Amendment_0002.pdf

0011180182 ES 00272-7

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Se page 2 for details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 25-Jul-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912PF18Q0022

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Jul-2018

CODE

414TH CSB RCO ITALY SUBOFFICE LIVORNO

VIA AURELIA, EDIFICIO 5131

ZONA DEPOSITO

56128 TIRRENIA (PISA)

W912PF 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912PF18Q0022

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

The purpose of this amendment is as follows:

a) To revised Section L and Section M as detailed below (corrections are in yellow)

b) To request to all offerors to submit a signed copy of the amendment not later than 26 July 2018 at 17:00 PM.

The following have been deleted:

AMENDMENT 0001

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 16-Jul-2018 12:00 PM to 18-Jun-2018 12:00 PM.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

SECTION L

A. Each offeror shall provide a lump sum price in Euro currency and without IVA tax for all contract line item(s) in the bid schedule.

B. An authorized official of the firm shall sign:

- The SF 1442:

C. To be awarded a government contract you MUST have DUNS (Dun & Bradstreet) (http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform ) and NCAGE (www.dlis.dla.mil/Forms/Form_AC135.asp) numbers and be registered in SAM Registration ((https://www.sam.gov).

D. Proposal Copies: One electronic (CD-R or DVD-R) copy of the proposal shall be submitted. The CDROM or DVD shall be “Read only” and all documents shall be submitted in Microsoft Office (version 2007 compatible) formats or Adobe Acrobat (PDF). No e-mail submissions will be accepted. One electronic copy for the technical factors and non price factor shall be submitted.

I. DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THE EVALUATION

1. Failure to address all the mandatory requirements may cause the proposal to be disqualified from further consideration.

2. The offeror is responsible for submitting a well-written proposal, with adequately detailed information, which clearly demonstrates compliance with the solicitation requirements.

FACTORS:

TECHNICAL FACTOR I – DESIGN EXPERIENCE

1. In this context “offeror” refers to the proposed prime contractor or in case of an offeror without the qualification for the performance of the design, any firm authorized by Italian law to practice the professions of architecture and/or engineering that the prime contractor proposes to associate with. The associated architecture and/or engineering firm must perform the design work. Since the Government will evaluate the qualification of the firm that the prime contractor proposes to associate with, no substitution for this firm will be authorized.

2. The offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant Experience in scope, complexity and price. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least two (2) relevant projects provided by the offeror on the "Design Past Experience Questionnaire" (Attachment #6) (in English). The value of each project shall be not less than Euro 50,000 ($53,596). To be relevant the projects must be similar in scope and complexity i.e. each project shall contain consist of the following works "water and / or sewage treatment systems. The past design contracts must have been performed and completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation as identified on Page 1, Block 3.

The past design projects must have been performed by the design firm signing the letter of intent as required by Section L of this solicitation.

The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:

Acceptable - Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable - Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

3. A letter of intent signed by an authorized agent of the Architect and Engineering firm that will be performing the design portion of this project must be included. If the design work will be performed “in-house” by the prime contractor, a letter must be submitted stating this fact.

TECHNICAL FACTOR II – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

The offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant Experience in scope, complexity and price. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least two (2) relevant projects provided by the offeror on the "Construction Experience Questionnaire" (Attachment #7) (in English). The value of each project shall be not less than Euro 50,000. ($53,596). To be relevant the projects must be similar in scope and complexity i.e. each project shall contain consist of the following works "water and / or sewage treatment systems". The past contracts must have been performed and completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation as identified on Page 1, Block 3.

The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:

Acceptable - Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable - Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

NON-PRICE FACTOR III - PAST PERFORMANCE

The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least two (2) projects provided by the offeror on the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment #8) (in English). In order to be considered relevant the value of each project shall be similar in scope, size and complexity i.e. each project shall contain consist of the following works:

"water and / or sewage treatment systems". The value of each project shall be not less than Euro 50,000 ($53,596).

In order to be considered recent the past contracts must have been performed and completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation as identified on Page 1, Block 3.

The offeror is encouraged to submit past performance information with evidence of customer satisfaction such as performance evaluation, special commendation, recognition , letters of appreciation, “ certificato di regolare esecuzione” o “collaudo finale” photographs of the projects , etc.

FACTOR IV : PRICE

Offerors are required to fill in the lump sum prices for CLIN 0001.

III. DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY

The U.S. Government requires the offeror to submit the following documentation/certification to be satisfied that a prospective contractor currently meets the applicable standards in Federal Acquisition Regulation 9.104

– Standards.

A. DOCUMENTO UNICO DI REGOLARITĄ CONTRIBUTIVA (DURC)

The offeror shall provide with the proposal a copy certified and NOT older than ninety (90) days at the time set forth for the receipt of the offer of the DURC. (Documento Unico di Regolaritą Contributiva). Self certifications are not allowed. However, if the offeror has submitted a certified DURC to the issuing office (RCO Sub Office Livorno) within 90 days from the due date of this proposal, then the offeror may submit a copy of the previously certified DURC. The document MUST include the following statement otherwise the proposal will be rejected. “Con il presente documento si dichiara che l’impresa RISULTA REGOLARE ai fini del

DURC”.

B. CERTIFICATE OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (CERTIFICATO DI ISCRIZIONE

ALLA CAMERA DI COMMERCIO) (ORDINARIO)

The offeror shall provide with the proposal a copy certified and NOT older than two (2) months at the time set forth for the receipt of the offer of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio). Self-certifications are not allowed. However, if the offeror has submitted a certified Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership to the issuing office (RCO Sub Office Livorno) within 90 days from the due date of this proposal, then the offeror may submit a copy of the previously certified Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership. The certificate must include the following statement otherwise the proposal will be rejected. "NULLA OSTA ai fini dell’articolo 10 della Legge 31 Maggio 1965, n. 575 e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione e’ emessa dalla C.C.I.A.A. utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla Prefettura di Roma."

C. EXTRACT OF THE REGISTRATION BOOK (ISTITUZIONE DEL LIBRO UNICO): The offeror shall provide with the proposal a copy or a photocopy of the Extract Registration Book (ISTITUZIONE DEL LIBRO UNICO) listing the employees presently employed by the offeror.

D. EQUIPMENT LIST: The offeror shall provide with the proposal a list of all the major equipment presently in its possession.

E. BANK REFERENCE: The offeror shall provide a bank reference that discusses whether or not the offeror has an adequate financial resource to successfully complete the resultant contract.

F. PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH DLGS NO. 81/2008

ATTACHMENT XVII (SAFETY LAW).

In order to verify compliance with the Italian DLGS No. 81/2008, Enclosure XVII (Safety Law), the offeror shall provide the below required documentation/certification. If the offeror has submitted the below information to the issuing office (RCO Sub Office Livorno) within 90 days from the due date of this proposal, then the offeror may reference that submission instead of submitting duplicate information. In its proposal, the offeror must reference the request for proposal number for which the information was previously submitted.

1. Photocopy of the Chamber of commerce, industry or craftsmanship certificate showing the company’s business trade related to the typology of the contract;

2. Evaluation of risks document as in Art. 17, Para. 1, Sub-Para. a), or self-certification as in Art. 29, Para. 5, of the same DLGS;

3. Specific documentation showing that machinery, equipment and provisional clauses are in conformance with what required by the DLGS;

4. List/s of individual safety/protective equipment issued to employees;

5. Appointment of a safety manager responsible for the implementation of preventive and protective safety measures; of the individuals responsible for the fire prevention and fire-fighting measures, the evacuation procedures, for the management of emergencies, and qualified medical physician (doctor) when required;

6. Name/s of the employee’s safety representative/s;

7. Qualification certificates of the above mentioned individuals and employees as prescribed by the DLGS;

8. List of employees as they appear in the offeror’s Istituzione del Libro Unico and relative health records attesting they are medically fit, as required by the DLGS;

9. Photocopy of the record of social security contributions (DURC), as prescribed in D.M. 24 Oct 2007; and

10. Statement that no interim orders, negative administrative provisions or suspensions exists as specified in the Art. 14 of the DLGS no. 81/2008

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M - BASIS FOR AWARD

BASIS OF AWARD

A. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factor(s) considered (Lowest Price Technically Acceptable).

In order to be considered awardable, there must be an acceptable rating in every non- price factor. The offeror is responsible for submitting a well-written proposal, with adequately detailed information, which clearly demonstrates compliance with the solicitation requirements.

The U.S. Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

Discussions will only be conducted with those in the competitive range.

Offerors may be asked to clarify some issues regarding the technical factors and non price factors to enhance U.S. Government understanding. Such clarifications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, and/or otherwise revise the proposal.

Award may be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for the below factors.

B. FACTORS

The solicitation provides for the following non-price factors:

Technical Factor I - Design Past Experience Technical Factor II - Construction Past Experience Non-Price Factor III - Past Performance Factor IV - Price

C. EVALUATION OF THE NON-PRICE FACTORS

Phase One. The Contract Specialist will screen each proposal for completeness to ensure that all mandatory requirements for this solicitation have been addressed. This level of evaluation does not include an in-depth reading of the proposal’s content, but it is conducted solely to ensure that a complete proposal has been received and that meets the requirements of the solicitation. Failure to address all the mandatory requirements may be grounds to disqualify the proposal from further review.

Phase Two. In this phase, the evaluation team evaluates the technical factor.

TECHNICAL FACTOR I – DESIGN EXPERIENCE

The offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant Experience in scope, complexity and price. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least two (2) relevant projects provided by the offeror on the "Design Past Experience Questionnaire" (Attachment#6)( in English). The value of each project shall be not less than Euro 50,000 ($53,596). To be relevant the projects must be similar in scope and complexity i.e. each project shall contain consist of the following works: "water and / or sewage systems". The past design contracts must have been performed and completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation as identified on Page 1, Block 3.

The past design projects must have been performed by the design firm signing the letter of intent as required by Section L of this solicitation.

The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:

Acceptable - Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable - Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

TECHNICAL FACTOR II – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

The offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant Experience in scope, complexity and price. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least two (2) relevant projects provided by the offeror on the "Construction Experience Questionnaire" (Attachment #7) (in English). The value of each project shall be not less than Euro 50,000 ($53,596). To be relevant the projects must be similar in scope and complexity each project shall contain consist of the following works: "water and / or sewage treatment systems". The past contracts must have been performed and completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation as identified on Page 1, Block 3.

The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:

Acceptable - Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable - Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

NON-PRICE FACTOR III — PAST PERFORMANCE

This factor will be rated acceptable or unacceptable based on whether the past performance submitted for consideration is relevant and demonstrates successful past performance by the offeror, such as no terminations for default, no ratings less than satisfactory by its customers/references, whether the quality of its work was satisfactory and completed in a timely manner and whether the offeror demonstrated reasonableness and cooperation during performance of the contracts. Past failure to apply sufficient tenacity and perseverance to perform acceptably is strong evidence of unacceptable past performance. In addition, failure to meet the quality requirements of a contract is a significant factor to consider in determining unsatisfactory performance. Offerors may be asked to clarify some issues regarding the aforementioned factors to enhance U.S. Government understanding. Such clarifications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, and/or otherwise revise the proposal.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Descriptions:

Acceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

FACTOR IV - EVALUATION OF THE PRICE

A contract will be awarded to the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Offeror (LPTA).

(End of Summary of Changes)