amd4.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

A. CONTRACT CHANGES:

(1) Add site visit notes and sign-in sheet

(2) Change the proposal due date from 18 April 2017 at 2:00 PM EST to 21 April 2017 at 02:00 PM EST B. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES: The revised Section listed below (revised by Amendment No. 0004) is hereby added to and made a part of the solicitation. Revised or added information is underlined and deleted information is struck out. Revisions can be located in the appropriate volume of specifications by searching for an asterisk and amendment number (i.e., *1). Revised Section 01 10 00 C. CONTRACT DRAWINGS: There are no draw ing changes w ith this amendment. bldg. 3240 and 3245 IFC draw ings and specs FIO (For Information Only) w ill be sent to Phase II Offerors via DVD.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Apr-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HN-15-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Dec-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Apr-2017

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT SAVANNAH

100 W OGLETHORPE AVENUE

SAVANNAH GA 31401-3640

W912HN 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912HN-15-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 00 00 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

The required response date/time has changed from 18-Apr-2017 02:00 PM to 21-Apr-2017 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

PHASE II

SECTION 00 21 00

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

FOR PHASE II

1. DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

1.1 Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for General Construction and Design/Build Construction is intended to provide rapid response for General Construction: rehabilitation, building additions, maintenance or repair of situations relating, but not limited to: site work, mechanical systems, plumbing, utility systems, structural, architectural, electrical, HVAC, instrumentation, security and safety areas of barracks or administrative facilities in a cost effective manner. Work requiring the use of civil funds is not allowed. Work may include, but not be limited to:

1.2 Building Renovation and Additions:

1.2.1. Provide design-build or design-bid-build construction, rehabilitation, renovation for major renovation repair of facilities that will have a 25 year useful life before needing replacement in accordance with regulations and applicable codes. The following types of facilities or their equivalent or similar commercial or institutional types may include but not be limited to: Administrative Office Buildings & Barracks. Work may include:

1.2.1.2. Building additions or renovations to include: floors, ceilings, walls, windows, doors, carpentry, IT upgrades, electrical (e.g. lights & power), mechanical upgrades (e.g. HVAC, controls), furniture incidental to construction (e.g. workstations), lead, asbestos and mold remediation, interior and/or exterior painting, surface deterioration (e.g. patching drywall, replacing siding, trim work, etc).

1.2.2. Work can also include:

1.2.2.1. Roofs: Replacement and repair of roof and roofing systems. Work may include gutters, downspouts, flashing, fascia and soffits. Incidental damage (e.g. ceiling replacement, painting and carpet cleaning) as a result of roof leaks.

1.2.2.2. Anti-Terrorism Force Protection: Building and site security (e.g. site layout, security design, security equipment, threat development, level of protection, and design constraints and communications)

1.2.2.3. Mechanical/Electrical Construction: HVAC systems, plumbing systems, waste water drainage systems, fire alarm, fire protection sprinkler systems, fire suppression systems, back flow preventers, all devices, equipment and components associated with constructing and installing these systems. Work can also include, but not be limited to the following: Installation of mass notification, fire detection systems, DDC Controls systems, underground high temperature lines, medium temperature lines, chill water distribution systems, variable frequency controls on HVAC systems, testing, adjusting, and balancing of HVAC systems, troubleshooting and re-commissioning of existing DDC/HVAC systems, design and installation of computer room HVAC systems, commissioning of building systems and pumping systems.

1.2.3.4. Interior and exterior utility systems: high and low voltage electrical lines, communication systems (telephone & data lines), security & security camera systems and cabling. Natural gas, water, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and propane gas lines, emergency generator systems, automatic transfer switches, and emergency power connections into existing electrical systems.

1.2.3.5. Horizontal: Streets, concrete aprons, sidewalks, storm drainage, landscaping, sodding, parking lots, traffic lines and traffic markings. Including but not be limited to:

Site preparation, earthwork, grading, clearing & grubbing, surveying, fencing, drainage systems, storm water management and erosion control.

1.2.3.6. Incidental Work:

1.2.3.6.1. New construction, renovation, rehabilitation repair or demolition services incidental to the tasks performed in any of the above paragraphs. This work shall include, but is not be limited to: carpentry, painting, signage, lighting, and similar electrical work that may be required to provide a complete, safe and usable facility during and after the course of building construction, roofing, mechanical, plumbing, painting or paving services.

1.2.3.6.2. Testing, reports and surveys associated with new construction, renovation, rehabilitation of, repairs and additions to, buildings (including mold, lead and asbestos), structures, roads (including traffic/pedestrian patterns), drainage systems, mechanical systems and utility systems.

1.2.3.7. Restrictions: Task orders for design only or demolition only shall not be placed against the contract.

1.3. The purpose of the Source Selection plan is to establish a uniform evaluation procedure for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Source Selection Authority (SSA) using the Trade-Off Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-1). In as much as the proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform any resulting contract, and task orders issued there under, the proposal should be specific and complete in every detail as well as be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract and task orders issued thereafter.

1.4 For the purposes of this solicitation amendment, the Government will implement Phase II of Design Build Process. The Government has completed the evaluation of all of the offerors performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described for Phase I. The Government has selected eight (8) of the most highly qualified Offerors to participate in Phase II.

1.5 This is Phase II of the solicitation process and the Government will evaluate both technical capability and price.

1.6 Only those Offerors who have received written notification from the Savannah

District Contracting Officer that their firm has been selected to participate in Phase II of this solicitation will be permitted to a proposal. The technical requirements package for the Seed Task Order, Project Number PN69750 is attached to this solicitation.

2. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT:

2.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

2.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one binder is used, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

2.3 Electronic Matter Submissions. In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format. Offerors may use compressions utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission. Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 14 of Standard Form 30 or listed elsewhere in the solicitation.

Title the file(s) in the following format:

W912HN-15-R-0002_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME I

W912HN-15-R-0002_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME II

Submit the Price and Technical proposals electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website at: https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE/.At the AMRDEC SAFE website select the link: I do not have a CAC or this machine is not configured to read my CAC and I would like to access SAFE as a Guest User, to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s).

[Note: It has been reported that documents are more quickly uploaded into the AMRDEC SAFE website when using a Firefox web browser. The Government cannot verify that this is true and offers no guarantee that offerors will have more success utilizing any particular browser.]

When your proposal is submitted via the AMRDEC SAFE website, the website will provide notification of the submittal to the Government recipients. When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, you will be required to enter e-mail addresses for the recipients. For this solicitation, the recipients will be the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist. The Contract Specialist for this project is Ms. Gosia M. Thompson, whose e-mail address is Gosia.m.thompson@usace.army.mil.

The Contracting Officer for this project is Ms. Nina Crow, whose e-mail address is nina.g.crow@usace.army.mil. These e-mail addresses are the ones you will enter as recipients.

In addition, after uploading your documents, you will be required to verify your email address before AMRDEC will send notification to the Government recipients. This is a very important step – even if you successfully upload your proposal to AMRDEC SAFE, notification will not be sent to the Government until you verify your email address, which may result in the rejection of your proposal for lateness. Follow the instructions on the AMRDEC website and the confirmation emails you receive from AMRDEC.

Proposal Due Date and Time:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN-15-R-0002 Due Date of Proposal: 21 April 2017 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 P.M. (Eastern time)

Title of Project: TBUP MATOC

The date and time of delivery will be established by the time of receipt of the e-mail notification to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer by the AMRDEC SAFE website, not by the date and time of uploading of the proposal into the AMRDEC SAFE website. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous – in fact, it can take several minutes or even hours in some cases. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal. If an electronic submission is uploaded minutes before the deadline but notification is not actually received in the recipients’ e-mail inboxes until after the deadline, the submission will be considered late.

The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient of proposals. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

2.4. Number of Copies. Offerors SHALL submit an electronic version (PDF Format) of the original Volume I and Volume II. Offerors SHALL submit only two files in PDF format (i.e. Volume I and Volume II). These two files should be named in a specific format: Solicitation Number, Offerors Company and the volume (i.e. W912HN-15-R- 0002_USACE_VolumeI.pdf). Given the limited time and resources of the evaluation board, failure to provide proposal in the correct format may hinder the board's ability to evaluate the Offeror's proposal.

3. PHASE II – PROPOSAL TABBING REQUIREMENTS. Phase II proposals from selected Offerors shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph 2 and shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

3.1 VOLUME I – CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND PRICE PROPOSAL

TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror. Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture.

TAB B – Proposal Pricing Schedule, Section 00 00 10—Schedule B, Seed Task Order Pricing

TAB C – Bid Bond – See Clause 52.228-1 and any other notes, for required bond information. The Offeror is required to submit a bid bond for the seed task order. Any bid bond found to be insufficient may affect an Offeror’s responsibility determination.

Photocopied, scanned or facsimile bonds will not be accepted.

Bid Bond Due Date and Time:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN-15-R-0002 Due Date of Proposal: 21 April 2017 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 P.M. (Eastern time)

Title of Project: TBUP MATOC

The original bid bond must be mailed via USPS to:

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SAVANNAH

ATTN: CECT-SAS-E (Gosia M. Thompson)

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVE.

SAVANNAH, GA 31401

The package must be clearly identified with the Offeror’s name, address, and the solicitation number.

3.2 VOLUME II – TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

TAB D – PHASE II FACTOR 3 – Design Technical - Building Function and Aesthetics

TAB E – PHASE II FACTOR 4 – Design Technical Approach - Quality of Building Systems

4. TAB D — PHASE II FACTOR 3 – DESIGN TECHNICAL - BUILDING FUNCTION

AND AESTHETICS

4.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1. Presentation Drawings

a. Presentation exterior elevations of each facility clearly noting proposed materials and colors.

b. Presentation interior of the facility clearly noting proposed materials and colors.

c. A color board including primary interior and exterior finish materials.

4.1.2. Technical Approach Narratives.

a. Provide technical approach narratives, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. Preface the narratives with a design concepts narrative, providing the design rationale and basis of the proposal.

Whether individual narratives or a single combined narrative is provided, the maximum total length for narratives under this technical section shall not exceed eight (8) pages.

b. Architectural Theme and Materials. This narrative is separate from the narrative above and shall not exceed two (2) pages. Describe the architectural themes of the various facilities and spaces which demonstrate how the proposal achieves the results desired by the Statement of Work of the seed project. Narrative should address how the selection of materials and colors enhances the exterior and interior aesthetics of the facilities and improves the living and/or working conditions for the soldier populations who will utilize the facilities. This narrative is not intended to be a material listing, but to explain/reflect how the selections were made and how they address the requirements.

4.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

4.2.1. PHASE II - FACTOR 3 – DESIGN TECHNICAL - BUILDING FUNCTION AND

AESTHETICS: The following elements will be evaluated:

4.2.1.1. Do the facilities provide acceptable life safety and fire safety measures?

4.2.1.2. Building Aesthetics: This element considers the overall “appeal” of the facility and the desire that both the interior and exterior of the facilities present a professional, attractive appearance. The following will be considered under this component:

a. Exterior Considerations:

1) Proposals shall be evaluated on design of facades, roof lines, and delineation of entrances, proportions of fenestration in relation to elevations, shade and shadow effects, materials, textures, exterior color schemes.

2) Is the building complimentary of the adjacent structures? Is the building an attractive addition to the installation? How well does the building harmonize with its environment, including surrounding facilities?

b. Interior Considerations:

1) Are the proposed colors and material finishes conducive to the working environment of the facility?

2) For administrative areas, does the interior design provided establish a positive working environment?

3) Has the proposal addressed/provided for natural and artificial light in the living and working spaces and is the arrangement of fenestration and lighting fixtures in the spaces conducive to furniture placement and space usage?

4) Do the proposed ceiling material, elevation, and design enhance the environment?

5) Has “support item” placement been considered and addressed in the proposal to enhance the environment? For example: placement of supply/exhaust devices, placement of electrical panels, and placement of exhaust fans, etc.

6) Does the proposals provide for acoustic control of noise from service/support spaces to administrative areas?

5. TAB E – PHASE II - FACTOR 4 – DESIGN TECHNICAL APPROACH - QUALITY OF

BUILDING SYSTEMS

5.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Presentation Drawings. There are no specific drawings requirements for this TECHNICAL SECTION. However, the Offeror has the option of providing concept level drawing information for specific materials and/or systems which the Offeror feels are necessary to describe the proposed systems or materials.

b. Technical Approach Narratives. Provide technical approach narrative, both qualitative and quantitative, defining the elements of the proposal. It is acceptable to include all the elements below into a single combined narrative for the entire facility. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that all aspects identified in the evaluation criteria below are addressed. Whether individual narratives or a single combined narrative is provided, the maximum total length for narratives under this-TECHNICAL SECTION shall not exceed eight (8) typewritten pages:

c. Architectural Finishes: Describe how the materials selected provide for a suitable environment for the expected population of the facility. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on aesthetics, durability and maintenance of the finishes proposed.

d. Mechanical Systems: Describe how the mechanical systems selected provide for a highly efficient environmental control system including information about provisions for indoor air quality maintenance. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, limiting energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

e. Plumbing Systems: Describe how the plumbing systems selected provide for a highly efficient domestic hot water system and an efficient piping system.

Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

f. Electrical Systems: Describe how the electrical power and lighting systems, telephone, data, and cable television systems selected provide for a highly efficient electrical system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements. Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations, energy consumption, and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage.

g. Site Utilities and Site Systems: Describe how the site utility systems selected provide for an efficient piping system. Discuss how these selections provide value to the Government and how they address the minimum requirements.

Narrative should focus on maintenance considerations and suitability of the proposed systems for the expected usage. Include information regarding coordination with privatized utility providers where applicable.

h. Interoperability: Describe how systems integrated into the new facilities which require connection and interface with existing installation wide systems will be accommodated in the proposed project. Narrative should address the following systems as minimum: Fire Alarm, Telephone, Cable Television, UMCS, and privatized utility companies where applicable.

i. Energy Conservation: Describe the strategy to achieve required energy savings as specified in the RFP.

j. ATFP Considerations: Describe how the proposed materials, systems, and designs address the mandatory building ATFP requirements included in the Statement of Work.

k. Proposed Material Identifications: In order to evaluate and rate the quality of the materials being proposed, including any material or equipment warranties exceeding the one year warranty in the contract clause “Warranty of Construction”, the Offeror shall include in the proposal material identification for major materials in each of the areas shown below:

1) Architectural Finishes

2) Interior Walls

3) Floors

4) Ceilings

5) Exterior Walls

6) Window systems/types (not individual windows)

7) Roofing Systems

8) Mechanical Systems

9) Central Heating/Cooling Equipment

10) Pumps

11) Air Handling Equipment

12) HVAC System Control Equipment

13) Energy Conservation Features

14) Plumbing Systems

15) Domestic Hot Water Generator

16) Electrical Systems

17) Main Switchgear and Panels

18) Data, Telephone, Cable TV, Intercom, CCTV, or Other Special

Systems as Identified in the SOW

l. The Government will evaluate and consider materials and equipment proposed by brand name and model number as a quality standard. Unless substitution of a manufacturer, brand name or model is otherwise specifically prohibited in the contract, if the successful Offeror desires to substitute manufacturers, brand names or models after award, the substituted product must meet the contract requirements and be approved by the designer of record and the Government as equal in function, performance, quality and salient features to that initially proposed.

m. Acceptance of the proposal is not a guarantee that the proposed products meet the contractual requirements.

5.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.2.1. PHASE II FACTOR 4 – DESIGN TECHNICAL APPROACH - QUALITY OF

BUILDING SYSTEMS:

a. It is the Army's objective that these buildings will have a 50 year useful life.

The design and construction should provide an appropriate level of quality to ensure the continued use of the facility over that time period with the application of reasonable preventive maintenance and repairs that would be industry-acceptable to a major civilian sector project OWNER. The facility design should consider that the Army may repurpose the use of the facility over the 50 year life. Within that overriding theme the Government will evaluate the Offeror selected systems and components proposed in terms of warranties provided, maintenance considerations (frequency, estimated cost, access, equipment locations), operability (ease of use, placement of control features, simplicity), durability (withstand troop usage, ease of cleaning), sustainability, and energy consumption (HVAC, lighting, power, etc.). The minimum acceptable level of quality for finishes and materials for these buildings are those materials suitable for the expected population and usage.

Residential or similar grade finishes and materials are not acceptable for inclusion in these buildings.

1) The Government encourages the Offeror place emphasis on those design features which optimize and emphasize functional/operational requirements; interior/exterior finishes and systems; and life cycle/ energy efficiency. The following items will be considered in the evaluation of the building systems and materials of the various facilities:

2) Architectural Finishes. Satisfactory proposals include finishes which provide usable spaces for the intended purposes. Proposals will receive additional consideration for materials offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

3) Architectural Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

4) Mechanical Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic environmental control function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, reduce energy consumption, sustainability, maintainability (cyclical maintenance, access, equipment placement), and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

5) Plumbing Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary.

Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

6) Electrical Components and Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary.

Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, sustainability, durability (stand up to troop usage), have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

7) ATFP Considerations. This consideration verifies the inclusion/compliance with the building related (laminate windows, design for progressive collapse, etc.) ATFP minimum standard constraints included in the Statement of Work. All proposals must be compliant with the ATFP requirements of the Statement of Work to be considered for award. Satisfactory proposals are compliant with all ATFP requirements.

8) Site Utilities Components and Site Systems. Satisfactory proposals include components and systems that provide the basic function necessary. Proposals will receive additional consideration for components and systems offered that include extended warranties, longer life expectancies, and sustainability, have low maintenance requirements, and enhance the overall life cycle cost efficiency of the facility.

9) Energy Conservation: Proposals will receive a Satisfactory rating if they describe a feasible strategy to achieve required energy savings stated in the RFP.

5.3. Factor 3 Design Technical Building Function and Aesthetics and Factor 4 Design Technical Approach – Quality of Building Systems will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions.

5.3.1. OUTSTANDING - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

5.3.2. GOOD - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

5.3.3. ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

5.3.4. MARGINAL - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

5.3.5. UNACCEPTABLE - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

6. PHASE II – PROPOSAL EVALUATION.

6.1. The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, proposal corrections and any information obtained from other sources, e.g.

past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

6.2. Each member of the SSEB will independently consider all information provided in the proposal. Once these individual analyses are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor. It is the responsibility of each member of the SSEB to provide and document sufficient strengths, weaknesses, and/or deficiencies to support the assigned rating for each factor. Comments are required for all ratings.

6.3. The final ratings on individual factors, to include all support documentation, will be provided to the Source Selection Authority. The Source Selection Authority, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will determine which Offeror, if any, will receive the contract award.

7. EXCEPTIONS. Exceptions to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation (e.g., standard company terms and conditions) may result in a determination to reject a proposal.

8. RESTRICTIONS. Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

9. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF FACTORS

FACTOR 3 (Design Technical - Building Function and Aesthetics) will be equal in importance to FACTOR 1 (Past Performance) and both are more important than FACTOR 2 (Design Experience) and FACTOR 4 (Design Technical Approach - Quality of Building Systems).

FACTOR 4 – (Design Technical Approach - Quality of Building Systems) is more important than FACTOR 2 (Design Experience).

All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined are more important than PRICE

10. PHASE II FACTOR 5 - PRICE.

10.1. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in establishing the competitive range prior to discussions (if held) and in making the best value decision for award of any resultant contract(s). It will be evaluated for reasonableness as well. Bonding rate, home office overhead, and field office overhead rates for firm fixed price type task orders shall be proposed and submitted on the Task Order. These rates will be binding throughout the entire period of the MATOC. Pricing for the Seed Task Order shall be completed and submitted on the task order pricing schedule shown at section 00010- Schedule B of the solicitation.

10.2. The Government will perform a price analysis on all proposals received for the seed task order. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine fairness and reasonableness. Historical price information, competitive price information, the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), or any other pricing tool as necessary will be utilized in this analysis. The evaluation will determine the extent to which the price proposal is consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Offerors are advised that any offer wherein pricing is deemed unfair or unreasonable will be rendered ineligible for award.

11. BASIS FOR AWARD

11.1. Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include capability in accordance with the evaluation criteria and responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.104.

11.2. In order to determine which proposals represent the best value, a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in this RFP will be conducted, and in turn, the Government will compare proposals to one another. The Government will award up to 5 contracts to the responsible Offerors whose technical submittal and price proposal contains the combination of those criteria described in this document offering the best value to the Government.

11.3. The successful Offerors, if any, will be awarded a MATOC with a maximum quantity of $245 Million and a $2,500.00 guaranteed minimum for the base ordering period.

11.4. For the Seed Task Order, the Government will award the task order to the responsible Offeror selected for award of a MATOC whose technical submittal and price proposal contain the combination of those criteria described in this document offering the best value to the Government. . The Government shall use the total as the evaluated price for making the best value determination for award of the Seed Task Order. Award of the Seed Task Order cannot be made if the price exceeds the statutory limitation and will be stated in the Task Order Notes. Contract award will be made in accordance with FAR 52.215-1.

11.5. As technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between proposals are of increased importance in determining the most advantageous proposal. Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in scoring and relative advantages and disadvantages between proposals are of increased importance to the determination.

11.6. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest reasonably priced Offeror. The right is also reserved to reject any and all offers.

11.7. Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer.

SECTION 00 30 00 - AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The following have been added by full text:

SITE VISIT INFORMATION

Site Visit notes

Bldg. 3335 Starship Barracks Site Visit 30 MAR 17

Meeting with Phase II Offerors, DPW POC, Resident Office USACE POC and USACE PM

Reviewed the requirements of the RFP and at that time stated how we would be expecting proposals on

18 APR 2017.

Stated that all questions concerning the project and contract in general would be addressed through

ProjNet Bidder Inquiries.

Walked through the Bldg. 3335 sleeping bays, company operations areas, central corridors, mechanical rooms, electrical rooms, large classrooms, laundry rooms, bathrooms, BEQ rooms above the BN HQ and viewed all exterior of the building and central flat roof areas.

Made note of a few questions concerning floor finishes, CTA Ceiling finishes, window shading, large classroom subdivision and ice machines that were later input into ProjNet Bidder Inquiry and have been or are in the process of being answered.

Proceeded with the group to Bldg. 3240 for a walk through of a finished Starship Barracks that the customer was very happy with.

Toured 3240 sleeping bays, one of the large classrooms, mechanical rooms, electrical rooms, bathrooms, BEQ area above the BN HQ, exterior of the building, chiller yard for the building and the corridors of the building.

Allowed all Offerors the chance to drive by the exterior stairs on Bldg. 3245 to see what is desired on

Bldg. 3335.

Mentioned a follow up site visit which was confirmed in ProjNet Bidder Inquiries and was 5 APR 2017 from 0800 to 1200.

(End of Summary of Changes)