E440.1 Soil MI05SDa0905

2.7 percent JTotal Organic Carbon J181 Days

E440.1 Soil MI05SDb0905

5.8 percent JTotal Organic Carbon J181 Days

E440.1 Soil MI05SDc0905

0.16 percent JTotal Organic Carbon J181 Days

E440.1 Soil MI05SDd0905

0.16 percent JTotal Organic Carbon J181 Days

August 2006 Page 3 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI05SDe0905

0.1 percent JTotal Organic Carbon J181 Days

E440.1 Soil MI06SDa0905

0.92 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI06SDb0905

0.6 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI06SDc0905

1.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI06SDd0905

2.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI06SDe0905

2.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI07SDa0905

1.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI07SDb0905

0.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI07SDc0905

0.19 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI07SDd0905

0.52 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI07SDe0905

0.26 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI08SDa0905

1.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI09SDa0905

3.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J241 Days

August 2006 Page 4 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI09SDc0905

3.7 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J241 Days

E440.1 Soil MI09SDd0905

0.21 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J241 Days

E440.1 Soil MI105SDa0905

2.1 percent JTotal Organic Carbon J181 Days

E440.1 Soil MI106SDa0905

0.71 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J259 Days

E440.1 Soil MI107SDb0905

0.22 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI10SDa0905

1.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J258 Days

E440.1 Soil MI10SDb0905

0.31 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J258 Days

E440.1 Soil MI10SDc0905

0.23 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI10SDd0905

0.44 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI10SDe0905

0.19 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI110SDd0905

0.37 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI110SDe0905

0.15 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI113SDa0905

0.22 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J244 Days

August 2006 Page 5 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI116SDb0905

2.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J244 Days

E440.1 Soil MI116SDd0905

4.4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J244 Days

E440.1 Soil MI11SDa0905

0.67 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI11SDb0905

0.29 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI11SDc0905

0.23 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI11SDd0905

0.21 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI11SDe0905

0.43 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI120SDb0905

6.9 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI122SDc0905

12 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J253 Days

E440.1 Soil MI122SDe0905

12 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI126SD0905

10 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI12SDa0905

2.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI12SDb0905

2.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

August 2006 Page 6 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI12SDc0905

1.7 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

E440.1 Soil MI13SDa0905

0.34 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J244 Days

E440.1 Soil MI13SDb0905

0.28 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI13SDc0905

3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J245 Days

E440.1 Soil MI13SDd0905

0.18 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J253 Days

E440.1 Soil MI15SDa0905

1.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J247 Days

E440.1 Soil MI15SDb0905

1.9 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J247 Days

E440.1 Soil MI15SDc0905

0.16 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J247 Days

E440.1 Soil MI16SDa0905

1.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI16SDb0905

2.6 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI16SDc0905

2.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI16SDd0905

5.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J249 Days

E440.1 Soil MI16SDe0905

0.42 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J244 Days

August 2006 Page 7 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI17SDa0905

1.7 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J248 Days

E440.1 Soil MI17SDb0905

0.88 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J248 Days

E440.1 Soil MI17SDc0905

0.28 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J248 Days

E440.1 Soil MI17SDd0905

0.28 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J248 Days

E440.1 Soil MI17SDe0905

0.25 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J248 Days

E440.1 Soil MI18SDa0905

1.4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI18SDb0905

1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J248 Days

E440.1 Soil MI18SDc0905

0.86 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI18SDd0905

0.35 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI18SDe0905

0.25 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI19SDa0905

0.63 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J260 Days

E440.1 Soil MI19SDb0905

0.37 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J260 Days

E440.1 Soil MI19SDc0905

0.26 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J260 Days

August 2006 Page 8 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI20SDa0905

6.9 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI20SDb0905

4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI20SDc0905

0.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI20SDd0905

0.08 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI20SDe0905

0.09 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI21SDa0905

1.6 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J251 Days

E440.1 Soil MI21SDb0905

5.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI21SDc0905

1.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI21SDd0905

0.17 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI22SDa0905

9.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI22SDb0905

10 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI22SDc0905

12 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

E440.1 Soil MI22SDd0905

12 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J252 Days

August 2006 Page 9 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI22SDe0905

11 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J253 Days

E440.1 Soil MI23SDa0905

0.64 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J87 Days

E440.1 Soil MI23SDd0905

0.25 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J87 Days

E440.1 Soil MI23SDg0905

0.33 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J87 Days

E440.1 Soil MI23SDj0905

0.25 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J87 Days

E440.1 Soil MI23SDm0905

0.29 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J87 Days

E440.1 Soil MI23SDp0905

0.37 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J87 Days

E440.1 Soil MI24SDa0905

4.9 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J89 Days

E440.1 Soil MI24SDd0905

1.7 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J89 Days

E440.1 Soil MI24SDg0905

1.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J89 Days

E440.1 Soil MI24SDj0905

2.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J89 Days

E440.1 Soil MI24SDm0905

1.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J89 Days

E440.1 Soil MI25SDa0905

6.4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J88 Days

August 2006 Page 10 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI25SDd0905

4.9 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J91 Days

E440.1 Soil MI25SDg0905

4.4 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J91 Days

E440.1 Soil MI25SDj0905

4.8 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J91 Days

E440.1 Soil MI25SDm0905

6.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J91 Days

E440.1 Soil MI25SDp0905

7.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J91 Days

E440.1 Soil MI25SDs0905

7.1 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J91 Days

E440.1 Soil MI26SD0905

7.9 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI27SD0905

0.5 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI29SDa0905

8.3 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI29SDb0905

5.7 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI29SDc0905

5.2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI29SDd0905

7 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J250 Days

E440.1 Soil MI30SDa0905

2 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J262 Days

August 2006 Page 11 of 122Table

Holding Times - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil MI31SDa0905

0.96 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI31SDb0905

0.18 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

E440.1 Soil MI31SDc0905

0.13 PERCENT JTotal Organic Carbon J243 Days

Qualifier Description:

J = The result is an estimated concentration.

UJ = Analyte not detected,quantitation limit estimated.

* The most severe flag for each analyte becomes the final validation flag

Criteria:

HTa>UCL Holding time exceeded=

August 2006 Page 12 of 122Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result Low-level Detects Final Qualifier*Sample ID Criteria

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

E200.7 Water

Potassium, pore 25000 UG/L JPW05SDc0905 < RL

E200.8 Water

2 UG/L JPW01SDa0905 < RL 22 UG/L JPW01SDb0905 < RL 5 UG/L JPW01SDb0905 < RL

1.9 UG/L JPW01SDc0905 < RL

5.4 UG/L JPW01SDc0905 < RL

15 UG/L JPW01SDc0905 < RL 2 UG/L JPW02SDa0905 < RL

3.2 UG/L JPW02SDb0905 < RL

7.7 UG/L JPW02SDc0905 < RL

13 UG/L JPW03SDa0905 < RL 16 UG/L JPW03SDb0905 < RL 77 UG/L JPW03SDc0905 < RL

8.3 UG/L JPW04SDa0905 < RL

2.8 UG/L JPW04SDa0905 < RL

1.9 UG/L JPW04SDb0905 < RL

5.2 UG/L JPW04SDb0905 < RL

2.5 UG/L JPW04SDb0905 < RL

1.7 UG/L JPW04SDc0905 < RL

5.4 UG/L JPW04SDc0905 < RL

3.4 UG/L JPW04SDc0905 < RL

12 UG/L JPW04SDc0905 < RL

8.7 UG/L JPW05SDa0905 < RL

3.7 UG/L JPW05SDa0905 < RL

3.4 UG/L JPW05SDb0905 < RL

3.7 UG/L JPW05SDc0905 < RL

1.2 UG/L JPW06SDa0905 < RL

15 UG/L JPW06SDa0905 < RL

3.1 UG/L JPW06SDa0905 < RL

6.2 UG/L JPW06SDa0905 < RL

4.1 UG/L JPW06SDb0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 1 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

8.9 UG/L JPW06SDb0905 < RL

19 UG/L JPW06SDb0905 < RL

9.1 UG/L JPW06SDc0905 < RL

2.9 UG/L JPW06SDc0905 < RL

Antimony, pore

0.52 UG/L JPW16SW0905 < RL

Copper, pore

1.3 UG/L JMI14SW0905 < RL

1.1 UG/L JPW06SW0905 < RL

1.1 UG/L JPW16SW0905 < RL

Molybdenum, pore

0.37 UG/L JMI14SW0905 < RL

0.4 UG/L JPW06SW0905 < RL

E245.1 Water

Mercury, pore

0.33 UG/L JPW01SDa0905 < RL

0.37 UG/L JPW03SDb0905 < RL

0.32 UG/L JPW06SDb0905 < RL

0.32 UG/L JPW06SDc0905 < RL

E300 Water

Fluoride

0.1 MG/L UPW01SDa0905 < RL

0.1 MG/L UPW01SDb0905 < RL

0.15 MG/L JPW03SDc0905 < RL

Nitrate as N

0.06 MG/L JPW06SW0905 < RL

0.06 MG/L JPW16SW0905 < RL

E350.1 Water

Ammonia as N

0.25 MG/L JPW06SW0905 < RL

0.25 MG/L JPW16SW0905 < RL

E440.1 Soil

Total Organic Carbon

0.17 PERCENT JMI01SDc0905 < RL

0.12 PERCENT JMI01SDd0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 2 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

0.1 percent JMI05SDe0905 < RL

0.08 PERCENT JMI20SDd0905 < RL

0.09 PERCENT JMI20SDe0905 < RL

0.13 PERCENT JMI31SDc0905 < RL

SW6010B Soil

Antimony 21 MG/KG JMI03SDb0905 < RL 15 MG/KG JMI04SDb0905 < RL 39 MG/KG JMI09SDc0905 < RL 21 MG/KG JMI106SDa0905 < RL 17 MG/KG JMI113SDa0905 < RL 33 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 < RL 17 MG/KG JMI13SDa0905 < RL 25 MG/KG JMI13SDc0905 < RL 37 MG/KG JMI14SDb0905 < RL 44 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 < RL 89 MG/KG JMI28SDb0905 < RL 15 MG/KG JMI31SDa0905 < RL

Antimony-STLC

0.031 mg/L JMI01SDb0905 < RL

0.027 mg/L JMI04SDb0905 < RL

0.037 mg/L JMI05SDa0905 < RL

0.043 mg/L JMI06SDa0905 < RL

0.036 mg/L JMI08SDa0905 < RL

0.05 mg/L JMI12SDa0905 < RL

0.03 mg/L JMI13SDa0905 < RL

0.029 mg/L JMI17SDa0905 < RL

0.032 mg/L JMI20SDa0905 < RL

0.066 mg/L JMI21SDa0905 < RL

Arsenic

1.8 MG/KG JMI01SDc0905 < RL

2.9 MG/KG JMI01SDd0905 < RL

1.8 MG/KG JMI11SDc0905 < RL

1.5 MG/KG JMI11SDd0905 < RL

14 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 3 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

15 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL 13 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL

9.9 MG/KG JMI29SDa0905 < RL

Arsenic-STLC

0.043 mg/L JMI14SDa0905 < RL

Beryllium

0.22 MG/KG JMI01SDd0905 < RL

0.21 MG/KG JMI03SDc0905 < RL

0.25 MG/KG JMI04SDc0905 < RL

0.31 MG/KG JMI04SDe0905 < RL

0.46 MG/KG JMI05SDa0905 < RL

0.25 MG/KG JMI06SDc0905 < RL

0.28 MG/KG JMI07SDe0905 < RL

0.52 MG/KG JMI09SDa0905 < RL

0.44 MG/KG JMI09SDc0905 < RL

0.33 MG/KG JMI105SDa0905 < RL

0.22 MG/KG JMI10SDd0905 < RL

0.2 MG/KG JMI110SDd0905 < RL

0.23 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 < RL

0.25 MG/KG JMI11SDd0905 < RL

0.87 MG/KG JMI122SDc0905 < RL

0.94 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL

0.32 MG/KG JMI13SDc0905 < RL

0.4 MG/KG JMI14SDd0905 < RL

0.31 MG/KG JMI15SDb0905 < RL

0.14 MG/KG JMI15SDc0905 < RL

0.35 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 < RL

0.16 MG/KG JMI17SDd0905 < RL

0.7 MG/KG JMI20SDb0905 < RL

0.21 MG/KG JMI20SDd0905 < RL

0.19 MG/KG JMI20SDe0905 < RL

1.1 MG/KG JMI22SDa0905 < RL

0.83 MG/KG JMI22SDb0905 < RL

0.78 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 < RL

0.85 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 4 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

0.74 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL

0.59 MG/KG JMI28SDb0905 < RL

0.49 MG/KG JMI28SDd0905 < RL

0.96 MG/KG JMI29SDa0905 < RL

0.89 MG/KG JMI29SDc0905 < RL

Boron 120 MG/KG JMI122SDc0905 < RL 120 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL 100 MG/KG JMI22SDb0905 < RL 130 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 < RL 140 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL 110 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL

13 MG/KG JMI27SD0905 < RL

13 MG/KG JMI31SDb0905 < RL 12 MG/KG JMI31SDc0905 < RL

Cadmium

0.85 MG/KG JMI02SDd0905 < RL

1.1 MG/KG JMI12SDb0905 < RL

0.91 MG/KG JMI12SDc0905 < RL

1.2 MG/KG JMI14SDa0905 < RL

0.6 MG/KG JMI18SDe0905 < RL

0.63 MG/KG JMI19SDb0905 < RL

0.79 MG/KG JMI19SDc0905 < RL

Cobalt 5 MG/KG JMI01SDd0905 < RL

4.9 MG/KG JMI03SDb0905 < RL

20 MG/KG JMI05SDb0905 < RL

3.2 MG/KG JMI05SDe0905 < RL

4.8 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 < RL

23 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL

7.2 MG/KG JMI14SDb0905 < RL

6.9 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 < RL

3.2 MG/KG JMI17SDc0905 < RL

2.7 MG/KG JMI17SDe0905 < RL

4.5 MG/KG JMI20SDd0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 5 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

15 MG/KG JMI21SDb0905 < RL 23 MG/KG JMI22SDb0905 < RL 22 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 < RL 22 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL 18 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL 23 MG/KG JMI29SDa0905 < RL

Copper 40 MG/KG JMI122SDc0905 < RL 39 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL 11 MG/KG JMI18SDa0905 < RL

8.2 MG/KG JMI18SDb0905 < RL

51 MG/KG JMI22SDa0905 < RL 36 MG/KG JMI22SDb0905 < RL 40 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 < RL 41 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL 39 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL

7.3 MG/KG JMI28SDe0905 < RL

44 MG/KG JMI29SDa0905 < RL

Lead

3.4 MG/KG JMI03SDa0905 < RL

2.5 MG/KG JMI04SDe0905 < RL

10 MG/KG JMI05SDb0905 < RL 11 MG/KG JMI120SDb0905 < RL

4.4 MG/KG JMI18SDa0905 < RL

2.8 MG/KG JMI18SDb0905 < RL

8.7 MG/KG JMI20SDa0905 < RL

9.5 MG/KG JMI20SDb0905 < RL

16 MG/KG JMI22SDa0905 < RL 16 MG/KG JMI28SDb0905 < RL

2.8 MG/KG JMI28SDe0905 < RL

13 MG/KG JMI29SDc0905 < RL 11 MG/KG JMI29SDd0905 < RL

Nickel 13 MG/KG JMI03SDb0905 < RL 12 MG/KG JMI05SDe0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 6 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

16 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 < RL 17 MG/KG JMI14SDb0905 < RL 28 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 < RL 12 MG/KG JMI17SDe0905 < RL 11 MG/KG JMI21SDa0905 < RL 40 MG/KG JMI28SDb0905 < RL

Potassium 1100 MG/KG JMI02SDa0905 < RL 1200 MG/KG JMI02SDb0905 < RL 1200 MG/KG JMI02SDc0905 < RL 920 MG/KG JMI02SDd0905 < RL 970 MG/KG JMI02SDe0905 < RL 1000 MG/KG JMI03SDa0905 < RL 1300 MG/KG JMI03SDd0905 < RL 890 MG/KG JMI04SDa0905 < RL 1600 MG/KG JMI04SDc0905 < RL 1400 MG/KG JMI04SDe0905 < RL 1500 MG/KG JMI05SDa0905 < RL 890 MG/KG JMI06SDa0905 < RL 2100 MG/KG JMI06SDc0905 < RL 1500 MG/KG JMI06SDd0905 < RL 2000 MG/KG JMI09SDa0905 < RL 2200 MG/KG JMI09SDc0905 < RL 1200 MG/KG JMI105SDa0905 < RL 1000 MG/KG JMI106SDa0905 < RL 1400 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 < RL 1600 MG/KG JMI116SDd0905 < RL 3000 MG/KG JMI120SDb0905 < RL 4700 MG/KG JMI122SDc0905 < RL 4800 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL 2000 MG/KG JMI13SDc0905 < RL 1500 MG/KG JMI14SDb0905 < RL 2700 MG/KG JMI14SDc0905 < RL 2300 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 < RL 1600 MG/KG JMI16SDd0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 7 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

2300 MG/KG JMI20SDa0905 < RL 2900 MG/KG JMI20SDb0905 < RL 1200 MG/KG JMI21SDa0905 < RL 2800 MG/KG JMI21SDb0905 < RL 4600 MG/KG JMI22SDa0905 < RL 4100 MG/KG JMI22SDb0905 < RL 4500 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 < RL 4900 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL 4700 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL

1400 MG/KG JMI26SD0905 < RL

2400 MG/KG JMI28SDd0905 < RL 5200 MG/KG JMI29SDa0905 < RL 1400 MG/KG JMI30SDa0905 < RL

Selenium

4.2 MG/KG JMI126SD0905 < RL

1.8 MG/KG JMI12SDb0905 < RL

Sodium 740 MG/KG JMI01SDb0905 < RL 710 MG/KG JMI01SDd0905 < RL 730 MG/KG JMI02SDb0905 < RL 480 MG/KG JMI02SDc0905 < RL 540 MG/KG JMI02SDd0905 < RL 540 MG/KG JMI02SDe0905 < RL 360 MG/KG JMI03SDc0905 < RL 660 MG/KG JMI03SDd0905 < RL 390 MG/KG JMI03SDe0905 < RL 380 MG/KG JMI04SDb0905 < RL 650 MG/KG JMI04SDc0905 < RL 790 MG/KG JMI04SDd0905 < RL 1300 MG/KG JMI05SDa0905 < RL 700 MG/KG JMI06SDb0905 < RL 940 MG/KG JMI06SDc0905 < RL 1100 MG/KG JMI105SDa0905 < RL 460 MG/KG JMI10SDb0905 < RL 480 MG/KG JMI10SDc0905 < RL

August 2006 Page 8 of 93Table

Results between the RL and MDL - Qualified Data Table

450 MG/KG JMI10SDd0905 < RL 510 MG/KG JMI10SDe0905 < RL 450 MG/KG JMI110SDd0905 < RL 450 MG/KG JMI110SDe0905 < RL 480 MG/KG JMI122SDc0905 < RL 470 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 < RL

310 MG/KG JMI126SD0905 < RL

390 MG/KG JMI22SDa0905 < RL 400 MG/KG JMI22SDb0905 < RL 450 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 < RL 550 MG/KG JMI22SDd0905 < RL 430 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 < RL

73 MG/KG JMI27SD0905 < RL

420 MG/KG JMI28SDb0905 < RL 260 MG/KG JMI29SDb0905 < RL 250 MG/KG JMI29SDc0905 < RL 280 MG/KG JMI29SDd0905 < RL

SW7471A SOIL

Mercury-STLC

0.00073 mg/L JMI12SDa0905 < RL

Qualifier Description:

J = The result is an estimated concentration.

U = Analyte not detected above quantitation limit.

August 2006 Page 9 of 93Table

MDL Exceeds RL- Qualified Data Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result QualifierSample ID Criteria

No qualified data

January 2006 Page 1 of 14Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result Calibration Qualifier*Sample ID Criteria

Calibration Criteria - Qualified Data Table

No data qualified

August 2006 Page 1 of 15Table

Blank Contamination - Qualified Data Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result Blank Contamination

Qualifier*Sample ID Criteria Comments

E300 Water Fluoride

0.1 MG/L UPW01SDa0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.1 MG/L UPW01SDb0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.12 MG/L UPW01SDc0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.18 MG/L UPW04SDb0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.12 MG/L UPW04SDc0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.12 MG/L UPW06SDa0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.1 MG/L UPW06SDb0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

0.16 MG/L UPW06SDc0905 LB<RL blank target = 0.05MG/L

E300 Water Nitrate as N

0.94 MG/L UPW01SDa0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.24MG/L

0.2 MG/L UPW01SDb0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.24MG/L

0.71 MG/L UPW01SDc0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.24MG/L

0.46 MG/L UPW02SDa0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.1MG/L

0.11 MG/L UPW02SDc0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.1MG/L

0.13 MG/L UPW03SDa0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.1MG/L

0.28 MG/L UPW03SDb0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.1MG/L

0.22 MG/L UPW03SDc0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.1MG/L

0.32 MG/L UPW04SDc0905 LB>RL blank target = 0.24MG/L

SW6010B Soil Zinc

25 MG/KG UMI116SDb0905 EB>RL blank target = 6UG/L 31 MG/KG UMI20SDd0905 EB>RL blank target = 7.8UG/L 16 MG/KG UMI21SDa0905 EB>RL blank target = 7.8UG/L

Criteria:

EB>RL Equipment blank concentration greater than the RL= LB<RL Laboratory blank contamination less than the RL= LB>RL Laboratory blank contamination greater than the RL=

Qualifier Description:

U = Analyte not detected above quantitation limit.

January 2006 Page 1 of 16Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result Field Duplicate Qualifier*Sample ID Criteria

Field Duplicate Precision - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil Total Organic Carbon

6.9 PERCENT JMI120SDb0905 FD>RPD

4 PERCENT JMI20SDb0905 FD>RPD

SW6010B Soil Aluminum

17000 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 FD>RPD 29000 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 FD>RPD

SW6010B Soil Boron

200 MG/KG JMI113SDa0905 FD>RPD 340 MG/KG JMI13SDa0905 FD>RPD

SW6010B Soil Calcium

9500 MG/KG JMI120SDb0905 FD>RPD 5400 MG/KG JMI20SDb0905 FD>RPD

SW6010B Soil Magnesium

1600 MG/KG JMI116SDb0905 FD>RPD 2800 MG/KG JMI16SDb0905 FD>RPD

SW7473 Soil Mercury

210 MG/KG JMI06SDa0905 FD>RPD 57 MG/KG JMI106SDa0905 FD>RPD 600 MG/KG JMI122SDc0905 FD>RPD 56 MG/KG JMI122SDe0905 FD>RPD 43 MG/KG JMI22SDc0905 FD>RPD 21 MG/KG JMI22SDe0905 FD>RPD

Criteria:

FD>RPD Field duplicate exceeds RPD criteria=

Qualifier Description:

J = The result is an estimated concentration.

August 2006 Page 1 of 17Table

Method Matrix Analyte Result Qualifier*Sample ID / QC Type CriteriaLCS Recovery

Blank Spike - Qualified Data Table

E440.1 Soil Total Organic Carbon

0.47 PERCENT JMI01SDb0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.17 PERCENT JMI01SDc0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.12 PERCENT JMI01SDd0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

6.4 PERCENT JMI03SDd0905 / N %R = 124 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.4 PERCENT JMI03SDe0905 / N %R = 124 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.53 PERCENT JMI04SDa0905 / N %R = 124 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.52 PERCENT JMI04SDb0905 / N %R = 124 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.92 PERCENT JMI06SDa0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.6 PERCENT JMI06SDb0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

1.5 PERCENT JMI06SDc0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

2.5 PERCENT JMI06SDd0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

2.1 PERCENT JMI06SDe0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.71 PERCENT JMI106SDa0905 / FD %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

1.3 PERCENT JMI10SDa0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.31 PERCENT JMI10SDb0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.22 PERCENT JMI113SDa0905 / FD %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.67 PERCENT JMI11SDa0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.29 PERCENT JMI11SDb0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.23 PERCENT JMI11SDc0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.21 PERCENT JMI11SDd0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.43 PERCENT JMI11SDe0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 12 PERCENT JMI122SDc0905 / FD %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

10 PERCENT JMI126SD0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.34 PERCENT JMI13SDa0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.18 PERCENT JMI13SDd0905 / N %R = 122 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 11 PERCENT JMI22SDe0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

4.9 PERCENT JMI25SDd0905 / N %R = 123 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

4.4 PERCENT JMI25SDg0905 / N %R = 123 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

4.8 PERCENT JMI25SDj0905 / N %R = 123 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

6.3 PERCENT JMI25SDm0905 / N %R = 123 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

7.1 PERCENT JMI25SDp0905 / N %R = 123 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

7.1 PERCENT JMI25SDs0905 / N %R = 123 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

7.9 PERCENT JMI26SD0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

August 2006 Page 1 of 48Table

Blank Spike - Qualified Data Table

0.5 PERCENT JMI27SD0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

8.3 PERCENT JMI29SDa0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

5.7 PERCENT JMI29SDb0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

5.2 PERCENT JMI29SDc0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

7 PERCENT JMI29SDd0905 / N %R = 127 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.96 PERCENT JMI31SDa0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.18 PERCENT JMI31SDb0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

0.13 PERCENT JMI31SDc0905 / N %R = 126 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

SW6010B Soil Aluminum

110000 MG/KG JMI12SDa0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 84000 MG/KG JMI12SDb0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 65000 MG/KG JMI12SDc0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 48000 MG/KG JMI14SDa0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 17000 MG/KG JMI14SDb0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 47000 MG/KG JMI14SDc0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 32000 MG/KG JMI14SDd0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 43000 MG/KG JMI14SDe0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 24000 MG/KG JMI19SDa0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 26000 MG/KG JMI19SDb0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 31000 MG/KG JMI19SDc0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 33000 MG/KG JMI28SDa0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 40000 MG/KG JMI28SDb0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 34000 MG/KG JMI28SDc0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 28000 MG/KG JMI28SDd0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL 14000 MG/KG JMI28SDe0905 / N %R = 125 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS>UCL

SW6010B Soil Antimony

18 MG/KG UJMI01SDb0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL 17 MG/KG UJMI01SDc0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL 17 MG/KG UJMI01SDd0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL 14 MG/KG UJMI02SDa0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL 22 MG/KG UJMI02SDb0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL 16 MG/KG UJMI02SDc0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL 17 MG/KG UJMI02SDd0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120 LCS<LCL

August 2006 Page 2 of 48Table

Blank Spike - Qualified Data Table

16 MG/KG UJMI02SDe0905 / N %R = 67 LCL=80 UCL=120…