Amendment_0003_W912ES16R0002.pdf

W81G6753364421

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See the "Summary of Changes"/Block 14 Continuation Sheet for the purpose of this amendment.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Aug-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912ES-16-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Jul-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Aug-2016

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE - ST. PAUL

180 5TH STREET E SUITE 700

ST. PAUL MN 55101-1678

W912ES 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912ES-16-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 3

The purpose of this amendment is as follows:

1. The last paragraph of Section A. Basis of Award in local provision 52.215-4005-Preparation and Evaluation of Proposals (Construction) has been revised. Deletions are not shown. Changes are highlighted in yellow below.

2. The first paragraph of Section B. Proposal Submission Requirements in local provision 52.215-4005- Preparation and Evaluation of Proposals (Construction) has been revised. Deletions are not shown.

Changes are highlighted in yellow below.

3. The Key Personnel clause in section 00 80 00 has been deleted and replaced in its entirety with a new local clause entitled “Approved Substitutions”.

4. The bid schedule is hereby replaced in its entirety with a new bid schedule entitled “Amendment 3 Bid Schedule”. All changes are highlighted in yellow.

5. Revise drawing number CS304 that was incorrectly labeled “Approach Slab”. This drawing now refers to Foundation Slabs 1A and 1B and is attached in one full size and one half size drawing.

6. Revise drawing number CS505 that was incorrectly labeled “Approach Slab”. This drawing now refers to Foundation Slab and is attached in one full size and one half size drawing.

7. The geotechnical report noted in Section 31 32 13.00 12; 1.10 Job Conditions is attached and entitled “Amendment 3 Geotechnical Report”.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The Issued By organization has changed from

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE - ST PAUL

180 5TH STREET EAST

SUITE 700

ST. PAUL MN 55101-1678

to

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE - ST. PAUL

180 5TH STREET E SUITE 700

ST. PAUL MN 55101-1678

CLIN 0011

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 17,900.00 from 1,100.00 to 19,000.00.

CLIN 0020

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 319,000.00 from 359,000.00 to 40,000.00.

CLIN 0021

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 144,000.00 from 162,000.00 to 18,000.00.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0011 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

POP 27-SEP-2016 TO

20-SEP-2020

N/A CITY OF WEST FARGO

EARNIE HANSON

117 8TH STREET WEST

WEST FARGO ND 58078

701 306 7057 FOB: Destination

WF

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

POP 27-SEP-2016 TO

20-SEP-2020

N/A CITY OF WEST FARGO

EARNIE HANSON

117 8TH STREET WEST

WEST FARGO ND 58078

701 306 7057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0020 has been changed from:

POP 27-SEP-2016 TO

20-SEP-2020

N/A CITY OF WEST FARGO

EARNIE HANSON

117 8TH STREET WEST

WEST FARGO ND 58078

701 306 7057

POP 27-SEP-2016 TO

20-SEP-2020

N/A CITY OF WEST FARGO

EARNIE HANSON

117 8TH STREET WEST

WEST FARGO ND 58078

701 306 7057

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0021 has been changed from:

POP 27-SEP-2016 TO

20-SEP-2020

N/A CITY OF WEST FARGO

EARNIE HANSON

117 8TH STREET WEST

WEST FARGO ND 58078

701 306 7057

POP 27-SEP-2016 TO

20-SEP-2020

N/A CITY OF WEST FARGO

EARNIE HANSON

117 8TH STREET WEST

WEST FARGO ND 58078

701 306 7057

AMENDMENT 3 BID SCHEDULE

Unit

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Total Price

0001 Performance and Payment Bonds 1 JOB

0002 Demolition 1 JOB

0003 Signs and Pavement Markings 1 JOB

0004 Care of Water 1 JOB 0005 Stripping 0005AA First 10,000 CY 10,000 CY 0005AB Over 10,000 CY 2,000 CY 0006 Inspection Trench 2,100 LF 0007 Ditch Excavation 2,000 CY 0008 Channel Excavation 0008AA First 330,000 CY 330,000 CY

0008AB Over 330,000 CY 80,000 CY 0009 Deep Mixing Method (DMM) 1 JOB 0010 Preload Removal 48,100 CY 0011 Granular Blanket Drain 19,000 TON 0012 Settlement Plates 6 EA 0013 Wick drains 265,000 LF 0014 Riprap R470 0014AA First 5,000 CY 5,000 CY 0014AB Over 5,000 CY 500 CY 0015 Riprap R140 0015AA First 11,000 CY 11,000 CY 0015AB Over 11,000 CY 2,500 CY 0016 Riprap R20 0016AA First 5,000 CY 5,000 CY 0016AB Over 5,000 CY 1,400 CY 0017 Bedding B1 0017AA First 2600 CY 2,600 CY 0017AB Over 2600 CY 600 CY 0018 Bedding B2 0018AA First 4000 CY 4,000 CY 0018AB Over 4000 CY 1,000 CY 0019 Bedding B3 0019AA First 1600 CY 1,600 CY 0019AB Over 1600 CY 300 CY 0020 Geotextile ‐ Type 1 40,000 SY 0021 Geotextile ‐ Type 2 18,000 SY 0022 Aggregate Surface 1,400 TON 0023 Topsoil Respread 0023AA First 40,000 CY 40,000 CY 0023AB Over 40,000 CY 5,500 CY 0024 Mulch for Preload Embankment 7 AC 0025 Seeding 90 AC 0026 Chainlink Fence 475 LF 0027 Pile Load Test 1 JOB 0028 Steel H‐Pile (HP 14x73) 0028AA First 44,000 LF 44,000 LF 0028AB Over 44,000 LF 11,600 LF 0029 Steel Sheet Pile 27,500 SF 0030 Structural ‐ Dam Walls 1 JOB 0031 Structural ‐ Control Structure/Stilling Basin 1 JOB 0032 Dam Wall Bridge Deck 1 JOB 0033 Bridge Beams 1 JOB 0034 Tainter Gates 1 JOB 0035 Trunnion Girder 1 JOB

0036 Gate Operating Equipment 1 JOB 0037 Structural ‐ Control Building 1 JOB 0038 Utility Service 1 JOB 0039 Electrical ‐ Parking Lot 1 JOB 0040 Electrical ‐ Control Building 1 JOB 0041 Electrical ‐ Structures 1 JOB 0042 PLC Control System 1 JOB 0043 Camera System 1 JOB 0044 Mechanical ‐ Control Building 1 JOB 0045 Site Work ‐ Control Building 1 JOB

Total Offer

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

52.215-4005 Preparation and Evaluation of Proposals (Construction)

A. Basis for Award:

Award will be made to the responsible offeror representing the best value based on the Lowest-Priced, Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal. Each technical evaluation factor and subfactor must be found to be “acceptable” in order for the proposal to be found technically acceptable. Proposals will not be ranked.

Award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable proposal. Firms may only submit one proposal. Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings are defined as follows:

Acceptable: Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The successful offeror’s Technical Proposal and any proposed subcontractors will be incorporated in any resulting contract. The successful contractor’s proposed schedule will be incorporated into the awarded contract. The incorporated Schedule dates will become enforceable contractual completion dates. The identified subcontractors must be used on the project.

It is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure the completeness of its proposal. The Government may evaluate solely on the information provided in the initial proposal and not assume that an offeror possesses any capability that is not specifically identified in the proposal. The Government intends to award without discussions.

Failure to submit mandatory information for a factor or subfactor, indicated by the word “shall” or similar verbiage in the solicitation, will result in a rating of “unacceptable” for that factor, and the offeror will be ineligible for award unless the Procuring Contracting Officer decides to hold discussions and includes the offeror in the competitive range.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s and their major subcontractors experience and certifications only.

If an offeror wishes to be credited with a subcontractor’s or supplier’s experience or certification, a letter of commitment signed by the subcontractor/supplier and the prime contractor (offeror) must be submitted with the proposal. The letter of commitment shall clearly state that the offeror and the subcontractor/supplier have committed to construct this project together if the offeror receives the contract award. In regard to Experience, if an offeror submits projects demonstrating experience in one of the factors, and that project was completed by a subcontractor, a subsidiary, or a supplier, as opposed to the offeror, the offeror MUST submit a signed letter of commitment from the contractor who performed and completed the work. If a letter of commitment is not submitted, the experience/certifications will not be considered.

B. Proposal Submission Requirements

The offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying digital copies as set forth below.

The offeror’s proposal shall consist of two volumes:

Volume I-Technical Proposal

Volume II-Price Proposal

All pages in the Technical Proposal containing text in response to this RFP shall be consecutively numbered, type-written on 8½ x 11 inch paper with margins of at least one inch, double sided, and created using a font no smaller than 12 with a maximum of 30 double-sided pages. Printing shall be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape. These formatting and page limitation requirements do not apply to 1) the Schedule; 2) Attachment 1 (Experience Sheets); 3) Letter(s) of Commitment, and 4) Certifications required in the Evaluation Factors section below.

The schedule shall be provided on one-sided 11 x 17 pages folded in to the technical proposal and not exceed 10 pages.

Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

Proposals must be submitted in hard copy AND electronically. The electronic files shall contain identical information to the hard copy files. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

Format for hard-copy and electronic files. Each hardcopy volume shall be submitted in a separate three-ring binder that is clearly labeled with its title and volume number. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFP number in the header and/or footer.

The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volume Title Originals Electronic Copies Volume I 7 1 Volume II 1 1

Electronic Copies shall be submitted on CD’s or DVD’s. Zip disks are not permitted. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files that are configured for printing by the Government. Each CD shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date, and the offeror’s name. **Please note – Self extracting exe files are not acceptable.

**All of the hard-copy versions shall be identical, if the hard-copy versions differ from the electronic version, the hard-copy versions (originals) will govern.

Volume I: Technical Proposal: The Technical Proposal shall include the following:

1. The Solicitation number (“W912ES-16-R-0002”).

2. The offeror’s name, address, telephone and email address.

3. DUNS number, CAGE code and TAX ID number.

4. Names, titles, telephone and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

6. Letter(s) of Commitment (if applicable).

7. Documentation evidencing those individuals that have authority to bind the offeror

(appropriate to the partnership, company, corporation, or joint venture demonstrating the agency relationship (ie. copies of corporate resolutions, powers of attorney, or official meeting notes)).

8. Responses to all technical evaluation factors. All responses in the offeror’s Technical Proposal must clearly indicate the areas to which they are applicable:

a. Part I: Schedule

b. Part II: Work Plan

c. Part III: Recent and Relevant Experience

d. Part IV: Certifications

9. The Technical proposal shall not include pricing information.

Volume II: Price Proposal: The Price Proposal shall include the following:

1. Completed Standard Form (SF) 1442, including acknowledgement of all Amendments.

2. Completed Pricing Schedule/Bid Schedule.

3. Proof of current System for Award Management (SAM) registration including the applicable

NAICS code for this acquisition (237990).

4. Representations and Certifications.

Offerors shall complete and submit the price schedule (schedule of items/bid schedule) with their proposal and include a price for each line item, including subtotals and totals. Failure to do so may result in the proposal being rejected without further consideration.

C. EVALUATION FACTORS

The evaluation factors and significant sub-factors are listed below. Failure to submit the required information for all evaluation factors will result in a rating of “unacceptable” for that factor, and the offeror will be ineligible for award unless the Procuring Contracting Officer decides to hold discussions and includes the offeror in the competitive range. Technical evaluation factors (Part I: Schedule, Part II: Work Plan, Part III: Recent and Relevant Experience, Part IV: Certifications) will be evaluated first. Price will be evaluated last.

A. Technical Proposal, Part I: Schedule

Submission Requirements:

The Schedule shall include a network diagram listing, at a minimum, the following significant project activities and their interrelation to each other.

a. Deep Mixing Method and Preload

b. Channel Excavation

c. Dam, Embedded Levee, and EMB Embankment Construction

d. Riprap and Bedding – Upstream and Downstream

e. Pile Driving (H-Pile and Sheet Pile)

f. Dam Wall Construction

g. Precast Bridge Deck Design, Fabrication, and Installation

h. Precast Concrete Beam Design, Fabrication, and Installation – Service Bridge and Machinery Platform

i. Cast in Place Concrete Bridge Decks - Service Bridge & Machinery Platform

j. Control Structure Construction – Including Footing Slabs, Walls, Piers, Trunnion Girders, Stairways, Fencing and Hand Rail

k. Tainter Gate Shop Drawing Development, Fabrication, Delivery, Field Assembly, Painting, and Installation

l. Gate Operating Machinery Design, Shop Drawing Development, Fabrication, Delivery, Painting and Installation

m. Control Building Construction

n. Power and Control Wiring

o. Site work including Maintenance Roads, Parking Lot, and Lighting.

In order for your proposal to be considered acceptable the Schedule shall include: 1) all of the significant project activities (a. – o.) above, 2) activity durations for each of the activities, 3) start/stop dates for each activity, 4) non-work dates (including weather days), and 5) all critical paths. In addition, the Schedule shall meet all schedule requirements specified in the solicitation, and must be considered feasible in light of the construction schedule specified in the solicitation, the site conditions, equipment and crews proposed in the work plan, and the environmental and other work restrictions contained in all of the contract documents. Work restrictions shall include restrictions contained within the Work Restrictions section as well as restrictions contained within individual technical sections.

B. Technical Proposal, Part II: Work Plan

a. The work plan shall be a detailed narrative description of the proposed work. The plan shall address the labor, material, and equipment proposed to be used to complete all of the project activities identified in Section A Schedule (above).

b. The work plan shall include the number of crews, crew sizes, pieces of equipment, equipment make and model, and production rates for each of the project activities noted in the Schedule.

c. The plan shall identify the number of days per week, the number of shifts per day, and the number of hours per shift anticipated for the significant project activities, a.-o. in Section A Schedule (above).

d. The plan shall identify which of the above project activities will be performed by subcontractors.

In order for your proposal to be considered acceptable, the Work Plan shall: 1) include all of the work plan requirements (a. – d.) above for each of the significant project activities (a. – o.) above in section A Schedule, and 2) be considered feasible in light of the work being accomplished, the site conditions, and the schedule requirements specified in the solicitation.

C. Technical Proposal, Part III: Recent and Relevant Experience

The offeror shall provide recent and relevant projects by completing Attachment 1.

For each of the Work Elements listed below (a.-f.), two (2) relevant projects shall be provided for the firm that will perform the work. NOTE: Only 6 Attachment 1 documents are provided with this RFP, one for each Work Element-you will need to provide 2 for each Work Element (a.-f.) for a total of 12. As stated above, a letter of commitment is required for a subcontractor’s experience to be evaluated. If more than two (2) relevant projects are provided for a Work Element, only the two (2) most recently completed projects will be evaluated. If a project qualifies as relevant experience for more than one Work Element, provide multiple sheets for that project, one for each Work Element it satisfies.

Recent is defined as work that is ongoing but not less than 50% physically complete or work that was completed by the firm within the last ten (10) years of the date of the initial proposal under this solicitation. The definitions of relevant are included within each of the work element descriptions below (a.-f.)

Work Elements:

a. Fabrication of large steel water control gates To be considered relevant, the project must demonstrate experience with fabrication of large (greater than 20 ton) steel water control gates.

b. Installation of large steel water control gates

To be considered relevant, the project must demonstrate experience with assembly and installation of large (greater than 20 ton) steel water control gates.

c. Design, monitoring, and testing of mass concrete

To be considered relevant, the project must meet the following definition of mass concrete and consist of not less than 1,000 cubic yards of concrete requiring temperature monitoring. The project must demonstrate experience with design, as defined below, and monitoring, and testing, of mass concrete.

The determination of cast-in-place versus mass concrete is made by analyzing the specific combination of factors for the individual structure under consideration. These factors include the equivalent cement content, thickness of the structural component and the placement conditions.

d. Placement and curing of mass concrete

To be considered relevant, the project must meet the definition of mass concrete above and shall demonstrate experience with placement and curing of mass concrete consisting of not less than 1,000 cubic yards of concrete requiring temperature monitoring.

e. Design of gate operating equipment

To be considered relevant, the project shall demonstrate experience by a licensed (any state) mechanical engineer in the design of a mechanical hoist drive system with at least 100,000 pounds lifting capacity. The licensed engineer must have been, and continue to be, employed by the offeror or a committed subcontractor, and must be assigned to work on this contract.

f. Manufacture and assembly of gate operating equipment To be considered relevant, the project must demonstrate manufacture and assembly of gate operating machinery capable of lifting over 100,000 lbs.

In order for your proposal to be rated as “acceptable” under this factor you must provide 2 recent and relevant projects for each of the above noted 6 work elements (a.-f.).

D. Technical Proposal, Part IV: Certifications

The offeror shall provide current copies of one of the following two American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) certifications for all fabrication plants to be utilized for the tainter gates, along with proof that the certification has been continuously held for the past five (5) years. As stated above, a letter of commitment is required for a subcontractor’s (i.e., fabrication plant) experience to be evaluated.

1. Intermediate Bridges certification with Supplemental Requirement F- Requirements for Fabricators of Bridges with Fracture-Critical Members

OR

2. Advanced Bridges certification with Supplemental Requirement F- Requirements for Fabricators of Bridges with Fracture-Critical Members

For the period prior to July 1, 2014, the Major Steel Bridge CBR Certification with Fracture Critical Endorsement will also be accepted as proof that one of the certifications above has been continuously held for the past five (5) years.

In order for your proposal to be rated as “acceptable” under this factor you must provide one of the two current certifications noted above and proof that the certification has been continuously held for the past five years.

D. EVALUATION PROCESS

1. After receipt of proposals, the SSEB will convene and the voting members will independently evaluate all submitted proposals according to the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation, beginning with the Technical proposals. Once the Technical evaluations are completed, the SSEB chairperson will lead the SSEB in discussion of each proposal, and they will come to a consensus decision as to the acceptability of each factor for each offeror. After concluding the evaluations, the chairperson will provide an oral briefing of the consensus evaluation results to the SSA and submit a written consensus evaluation report for the record.

The written consensus report will detail the reasons for acceptability or unacceptability of proposals noted during the SSEB evaluation. The SSEB will make no recommendation as to who shall receive the award and additionally shall not establish a rank order or order of merit list pertaining to the offers being evaluated. Upon completion of the Technical proposal report for the record, the SSEB will evaluate the Price proposals using the same process as for the Technical evaluations.

The SSEB will evaluate each offeror’s price in terms of unbalancing and for potential performance risks.

The Procuring Contracting Officer, or the Procuring Contracting Officer’s designee, will evaluate each offeror’s price IAW FAR 15.404 to determine price reasonableness. In this context, reasonableness will be determined by comparing offered prices to one another, to the government estimate, and to pricing for previous work of a similar nature.

2. After receiving the SSEB chairperson’s written consensus evaluation and report and briefing for both the Technical and Price proposals, the SSA, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will make a source selection decision on the basis of the lowest priced proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for the technical factors. While the SSA may use reports and analyses prepared by others, the source selection decision shall represent the SSA's independent judgment. The source selection decision shall be documented, and the documentation shall include the rationale for any business judgments made or relied on by the SSA.

3. If, during the evaluation process, any offerors are eliminated from the competition, the offerors excluded from the competition shall be promptly notified in writing. The notice shall state the basis for the determination and that a proposal revision will not be considered. The Procuring Contracting Officer shall award a contract to the successful offeror by furnishing the executed contract or other notice of the award to that offeror. Each offeror whose proposal was not selected for award, will be notified in writing within three days after the date of the contract award. Debriefings will be provided to unsuccessful offerors who submit timely requests.

ATTACHMENT 1: Experience, a. Fabrication of large steel water control gates Firm for which relevant information is being provided (i.e. name of offeror or subcontractor):

Firm: __________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________________________________

Check the box if a Letter of Commitment is included (if applicable).

a. Project Name:

b. Contract or Subcontract Number:

c. Date of Award:

d. Contract Value: e. Date of Completion/Percent Complete:

f. Contract Duration: g. Project Location (City, State):

h. Project Description (Please describe the work performed):

i. Describe the recent contract effort relevant to this work element:

j. Was this work performed as a subcontract?

Yes No

k. Prime Contractor:

a. Name:

b. Complete Address:

c. Phone:

d. Email

l. Reference:

a. Name and Title:

b. Organization:

c. Phone and Email:

ATTACHMENT 1: Experience, b. Installation of large steel water control gates

Firm: __________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________________________________

Check the box if a Letter of Commitment is included (if applicable).

Yes No

ATTACHMENT 1: Experience, c. Design, monitoring, and testing of mass concrete

Firm: __________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________________________________

Check the box if a Letter of Commitment is included (if applicable).

Yes No

ATTACHMENT 1: Experience, d. Placement and curing of mass concrete

Firm: __________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________________________________

Check the box if a Letter of Commitment is included (if applicable).

Yes No

ATTACHMENT 1: Experience, e. Design of gate operating equipment

Firm: __________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________________________________

Check the box if a Letter of Commitment is included (if applicable).

Yes No

ATTACHMENT 1: Experience, f. Manufacture and assembly of gate operating equipment

Firm: __________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ________________________________________________________________________________

Check the box if a Letter of Commitment is included (if applicable).

Yes No

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

APPROVED SUBSTITUTIONS

In connection with this solicitation and resultant contract, any subcontractors or suppliers will be limited to individuals or firms that were specifically identified in the Contractor's accepted proposal. Prior to substituting, removing, replacing, or diverting any of the firms or individuals specified in your proposal, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing 15 working days in advance and shall submit a written request and justification (including proposed substitutions) in sufficient detail to permit evaluation IAW the original evaluation factors for award as detailed in the RFP as amended (if applicable).

The proposed substitution of subcontractors, suppliers, etc. must meet or exceed all of the evaluation factors for award in the original amended RFP for any/all entities being replaced at no additional cost to the Government. No change shall be made by the Contractor without the prior written consent of the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor within 10 working days after receipt of all required information of the decision on the substitution(s). In the event the proposed substitution(s) of subcontractors, suppliers, etc. does not meet or exceed the evaluation criteria of the personnel/entities being replaced, the Government reserves the right to require continued performance of previously accepted entities or to require substitution of acceptable replacements.

In the event that the contractor cannot provide a listed subcontractor or one of equal qualification, the contracting officer may reduce the contract price or take such other actions as are necessary to protect the interests of the Government, including the timely completion of the contract work.

The following have been deleted:

KEY PERSONNEL

(End of Summary of Changes)