Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Medical and Dental Readiness Services
- Solicitation number
- W912L6-22-R-0003
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Past Performance Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Summary of Changes_28Mar22.pdf | ||
| RFI Log_24Mar22.pdf | ||
| W912L6-22-R-0003 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| W912L6-22-R-0003 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| W912L6-22-R-0003.pdf | ||
| W912L6-22-R-0003 Amendment 0001 Summary of Changes.pdf | ||
| W912L6-22-R-0003.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Date:
Solicitation #
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this Questionnaire and send by email to: joseph.b.jarvis.civ@army.mil
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
VENDOR
| 1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: |
| 2. CONTRACT NO.: |
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
Audio Visual Equipment and Programming Installation Services for Education Center.
Please add a continuation page if additional space necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (PCO/COTR/OTHER) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. DURATION OF BUSINESS RELATIONS WITH NAMED FIRM:
Please Circle the response code which best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VG = Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S = Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MG = Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or where not fully implemented.
US = Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’ corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/O = Not Observed
[Please Provide Comments to Identify Specific Strengths/Weaknesses in each area) see page 2.
A. Offerors Business Practices -
Business/Contracting Relations
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Problem Resolution
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Process Improvement
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Lesson Learned Incorporation
EX
VG
S
MG
B. Customer Relationship-
Cooperative Behavior
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Commitment to Customer Satisfaction
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Responsiveness
EX VG
S
MG
US
N/O
C. Ability to Successfully Perform-
Training
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Design, Development and Performance of Course
Instruction EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Course Curriculum
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Course benefit in work place EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
B. Prior Experience -
Personnel Technical Knowledge in subject EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
D. Adherence to Schedule -
Vendor adherence to scheduled dates
EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
E. Quality of Contractors Team-
Thoroughness EX
VG
S
MG
US
N/O
Accuracy EX
VG
S
MG
Overall Quality
EX
VG
S
MG
US
9. Overall Assessment: (a) EXCEPTIONAL (b) VERY GOOD (c) SATISFACTORY (d) MARGINAL (e) UNSATISFACTORY (f) NOT OBSERVED
10. Any unsatisfactory performance identified above has been shared with the contractor. ( ) Yes: written or oral ? ( ) No
PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO IDENTIFY:
a. Specific Strengths/Weaknesses Related to Part 8 Above -- Please Cite the Alpha-Numeric Criteria Code.
b. Two or Three Best Corporate "Traits" or Skills Observed.
c. Any Areas of Performance that are the Most "Troublesome".
Please add a continuation page for comments
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .