B.08.03 Amendment 0001 W912ER22R0006.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Please see the continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Dec-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912ER22R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Nov-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Dec-2021

CODE

W912ER DISTRICT (TAM), USACE

MIDDLE EAST DISTRICT (CETAM-CT)

PO BOX 2250

WINCHESTER VA 22604-1450

W912ER 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912ER22R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

CONTINUATION PAGE

The purpose of this amendment is to make the following changes:

1. Change the proposal due date to 09 February 2022.

2. Change the bidder inquiry closing date from 7 days to 10 days before the proposal due date.

3. Remove language pertaining to a site visit. Photos of the site where the work is to be performed will be provided on the SAM.gov website instead in a future amendment.

4. Add the Marginal rating to the Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method for Factor 1.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 29-Dec-2021 04:30 PM to 09-Feb-2022 04:30 PM.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

This solicitation pertains to a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for construction services in Jordan using a design-bid-build procurement process. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Transatlantic Middle East District (TAM), has a requirement from the U.S. Air Force to construct an Air Traffic Control Tower and infrastructure at an undisclosed location in Jordan.

The primary North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for work under this procurement is 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) with a small business size standard of $ 39.5 million.

This project will be awarded based on the CLINs in the bid schedule and will be awarded to a single offeror. The magnitude of construction for this project is between $10,000,000.00 and $25,000,000.00.

The contractor shall provide all management, administration, quality control, labor, transportation, equipment, materials, vehicles, supplies, and other items as necessary to perform the services contained in the scope of work.

System For Award Management (SAM). Contractors (including joint venture entities) shall be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and determined to be responsible prior to award. For more information, see the SAM website at https://sam.gov. Please ensure that NAICS code 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction is listed in your SAM registration.

B. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, CONTENT, AND FORMAT

The Government will not reimburse any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of any responses to this solicitation. Oral explanations or instructions to offerors are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation. Any and all amendments to the solicitation will be issued electronically at the SAM.gov website. It is an offeror’s responsibility to continuously check for any amendments to the solicitation and acknowledge any and all amendments in its proposal submission.

Offerors shall not modify the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal or add conditions or qualifications to their offers. Should an offeror include terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, that offeror may be determined to be ineligible for award. Any questions related to specific terms and conditions contained within the solicitation should be resolved prior to submission of an offer.

References to “confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of an offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include information in their proposals they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, shall clearly mark their proposals in accordance with the instructions at FAR clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition, paragraph (e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data.

Use of the words “will”, “shall”, or “must” indicates a mandatory requirement for which failure to comply, at the time and date for submission of proposals, may result in an offeror’s proposal being disqualified from consideration for Award. Failure to comply with non-pricing requirements that are annotated with the words “should” or “may” can result in a lowering of an offeror’s non-pricing ratings, and may have a significant effect upon an offeror being selected for the contract award. Time periods, if stated as a number of days, are calendar days unless otherwise specified.

1. PROPOSAL CONTENT

Offerors are required to submit proposals with at least the minimum content specified herein. A proposal without the minimum content may result in a determination that the proposal is non-responsive. The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of an offeror.

All information intended to be evaluated as part of the technical proposal shall be submitted within the technical proposal. Do not include references to material or information not found within the technical proposal. Referencing information not found within the proposal could lead to an offeror’s proposal being determined unacceptable if materially incomplete in any aspect.

An offeror’s proposal shall be submitted electronically, and shall be comprised of three files, in Adobe portable document format (PFD), or comparable format: the first file will include the offeror’s Volume I – Non-Price (Technical) Proposal, the second file will include the offeror’s Volume II – Price Proposal, and the third file will include the offeror’s Volume III – Responsibility Determination. All documents must be searchable.

Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted is current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone numbers.

The Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits specified within each evaluation factor. For the evaluation of each factor the first page, with substantive content as described in Paragraph B. 2.

Proposal Format, will be considered page one (1) to determine adherence to the page limit. Elaborately prepared proposals are not required, and any material in excess of what is requested, such as corporate marketing information, will not be considered.

Failing to submit or completely fill out the solicitation attachments may result in a determination that the proposal is unacceptable. Therefore, offerors are urged to follow instructions and raise questions through the Bidder Inquiry process (via ProjNet) described below.

VOLUME I – NON-PRICE (TECHNICAL) PROPOSAL: The information required within each factor of an offeror’s technical proposal is described under below. Do not submit pricing information within the non-price (technical) proposal. Volume I shall include the information listed below. Offerors are reminded to adhere to any page limitations stated in a specific factor.

i. COVER PAGE: A cover page shall appear at the beginning of the Volume I and, at a minimum, shall consist of the following information:

a. Solicitation number W912ER22R0006

b. Offeror’s name, physical mailing addresses, telephone number, and email address of the official having the authority to bind the offeror contractually.

c. Offeror’s DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax ID (TIN)

ii. TABLE OF CONTENTS: A table of contents shall be placed in Volume I, which identifies major areas by title and page numbers.

iii. NON-PRICE (TECHNICAL) PROPOSAL:

a. Factor 1 – Construction Experience: All documents comprising the offeror’s Factor 1: Construction Experience submission shall be included.

b. Factor 2 – Technical Approach: All documents comprising the offeror’s Factor 2: Technical Approach submission shall be included.

c. Factor 3 – Past Experience: All documents comprising the offeror’s Factor 3: Past Performance submission shall be included.

iv. Completed Representations and Certifications (Section 00 45 00).

v. (where applicable) Completed Corporate Certificate/Authority to Bind Partnership (Attachment 1), or Joint Venture Agreement

_____ If the offeror is a corporations, completed Corporate Certificate; OR

_____ If the offeror is a partnership, a completed Authority to Bind Partnership and a copy of the partnership agreement

_____ If the offeror is a joint venture (JV), a copy of the Joint Venture

Agreement. If any member of the JV is a corporation, the offeror must also submit a Corporate Certificvate for each corporate JV member.

Failure to submit the required information, including the Completed Representation and Certifications (Section 00 45 00), or Corporate Certificate/Authority to Bind Partnership and Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable), may result in a determination that the proposal is unacceptable.

VOLUME II - PRICE PROPOSAL: The information required within an offeror’s price proposal is described under the price evaluation, Factor 4, Price. Within an offeror’s price proposal, the following shall also be submitted:

i. COVER PAGE: A cover page shall appear at the beginning of Volume II and, at a minimum, shall consist of the following information:

a. Solicitation number

b. Offeror’s name, physical mailing addresses, telephone number, and email address of the official having the authority to bind the offeror contractually

c. Offeror’s DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax ID (TIN)

ii. TABLE OF CONTENTS: A table of contents shall be placed in Volume II, which identifies major areas by title and page numbers.

iii. PRICE PROPOSAL

a. Signed Solicitation, Offer, and Award (SF 1442) with blocks 14-20c completed, including acknowledgment of all amendments.

b. Completed SF 1442, Section 00 10 00, CLIN Schedule.

c. Completed Proposal Schedule and Cost Breakdown Sheet (Attachment 5) in an Excel format. Ensure figures and totals match Section 00 10 00, CLIN Schedule.

Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted is current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone numbers.

Failing to submit or completely fill out the solicitation attachments may result in a determination that the proposal is unacceptable. Therefore, offerors are urged to follow instructions and raise questions through the Bidder Inquiry process (via ProjNet) described in Section II.D, below.

VOLUME III – RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE: The information required within Volume III is described in Attachment 10, Contractor Determination.

This Questionnaire is not an additional non-pricing factor; the information requested pertains to the offeror’s ability to perform the contract (if awarded) rather than the acceptability of the offer presented. Your responses to this Questionnaire will assist the Contracting Officer in making their responsibility determination. It is the duty of the offeror to supply all necessary documentation to establish its responsibility.

2. PROPOSAL FORMAT

Proposals must be typed and submitted in English. Proposals submitted in a language other than English are unacceptable. Letters of Commitment, partnership agreements or licenses if not written in English, must be accompanied by an English translated copy with a signed statement, in English, by an authorized representative who can bind the entity of each partner that the English translation is true and correct.

An offeror’s proposal must be submitted as three separate files in Adobe portable document format (PDF), or comparable format: the first file will include the offeror’s Volume I – Non-Price (Technical) Proposal, the second file will include the offeror’s Volume II - Price Proposal, and the third file will include the offeror’s Volume III – Responsibility Determination. The proposal must be submitted electronically thru the DoD SAFE (Secure Access File Exchange) site located at https://safe.apps.mil as discussed in in the Proposal Submission Instructions. This site supports file package exchanges of up to 8GB. Each volume must include the content and adhere to the format discussed above. All documents must be searchable.

An offeror’s technical proposal (including representation and certification information) and price proposal must be submitted as two separate volumes (PDF files) as identified in Section II. Paragraph B.1, Proposal Content. Page limits, if stipulated must be adhered to. The Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits specified herein. Proposals shall be sized to print on THE EQUIVALENT TO 8 ½” X 11” paper; I.E. A4 (THE EQUIVALET TO 11” X 17” for drawings; I.E. A3; I.E. CADD SIZE D DRAWING OR THE EQUIVALENT TO

30”X 42”; I.E. CADD SIZE E DRAWING). Margins shall be no smaller than a half inch (1/2”), font face shall be Times New Roman or Arial, and font size shall be no smaller than 10 point font. Page is defined as a single sheet of paper with text on one side. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a cover page, tabs or separator pages or a table of contents are not included in the page limitation.

Note: Corporate certificates, Partnership agreements or Joint Venture Agreements, Letter of Commitment, CMW certification, and Licenses are also not included in page limitations.

Offerors shall place the following notification on the bottom of each page of their proposals: “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104. Do not disclose any source selection information to any unauthorized person.”

All information must be confined to the appropriate volume. The offeror should limit the proposal to the required information sufficient to provide the Government an adequate basis for evaluation. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details, in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of the proposal. Each volume of the proposal must contain a table of contents, summary section with a brief abstact of the volume, and the narrative discussion. Proprietary information must be clearly marked.

C. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Proposals must be submitted electronically. The electronic submission must include Volume I, Volume II and Volume III as three separate files in PDF (or comparable) format, submitted to the following through the DoD SAFE (Secure Access File Exchange) site located at https://safe.apps.mil:

Mr. Ryan K. Gregory at Ryan.K.Gregory@usace.army.mil and Ms. Christina R.W. Loy at Christina.W.Loy@usace.army.mil

In order to submit a proposal, offerors must email Mr. Gregory and Ms. Loy at least four (4) calendar days prior to the proposal due date to request a DoD SAFE code. This code is required to upload and transmit proposals through the DoD SAFE website.

Proposals are due no later than February 09, 2022 by 4:30PM Eastern Standard Time (EST). This date shall be considered the proposal due date, after which proposal revisions will not be accepted.

Facsimile Proposals are not permitted. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure its proposal is received by the Government system by the date and time of the proposal deadline, e.g., undeliverable messages due to an offeror’s proposal size or IT issues are not the responsibility of the Government.

D. LATE PROPOSALS

1. Any proposal, modification, or revision received by the Government after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the contracting officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and –

(i) it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, and it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of proposals; or

(ii) there is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of proposals; or

(iii) it is the only proposal received.

2. However, a late modification of an otherwise successful proposal that makes its terms more favorable to the Government will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

E. SOLICITATION INQUIRIES

1. All inquiries regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry. Telephone and email inquiries will not be accepted. Bidder Inquiry is a web-based program that allows bidders to post questions regarding the solicitation and view all questions by other bidders and responses by USACE. Bidder Inquiry can be accessed through ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet/.

a. Offerors shall only submit one question per inquiry. All inquiries containing multiple questions will be rejected.

b. Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question(s) via email, followed by an answer to their question(s) after it has been processed by our technical team. Offerors may view all bidder inquiries through ProjNet.

c. Inquiries must be submitted no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the proposal due date. The inquiry system in ProjNet will be closed at that time and will not accept further inquiry postings.

2. To submit and review bid inquiries, prospective offerors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access.

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 4AHEZB-IN7H65

3. Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

a. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

b. Identify the Agency as USACE.

c. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

d. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

e. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

f. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

g. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

4. Submit questions or review questions and answers. A bidder who submits a question will receive an automated email notification that their question has been received. When an answer is posted to a question, the question and answer is then available for all other bidders to review.

5. For specific step-by-step for POSTING YOUR INQUIRIES, see the Reference link on the Contract Viewer.

6. For questions about the ProjNet-®, please contact the Call Center help desk USA toll free at 1-800-428-HELP, which operates from 8AM to 5PM (Central US time zone). ProjNet-® questions can also be emailed to the helpdesk at staff@rcesupport.com.

Ensure Government's written responses to questions/inquiries from prospective offerors during the Question and Answer period do not conflict with information provided or required by an evaluation factor. If there is a conflict, issue an amendment and revise the factor to clear up any discrepancy.

7. Photos of the site where the work will be performed will be provided on the SAM.gov website.

See FAR Clause 52.236-27, SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995) for additional information. The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, Contractors are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

F. BASIS OF AWARD

1. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best overall value to the Government and has been determined to be responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1. The Best Value Tradeoff (BVTO) process (see FAR 15.101-1) will be used to determine which proposal provides the greatest overall benefit to the Government, in response to the requirements.

2. The Government intends to select one offeror for an award without discussions, but reserves to the right to hold discussion if the Government determines that to do so would be in its best interest. Therefore, an offeror’s proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a technical and pricing standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is determined by the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority (SSA) to be necessary.

G. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVALUATION FACTORS

For evaluation purposes, Factor 1 – Construction Experience, and Factor 2 – Technical Approach are equal to one another, and when combined, are significantly more importance than Factor 3 – Past Performance. When combined, Factor 1 – Construction Experience, Factor 2 – Technical Approach and Factor 3 – Past Performance are significantly more important to the Price (Factor 4) aspect of an offeror’s proposal in the selection process.

In its evaluation of the offeror’s technical proposal, the Government may identify significant strengths, strengths, significant weakness, weaknesses, and deficiencies, relying on the definitions below.

Significant Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Strength is an aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Significant Weakness is a flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Weakness is a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Uncertainty is any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offer is unclear (e.g.

more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

A risk as it pertains to source selection is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

There may be contained within the evaluation factors certain mandatory or minimum requirements to be met for evaluation. There are also contained within the described factors certain documents for submission. Failure to satisfy any mandatory or minimum requirement may result in a determination that a proposal is unacceptable. A final determination that an offer is unacceptable means that an award to the offeror involved cannot be made.

The Government intends to select one offeror for an award without discussions, but reserves the right to hold discussions if the Government determines that to do so would be in its best interest. Therefore, an offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a technical and pricing standpoint.

H. EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government’s evaluation includes an assessment of the following factors:

FACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 4: PRICE

1. FACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

Proposal Submission Requirements:

Offeror shall submit a portfolio of at least two and no more than five projects that demonstrate experience on military or commercial construction projects similar to the Design-Bid-Build Construction of Air Traffic Control Tower at UD 2.4, Kingdom of Jordan, described in this RFP. To be considered similar, the projects must be in the same geographic region as the solicitation’s requirements, with a contract value of $10M or more, comparable in magnitude and scope to the construction being acquired by this RFP, i.e., new vertical construction of four stories or more, or major repairs/upgrades of existing air traffic control towers. Project magnitude may be defined as, but is not limited to the following: dollar amount, square feet, similar materials, similar trades or all of the above. Projects that are submitted do not need to meet all aspects of the definition of similar, as it pertains to project magnitude and scope. Submitted projects are to be comparable in scope and magnitude. While projects that are submitted should collectively meet the definition of similar, the projects must address the geographic and contract value aspects in accordance with the proposal submission requirements.

To be considered, a project shall be at least 75% complete or completed within the last five (5) years.

For the purposes of this evaluation the “same geographic region” shall include Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates.

For similar work experience gained by the offeror while a subcontractor, the offeror should provide a description of their role as the subcontractor. The description shall include the type of work performed, the dollar value of the work performed, and the percentage of work completed. The description shall also include an explanation of why such experience is similar to this project, the prime contractor’s contract number, and contact information for the prime contractor and government or owner representative for the project.

If an offeror wishes to receive credit for the experience of a subcontractor or teaming partner, the offeror must submit a signed letter of commitment to use the proposed firm on the project, signed both by the subcontractor/teaming partner and the offeror. The commitment letter must be submitted even if the subcontractor/teaming partner is affiliated with the offeror (for example, the subcontractor/teaming partner is a subsidiary of a joint venture partner, or a subsidiary of a firm to which the joint venture partner is also a subsidiary).

The offeror shall provide the following information for each submitted project:

(a) Project Title

(b) Location

(c) Contract Number

(d) Project Delivery Method: Indicate whether the project was Design/Build, Design/Bid/Build, or Design Only

(e) Designer of Record

Using the Project Summary Form (Attachment 3) and the Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ) (Attachment 4), the offeror shall demonstrate experience in performing projects meeting or exceeding the requirements described in paragraph b. below. Offerors shall qualify by submitting projects wherein the offeror performed as the Prime Contractor, or;

(1) A subcontractor where they completed work relevant to the projects described in paragraph b. below.

If qualifying for work performed as a subcontractor, the offeror shall submit a letter from the prime contractor confirming what work specifically was completed by the offeror, or;

(2) By leveraging the experience of a proposed major subcontractor. If qualifying for work based on a proposed subcontractor, the offeror shall submit a completed Letter of Intent from the subcontractor.

(3) By using work the offeror performed as a joint venture. The offeror may submit projects for evaluation in which it was a partner in a joint venture agreement. A copy of the joint venture agreement shall also be submitted with the proposal.

Ensure that the PPQs submitted for Factor 1 clearly describe the relevant characteristics of the project.

Offerors should submit recent projects that satisfy the requirements listed below. An individual project which satisfies multiple requirements listed below can be used to satisfy more than one required project. Individual projects which satisfy a single requirement listed below can also be used to satisfy each required project. The Government will not consider multiple smaller projects, such as individual task orders, which when combined would meet the minimum required size. Recent projects involving construction of the following facilities/projects to include:

(1) Air Traffic Control Tower – Construction of a multi-story Air Traffic Control Tower.

(2) Multiple story new vertical construction. A story is defined as an occupy-able floor or 12 feet of vertical construction.

(3) Experience with Pre-Cast Panels

The projects submitted for consideration in Factor 1 should be the same projects submitted for evaluation in Factor 3. The project description on the PPQ shall clearly describe the project. The Government will not assume any project characteristics that are not specifically identified and described. Using the PPQ form, the offeror shall describe how the project contained the elements described above and which project in paragraph b. is being met for Factor 1.

Offerors shall also provide a narrative, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, that outlines how their experience on prior projects will enable the offeror to successfully perform the requirements of the solicitation. The offeror should provide specific example of projects they have performed, and how the elements and features of those projects pertain to the offeror’s ability to deal with construction challenges likely to be present on this project, and how these experiences will positively enhance its performance handling a design-bid-build project featuring deep foundations, high-rise steel structure, precast panels, anti-terrorism/force protection requirements.

The offeror may highlight any experience that it has gained, regardless of the project’s similarity to the scope, magnitude, or location of the work contemplated by this solicitation, however the offeror should explain in detail how each of their previous projects they choose to present relate to their ability to execute the solicitation project successfully. For purposes of this portion of the evaluation, the focus is on the offeror’s prior experience in dealing with construction challenges, not on those project metrics required to conduct a past performance relevancy evaluation. A separate project relevancy analysis will be completed under the Past Performance factor.

The narrative should address the offeror’s experience with the following:

a. Obtaining access for the offeror’s workforce to work areas similar to that of the solicitation project, and maintaining that access throughout the duration of the project.

b. Hiring qualified laborers and maintaining a qualified workforce.

c. Procurement of long lead time items.

d. Staffing 24 hours a day, seven days a week operations or a reasonably similar schedule.

e. Obtaining permits, such as fire protection, building installation, utilities, etc.

f. Process improvements or innovative techniques utilized to address construction challenges.

g. The Offerors plan to implement safety measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Offeror shall address testing, monitoring, training of the workforce, preventative measures to include PPE.

h. Construction of cast-in-place pile foundations.

i. Performance of demand critical welding.

j. Design of seismic bracing for non-structural components.

k. Design of precast panels

l. Installation of high-rise precast panels In its evaluation, the Government is focused on the offeror’s experience. If an offeror discusses experience of its proposed major subcontractor(s), an unequivocal letter of commitment signed by the subcontractor(s) must be included in the offeror’s proposal. If this requisite letter of commitment is not submitted, the prior experience of the major subcontractor(s) will not be considered. If the offeror is a JV, the offeror may discuss the experience of the JV and experience of any JV partner. If using the prior experience of the JV or a JV partner, a JV agreement must be provided. If the requisite JV Agreement is not provided, the government will not consider the information presented.

Evaluation Procedures, Adjectival Ratings and Descriptions:

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s narrative for the degree to which the offeror possesses experience that will enable it to successfully perform the work included in the solicitation. The Government will evaluate the information presented and its application to the work required by the solicitation, to determine whether the experience described by the offeror appreciably increases the likelihood of the offeror successfully performing the work contemplated by the solicitation.

Greater Weight Considerations:

Greater weight may be given to proposals that demonstrate prior experience in any of the following areas:

Projects that include air traffic control tower new construction.

Projects that demonstrate more experience with multiple story, new vertical construction. A story is defined as an occupy-able floor or 12 feet of vertical construction.

Projects that demonstrate prior experience with pre-cast concrete panel facades.

Projects that demonstrate prior teaming experiences with significant subcontractors committed on this proposal.

Projects that demonstrate the offeror performing as the prime contractor.

Projects that demonstrate experience at military installations in Jordan

A single technical rating will be assigned to the prior experience of an offeror’s proposal. The ratings include consideration of risks in conjunction with a proposal’s significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies. The factor evaluation will utilize the combined technical/risk ratings and the risk descriptions as follows:

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description

Blue

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

2. FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

The Technical Approach portion of an offeror’s proposal will be limited to ten (10) pages in length, not including registrations, licenses, letters of intent, or the Performance Distribution Statement (Attachment 9). Information provided that exceeds the page limit will not be evaluated.

The offeror shall provide a detailed narrative that identifies the offeror’s understanding of the overall scope for the project and that describes its technical approach to completing the work. The narrative should identify all the major scope components of the project, including the critical components of the project. Additionally, offerors should/shall provide a discussion of the technical approach to the project that demonstrates not only an understanding of the geographic constraints, local labor market, laws, and other anticipated challenges, but also provides benefit to the project.

Offeror’s Use of Subcontractors. The Government recognizes that completion of a project is often a team effort.

An offeror that intends to utilize a major subcontractor (defined as a subcontractor who performs twenty percent (20%) or more of the total work at the project site) should submit one Letter of Commitment for each of the major subcontractors it plans to use. Each Letter of Commitment must (i) be written on company letterhead and addressed to the offeror; (ii) agree to a specific scope of work without caveats or disclaimers; and (iv) be executed by the subcontractor’s authorized representative.

After award, the offeror shall not change major subcontractors for which it submitted a Letter of Commitment without the contracting officer’s written approval. Approval will not be given unless the contracting officer considers the proposed substitute to be equal or better in all respects to the originally proposed major subcontractor and that the substitution is in the best interests of the Government.

The narrative should specifically address the following categories:

a. Licensing: the offeror shall provide either:

i. a valid and current (e.g., not expired) copy of Jordan business registration documentation. If the offeror provides a Jordan business license that will expire prior to May 10, 2022, the proposal shall include the offeror’s supported plan to extend the Jordan business license;

OR

ii. Plan to obtain a Jordan business license. This plan should explain the offeror’s understanding of the process to obtain licensure in Jordan, including the expected processing time for obtaining a business license and/or registration.

b. Self-Performance: The awardee will be required to perform on the site and with its own organization, at least thirty percent (30%) of the total amount of work to be performed under the contract. The Performance Distribution Statement further clarifies how the Government interprets the self-performance requirement. The offeror should include with its proposal the completed Performance Distribution Statement, indicating its plans for self-performance, and the plans for its proposed major subcontractors.

c. Base Access: An offeror shall explain how it will comply with relevant base access procedures, such as:

i. Security requirements for access to Jordanian Military Installations.

ii. Obtaining passes and clearances for access to Jordanian Military Installations. The offeror shall provide

(i) a copy of passes and clearances it intends to rely upon in gaining access to Jordanian Military Installations; OR if the offeror does not possess a valid pass or clearance, (ii) the offeror’s plan to obtain it.

This plan should explain the offeror’s understanding of the process to obtain the required base access passes and clearances.

iii. Plan to control access to the work site.

iv. Plan for obtaining base access for personnel, subcontractors, and construction materials and equipment, including an explanation of how the offeror will obtain base passes, the anticipated timeframe for obtaining base passes, and any known restrictions or heightened screening processes for certain foreign nationals seeking access to Jordanian Military Installations.

d. Permit Requirements: the offeror shall describe in detail its understanding of the Jordan permit requirements as they apply to this project and (1) provide a list of necessary permits applicable to this project, (2) a detailed plan to obtain the necessary permits, including its expected timeframe for obtaining these permits, and (3) if possible, evidence of obtaining applicable permits for similar past projects.

e. Recruitment: the offeror shall state the anticipated number of workers to be recruited, the skills they are expected to have, and the country or countries from which the contractor intends to recruit them. This narrative should/shall explain how the contractor intends to attract candidates and the recruitment strategy including the recruiter. The offeror should provide a sample recruitment agreement in English.

f. Organization: the offeror shall describe the management process that the offeror plans to use to manage this project. The plan shall provide a narrative on the project organization, defining the roles, responsibilities, and authority to be delegated to the staff in each position. The plan shall discuss how work flows through the organization, including subcontractor efforts, and identify all of the major components of the team for the project, explaining how each component of the work will be integrated into the overall scope. Project titles and names used should match any resumes required elsewhere in this solicitation. The plan shall identify how the offeror will integrate the design team into the organization for the project, and explain the role the design team will be allotted in the decision-making process for the Project. The offeror shall provide an organizational chart showing the relationship between the offeror, on-site staff, sub-contractors, QC personnel, safety personnel, and USACE.

g. Quality Control: the offeror shall provide information on its team’s capabilities to assure quality control, including its quality control approach, corporate systems, and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. The narrative shall also provide information on how it will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, submittal reviews, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation

Evaluation Criteria, Adjectival Ratings, and Descriptions An offeror’s approach will be evaluated in its entirety to determine the offeror’s understanding of the requirements, inherent challenges that are specific to this project scope, schedule, and location, and its capability to execute the requirements of the solicitation.

The Government will evaluate proposals to determine the completeness and feasibility of an offeror’s management approach and its understanding of the overall scope of work and anticipated challenges. The Government will evaluate an offeror’s management approach based on the following aspects:

Licensing: The Government will consider the extent to which the offeror has proven (1) it holds a license in good standing which will permit the offeror to perform the work required within the period of performance; or (2) it understands the business license process and has clearly explained how it plans to obtain the business license necessary to perform the work required at Jordanian Military Installations within the period of performance.

NOTICE TO PROCEED (NTP) SHALL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT CURRENT LICENSING. FAILURE

TO HAVE SUFFICIENT LICENSING WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER CONTRACT AWARD MAY BE

GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION.

Self-Performance: The Government will evaluate the percentage and type of work the offeror plans to self-perform at the project site with its own organization, as well as the percentage and type of work the offeror plans to perform by subcontractor. In so doing, the Government will consider whether the offeror’s plan presents potential risk to the successful completion of the project. As necessary, the Performance Distribution Statement Sheet will be cross-referenced for consistency with the offeror’s cost breakdown sheet, as well as the submitted Letters of Commitment.

Base Access: The Government will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s understanding of the relevant security requirements for Jordanian Military Installations. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s plan to gain site access and base passes, for completeness, reasonableness, and feasibility. The Government will also consider whether the offeror has included in its proposal valid passes or clearances, or a complete and reasonable plan to obtain passes or clearances to allow the offeror to perform the work required within the period of performance.

Permit Requirements: The Government will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s understanding of the current Jordan permitting requirements as they apply to this project and the completeness of the offeror’s list of necessary permits applicable to this project. The Government will also consider whether the offeror has provided a complete and reasonable plan to obtain permits that will allow the offeror to perform the work required within the period of performance.

Recruitment: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s plan for recruitment for logic and ease of implementation, and whether the plan complies with FAR 52.222-50, Combatting Trafficking in Persons.

Organization: The Government will evaluate the extent to which an offeror’s plan for organization includes well defined organization and lines of authority; responsibility; communication; integration of design team; and tracking of schedules.

Quality Control: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s demonstrated understanding of the contractual requirements associated with quality control for pre-cast concrete panels. The Government will evaluate the completeness and reasonableness of the offeror’s quality control plan.

A single technical rating will be assigned to the Technical Approach of an offeror’s proposal. In rating the offeror, the Government will focus on the strengths, deficiencies, weaknesses, risks, and uncertainties indicated in the offeror’s proposal. The chart below explains the rating which will be applied to the Technical Approach portion of the offeror’s proposal, based on how well the offeror’s proposal meets the Technical Approach proposal submission requirements.

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description

Blue

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

3. FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

The Past Performance evaluation includes an assessment of an offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements and results in an assignment of a single performance confidence assessment rating based on an offeror’s past performance record.

For the purpose of this evaluation:

A “recent” project is defined as a construction project which (1) has been completed within the last five (5) years of the RFP issuance date, or (2) is currently under…