Amendment_0002_W912P618B0013_-_Water_Main_Replacement_Section_219_project,_East_Chicago.pdf

W81G6681491702

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

REFERENCE INVITATION FOR BIDS NO. W912P618B0013, "WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT SECTION 219 PROJECT, EAST CHICAGO, LAKE

COUNTY, INDIANA"

-- THE DESCRIPTION OF THIS AMENDMENT CONTINUES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES --

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Sep-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912P618B0013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Sep-2018

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, CHICAGO

231 SOUTH LASALLE STREET SUITE 1500

CHICAGO IL 60604-1437

W912P6 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912P618B0013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

A. BID OPENING DATE AND TIME:

The Bid Opening Date and Time is NOT EXTENDED by this Amendment, therefore, bids are due by 1:00 p.m.

(Central Time) on 24 September 2018. Detailed information regarding the submission of bids is located at Section 00 22 13 of the Solicitation document – See “IMPORTANT BID NOTES.”

B. REVISED DRAWING SHEET: The following Drawing Sheet has been revsied and is hereunder enclosed, replacing the previously furnished respective sheet.

Sheet C4.1 has been revised at the General Water Service Plan and Water Service Details.

C. AMENDED SPECIFICATION SECTIONS: The following Specification Sections have been revised. The revised sheets are enclosed hereunder and replace the previously furnished sections.

a. SECTION 00 31 32.13 SUBSURFACE DRILLING AND SAMPLING INFORMATION. Added new Geotechnical Engineering Investigation report at the end of section, dated September 2018.

b. SECTION 01 10 00 GENERAL PROVISIONS. City of East Chicago Point of Contact added to General Provisions.

c. SECTION 01 22 00.00 12 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES. Revisions to water services of various sizes under Payment paragraphs.

d. SECTION 32 12 16 HOT MIX BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. Submittal instructions text added paragraph 1.3.

e. SECTION 33 11 00 WATER UTILITY DISTRIBUTION PIPING. Various deletions under paragraphs associated with Water Meters and Meter Boxes.

D. CONTRACTOR’S INQUIRIES: By this Amendment, the Chicago District, USACE responds to Contractor’s inquiries (SEE THE FOLLOWING).

Question 1: Do you have a more detailed spec on the meter pits to be installed? Part number’s for pit, lid, copper meter setter, in line check valve, shut off valve? Are the meter pits per Indiana American Water specifications?

USACE Response Q1: Refer to revised Sheet C4.1, Water Service Detail, which is enclosed hereunder this Amendment.

Question 2: There is no bid line items for the 16” cut & cap found on page C1.3. How will this be addressed?

USACE Response Q2: Refer to Section 00 10 00 of the Solicitation document (bid schedule) wherein the following CLIN 0001BR is contained which addresses the 16-inch Cut and Cap found on Sheet C1.3.

Question 3: There is no bid line item for the 12” Cut & Cap found on page C1.6. How will this be addressed?"

USACE Response Q3: Refer to Section 00 10 00 of the Solicitation document (bid schedule) wherein the following CLIN 0001BQ is contained which addresses the 12-inch Cut and Cap found on Sheet C1.3.

E. POINT OF CONTACT: The Point of Contact (POC) for this Amendment is Ericka Hillard at (312) 846‐5378;

email: ericka.d.hillard@usace.army.mil.

W912P618B0013

(The aforementioned Revised Drawing Sheet and Revised Specification Sections follow)

East Chi cago I ndi anapol i s Bl vd Wat er Mai n I mpr ovement s Pr oj ect W912P618B0013

SECTI ON TABLE OF CONTENTS

DI VI SI ON 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTI NG REQUI REMENTS

SECTI ON 00 31 32. 13

SUBSURFACE DRI LLI NG AND SAMPLI NG I NFORMATI ON

PART 1 GENERAL

1. 1 SUBSURFACE CONDI TI ONS

1. 2 SI TE SPECI FI C DATA

1. 3 ADDI TI ONAL I NFORMATI ON ON SUBSURFACE CONDI TI ONS

PART 2 PRODUCTS ( NOT USED)

PART 3 EXECUTI ON ( NOT USED)

- - End of Sect i on Tabl e of Cont ent s - -

DOCUMENT 00 31 32. 13 Page 1

AMD 0002 - 09/ 19/ 18

SECTI ON 00 31 32. 13

SUBSURFACE DRI LLI NG AND SAMPLI NG I NFORMATI ON

PART 1 GENERAL

1. 1 SUBSURFACE CONDI TI ONS

Subsur f ace expl or at or y bor i ngs have been obt ai ned by t he Gover nment t o det er mi ne t he gener al char act er of t he subsur f ace mat er i al s wi t hi n t he pr oj ect ar ea. The l ogs of t he bor i ngs t hat f al l wi t hi n t he ar ea of t hi s cont r act ar e i nc l uded f or t he conveni ence of t he Cont r act or . The Gover nment assumes no r esponsi bi l i t y f or any i nt er pr et at i on or deduct i ons made by t he Cont r act or f r om t he l ogs and dat a. Whi l e t he bor i ngs ar e gener al l y r epr esent at i ve of subsur f ace condi t i ons at t hei r r espect i ve l ocat i ons and f or t hei r r espect i ve ver t i cal r eaches, l ocal i zed var i at i ons of char act er i st i cs of t he subsur f ace mat er i al s of t hi s r egi on shoul d be ant i c i pat ed. Gr oundwat er el evat i ons, shown on t he bor i ng l ogs, ar e t hose encount er ed at t he t i me when t he bor i ngs wer e t aken and wi l l f l uct uat e due t o f act or s such as r ai nf al l , l ake and/ or r i ver st ages.

1. 2 SI TE SPECI FI C DATA

Bor i ng l ogs ar e pr ovi ded at t he end of t hi s sect i on as Appendi x A.

1. 3 ADDI TI ONAL I NFORMATI ON ON SUBSURFACE CONDI TI ONS

Addi t i onal i nf or mat i on on subsur f ace condi t i ons at t he pr oj ect s i t e, i ncl udi ng compl et e l abor at or y r esul t s, i s cont ai ned i n t he f ol l owi ng reports:

a. Subsur f ace I nvest i gat i on Repor t . Pr epar ed by K&S Engi neer s, I nc. , 2018.

ba. Subsur f ace I nvest i gat i on Repor t . Pr epar ed by K&S Engi neer s, I nc. , 2011.

PART 2 PRODUCTS ( NOT USED)

PART 3 EXECUTI ON ( NOT USED)

- - End of Sect i on - -

DOCUMENT 00 31 32. 13 Page 2

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION

Proposed Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana

K&S File No. 12408

Prepared For:

DLZ Indiana, LLC 900 Ridge Road, Suite L

Munster, IN 46321

Attn: Mr. Anthony Kenning

September 14, 2018

September 14, 2018

DLZ Indiana, LLC 2211 E. Jefferson Blvd.

South Bend, IN 46615

Attn: Mr. Anthony Kenning

Re: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive

Dear Mr. Kenning

Submitted herewith is the report of our geotechnical engineering investigation for the above-referenced project. This study was authorized in accordance with our Proposal No.

11560 dated June 12, 2018 and your subsequent authorization.

This report contains the results of our field and laboratory testing program in accordance with the current INDOT Standard Specifications and AASHTO Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials, as well as an engineering interpretation of the geotechnical data with respect to the available project characteristics.

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If we can be of any further assistance, or if you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact either of the undersigned.

Sincerely, K&S Engineers, Inc.

Tahir (Tony) Munawar Linda K. Laffin, P.E.

Project Engineer Senior Engineer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Nos.

1.0 INTRODUCTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2

2.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION ----------------------------------------- 2

2.1 Field Investigation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2

2.2 Laboratory Investigation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3

3.0 GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ------------------------------------------------ 4

3.1 Subsurface Conditions -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4

3.2 Groundwater Conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4

4.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ------------------------------------------------------- 5

5.0 REMARKS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5

APPENDIX A

BORING LOCATION PLAN

FIELD CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR SOIL EXPLORATION

INDOT BORING LOGS

APPENDIX B

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION TEST RESULTS

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES

GRADATION TABLES

APPENDIX C

GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive

1.0 INTRODUCTION

DLZ is planning the construction of a Watermain at the above referenced site in East

Chicago, Lake County, Indiana. The purpose of this exploration was to determine the general subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the general area of the proposed

Watermain alignment.

The scope of work included subsurface exploration by drilling a total of seven (7) soil borings at the locations shown on boring location plan, laboratory testing of the soils, engineering analysis of the pertinent geotechnical data, and preparation of the boring logs, gradation curves and this report.

The purpose of this study was to perform sieve analysis (gradation) of the soil samples in order to determine if the on-site granular materials are suitable to reuse for sewer line backfill and also if the on-site materials meets the requirements of INDOT B-Borrow structural backfill. Samples obtained during this exploration will be retained in our facility for a period of 60 days, after which time they will be discarded unless other arrangements are made.

2.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION

2.1 Field Investigation

Subsurface conditions for the proposed project were investigated on August 20, 2018.

Truck-mounted drilling equipment using hollow-stem-augers was utilized to complete the borings. Split-spoon samples were obtained by using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedures in accordance with the American Association of State Highway and

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive

Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Standard Test Method T-206. Split-spoon samples and standard penetration test resistances (SPT N-values) were obtained continuously to a depth of 7 feet, as indicated on the boring logs. Subsequent to the drilling activities, each test hole was backfilled in accordance with the specifications set forth by the Indiana

Department of Transportation (INDOT) document “Exhibit C” and the INDOT “Aquifer

Protection Guidelines.”

The number, locations and depths of the borings were selected by K&S and DLZ. The soil boring locations were marked in the field by a representative of K&S. Approximate boring locations are presented on boring location plan, Exhibit-1, in Appendix A.

The boring logs, which show visual descriptions of all soil strata encountered, using the

AASHTO classification system, are included in Appendix A. Sampling information and other pertinent field data and observations are also included on the boring logs. In addition, a Field Classification sheet defining the terms and symbols used on the logs and explaining the standard penetration test (SPT) procedure is provided immediately preceding the boring logs in Appendix A.

2.2 Laboratory Investigation

The soil samples obtained from each soil boring were logged, labeled, sealed and transported to our laboratory for further classification and testing. The soil samples were visually classified by a geotechnical engineer in accordance with the AASHTO Soil

Classification System (AASHTO M-145) and the visual classifications verified or modified based upon the results of laboratory tests. Final boring logs were subsequently prepared and are included in Appendix A. Soil index property tests including: grain size distribution and analyses (AASHTO T-11/T-27), natural moisture content tests (AASHTO T-265) and organic content tests (AASHTO T-267) were performed on representative soil samples.

The results of all laboratory tests are included on the respective boring logs and/or summary sheets in Appendix B.

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive

3.0 GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

3.1 Subsurface Conditions

The general subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by drilling a total of seven

(7) borings extending to a depth of 7 feet at each location. The subsurface conditions disclosed by the field investigation are summarized in the following paragraphs. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions encountered in each test boring are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. It should be noted that the stratification lines shown on the soil boring logs represent approximate transitions between material types. In-situ stratum changes could occur gradually or at slightly different depths and variations in the soil stratigraphy.

In general, approximately 3 to 4 inches of asphalt pavement was noted at the surface of these borings. Underlying the asphalt pavement, approximately 6 to 10 inches of slag

(aggregate base) fill was noted with the exception of boring RB-3, where approximately 3 inches of red brick fill was noted below the asphalt pavement and above the slag fill.

Underlying the above mentioned aggregate base (slag and brick) fill, mostly brown and occasionally brown to dark brown sand (A-3) was noted in upper 2 to 3 feet, which was followed by natural brown sand (A-3) through the borings termination depth of 7 feet below the existing grade. The brown to dark brown sand noted in upper 2 to 3 feet depth in

Borings RB-3 through RB-7 could possibly be a fill material.

The density of the granular soils varied from loose to medium dense, as exhibited by N-values ranging from 9 to 29 blows per foot (bpf). The laboratory moisture contents in the sand ranged from 5.1 to 19.7 percent. The organic content of sand samples ranged from

0.4 percent to 2.1 percent. All the test results are provided in Appendix B.

3.2 Groundwater Conditions

Groundwater observations were made during drilling operations (by noting the depth of water on the drilling tools) and in the open boreholes following withdrawal of the drilling augers and are reported on the boring logs. Groundwater was not encountered during the present subsurface exploration. Please note that while groundwater observations in granular soil are generally accurate at the time of the observation, groundwater levels

From 151st Street to Columbus Drive are subject to seasonal and long-term fluctuations in response to climatic conditions

(precipitation, evaporation, surface water runoff), man-made influences, and other environmental or physical factors.

4.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of gradation tests, it may be concluded that the brown sand (A-3) noted below the slag fill (aggregate base) is considered suitable to use as a B-Borrow structural backfill material. In Borings RB-3 through RB-7, brown to dark brown sand was encountered below the slag fill. Brown to dark brown sand was observed to be extending to a depth of about 2 to 3 feet below the existing grade. This sand should be carefully observed to see the presence of any organics or other unsuitable non-soil materials. The slag fill could be stockpiled and re-used as an aggregate base (if approved by the project engineer).

5.0 REMARKS

Our professional services have been performed, our findings are prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. The opinions presented in this report are based upon visual observations, limited testing and engineering judgment. No other representation, warranty, or guarantee is intended.

This company is not responsible for the independent conclusions, opinions or recommendations made by others based on the field exploration and laboratory test data presented in this report. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project.

If you have any questions concerning this report, or if you require any additional services, please do not hesitate to contact us.

APPENDICES

BORING LOCATION PLAN

BORING LOCATION PLAN (Exhibit-1)

K & S ENGINEERS, INC.

SOIL TESTING AND FOUNDATION CONSULTANTS

EXHIBIT-1 (Sheet 1/2)

Scale: Not to Scale

Date: 8-13-2018

LEGEND: Approximate Boring Locations

INDOT DES. No.

Begin Project

St. 97+60 “A” N.B/S.B

SITE PLAN AND BORING LOCATIONS

PROPOSED INDIANAPOLIS BLVD WATERMAIN RECONSTRUCTION

151ST STREET TO COLUMBUS DRIVE, LAKE COUNTY, IN.

K & S ENGINEERS, INC.

SOIL TESTING AND FOUNDATION CONSULTANTS

EXHIBIT-1 (Sheet 2/2)

Scale: Not to Scale

Date: 8-13-2018

LEGEND: Approximate Boring Locations

INDOT DES. No.

Begin Project

St. 97+60 “A” N.B/S.B

SITE PLAN AND BORING LOCATIONS

PROPOSED INDIANAPOLIS BLVD WATERMAIN RECONSTRUCTION

151ST STREET TO COLUMBUS DRIVE, LAKE COUNTY, IN.

Particle Size Identification Non-Cohesive Soils (Based on INDOT Standard Specifications Sections 903) (Silt, Sand, Gravel and Combinations)

Boulders - 3 in. (75 mm) diameter or more Density Gravel - 2.0 mm (No. 10 sieve) to 3 in. Very loose - 5 blows/ft or less Sand (coarse) - 0.425 mm to 2.0 mm Loose - 6 to 10 blows/ft (No. 40 sieve to No. 10 sieve) Medium dense - 11 to 30 blows/ft Sand (fine) - 0.075 mm to 0.425 mm Dense - 31 to 50 blows/ft (No. 200 sieve to No. 40 sieve) Very dense - 51 blows/ft or more Silt - 0.002 mm to 0.075 mm (No. 200 sieve) Clay - Smaller than 0.002 mm

COHESIVE SOILS

(Clay, silt and combinations)

Consistency Plasticity Very soft - 3 blows/ft or less Degree of Plasticity Plasticity Index Soft - 4 to 5 blows/ft None to slight 0-4 Medium stiff - 6 to 10 blows/ft Slight 5-7 Stiff - 11 to 15 blows/ft Medium 8-22 Very stiff - 16 to 30 blows/ft High to very high over 22 Hard - 31 blows/ft or more

Classification shown on the test boring logs are made by visual inspection of samples and confirmed/modified based on index property tests.

Standard Penetration Test (AASHTO T 206) – Driving a 2.0” O.D., 1 3/8” I.D. sampler a distance of 1.0 foot into undisturbed soil with a 140 pound hammer free falling a distance of 30 inches. It is customary for K&S to drive the sampler 6 inches to seat the sampler into undisturbed soil, then perform the test.

The number of hammer blows for seating the sampler and making the test are recorded for each 6 inches of penetration on the drill log (Example – 6-8-9). The standard penetration test result can be obtained by adding the last two figures (i.e. 8+9 = 17 blows/foot).

Strata Changes – In the column “Soil Classification” on the test boring logs, the horizontal lines represent strata changes. A solid line (_______) represents actually observed change. A dashed line (_ _ _ _ _) represents an estimated change.

Ground Water – Observations were made at the times indicated. Porosity of soil strata, weather conditions, site topography, etc., may cause changes in the water levels indicated on the logs.

0.3

1.0

7.0

SS

SS

SS

9-13-16-15

7-10-11-14

7-9-11-15

7.575

NPNP

Asphalt - 4 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag Dark gray, - 8 inches , Aggregate Base, (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (Lab No. 101)

Bottom of Boring at 7.0 ft

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

586.0 12+00

14.0 ft Left

7.0 ft

Caved in at 3.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

585.0

580.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-1

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1 4/

7.0

SS

SS

SS

19-13-11-9

9-11-13-12

7-9-11-12

11.9

NPNP

Asphalt - 4 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag Dark gray, - 8 inches , Aggregate Base, (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (Lab No. 102)

Bottom of Boring at 5.0 ft

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

585.0 22+00

14.0 ft Left

5.0 ft

Caved in at 2.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

580.0

575.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-2

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1

0.5

1.0

3.0

7.0

SS

SS

SS

8-6-4-4

3-5-7-9

7-10-11-14

17.650

NPNP

Asphalt - 3 inches, (VISUAL)

Bricks Red, - 3 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag Dark gray, - 6 inches (Aggregate Base), (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Brown to Dark Brown, Moist, Loose, (Lab No. 103)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (Lab No. 102)

Bottom of Boring at 7.0 ft

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

585.0 32+00

14.0 ft Left

7.0 ft

Caved in at 3.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

580.0

575.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-3

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1

2.0

7.0

SS

SS

SS

7-8-9-11

9-11-12-11

7-9-13-11

7.9

NPNP

Asphalt - 4 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag Dark gray, - 8 inches (Aggregate Base), (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Brown to Dark Brown, Moist, Loose, (FILL), (Lab No. 103)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (Lab No. 104)

Bottom of Boring at 7.0 ft

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

586.0 42+00

14.0 ft Left

7.0 ft

Caved in at 3.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

585.0

580.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-4

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1

2.0

7.0

SS

SS

SS

10-11-6-5

6-5-4-7

6-5-7-10

7.3

NPNP

Asphalt - 4 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag Dark gray, - 8 inches (Aggregate Base), (VISUAL)

Sand with Slag Dark brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (FILL), (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Loose to Medium Dense, (Lab No. 105)

Bottom of Boring at 7.0 ft

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

585.0 52+00

6.0 ft Left

7.0 ft

Caved in at 2.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

580.0

575.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-5

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1

2.0

7.0

SS

SS

SS

10-13-7-4

3-4-7-8

4-7-7-9

7.775

NPNP

Asphalt - 4 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag with Cruwhed Stone Dark gray, - 8 inches (Aggregate Base), (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Dark brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (FILL), (Lab No. 103)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Loose to Medium Dense, (Lab No. 106)

Bottom of Boring at 7.0 ft

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

585.0 62+00

14.0 ft Left

7.0 ft

Caved in at 2.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

580.0

575.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-6

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1

1.2

2.0

5.0

7.0

SS

SS

SS

7-5-4-3

3-4-7-7

5-7-9-11

19.7

5.7

5.1

NP

NP

NP

NP

Asphalt - 4 inches, (VISUAL)

Slag with Crushed Stone Dark gray, - 10 inches (Aggregate Base), (VISUAL)

Sand Dark brown to Black, Moist, Loose, (FILL), (VISUAL)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (Lab No. 107)

Sand A-3, Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, (Lab No. 108)

Bottom of Boring at 7.0 ft

NP

NP

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

Ruben/Carlos/Tony Munawar

80 °F

Cloudy

BORING METHOD

RIG TYPE

CASING DIA.

CORE SIZE

ELEVATION

STATION

OFFSET

LINE

DEPTH

HAMMER

DRILLER/INSP

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

08-20-18

08-20-18

At completion NoneGROUNDWATER:

LOCATION

COUNTY

HSA

Diedrich D-120

585.0 72+00

6.0 ft Left

7.0 ft

Caved in at 3.0 ft

PROJECT NO.: 12408

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

Encountered at None

: STRUCTURE #

S A

M P

LE

N

U M

B E

R

D R

Y D

E N

S

IT

Y pc f

% R E

C O

V E

R Y

M O

IS

T

U R

E C

O N

T E

N T

U N

C O

N F

C

O M

P t sf

PIPL

ATTERBERG

LIMITS

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

580.0

575.0

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT :

LLS

A

M P

LE

D

E P

T H

PROJECT TYPE

K & S Engineers, Inc.

BORING NO.:

SHEET

REMARKS

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.) DATUM :

OF

NORTHING :

P O

C K

E T

P E

N t sf

EASTING :

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

DES NO.

S P

T pe r 6"

INDOT BORING LOG

RB-7

E

LE

V A

T

IO

N

IN

D

O T

B O

R

IN

G L

O G

I

N D

IA

N

A P

O

LI

S B

LV

D

. W A

T E

R M

A

IN

IM

P

R O

V E

M E

N T

S _E

A S

T C

H

IC

A G

O _I

N .G

P J

IN

D

O T

_I

.G D

T

/1

RB-1 1 - 7 SAND A-3 (0) 0.0 97.1 NP NP NP 0.75

RB-2 3 - 7 SAND A-3 (0) 1.7 94.9 NP NP NP 0.44

RB-3 1 - 3 SAND A-3 (0) 0.1 94.9 NP NP NP 1.7 15.6

RB-4 3 - 7 SAND A-3 (0) 2.4 93.2 NP NP NP 0.69

RB-5 3 - 7 SAND A-3 (0) 0.3 96.6 NP NP NP 0.72

RB-6 1 - 7 SAND A-3 (0) 0.5 96.4 NP NP NP 0.45

RB-7 1 - 2 2.11 18.2

RB-7 3 - 5 SAND A-3 (0) 4.6 92.9 NP NP NP 0.62

RB-7 5 - 7 SAND A-3 (0) 19.8 73.3 NP NP NP 0.49

Summary of Classification Tests

Sheet 1 of 1

Gravel

Sand

LOI

pHBoring AASHTO Classification

PLDepthSample Silt

Clay

Colloid

LL PITextural Classification

Ca/Mg

Moisture

Route #

DES #

Project Type

Location

County

Project #

Proposed Watermain Improvements (151st St. to Columbus Dr.)

Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

Lake

12408

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

Indianapolis Blvd

IN

D

O T

_S U

M M

A R

Y _O

F

C

LA

S S

IF

IC

A T

IO

N

_T E

S T

S

IN

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J

IN

_D O

T 1.

G D

T

/1 4/

0.0010.010.1110100

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

D30

Specimen Identification

COBBLES

0.0

CuPI Cc

6 8

Specimen Identification

3/4

0.184

2.18

%Sand

HYDROMETER

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

%Clay

LL

D10

0.90

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

D60

0.085

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

97.1

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

fine

%Silt

RB-1

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

2001.5 coarse

0.118

PL

NPNPRB-1 NP

%Gravel

Classification

1/2 60 100 1403

%Colloid

1.0

1.0

A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J U

S _L

A B

.G D

T

/1 4/

0.0010.010.1110100

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

D30

Specimen Identification

COBBLES

1.7

CuPI Cc

6 8

Specimen Identification

3/4

0.206

2.34

%Sand

HYDROMETER

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

%Clay

LL

D10

1.13

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

D60

0.088

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

94.9

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

fine

%Silt

RB-2

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

2001.5 coarse

0.143

PL

NPNPRB-2 NP

%Gravel

Classification

1/2 60 100 1403

%Colloid

3.0

3.0

A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J U

S _L

A B

.G D

T

/1 4/

0.0010.010.1110100

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

D30

Specimen Identification

COBBLES

0.1

CuPI Cc

6 8

Specimen Identification

3/4

0.188

2.10

%Sand

HYDROMETER

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

%Clay

LL

D10

1.42

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

D60

0.09

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

94.9

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

fine

%Silt

RB-3

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

2001.5 coarse

0.155

PL

NPNPRB-3 NP

%Gravel

Classification

1/2 60 100 1403

%Colloid

1.0

1.0

A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J U

S _L

A B

.G D

T

/1 4/

0.0010.010.1110100

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

D30

Specimen Identification

COBBLES

2.4

CuPI Cc

6 8

Specimen Identification

3/4

0.222

2.33

%Sand

HYDROMETER

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

%Clay

LL

D10

1.28

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

D60

0.095

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

93.2

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

fine

%Silt

RB-4

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

2001.5 coarse

0.164

PL

NPNPRB-4 NP

%Gravel

Classification

1/2 60 100 1403

%Colloid

3.0

3.0

A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J U

S _L

A B

.G D

T

/1 4/

0.0010.010.1110100

6 83/4 40 1403 2

COBBLES

HYDROMETER

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

96.6

Cc Cu

D60

0.275

Specimen Identification Ca/Mg %Colloid

3.0

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

2001.5 3010

D10 LOI %Gravel %Clay fine

RB-5

RB-5

NP NP NP 1.10 2.47

3.0 0.111 0.3

Textural Classification LL

D30

Lab # coarse

50 6016 100201/2 41

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

0.183

PL PI

%Sand %Silt

Specimen Identification

105 A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J

IN

D O

T _I

_1

9.

G

D T

9/

/1

0.0010.010.1110100

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

D30

Specimen Identification

COBBLES

0.5

CuPI Cc

6 8

Specimen Identification

3/4

0.233

1.82

%Sand

HYDROMETER

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

%Clay

LL

D10

1.06

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

D60

0.128

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

96.4

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

fine

%Silt

RB-6

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

2001.5 coarse

0.178

PL

NPNPRB-6 NP

%Gravel

Classification

1/2 60 100 1403

%Colloid

1.0

1.0

A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J U

S _L

A B

.G D

T

/1 4/

0.0010.010.1110100

6 83/4 40 1403 2

COBBLES

HYDROMETER

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

92.9

Cc Cu

D60

0.269

Specimen Identification Ca/Mg %Colloid

3.0

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

2001.5 3010

D10 LOI %Gravel %Clay fine

RB-7

RB-7

NP NP NP 0.94 1.71

3.0 0.158 4.3

Textural Classification LL

D30

Lab # coarse

50 6016 100201/2 41

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

0.2

PL PI

%Sand %Silt

Specimen Identification

107 A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J

IN

D O

T _I

_1

9.

G

D T

9/

/1

0.0010.010.1110100

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

D30

Specimen Identification

COBBLES

19.8

CuPI Cc

6 8

Specimen Identification

3/4

0.309

3.61

%Sand

HYDROMETER

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

%Clay

LL

D10

1.11

SILT Clay

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST REPORT

D60

0.086

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

73.3

3/8 3

GRAVEL

SAND

fine

%Silt

RB-7

P E

R C

E N

T F

IN

E

R B

Y W

E

IG

H T

2001.5 coarse

0.171

PL

NPNPRB-7 NP

%Gravel

Classification

1/2 60 100 1403

%Colloid

5.0

5.0

A-3 (0) SAND

DES #: Structure #:

Project #: 12408 County: Lake Location: Indianapolis Boulevard, East Chicago, Indiana

K&S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Ave Highland, IN 46322 Telephone: (219) 924-5231 Fax: (219) 924-5271

IN

D

O T

_G R

A

IN

_S

IZ

E

I N

D

IA

N A

P O

LI

S

B

LV

D . W

A T

E R

M A

IN

IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T S

_E A

S T

C H

IC

A

G O

_I N

.G P

J U

S _L

A B

.G D

T

/1 4/

9715 Kennedy Avenue, Highland, IN 46322 AASHTO T-11/T-27

Phone: 219-924-5231, Fax: 219-924-5271

Client: Sample ID. 12408-1

File No. 12408 Sample No. 1

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 1

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0.00 0.00 319.64 100.0 85-100 100 100

0.00 0.00 319.64 100.0 - - -

0.00 0.00 319.64 100.0 45-85 90-100

0.07 0.07 319.57 100.0 25-75 75-100

0.19 0.26 319.38 99.9 - - -

0.23 0.49 319.15 99.8 5-45 15-70 70-100

5.99 6.48 313.16 98.0 - - -

172.35 178.83 140.81 44.1 - - -

131.50 310.33 9.31 2.9 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 319.64

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

3/8-Inch

2-Inch

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/12/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-1 (1' - 7')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

Client: Sample ID. 12408-2

File No. 12408 Sample No. 2

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 2

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0.00 0.00 299.67 100.0 85-100 100 100

0.00 0.00 299.67 100.0 - - -

2.45 2.45 297.22 99.2 45-85 90-100

2.15 4.60 295.07 98.5 25-75 75-100

2.16 6.76 292.91 97.7 - - -

2.22 8.98 290.69 97.0 5-45 15-70 70-100

12.10 21.08 278.59 93.0 - - -

183.05 204.13 95.54 31.9 - - -

85.52 289.65 10.02 3.3 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 299.67

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/12/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-2 (3' - 7')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

3/8-Inch

2-Inch

Client: Sample ID. 12408-3

File No. 12408 Sample No. 3

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 3

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0.00 0.00 387.30 100.0 85-100 100 100

0.00 0.00 387.30 100.0 - - -

0.19 0.19 387.11 100.0 45-85 90-100

0.30 0.49 386.81 99.9 25-75 75-100

0.41 0.90 386.40 99.8 - - -

1.29 2.19 385.11 99.4 5-45 15-70 70-100

12.36 14.55 372.75 96.2 - - -

278.27 292.82 94.48 24.4 - - -

75.19 368.01 19.29 5.0 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 387.30

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/12/2018

Brown to Dark Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-3 (1' - 3')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

Client: Sample ID. 12408-4

File No. 12408 Sample No. 4

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 4

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0.00 0.00 268.80 100.0 85-100 100 100

0.00 0.00 268.80 100.0 - - -

1.64 1.64 267.16 99.4 45-85 90-100

3.76 5.40 263.40 98.0 25-75 75-100

4.83 10.23 258.57 96.2 - - -

4.23 14.46 254.34 94.6 5-45 15-70 70-100

11.24 25.70 243.10 90.4 - - -

187.28 212.98 55.82 20.8 - - -

44.00 256.98 11.82 4.4 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 268.8

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/11/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-4 (2' - 7')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

Client: Sample ID. 12408-5

File No. 12408 Sample No. 5

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 5

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0.00 0.00 349.15 100.0 85-100 100 100

0.00 0.00 349.15 100.0 - - -

0.35 0.35 348.80 99.9 45-85 90-100

0.46 0.81 348.34 99.8 25-75 75-100

1.36 2.17 346.98 99.4 - - -

2.04 4.21 344.94 98.8 5-45 15-70 70-100

19.82 24.03 325.12 93.1 - - -

272.07 296.10 53.05 15.2 - - -

42.31 338.41 10.74 3.1 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 349.15

Remarks:

Tested By: PP Reviewed By: TM

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/11/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-5 (2' - 7')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

Client: Sample ID. 12408-6

File No. 12408 Sample No. 6

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 6

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0 0.00 474.63 100.0 85-100 100 100

0 0.00 474.63 100.0 - - -

1.47 1.47 473.16 99.7 45-85 90-100

0.70 2.17 472.46 99.5 25-75 75-100

1.68 3.85 470.78 99.2 - - -

5.28 9.13 465.50 98.1 5-45 15-70 70-100

48.37 57.50 417.13 87.9 - - -

359.96 417.46 57.17 12.0 - - -

42.78 460.24 14.39 3.0 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 474.63

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

3/8-Inch

2-Inch

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/12/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-6 (2' - 7')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

Client: Sample ID. 12408-7

File No. 12408 Sample No. 7

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 7

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0 0.00 455.12 100.0 85-100 100 100

1.46 1.46 453.66 99.7 - - -

7.46 8.92 446.20 98.0 45-85 90-100

10.32 19.24 435.88 95.8 25-75 75-100

7.06 26.30 428.82 94.2 - - -

11.54 37.84 417.28 91.7 5-45 15-70 70-100

94.94 132.78 322.34 70.8 - - -

292.21 424.99 30.13 6.6 - - -

18.84 443.83 11.29 2.5 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 455.12

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/11/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-7 (2' - 5')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

Client: Sample ID. 12408-8

File No. 12408 Sample No. 8

Project Name: Indianapolis Blvd. Watermain Improvements Test No. 8

Sample Description: Date Received:

Sample Source: Date Tested:

Each Sieve Cummulative 1/2-Inch No. 4 No. 30

0.00 0.00 612.98 100.0 85-100 100 100

15.3 15.30 597.68 97.5 - - -

28.52 43.82 569.16 92.9 45-85 90-100

69.80 113.62 499.36 81.5 25-75 75-100

32.89 146.51 466.47 76.1 - - -

34.56 181.07 431.91 70.5 5-45 15-70 70-100

67.96 249.03 363.95 59.4 - - -

223.15 472.18 140.80 23.0 - - -

98.52 570.70 42.28 6.9 0-8.0 0-8.0 0-8.0

Total Sample Wt., gm: 612.98

Remarks: Sample meets the requirements of B-Borrow and #30 Structural Backfill

Tested By: KP Reviewed By: TM

15-60

25-75

70-100

Nominal Sizes and % Passing Specifications

1-Inch

No. 30

No. 50

No. 100

3-35

3/4-Inch

1/2-Inch

85-100

55-95

PAN

No. 4

No. 8

No 16

1-Inch

8/20/2018

9/11/2018

Brown Sand (A-3)

Boring RB-7 (5' - 7')

DLZ

11/2-Inch

STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIAL

0-8.0No. 200

Wt. Retrained (grams)

Sieve Size

(US Std.)

Total

Passing

Passing

K & S Engineers, Inc.

9715 Kennedy Avenue

Highland, IN 46322

(219) 924-5231 (phone)

(219) 924-5271 (fax) info@kandsengineers.com

General Qualifications

• This report has been prepared in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architect and/or engineer in the design of this project. The scope is limited to the specific project and location described herein. In the event that any changes in the design or location of the building as outlined in this report are planned, we should be informed so that changes can be reviewed and the conclusions of this report modified as necessary. We recommend that we be authorized to review the project plans and specifications within our scope of work to confirm that the recommendations contained in this report have been interpreted in accordance with our intent. Without this review, we will not be responsible for misinterpretation of our data, our analysis, and/or our recommendations, nor how these are incorporated into the final design.

• The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the location diagram and from any other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect any variations which may occur between these borings. In the performance of subsurface explorations, specific information is obtained at specific locations at specific times. However, it is a well-known fact that variations in soil and rock conditions exist on most sites between boring locations and also, such situations as groundwater levels vary from time to time. The nature and extent of variations may not become evident, it will be necessary for a re-evaluation of the recommendations of this report after performing on-site observations during construction period and noting the characteristics of any variations.

SECTI ON TABLE OF CONTENTS

DI VI SI ON 01 - GENERAL REQUI REMENTS

SECTI ON 01 10 00

GENERAL PROVI SI ONS

06/15

PART 1 GENERAL

1. 1 REFERENCES

1. 2 CERTI FI CATES OF COMPLI ANCE

1. 3 RESPONSI BLI TY OF THE CONTRACTOR

1. 4 SUBMI TTALS

1. 5 DRUG FREE WORKPLACE

1. 6 REAL ESTATE

1. 7 CONSTRUCTI ON SCHEDULE

1. 8 CONSTRUCTI ON PROGRESS PHOTOGRAPHS

1. 8. 1 Phot ogr aphi c Document at i on

1. 8. 1. 1 Di gi t al Phot ogr aphi c Medi a

1. 8. 2 Const r uct i on Compl et e Phot ogr aphs

1. 8. 3 Payment and Accept ance

1. 9 I NSPECTI ON

1. 10 CONDI TI ON OF EXI STI NG STRUCTURES

1. 11 PRESERVATI ON OF HI STORI CAL, ARCHAEOLOGI CAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

1. 12 MI NI MUM AMOUNT OF I NSURANCE REQUI RED

1. 13 TI ME EXTENSI ONS FOR UNUSUALLY SEVERE WEATHER

1. 14 PERMI TS AND RESPONSI BI LI TI ES

1. 15 COORDI NATI ON WI TH OTHERS

1. 16 SPECI AL SAFETY REQUI REMENTS

1. 17 ONE CALL SYSTEMS FOR EXCAVATORS

1. 18 ELECTRI CAL POWER LI NES

1. 19 BORROW/ DI SPOSAL SI TES AND QUARRI ES

1. 20 TAX EXEMPTI ON

1. 21 PROGRESS MEETI NGS

1. 22 VETERANS EMPLOYMENT EMPHASI S FOR U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGI NEERS

CCONTRACTS

1. 23 SECURI TY REQUI REMENTS

1. 23. 1 CLAUSE 2 - Access and Gener al Pr ot ect i on/ Secur i t y Pol i cy and

Procedures

1. 23. 2 CLAUSE 13 - Exposur e t o Cl assi f i ed and/ or Sensi t i ve Mat er i al s and/ or Sensi t i ve or Rest r i ct ed Ar eas

1. 23. 3 CLAUSE 15 - E- Ver i f y Pr ogr am

PART 2 PRODUCTS ( NOT USED)

PART 3 EXECUTI ON ( NOT USED)

- - End of Sect i on Tabl e of Cont ent s - -

SECTI ON 01 10 00 Page 1

SECTI ON 01 10 00

06/15

GENERAL PROVI SI ONS

PART 1 GENERAL

1. 1 REFERENCES

The publ i cat i ons l i s t ed bel ow f or m a par t of t hi s speci f i cat i on t o t he ext ent r ef er enced. The publ i cat i ons ar e r ef er r ed t o i n t he t ext by basi c desi gnat i on onl y.

U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGI NEERS ( USACE)

EM 385- 1- 1 ( 2014) Saf et y and Heal t h Requi r ement s Manual

1. 2 CERTI FI CATES OF COMPLI ANCE

Any cer t i f i cat es r equi r ed f or demonst r at i ng pr oof of compl i ance of mat er i al s wi t h speci f i cat i on r equi r ement s must be execut ed i n t wo copi es.

Each cer t i f i cat e must be s i gned by an of f i c i al aut hor i zed t o cer t i f y on behal f of t he manuf act ur i ng company and must cont ai n t he name and addr ess of t he Cont r act or , t he pr oj ect name and l ocat i on, and t he quant i t y and dat e or dat es of shi pment or del i ver y t o whi ch t he cer t i f i cat es appl y. Copi es of l abor at or y t est r epor t s submi t t ed wi t h cer t i f i cat es must cont ai n t he name and addr ess of t he t est i ng l abor at or y and t he dat e or dat es of t he t est s t o whi ch t he r epor t appl i es. Cer t i f i cat i on shal l not be const r ued as r el i evi ng t he Cont r act or f r om f ur ni shi ng sat i sf act or y mat er i al , i f , af t er t est s ar e per f or med on sel ect ed sampl es, t he mat er i al i s f ound not t o meet speci f i c r equi r ement s.

1. 3 RESPONSI BLI TY OF THE CONTRACTOR

The Cont r act or shal l be r esponsi bl e f or t he pr of essi onal qual i t y , t echni cal accur acy and t he coor di nat i on of al l desi gns, dr awi ngs and speci f i cat i ons f ur ni shed by t he Cont r act or under t hi s cont r act . The Cont r act or shal l , wi t hout addi t i onal compensat i on, cor r ect or r evi se desi gns, dr awi ngs and specifications.

Nei t her t he Gover nment ' s r evi ew, appr oval or accept ance of , nor payment f or , any of t he ser vi ces r equi r ed under t hi s cont r act shal l be const r ued t o oper at e as a wai ver of any r i ght s under t hi s cont r act or of any cause or act i on ar i s i ng out of t he per f or mance of t hi s cont r act , and t he Cont r act or shal l be and r emai n l i abl e t o t he Gover nment i n accor dance wi t h appl i cabl e l aw f or al l damages t o t he Gover nment caused by t he Cont r act or ' s negl i gence i n connect i on wi t h desi gns, dr awi ngs and speci f i cat i ons, f ur ni shed under t hi s cont r act .

The r i…