Amendment W912KC22R0006_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Adjustment of numbering for each Clin.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Mar-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912KC22R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Feb-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Mar-2022

CODE

USPFO FOR PENNSYLVANIA

ATTENTION: DEPT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFF

: P & C, RM#242,

FORT INDIANTOWN GAP PA 17003-5003

W912KC 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912KC22R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 1001

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0003.

CLIN 1002

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0004.

CLIN 2001

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0005.

CLIN 2002

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0006.

CLIN 3001

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0007.

CLIN 3002

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0008.

CLIN 4001

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0009.

CLIN 4002

This CLIN has been renumbered to CLIN 0010.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0003 has been added:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2023 TO

31-MAR-2024

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230 FOB: Destination

W90LL4

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0004 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2023 TO

31-MAR-2024

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0005 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2024 TO

31-MAR-2025

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0006 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2024 TO

31-MAR-2025

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0007 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2025 TO

31-MAR-2026

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0008 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2025 TO

31-MAR-2026

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0009 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2026 TO

31-MAR-2027

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0010 has been added:

CAGE

POP 01-APR-2026 TO

31-MAR-2027

N/A W90LL4 - USPFO FOR PA

CARRIE PICONE

BLDG 0 48 FISHER AVE

FT INDIANTOWN GAP

ANNVILLE PA 17003-5003

717-861-8230

The following have been modified:

ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS

1. The USPFO for PA, Purchasing and Contracting Division will issue Delivery Orders on a Monthly basis.

2. Individuals authorized to issue Deliver Orders are:

Terry L. Fetterman Denise M. Keim Geoffrey A. Janavaris Robert D. Wenner Jr Steve Sisneros

3. Individuals authorized to place orders under the web based Automated Rations Program and Automated Food Management Information System (AFMIS) may place subsistence orders against the monthly Delivery Orders via those systems. See SOW Paragraph 4.1.6.

4. The COR and Contractor shall monitor fund balance of Delivery Order to ensure orders place do not exceed available funds.

5. Delivery Orders may be placed by customers outside the PAARNG with prior, written approval of a KO of the PANG. All requests must be submitted to the contracting office for review and approval prior to the contractor accepting a delivery order. See SOW Paragraph 4.1.7.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Award will be based on the lowest price, technically acceptable (LPTA) offer in accordance with FAR 15.101-2.

While the Government and the Source Selection Authority will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process, by its nature, is subjective, and therefore, professional judgement is implicit throughout the entire evaluation process.

Noncompliance with the RFP requirements may raise serious questions regarding an offeror’s technical ability, past performance and/or pricing, and may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award.

Failure to include all information requested may adversely affect the evaluation. Failure to address any factor or any technical subfactor shall be grounds for elimination from evaluation and consideration for award. A proposal which merely reiterates or promises to accomplish the requirements of the RFP will be considered unacceptable. A proposal which is orderly and sufficiently documented will enable the Government to perform a thorough and fair evaluation.

The factors to be considered when determining LPTA are as follows:

Factor 1: Technical. The technical factor is further divided into the following subfactors:

a. Facility Management

b. Products

c. Management

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Price

Proposals are evaluated for acceptability, not ranked using non-price factors/subfactors. All non-price factors/subfactors must receive an “acceptable” rating to continue further in the competition.

Technical capability will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. An offeror shall obtain an “acceptable” rating to continue further in the competition. Offerors who are deemed to merit an “unacceptable” rating will be removed from further consideration for award.

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

Facility Management: The Government will provide a Government Owned Contractor Operated (GOCO) facility.

Specifically; a 47,093 Square feet Dry/Cold Storage Warehouse, including furnished office space and limited Material Handling Equipment (MHE). To be considered “acceptable” the offeror’s proposal must acknowledge the Government facilities do support the requirements, or state in the proposal the offeror’s proposed course of action (COA), with specific facts, for any action needed to mitigate limitations the current Government facilities present so the offeror can fully support the requirements. Proposal with any COA which entails structural change to the Government facility will not be considered. To be considered “Acceptable” the proposal must demonstrate an understanding of the requirement and capability of fulfilling multiple orders, from the Government facility, with on-time delivery to multiple locations during the same time period. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s understanding of the contract requirements, and determine to what degree they are able to meet contract requirements.

To be considered “Acceptable” the offeror’s proposal will address their specific operational use of the Government facilities. The offeror’s proposal will acknowledge any current Material Handling Equipment (MHE) that is currently located in the Government facility which does not allow the offeror to meet the requirements will require the offeror to supply their own MHE. The offeror’s proposal will acknowledge use of the Government facilities for any other purpose not associated with the contract requirements is unauthorized without the written consent of the KO. This includes, in the event, the offeror has a current existing Government Contract or intent to pursue any other future Government Contract, in which the utilization of the Government facilities associated with this contract requirement could potentially be in the best interest of the Government, it must first be routed through the KO.

Products: To be considered acceptable, the narrative shall demonstrate an offeror’s understanding of the requirements.

Emphasis will be placed on required menu items offered, including any exclusions or exceptions which cannot be fulfilled, quality of offerings in meeting required Federal, State, DoD, or Army standards with regards to brand name/nationally recognizable products, labeling and packaging of products and minimizing waste for delivery locations which have limited storage space. The vendor shall demonstrate knowledge of the USDA/FDA quality programs as follows:

For meat, fish, poultry, and egg products, reference the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) “Security Guidelines for Food Processors” at the following website:

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/topics/SecurityGuide.pdf.

Information for the transportation and distribution of meat, poultry, and egg products is found at the following website http://www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/topics/transportguide.htm.

For fruits, vegetables, shell eggs, and other food products regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), reference FDA’s “Food Producers, Processors, and Transporters: Food Security Preventive Measures Guidance” dated October, 2007 at the following website:

http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodDefense/FoodSecurity/default.htm.

For dairy, grain, and oilseed products see quality assurance requirements in commodity requirements documents at the following website: https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs.

Management: To be considered acceptable, the proposal demonstrates the ability to successfully manage ordering and distribution processes necessary to meet contract requirements. Proposal demonstrates acceptable ordering and distributing processes to ensure the ability to accept orders by quantity of meals, break down the menu into required ingredient quantities, timely delivery to all locations identified and replacement for short shipments or rejected items.

Furthermore, the proposal demonstrates availability of qualified key personnel during requirement time periods capable of supporting this requirement

Past Performance: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the statement of work (SOW).

The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the offeror's probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror's record of relevant and current past performance information that pertain to the products and services outlined in the solicitation requirements. The Past Performance evaluation will consider such things as an offeror's business practices, customer relationship, and ability to successfully perform as proposed. In assessing performance confidence, the evaluator may: (1) use data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources; from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; (2) interview Program/Project Managers or Contracting Officers, or rely upon personal business experience with the offeror; (3) contact references identified in the contractor’s proposal; and (5) consider any information the offeror submits which explains any problems encountered on the identified contract and the offeror's corrective actions. The Government reserves the rights to obtain and evaluate past performance information from any source it deems appropriate.

The evaluation will take into account Past Performance information regarding predecessor companies, key qualified personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. The term “Qualified Personnel” means managers or workers preferably with past experience in a cold storage / refrigerated food warehousing environment.

The evaluation will also consider information provided relative to corrective actions taken to resolve problems on past or existing contracts.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable.

If award will be made without conducting discussions, offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposals, e.g., the relevance of an offeror's past performance information and adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond, or to resolve minor clerical errors.

“Current” means performance occurring within the last three (3) years for the period beginning three years prior to the solicitation release date. Within this period, performance occurring later in the period may have greater significance than work occurring earlier in the period.

In assessing “relevancy” of an offeror’s previous contracts, the Government may evaluate an offeror’s past performance for similarity of scope, magnitude of effort and complexity of work performed to those required for the proposed effort. The more relevant the project, the greater confidence there will be in the past performance assessment as a predictor of future performance.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (Neutral).

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Price. All prices submitted on the Pricing Schedule attachment will be evaluated to determine price reasonableness.

In determining the lowest price, the total overall proposed pricing submitted for the pricing order model (Sample Monthly Delivery) will be evaluated, along with the consolidated price list.

Prices from the pricing schedule shall be used on the pricing order model. All offers will be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. Offers may be rejected if it is determined the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

The Government will examine price proposals for artificially low unit prices. Offers found to be unreasonably high or unrealistically low (an indication of a “buy-in”) may be considered unacceptable and may be rejected on that basis.

The Government reserves the right to obtain additional information concerning the price (cost) as necessary to obtain a better understanding of the price proposed. No proposal revisions will be allowed under these conditions. Request for such information is for clarification purposes only. This does not constitute and shall not be construed as discussions. If a minor clerical error has occurred, the offeror may be given an opportunity to correct the minor error within the constraints of the "clarifications" process. The Contracting Officer in his/her sole discretion may later determine discussions to be necessary or appropriate.

In the event the Government does not award a contract pursuant to this solicitation within 90 calendar days after receipt of proposals and award will be made without discussions, the following will apply: The Government reserves the right to allow offerors to make an adjustment in their price proposals to accommodate cost changes caused by market conditions. The Contracting Officer will notify Offerors, normally by electronic mail (email) of a common closing date for receipt of the adjusted price proposals. No additional proposal revisions will be allowed under these conditions. This does not constitute and shall not be construed as discussions. If a minor clerical error has occurred, in which case the offeror may be given an opportunity to correct the minor error within the constraints of the "clarifications" process or the Contracting Officer in his/her sole discretion later determines discussions to be necessary or appropriate.

Technical and past performance, when combined, are equal in importance to price.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)