APPENDIX_Q.pdf

PDF 5 MB Posted

Attached to
FY10 144 PN Dormitory and Site Improvments at Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona
Solicitation number
W912PL-10-R-0011
Issued by

About this file

APPENDIX Q ACM SURVEY

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Am4.pdf PDF
Am3.pdf PDF
CAD FilesAm3.zip ZIP file
Am2.pdf PDF
CAD Files.zip ZIP file
Am01.pdf PDF
Appendix_P.pdf PDF
APPENDIX_C_thru_K.pdf PDF
APPENDIX_N.pdf PDF
APPENDIX_M.pdf PDF
Appendix_R.pdf PDF
APPENDIX_L.pdf PDF
W912PL-10-R-0011_Spec.pdf PDF
APPENDIX_O.pdf PDF
Appendix_A.pdf PDF
APPENDIX_B.pdf PDF
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

APPENDIX Q

ACM SURVEY

ASBESTOS

SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

DAVIS MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE

Building 3501/3600

Visiting Airmen’s Quarters (VAQ) Tucson, Arizona

Prepared for:

United States Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District 4101 Jefferson Plaza, NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109-3435

Prepared by:

ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC.

7301 South Paddington Road West Jordan, Utah 84084 T 801.255.2800 F 801.569.2501

ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title

1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Introduction

3.0 Building Description

4.0 Survey Procedures

4.1 Building Survey

4.2 Bulk Sample Collection

4.3 Bulk Sample Analysis

5.0 Survey Results

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results

5.4 Damage and Hazard Assessment

5.5 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations

5.6 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.7 Inaccessible Areas

5.8 Materials(s) assumed to contain 1.0% asbestos

6.0 Response Action Comments

6.1 EPA Requirements

6.2 Renovation Options

7.0 Cost Estimates

8.0 Limitations and Exclusion of Warranty

Appendices

A Data Tables Table 1 Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

Table 3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results Sorted by Sample Number Table 4 Bulk Sample Analytical Results Sorted by Homogeneous

Area Number Table 5 Damage Assessment of Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 6 Estimated Abatement Cost by Homogeneous Area

Table 7 Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, Quantity, % Asbestos, Abatement Cost, Disturbance Potential and Hazardous Rank

B Building Floor Plan(s)

C Photograph Log

D Laboratory Analytical Reports

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A survey of this facility was performed on November 18, 2009, by ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. The building was visually inspected to identify building materials that might contain asbestos. Bulk samples were collected from suspect materials and analyzed to determine if they contained asbestos. All Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) were assessed for damage and the potential for exposure. This survey was requested by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, US Army Engineer District-Albuquerque, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

The following table lists all ACMs that were identified in the building. Information specific to the building concerning inaccessible areas / materials and recommended response actions can be found in this report. There is important information in these sections that is not included in this executive summary. This report should be read in its entirety, including detailed information that is contained in other sections and appendices of this report.

ACMs by Homogeneous Area

Material ID # (1) Material Description Location

Asbestos Content (2) Quantity Cost Estimate (3)

S001

Textured Ceiling Material (TCM)

All quarters; 1st floor laundry; 1st floor day room; 1st floor break room; 2nd floor multipurpose room; 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor housekeeping rooms

2% C

~12,256 square feet

$79,664.00 @$6.50/square foot

M003

Wallboard w/joint compound

1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor hallway ceilings and walls; 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor latrine ceilings and walls; 3rd floor day room ceiling and walls

1.2% C **2.3% C point count

~31,683 square

$126,732.00 @$4.00/square foot

T001

Thermal System Insulation (TSI), tank-vertical

Ground floor mechanical room; hot water storage tank

*<1% A

~280 square feet

$5,600.00 @$20.00/square foot

(continued)

T002

TSI, tank-horizontal mechanical room; air separator tank

~90 square feet

$1,800.00

T003

TSI joints/fittings-mudded mechanical room, above ceilings, pipe chases throughout building

~500 each

$12,500.00 @$25.00/joint/fitting

M006

HVAC cloth tape

West Mechanical room, on metal ducting

60% C

~15 linear feet

$200.00 See footnote 3

M007

Window caulking-glazing

Exterior windows

~168 each

$21,000.00 @$125.00/window

Footnotes:

1. Homogeneous Area Number (not related to building room numbers).

2. A = Amosite Asbestos C = Chrysotile Asbestos .

3. Cost Estimates include asbestos removal costs only; abatement design, management fees and replacement costs are not included. For projects with small quantities, ask Contractors for their mobilization fee. Please refer to Section 7.0 for more details.

* = Although the EPA National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP; 40 CFR PART 61;

REQUIREMENT TO PERFORM POINT COUNTING TO QUANITFY ASBESTOS BELOW 10%) clarified this, we have categorized this material without point count analysis as asbestos because of the quantity and the potential for disturbance during demolition.

** = The point count analysis was limited to the source (plaster joint compound) layer.

Asbestos Survey and Assessment

2.0 INTRODUCTION

On November 18, 2009 ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. performed an asbestos survey and assessment at Building 3501/3600 (VAQ), Davis Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, Arizona. The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of both friable and non-friable Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) within and on the facility. Bulk samples were collected from suspect materials, submitted to a laboratory, and analyzed for asbestos content. Each occurrence of ACM was assessed for damage and friability.

The following accredited and certified inspector(s) performed the inspection, collected the samples and made assessment:

Jeffrey B. Rowland Name Signature Date

Utah ASB-1377 State of Accreditation State of Utah Division of Air Quality Asbestos Certification Number

Reviewed by:

Merlynn D. Densley, Ph.D., CIH Name Signature Date

Utah ASB-0450 State of Accreditation State of Utah Division of Air Quality Asbestos Certification Number CIH Certification Number 3376 Expiration date: June 2014

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Identification Building 3501/3600 (VAQ)

Building Name………………………Building 4310 Building Address……………………Davis Monthan Air Force Base Tucson, Arizona

Building Construction

Building Construction Date…………~1972

Building Type……………………….Dormitory, Offices Building Total Sq. Ft………………. Approx. 25,000 Structural System…………………... Concrete, block Exterior Wall Construction………… Concrete

Floor Deck Construction…………… Concrete Roof Construction………………….. Flat, single ply membrane built-up roof

Floors Above Grade……… Floors Below Grade………………... 0

Interior Finishes

Floors………………………............. Floor tile, concrete Ceilings……………………………...Asbestos-containing TCM, painted concrete Walls……………………………….. Asbestos-containing wall system Attic…………………………………None Crawl space………………………… None

Exterior Finishes

Windows…………………………….Asbestos-containing caulking/glazing (single paine steel)

Building Mechanical

Heating Plant……………………….. Forced air HVAC ducted supply with asbestos-containing cloth tape Mechanical Piping…………………. Hot and cold water piping with asbestos containing joints/fittings-mudded, and horizontal and vertical tanks. Straight runs are insulated with fiberglass

4.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES

4.1 Building Surveys

All accessible areas of the facility were visually inspected to identify suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs.) All accessible surfaces, structures, and mechanical systems within these areas were examined and all suspected ACMs were touched to determine friability.

Suspect ACMs were identified and assessed in homogeneous areas. A homogeneous area is defined as a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type, or formulation, of material. In cases where joint compound and/or tape have been applied to wallboard (gypsum board) and cannot be visually distinguished from the wallboard, it is considered an integral part of the wallboard and in effect becomes one material forming a wall or ceiling “system.”

Each homogeneous area was given a unique material identification number. Each ID number begins with a letter: “S” for Surfacing materials, “T” for Thermal System Insulation (TSI), or “M” for Miscellaneous materials. This letter is followed by a three-digit number, assigned in consecutive order. This number is used to identify the homogeneous area throughout the inspection report.

4.2 Bulk Sample Collection

Bulk samples were collected from all accessible homogeneous areas of suspect ACM for subsequent laboratory analysis to determine actual asbestos content. Sampling was conducted in a manner that minimized damage to the building, did not leave any unsightly marks, and did not create a health hazard for the inspectors.

The number of samples collected from each homogeneous area generally followed the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulations (40 CFR 763.86).

Friable surfacing materials were sampled using the random sampling scheme given in the EPA publication 560 / 5-85-30a, titled “Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials."” Between three (3) and seven (7) samples were collected from friable surfacing materials, depending on the size of the homogeneous area.

Bulk samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and visual estimation in accordance with the EPA Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, EPA-600 / M4-82-020. Samples were analyzed by DIXON INFORMATION INC., 78 West 2400 South, South Salt Lake City, Utah.

The laboratory is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology – National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST-NVLAP) for bulk-asbestos sample analysis and is also accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association

(AIHA).

Federal EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and AHERA regulations define ACM as material containing greater than 1% asbestos by weight; materials containing less than 1% asbestos are not considered regulated ACM.

The Federal OSHA Standard also defines an ACM as a material containing greater than 1% asbestos; however, OSHA also regulates materials containing asbestos in concentrations greater than "None Detected".

Further, the NESHAP regulations state that any sample found to contain less than 10% asbestos but greater than “none detected,” by visual estimation, must be assumed to contain greater than 1% asbestos unless confirmed to be less than 1.0% asbestos by point counting analysis. Any samples found to contain asbestos in this concentration range were assumed to contain greater than 1.0% asbestos and are listed in Section 5.9 of this report. All samples that have been point counted are identified as such in the sample result tables.

The laboratories reports can be found in Appendix D of this report.

SURVEY RESULTS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs)

Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified as being ACM if the laboratory analysis shows the material to contain any detectable asbestos, unless subsequent Point Counting analysis resulted in 1% or less asbestos being detected. Table 1 of the Executive Summary and in Appendix A lists all homogeneous areas that were found to be ACM. Each material is described by type of material, friability and visual appearance.

Friability is defined in accordance with EPA’s NESHAP regulations.

“Friable ACM” is any material containing more than 1% asbestos (as determined by PLM) that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure and also includes non-friable ACM that may become friable during building demolition.

“Non-friable ACM” is any material containing more than1% asbestos (as determined by PLM) that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

“Category I non-friable ACM” are asbestos-containing resilient floor coverings (commonly known as vinyl asbestos tile (VAT)), asphalt roofing products, packings, and gaskets.

“Category II non-friable ACM” encompasses all other non-friable ACM.

“Non-friable RACM” is used to denote thermal system insulation that is in good condition but would become friable during renovation or demolition and therefore is “regulated asbestos containing material” (RACM).

5.2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified as non-ACM if the laboratory analysis shows the material to contain no detectable asbestos. Table 2, located in Appendix A of this report, lists all homogeneous areas that were found to be non-ACM.

5.3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results

Table 3, located in Appendix A of this report, lists all of the bulk samples in order by sample number, that were collected from homogeneous areas of suspect ACM, along with the laboratory analytical results. Each sample was given a unique sample number.

There may be more than one sample number for the same homogeneous area of suspect ACM. The homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified on this table by their material identification numbers. The sample location listed on this table provides a brief, but specific, description of the location where the sample was collected.

This is different than the homogeneous area location provided on Tables 1 and 2. Table 4 is the same as Table 3 except the entries have been sorted by homogeneous area number.

5.4 Damage and Hazard Assessment

Each homogeneous area of ACM has been assessed for existing damage, accessibility, and potential for future damage, and this information is presented in Table 5, located in Appendix A of this report. This table also lists the substrate present beneath each homogeneous area of ACM.

Each homogeneous area of friable ACM and asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) was classified into one of the following seven categories, as specified in EPA’s AHERA regulations (40 CFR 763.88):

(1) Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM.

(2) Damaged friable surfacing ACM.

(3) Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM.

(4) Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM.

(5) ACBM with potential for damage.

(6) ACBM with potential for significant damage.

(7) Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM.

The damage categories are defined as follows:

“Undamaged” means the material had no visible damage, or extremely minor damage or surface marring (i.e., a room full of floor tile with only two or three small corners chipped off on the tile).

“Damaged” means the material had visible damage evenly distributed over less than 10% of its surface, or localized over less than 25% of its surface.

“Significantly Damaged” means the material had visible damage that is evenly distributed over 10% or more of its surface, or localized over 25% or more if its surface.

Each homogeneous area of ACM was evaluated for accessibility to the building occupants and the general public, assuming the building was fully occupied, using the following assessment categories.

“Inaccessible” means the material was located in an area that people had no reason to enter and could not access without special measures. One example would be the area above a solid ceiling.

“Rarely Accessed” identifies a material that was in a location that could be accessed but wasn’t unless there was a specific need. An example would be a pipe tunnel. Another example would be a high ceiling that is out of reach and not subject to any specific disturbance.

“Periodic Access” identifies a material that was in a location that was accessible, was not occupied full time, but was accessed on a routine basis. An example would be a mechanical room or boiler room.

“Continuous Access” identifies a material that was in a location that was occupied full time and was within reach of the occupants, or was frequently subject to direct disturbance. Examples would be exposed floor tile or a normal height ceiling.

5.5 Hazard Ranking

A hazard ranking has been determined for every ACM, in each functional space (room), and is listed in Table 7, Appendix A. The Hazard Rank is derived from the material's current condition and potential for future disturbance. Table 7 also presents material description, quantity, and estimated abatement cost.

The EPA Management Planner hazard assessment process used here produces seven Hazard Ranks. The rankings of potential hazard range from 1, most hazardous, to 7, least hazardous, and are used to determine abatement priority. The highest ranking is reserved for ACM that is "significantly damaged." Hazard rankings 2 - 4 reflect ACM that is "damaged" (slight damage is the term used in Table 7), with a ranking of 2 indicating "potential for significant damage," and a ranking of 3 indicating a "potential for damage." Hazard rankings of 5 to 7 are reserved for materials currently in good condition, but with a range of moderate to low in the likelihood for future disturbance.

Note that these seven rankings are different from, and should not be confused with, the seven AHERA categories of damage and potential damage described in Section 5.4, above, and listed in Table 5.

5.6 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations

NONE.

5.7 Suspect Materials Presumed to be Asbestos-Containing Materials without Laboratory Analysis

NONE.

5.8 Inaccessible Areas

Pipe chases, any mechanical piping behind walls, and suspect ACMs under the building.

5.9 Material(s) assumed to contain >1.0% asbestos without subsequent TEM or Point Count Analysis

TSI.

6.0 RESPONSE ACTION COMMENTS

Asbestos is regulated as a hazardous air pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the authority of the Clean Air Act. The asbestos regulations are included in the NESHAP and referenced as 40 CFR 61, Subpart M. ACMs identified in this report are subject to those regulations. Those regulations, and state and local regulations, should be carefully examined prior to renovation, demolition, cleanup, or any other activity which could disturb the ACMs, to ensure that all activities are in compliance with applicable requirements.

ACM is defined by the EPA, as any material containing greater than one percent of asbestos. ACMs are categorized as being either friable or non-friable. Friable ACMs are those materials that can be easily crumbled, pulverized, or otherwise broken up using hand or finger pressure when dry, and are materials considered more likely to produce airborne asbestos fibers. Non-friable ACMs are materials that do not meet the above test, and are considered less likely to produce airborne asbestos fibers. Not all ACMs are regulated under NESHAP. Regulated ACM (RACM) means (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of regulated demolition or renovation operations. Regulated demolition and renovation operations are those where the quantity of ACM affected is 260 linear feet or more on pipes, 160 square feet or more on other components, or 35 cubic feet or more in volume. There are certain notification requirements for demolition projects involving less than the above quantities.

Briefly, EPA requires that RACM be removed from facilities scheduled for demolition or renovation before any activity begins that would break up, dislodge, or similarly disturb the materials or preclude access to the materials for subsequent removal. Category I non-friable ACM that is not in poor condition and is not friable does not have to be removed prior to demolition of a facility. However, these materials are exempt from mandatory removal only during demolition, not renovation. Removal is mandated when renovation activities are expected to disturb these ACMs and render them friable. Category II non-friable ACM also does not have to be removed prior to demolition if the probability is low that the material will become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder (made friable) during demolition. However, state regulations may require the removal of these materials. Additionally, Category I non-friable ACM that has not become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition activities may be disposed of as ordinary construction waste.

In any situation where ACMs remain in a building, it should be managed under a comprehensive Operations and Maintenance program (O&M). The procedures and guidelines described in an O&M program should be followed whenever building maintenance activities may disturb any ACMs present in the building.

6.2 OSHA Requirements

The OSHA Asbestos Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101) uses the same definition of an ACM as the EPA; however, some OSHA requirements are pertinent if there is any concentration of asbestos above "None detected" present in a material.

OSHA classifies disturbance of asbestos during renovation and demolition into four work classifications:

OSHA Class I asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of TSI and surfacing ACM and Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material (PACM).

OSHA Class II asbestos work includes activities involving the removal of ACM which is not TSI or surfacing ACM. This includes, but is not limited to, the removal of asbestos-containing wallboard, floor tile and sheeting, roofing and siding shingles, and construction mastics.

OSHA Class III asbestos work includes repair and maintenance operations, where ACM including TSI and surfacing ACM and PACM, is likely to be disturbed.

OSHA Class IV asbestos work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM or PACM and activities to clean up dust, waste and debris resulting from Class I, II, and III activities.

OSHA has established specific worker qualifications, precautions and work practices for each of these four work classifications. These OSHA requirements should be included in any plans for renovation or demolition work when asbestos is found to be present.

6.3 Renovation Options

Some ACMs may remain in place during building renovations, as long as they are not disturbed and/or damaged.

7.0 COST ESTIMATES

A breakdown of the estimated removal costs by homogeneous area can be found in Table 6, Appendix A. These cost estimates are provided for use in long-term budgeting and planning only, and do not have a level of accuracy sufficient to be used as a construction design cost estimate. The actual cost of asbestos removal is highly dependent on a number of factors such as size of the project, the required time frame for removal, the time of year the job is conducted, the regulatory climate at the time, etc., therefore, actual abatement costs could vary significantly from these estimates. Replacement costs have not been included in these figures.

The cost for abatement design and management services is not included in these figures.

These additional fees can range from 15% of the estimated abatement costs for large projects to greater than 50% for very small projects. The design and management fees cover the cost of preparing plans and specifications, conducting the bidding process as well as third-party oversight during abatement.

8.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF WARRANTY

This asbestos survey and assessment was performed using procedures and a level of diligence typically exercised by professional consultants performing similar services.

However, ACM can be present in a structure, but not identified using ordinary investigative procedures.

No asbestos survey can completely eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM.

ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. level of diligence and investigative procedures are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM. The procedures used for this survey attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative costs, time, and building damage, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, the determinations in this report should not be construed as a guarantee that all ACM present in the subject property has been included in this report.

This report presents ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained during performance of consulting services. ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by sources outside of

ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC.

No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied or otherwise, except those stated or acknowledged herein.

Table 1

Homogeneous Area Number

Material Description Location Friability

Content Quantity

Textured Ceiling Material (TCM)

All quarters; 1st floor laundry; 1st floor day room; 1st floor break room; 2nd floor multipurpose room;

1st , 2nd and 3rd floor housekeeping rooms

Friable

2%

~12,256 square feet

1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor hallway ceilings and walls; 1st, 2nd, and 3rd floor latrine ceilings and walls; 3rd floor day room ceiling and walls

Category II non-friable

2.3% C point

~31,683 square feet

Insulation (TSI), tank-vertical mechanical room; hot water storage tank

<1% A

~280 square feet

TSI, tank-horizontal mechanical room; air separator tank

~90 square feet mechanical room, above ceilings, pipe chases throughout building

West mechanical room, on metal ducting

Category II non-friable

Table 2

Homogeneous Areas That Do Not Contain Asbestos

Material Description Material Location/Quantity

M001

Sink undercoating

1st floor laundry room/1 each stainless steel sink

M002

Cove Base mastic

Throughout building/~2,500 linear feet

M004

12" floor tile (gray w/dark gray-white streaks)

1st –3rd floor housekeeping rooms; 1st – 3rd floor latrine/shower areas/492 square

M005

Roof (flat, built-up rolled paper w/tar sealant)

Roof/~10,128 square feet

Table 3

Bulk Sample Analytical Results by Sample Number

Sample Number

Homogeneous

Material Sampled Sample Location Analytical Results

TCM

1st floor laundry room, southeast corner

NOT ANALYZED

stainless steel sink

NONE DETECTED

1st floor, room 172 southwest corner

1st floor day room, northeast corner

Cove base mastic

Room 172, behind door behind washer/dryer

1st floor hallway, north wall

1st floor break room

1st floor housekeeping room

Wallboard w/joint compound

1st floor housekeeping

2.3% point count

1.9% C point count

1st floor hallway, adjacent to east fire extinguisher

2nd floor housekeeping room, northeast corner

2nd floor men's latrine/shower storage

Bulk Sample Analytical Results by Sample Number

(Continued) Sample Number

Homogeneous

1st floor room 106, east

2nd floor west

3rd floor housekeeping room, behind door

Roof (flat, build-up w/tar sealant)

Northwest

Southwest

Southeast

Northeast

Center

Room 312

Room 314

Room 214

2nd floor latrine/shower storage room room, south wall

TSI, tank

Ground floor mechanical room, hot water storage tank-vertical, top of tank tank-vertical, west side tank-vertical, east side

<1% C

(Continued)

Homogeneous room, air separator tank-horizontal, south end horizontal, west side

TSI joints/fittings-mudded room, 12" diameter valve cover room, 6" diameter joint

Ground floor west mechanical room, ducting

Window caulking/glazing

Exterior window, east of mechanical room, north facing

Exterior window, west of mehanical room, south

Table 4 Bulk Sample Analytical Results by Homogeneous Area Number

Number Material Sampled Sample Location Analytical Results southeast corner stainless steel sink

1st floor, room 172 southwest corner

1st floor day room, northeast corner

Room 172, behind door behind washer/dryer

1st floor hallway, north wall

1st floor break room

1st floor housekeeping room

1st floor housekeeping room

2.3% point count

1.9% C point count

1st floor hallway, adjacent to east fire extinguisher room, northeast corner latrine/shower storage room

(Continued)

Homogeneous Area Number

12" floor tile (gray w/dark gray-white streaks)

2nd floor west room, behind door

Roof (flat, built-up w/tar sealant)

Northwest

Southwest

Southeast

Northeast

Center

Room 312

Room 314

2nd floor latrine/shower storage room room, south wall tank-vertical, top of tank tank-vertical, west side tank-vertical, east side

(Continued)

Homogeneous Area Number horizontal, south end horizontal, west side room, 12" diameter valve cover room, 6" diameter joint

Ground floor west mechanical room, ducting

Exterior window, east of mechanical room, north

Exterior window, west of mechanical room, south

Table 5 Damage and Hazard Assessment by Homogeneous Area

Area Number Material Type Substrate

Assessment Category Damage Accessibility

Disturbance Potential

Concrete

Damaged

Periodic

HIGH

NA

Undamaged

Continuous

T001 &

TSI, tank insulation

Metal

Low

Assessment Categories:

1-Damaged or significantly damaged Thermal System Insulation ACM 5-ACM with potential for damage 2-Damaged friable surfacing ACM 6-ACM with potential for significant damage 3-Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM 7-Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspect ACM 4-Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM

NA = Not applicable (material is non-friable surfacing or miscellaneous)

Table 6 Estimated Abatement Costs by Homogeneous Area

Area Number Material Quantity Unit Cost Extended Cost

$6.50/square foot

$4.00/square foot

T001 & T002

TSI tank insulation

~370 square feet

$20.00/square foot

$7,400.00

$25.00/each

Window caulking-glazing

$125.00/window

Table 7

Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, Quantity, % Asbestos, Abatement Cost, Condition, Disturbance Potential, Hazardous Rank

DAVIS MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE

Building 3501/3600

Material Description Quantity % Asbestos Cost Condition

Disturbance Potential

Hazardous Rank

Textured Ceiling Material

Fair

Potential for Significant Damage

2.3% C point

Good

T001 &T002

~370 square feet

$7,400.00

Photograph 1-DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

S001; TCM, Sample 01, 1st floor laundry room, southeast corner.

Photograph 2- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

S001; TCM, Sample 09-10, 1st floor Housekeeping room.

Photograph 3- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

Room 158; Women's Quarters, S001on ceiling. All quarters have S001.

Photograph 4- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M001; Non-asbestos sink undercoating, 1st floor laundry room.

Photograph 5- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View of ceramic tile over concrete, no vinyl tile underneath ceramic tile. 1st floor laundry room, behind washer/dryers.

Photograph 6- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M002; Samples 06-08, non-asbestos cove base mastic. No vinyl tile or black mastic underneath carpet.

Photograph 7- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View of 1st floor Women's quarters. M003; Asbestos-containing wallboard w/joint compound.

Photograph 8- DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M004; Non-asbestos containing 12" floor tile (gray w/dark gray-white streaks). 2nd floor Housekeeping, Sample 17.

Photograph 9– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M004; Non-asbestos 12" floor tile, Sample 19, 2nd floor latrines/showers storage room.

Photograph 10– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M005; Non-asbestos containing Roof, Samples 23-27.

Photograph 11– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M005; Roof, view southeast.

Photograph 12 – DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

3rd floor Housekeeping Roof access ladder to hatch.

Photograph 13– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

T001; Asbestos containing hot water storage tank-vertical, Samples 34-36.

Photograph 14–Area M016

T002; Asbestos containing air separator tank-horizontal, Samples 37, 38.

Photograph 15– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

M006; Asbestos containing HVAC cloth tape on metal ducting in ground floor West Mechanical Room, Samples 42, 43.

Photograph 16– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

T003; TSI joints/fittings-mudded, 12" diameter valve cover, Samples 39, 40.

Photograph 17– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

T003; TSI joints/fittings-mudded, 6" diameter joint, Sample 41.

Photograph 18– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View southeast, west-facing side of Bldg. 3501/3600 VAQ.

Photograph 19– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View southwest, north-facing side of Bldg. 3501/3600

VAQ.

Photograph 20– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View northwest, south-facing side of Bldg. 3501/3600

VAQ.

Photograph 21– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View northeast, west-facing side of Bldg. 3501/3600 VAQ.

Photograph 22– DAVIS MONTHAN AFB 3501 VAQ

View east, south-facing side of Bldg. 3501/3600 VAQ.

Open doors are the Mechanical and Fan rooms.

ASBESTOS

SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

Building 4310

Prepared for:

United States Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District 4101 Jefferson Plaza, NE Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109-3435

Prepared by:

ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC.

7301 South Paddington Road West Jordan, Utah 84084 T 801.255.2800 F 801.569.2501

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title

1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Introduction

3.0 Building Description

4.0 Survey Procedures

4.1 Building Survey

4.2 Bulk Sample Collection

5.0 Survey Results

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results

5.4 Damage and Hazard Assessment

5.5 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations

5.6 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.7 Inaccessible Areas

5.8 Materials(s) assumed to contain 1.0% asbestos

6.0 Response Action Comments

6.2 Renovation Options

7.0 Cost Estimates

8.0 Limitations and Exclusion of Warranty

Appendices

A Data Tables Table 1 Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

Table 3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results Sorted by Sample Number Table 4 Bulk Sample Analytical Results Sorted by Homogeneous

Area Number Table 5 Damage Assessment of Asbestos-Containing Materials Table 6 Estimated Abatement Cost by Homogeneous Area

Table 7 Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, Quantity, % Asbestos, Abatement Cost, Condition, Disturbance Potential and Hazardous Ranking

B Building Floor Plan(s)

C Photograph Log

D Laboratory Analytical Reports

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A survey of this facility was performed on November 17, 2009, by ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. The building was visually inspected to identify building materials that might contain asbestos. Bulk samples were collected from suspect materials and analyzed to determine if they contained asbestos. All Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) were assessed for damage and the potential for exposure. This survey was requested by United States Army Corps of Engineers, US Army Engineer District- Albuquerque, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

The following table lists all ACMs that were identified in the building. Information specific to the building concerning inaccessible areas / materials and recommended response actions can be found in this report. There is important information in these sections that is not included in this executive summary. This report should be read in its entirety, including detailed information that is contained in other sections and appendices of this report.

Asbestos Content (2) Quantity Cost Estimate (3)

T001 Thermal System Insulation (TSI), tank-horizontal

Mechanical room, ground floor

6% A 6% C ~ 345 square feet $6,900.00 @$20/square foot

Black mastic

Mechanical room, ground floor-inside fan unit

5% C

~25 square feet

$150.00

9" floor tile (dark brown w/red-cream streaks) w/black mastic

Floor 1 (entire floor, some exposed, some under carpet); Floor 2 (some exposed, some under carpet); Floor 3 (entire floor, some exposed, some under carpet)

12% C tile >1% C mastic

~22,575 square

$56,437.50 @$2.50/square foot

Floor tile mastic (black; underneath non-asbestos 12" floor tile-tan w/brown

Room 106, west

>1% C to 5% C

~590 square feet

$1,180.00 @$2/square foot

Mechanical room, pipe chases, above ceilings

6% A, 6% C 3% A, 3% C

@$25/joint

(continued)

M012

9" floor tile (brown w/red-cream streaks) w/mastic

2nd floor storage room, south

ND mastic

175 square feet

$437.50

M015

120 each (4'x5')

$15,000.00 @$125.00/window

*M016

Wall system (painted silver) ground floor (ceiling)

1.2% C plaster

200 square feet

$600.00 @$3.00/square foot

TSI-horizontal tank

Mechanical room east, ground floor (air separator tank w/mud underneath painted canvas jacketing); tank is elevated ~7'

4% C

~452 square feet

$9,040.00

**M018

Roof (flat, built-up

Roof

ASSUMED

~7,525 square

$18,812.50

Footnotes:

1. Homogeneous Area number (not related to building room numbers).

2. A = Amosite Asbestos, C = Chrysotile Asbestos, ND = None Detected.

3. Cost Estimates include asbestos removal costs only; abatement design and management fees and replacement costs are not included. For projects with small quantities, ask Contractors for their mobilization fee. Please refer to Section 7.0 for more details.

*M016 Wall System (painted silver) in the ground floor mechanical room is located on the ceiling. ACM plaster over the non-ACM wall board was found in one sample. The metal exhaust pipe from the hot water heater is vented through this asbestos-containing ceiling.

**M018 Roof (flat, built-up w/tar sealant) access is from the 3rd floor interior stair landing. During the inspection, the roof hatch would not open and access from the inside was not possible. The built-up roof on this building was assumed to be asbestos; however, it should be noted that the single ply membrane built-up roof on Building 3501 which was sampled by ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. during a concurrent asbestos inspection did not contain any asbestos.

Asbestos Survey and Assessment

2.0 INTRODUCTION

On November 17, 2009 ROWLAND CONSULTING, INC. performed an asbestos survey and assessment at Building 4310 (dormitory), Davis Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, Arizona. The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of both friable and non-friable Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) within and on the facility. Bulk samples were collected from suspect materials, submitted to a laboratory, and analyzed for asbestos content. Each occurrence of ACM was assessed for damage and friability.

The following accredited and certified inspector(s) performed the inspection, collected the samples and made assessment:

Jeffrey B. Rowland Name Signature Date

Utah ASB-1377 State of Accreditation State of Utah Division of Air Quality Asbestos Certification Number

Reviewed by:

Merlynn D. Densley, Ph.D., CIH Name Signature Date

Utah ASB-0450 State of Accreditation State of Utah Division of Air Quality Asbestos Certification Number CIH Certificate Number 3376

Expires June 2014

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Identification Building 4310 (dormitory)

Building Name………………………Building 4310 Building Address……………………Davis Monthan Air Force Base Tucson, Arizona

Building Construction

Building Construction Date…………~1972

Building Type……………………….Dormitory, Offices Building Total Sq. Ft………………. Approx. 25,000 Structural System…………………... Concrete, block Exterior Wall Construction………… Concrete

Floor Deck Construction…………… Concrete Roof Construction………………….. Flat, built-up roof of assumed asbestos composition Floors Above Grade……… Floors Below Grade………………... 0

Interior Finishes

Floors………………………............. Asbestos-containing floor tile, concrete Ceilings……………………………...Painted concrete, asbestos-containing gypsum board wall system (mechanical room) Walls……………………………….. Painted concrete, drywall Attic…………………………………None Crawl space………………………… None

Exterior Finishes

Windows…………………………….Single paine steel with asbestos containing caulking/glazing

Building Mechanical

Heating Plant……………………….. Forced air HVAC ducted supply Mechanical Piping…………………. Hot and cold water piping with asbestos-containing joints/fittings-mudded.

Horizontal & vertical tanks with asbestos-containing insulation. Straight runs are insulated with fiberglass

4.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES

4.1 Building Surveys

All accessible areas of the facility were visually inspected to identify suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM.) All accessible surfaces, structures, and mechanical systems within these areas were examined and all suspected ACM was touched to determine friability.

Suspect ACM was identified and assessed in homogeneous areas. A homogeneous area is defined as a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type, or formulation, of material. In cases where joint compound and/or tape have been applied to wallboard (gypsum board) and cannot be visually distinguished from the wallboard, it is considered an integral part of the wallboard and in effect becomes one material forming a wall or ceiling “system.”

Each homogeneous area was given a unique material identification number. Each ID number begins with a letter: “S” for Surfacing materials, “T” for Thermal System Insulation (TSI), or “M” for Miscellaneous materials. This letter is followed by a three-digit number, assigned in consecutive order. This number is used to identify the homogeneous area throughout the inspection report.

4.2 Bulk Sample Collection

Bulk samples were collected from all accessible homogeneous areas of suspect ACM for subsequent laboratory analysis to determine actual asbestos content. Sampling was conducted in a manner that minimized damage to the building, did not leave any unsightly marks, and did not create a health hazard for the inspectors.

The number of samples collected from each homogeneous area generally followed the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulations (40 CFR 763.86).

Friable surfacing materials were sampled using the random sampling scheme given in the EPA publication 560 / 5-85-30a, titled “Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials."” Between three (3) and seven (7) samples were collected from friable surfacing materials, depending on the size of the homogeneous area.

4.3 Bulk Sample Analysis

Bulk samples were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) and visual estimation in accordance with the EPA Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, EPA-600 / M4-82-020. Samples were analyzed by DIXON INFORMATION INC., 78 West 2400 South, South Salt Lake City, Utah.

The laboratory is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology – National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST-NVLAP) for bulk-asbestos sample analysis and is also accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association

(AIHA).

Federal EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and AHERA regulations define ACM as material containing greater than 1% asbestos by weight; materials containing 1% or less asbestos are not considered regulated ACM.

The Federal OSHA Standard also defines an ACM as a material containing greater than 1% asbestos; however, OSHA also regulates materials containing asbestos in concentrations greater than "None Detected".

Further, the NESHAP regulations state that any sample found to contain less than 10% asbestos but greater than “None detected,” by visual estimation, must be assumed to contain greater than 1% asbestos unless confirmed to be less than 1.0% asbestos by point counting analysis. Any samples found to contain asbestos in this concentration range were assumed to contain greater than 1.0% asbestos and are listed in Section 5.9 of this report. All samples that have been point counted are identified as such in the sample result tables.

The laboratories reports can be found in Appendix D of this report.

SURVEY RESULTS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs)

Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified as being ACM if the laboratory analysis shows the material to contain any detectable asbestos, unless subsequent Point Counting analysis resulted in 1% or less asbestos being detected. Table 1 of the Executive Summary and in Appendix A lists all homogeneous areas that were found to be ACM. Each material is described by type of material, friability and visual appearance.

Friability is defined in accordance with EPA’s NESHAP regulations.

“Friable ACM” is any material containing more than 1% asbestos (as determined by PLM) that, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure and also includes non-friable ACM that may become friable during building demolition.

“Non-friable ACM” is any material containing more than1% asbestos (as determined by PLM) that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

“Category I non-friable ACM” are asbestos-containing resilient floor coverings (commonly known as vinyl asbestos tile (VAT)), asphalt roofing products, packings, and gaskets.

“Category II non-friable ACM” encompasses all other non-friable ACM.

“Non-friable RACM” is used to denote thermal system insulation that is in good condition but would become friable during renovation or demolition and therefore is “regulated asbestos containing material” (RACM).

5.2 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

Homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified as non-ACM if the laboratory analysis shows the material to contain no detectable asbestos. Table 2, located in Appendix A of this report, lists all homogeneous areas that were found to be non-ACM.

5.3 Bulk Sample Analytical Results

Table 3, located in Appendix A of this report, lists all of the bulk samples in order by sample number, that were collected from homogeneous areas of suspect ACM, along with the laboratory analytical results. Each sample was given a unique sample number.

There may be more than one sample number for the same homogeneous area of suspect ACM. The homogeneous areas of suspect ACM are identified on this table by their material identification numbers. The sample location listed on this table provides a brief, but specific, description of the location where the sample was collected.

This is different than the homogeneous area location provided on Tables 1 and 2. Table 4 is the same as Table 3 except the entries have been sorted by homogeneous area number.

5.4 Damage and Hazard Assessment

Each homogeneous area of ACM has been assessed for existing damage, accessibility, and potential for future damage, and this information is presented in Table 5, located in Appendix A of this report. This table also lists the substrate present beneath each homogeneous area of ACM.

Each homogeneous area of friable ACM and asbestos-containing building material (ACBM) was classified into one of the following seven categories, as specified in EPA’s AHERA regulations (40 CFR 763.88):

(1) Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM.

(2) Damaged friable surfacing ACM.

(3) Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM.

(4) Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM.

(5) ACBM with potential for damage.

(6) ACBM with potential for significant damage.

(7) Any remaining friable ACBM or friable suspected ACBM.

The damage categories are defined as follows:

“Undamaged” means the material had no visible damage, or extremely minor damage or surface marring (i.e., a room full of floor tile with only two or three small corners chipped off on the tile).

“Damaged” means the material had visible damage evenly distributed over less than 10% of its surface, or localized over less than 25% of its surface.

“Significantly Damaged” means the material had visible damage that is evenly distributed over 10% or more of its surface, or localized over 25% or more if its surface.

Each homogeneous area of ACM was evaluated for accessibility to the building occupants and the general public, assuming the building was fully occupied, using the following assessment categories.

“Inaccessible” means the material was located in an area that people had no reason to enter and could not access without special measures. One example would be the area above a solid ceiling.

“Rarely Accessed” identifies a material that was in a location that could be accessed but wasn’t unless there was a specific need. An example would be a pipe tunnel. Another example would be a high ceiling that is out of reach and not subject to any specific disturbance.

“Periodic Access” identifies a material that was in a location that was accessible, was not occupied full time, but was accessed on a routine basis. An example would be a mechanical room or boiler room.

“Continuous Access” identifies a material that was in a location that was occupied full time and was within reach of the occupants, or was frequently subject to direct disturbance. Examples would be exposed floor tile or a normal height ceiling.

5.5 Hazard Ranking

A hazard ranking has been determined for every ACM, in each functional space (room), and is listed in Table 7, Appendix A. The Hazard Rank is derived from the material's current condition and potential for future disturbance. Table 7 also presents material description, quantity, and estimated abatement cost.

The EPA Management Planner hazard assessment process used here produces seven Hazard Ranks. The rankings of potential hazard range from 1, most hazardous, to 7, least hazardous, and are used to determine abatement priority. The highest ranking is reserved for ACM that is "significantly damaged." Hazard rankings 2 - 4 reflect ACM that is "damaged" (slight damage is the term used in Table 7), with a ranking of 2 indicating "potential for significant damage," and a ranking of 3 indicating a "potential for damage." Hazard rankings of 5 to 7 are reserved for materials currently in good condition, but with a range of moderate to low in the likelihood for future disturbance.

Note that these seven rankings are different from, and should not be confused with, the seven AHERA categories of damage and potential damage described in Section 5.4, above, and listed in Table 5.

5.6 Homogeneous Areas with Special Considerations

NONE

5.7 Suspect Materials Presumed to be Asbestos-Containing Materials without sampling or Laboratory Analysis Roof; flat built-up w/tar sealant

5.8 Inaccessible Areas

Roof; flat built-up w/tar sealant

5.9 Material(s) assumed to contain >1.0% asbestos without subsequent TEM or

Point Count Analysis

NONE

6.0 RESPONSE ACTION COMMENTS

Asbestos is regulated as a hazardous air pollutant by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the authority of the Clean Air Act. The asbestos regulations are included in the NESHAP and referenced as 40 CFR 61, Subpart M. ACMs identified in this report are subject to those regulations. Those regulations, and state and local regulations, should be carefully examined prior to renovation, demolition, cleanup, or any other activity which could disturb the ACMs, to ensure that all activities are in compliance with applicable requirements.

ACM is defined by the EPA, as any…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .