W912EP19R0021_MountSinai_Amendment0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 28

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE

DATE

29-Aug-2019

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE W912EP 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, JACKSONVILLE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

701 SAN MARCO BLVD

JACKSONVILLE FL 32207-8175

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W912EP19R0021

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

31-Jul-2019

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X is not extended.

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THISITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGESSET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCFsection headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM (SEC 14), SEAWALL REPLACEMENT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

A. SEE CONTINUATION SHEET FOR AMENDMENT DETAILS.

B. THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE REMAINS UNCHANGED @ SEPTEMBER 06, 2019 @ 2:00 P.M. LOCALTIME.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

30-105-04 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item14. The hour and date specified for receipt ofOffer is extended, Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

X

SF 30 CONTINUATION SHEET

Mount Sinai Medical Center Continuing Authorities Program (Sec 14)

Shoreline Protection Miami-Dade County, Florida

W912EP19R0021 2 Amendment 0003

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. CONSTRUCTION SOLICITATION AND SPECIFICATIONS:

A. Changes are indicated by asterisks appearing before and after the line or lines where amendments have been made to the text, and pertain only to changes made by this amendment. In some cases, replacement clauses are attached to this amendment.

B. Text changes have been updated with additions noted by underlined text and deletions noted by line/cross-outs, and pertain only to changes made by this amendment. The entire section is replaced if there is any change. The Project Table of Contents and Submittal Register are replaced without underlines and cross-outs if there are changes to these documents.

2. SPECIFICATIONS:

Volume 1: SECTION 00100A ADDITIONAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION/SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Delete Pages 00100A-1 thru 00100A-11 and Replace with the attached Revised Pages 00100A-1 thru 00100A-11.

3. DRAWINGS: The following are changes to the drawings. Drawings should be adequately marked to indicate that they have been changed. Drawings furnished to the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Clause entitled "CONTRACT DRAWINGS, MAPS, AND SPECIFICATIONS" will be revised to reflect the revisions made herein.

DELETE Drawing C-03 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-03.

DELETE Drawing C-04 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-04.

DELETE Drawing C-05 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-05.

DELETE Drawing C-06 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-06.

DELETE Drawing C-07 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-07.

DELETE Drawing C-09 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-09.

DELETE Drawing C-10 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-10.

DELETE Drawing C-11 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-11.

DELETE Drawing C-12 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-12.

DELETE Drawing C-13 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-13.

DELETE Drawing C-14 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-14.

DELETE Drawing C-15 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing C-15.

DELETE Drawing S-01 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing S-01.

DELETE Drawing S-04 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing S-04.

DELETE Drawing S-05 and REPLACE with the attached Drawing S-05.

(End of Summary of Changes)

Section 00100A – ADDITIONAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION/SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

Subject to the provisions contained herein, award will be made to one (1) offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR; who conforms to the solicitation requirements; provides the lowest evaluated price and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, meets the technically acceptable standard for the non-price factors. Prices will be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(a).

The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the lowest evaluated price proposal with an acceptable non-priced proposal (Technical and Past Performance). The Government will evaluate the proposals for technically acceptability by evaluating two non-price factors, Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience and Past Performance. These non-priced factors will be evaluated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis. The lowest price technically acceptable proposal will then be evaluated to determine fairness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(a). That offeror will be selected for award.

The Government reserves the right to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. Further, if the Contracting Officer determines that discussions are necessary and if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

B. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

Award will be made to the offeror who submits the lowest priced proposal that is determined to be technically acceptable. To be considered technically acceptable, an offeror’s proposal must be rated “Acceptable” under all non-price factors. The following evaluation factors and factors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

Factor 1 – PRICE

Factor 2 – DEMONSTRATED CORPORATE TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE: The Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience Factor must include the following:

Provide two (2) examples of completed construction projects that demonstrate experience(s) which consisted of the following:

W912EP19R0021 00100A-1 Amendment 0003

• Experience successfully constructing a steel sheet pile retaining wall with an integral concrete cap and having a continuous length of not less than 500 feet installed along a surveyed alignment within the previous ten (10) years.

• Experience successfully driving steel sheet piles within the last five (5) years primarily by either vibratory hammer and/or the push installation method as well as alternately with a diesel or pneumatic hammer driving method. The pile driving experience shall include both land and barge/boat driving equipment.

NOTE: All the experiences required on this factor need not have been performed on the same project.

Factor 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

1. Overview

By submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation, offerors agree to comply with all terms and conditions contained in the solicitation. Unless the solicitation specifically invites the offeror to submit exceptions, the Contracting Officer may reject any offer that contains exceptions and or qualifying language. In this solicitation, the words “offer” and “proposal” are used interchangeably. (See definition of “offer” at FAR 2.101.) Except for any portions of the offeror’s proposal incorporated into the resulting contract by reference, the terms and conditions included in the solicitation, including any amendments, shall take precedence over the offeror’s proposal.

To ensure the timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those criteria identified as evaluation factors. Proposals should be prepared simply and economically, and they should be straightforward and concise. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent. Offerors are discouraged from providing information not required by the RFP. Offerors shall submit all requested information requested in the RFP. Failure to submit requested information or to meet an RFP requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

This RFP does not commit the Government to reimburse any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal or for any other costs incurred by any firm submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation.

Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation. In accordance with Paragraph 999.204-

W912EP19R0021 00100A-2 Amendment 0003

4003, Section 00100 of the Solicitation, any and all amendments to the solicitation will be distributed via the Federal Business Opportunities website. It is the offeror’s responsibility to acknowledge any and all amendments in its proposal submission.

Offerors should not modify the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the price or non-price proposal or add conditions, exceptions, or qualifications to their offers. Should an Offeror include terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, that offer may be determined to be ineligible for award. Any questions related to specific terms and conditions contained within the solicitation should be submitted via Bidders Inquiry in ProjNet by not later than (NLT) the date specified in Section 00010A, Attachment A, Instructions For Technical Inquires and Questions, prior to submission of an offer.

2. Proposal Evaluation Process

A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers will evaluate all proposals. The technical evaluation will be conducted in strict confidence. Non-price proposals will be initially reviewed and evaluated without knowledge of the corresponding price proposal. The number and identities of offerors will not be revealed to anyone who is not involved in the evaluation and award process, nor will this information be released to other offerors. Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is the LPTA process.

D. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

The Offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying digital copy. In accordance with Paragraph Electronic Proposals in Section 00100, submit one electronic copy (CD/DVD only) that contains all volumes (Price, Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience, and Past Performance). The solicitation will provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal.

Offerors are required to submit proposals with the content specified herein. Proposals without the specified content may be determined Unacceptable and removed from the competition.

The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences.

Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to reject incomplete proposals after initial evaluation without further consideration.

All proposals shall contain the evaluation requirements stated herein and every binder shall also contain: Table of Contents, List of Tables (if required), List of Figures (if required), List of Appendixes, and Name/Address/Telephone Number/e-mail address of the Offeror.

Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. No material (information not part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. The offeror shall submit in the proposal the requested information specified herein.

W912EP19R0021 00100A-3 Amendment 0003

Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted are current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone numbers.

The Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits specified within each evaluation factor. Elaborately prepared proposals are not required, and any material in excess of what is requested, such as corporate marketing information, will not be considered. Failing to submit or completely fill out attachments properly may result in rejection of the offer without further evaluation. Therefore, Offerors are urged to follow instructions and raise questions through inquiries if instructions are not understood. Do not include references to material or information not found within its respective volumes.

Information submitted in the wrong volumes could lead to an Offeror’s proposal being determined “unacceptable” if materially incomplete in any aspect.

The proposal shall be divided into two volumes as indicated below. Each set of volumes shall be submitted sealed separately. Each volume shall be marked with the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number, the volume number and stamped with “Original” or “Copy.” Each respective original or copy shall be separately bound or placed in a three-ring binder. See Attachment 6 – Proposal Format.

• VOLUME ONE (Factor 1) – Price (1 Original, 1 Copy)

• VOLUME TWO (Tab A) – Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience

(1 Original, 4 Copies): Technical Experience Factor must include the following:

Do not include pricing information in Volume Two, Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience – Tab (A). NOTE: Page Limitations Not to Exceed 150 Pages.

• VOLUME TWO (Tab B) THREE – Past Performance (1 Original, 1 Copy). Do not include pricing information in Volume Two.

E. EVALUATION FACTORS

1. FACTOR 1 –

PRICE SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS

The Offeror’s volume for this factor shall be fully completed. Offeror completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP.

This volume will also include price and price related information:

a. Proposal Format (Attachment 6)

W912EP19R0021 00100A-4 Amendment 0003

b. Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) and Section 00010A (Line Items and Pricing Schedule). Include the completed Standard Form 1442 for the RFP, along with the completed Pricing schedule. The total price for the construction will be considered for evaluation, including all options and alternates (if applicable).

c. Section 00101, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors.

d. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee an original bid guarantee shall be submitted with each offer.

e. Attachment 4, Proposal Data Sheet.

f. Attachment 5, Determination of Responsibility.

g. Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

EVALUATION METHOD

The Price factor is not rated. It will be evaluated for reasonableness through the use of a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). The price analysis will also checkfor the appearance of unbalancedline item prices. Additionally, Offerors’ price proposals may be evaluated for price realism to determine if there are proposals that are unrealistically low in terms of overall price or reflective of an inherent lack of management and/or technical competence or comprehension of the requirements. Therefore, offerors are advised that their business decision to submit a low-priced proposal can be considered in assessing their understanding or the risk associated with their proposal.

Prices will be reviewed for minor or clerical errors. If necessary, Offerors will be afforded an opportunity to resolve any such errors. Any exchange with Offerors under this subparagraph shall be for the purpose of clarification (FAR 15.306(a)) and shall not constitute negotiations as defined at FAR 15.306(d). In the event of discrepancy between a unit price and the extended amount, the unit price shall be controlling.

Prices will be reviewed for apparent mistakes. Should this review reveal any prices that seem unreasonably low, the Contracting Officer will contact the offeror and ask the offeror to confirm the questioned price. If the offeror confirms the price, no further action will be taken under this subparagraph. If, however, the offeror alleges a mistake, the offeror may modify the proposal in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(6). Any modification submitted for the purpose of correcting a mistake shall include documentation explaining how the mistake was made. After resolution of minor or clerical errors and/or mistakes, prices will be reviewed for reasonableness, realism, unbalanced pricing or any other price related issue that could pose an unacceptable risk to the Government or indicate the offeror does not clearly understand the requirement at hand.

W912EP19R0021 00100A-5 Amendment 0003

After resolution of minor or clerical errors and/or mistakes, the Contracting Officer will perform a price analysis on all proposals received. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), to determine fairness and reasonableness and the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the proposal. The price analysis will also check for the appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Additionally, offerors’ price proposals may be evaluated for price realism to determine if there are proposals that are unrealistically low in terms of overall price or reflective of an inherent lack of management and/or technical competence or comprehension of the requirements.

Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP. Fairness and Reasonableness will be established using historical price information, price competition information, the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), and any other pricing tools necessary. Additionally, a price realism evaluation may be performed.

Submittal of Section 00101 is not considered for evaluation, but is required as part of the offeror’s proposal of this solicitation. The information requested in this Section needs to be fully completed along with completion of Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) per FAR 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications. The submitted information will be reviewed for completeness by Contracting Personnel.

In addition to other proposal information, the Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR Part 9.

2. FACTOR 2 – DEMONSTRATED CORPORATE TECHNICAL EXPERIENCE

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The Offeror’s volume for this non-priced factor shall include the Proposal Format Sheet, Attachment 6 with the Factor 2 submission requirements. Volume 2 will not include price or price related information.

Provide at least two (2) examples of recent and relevant experience on same or similar completed civil construction projects or close to completed projects that meet the solicitation criteria for Factor 2.

NOTE: Experience need not be all on the same project.

NOTE: Recent and relevant experience is defined as same or similar scope as a civil construction project having the features of work listed in Factor 2.

The project/projects submitted under Factor 2, Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience must have a corresponding submission under Factor 3, Past Performance. In addition, project/projects submitted under Factor 2 must be a completed project or a close to completed

W912EP19R0021 00100A-6 Amendment 0003 project

NOTE: A complete project is defined as work performed under a “project” that was physically completed within the last ten (10) years preceding the date of this solicitation and has been accepted by the customer.

A close to complete project is defined as work performed under a “project” that is over 75% physically complete.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under Factor 2 will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

Attachment 1, Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience must be utilized to provide project information in response for each project. The offeror shall ensure that all information required by the Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience Sheet is provided and all descriptions and explanations are in great detail to provide the technical evaluation team with a clear understanding of the work completed and how it is similar to this project. If a project is presented and has not been completed, the offeror shall explain which elements of the work are not completed and the percentage.

NOTE 1: The prime must have been the prime contractor on one (1) of the projects submitted under in Factor 2.

NOTE 2: If any portion of the work provided as demonstrated corporate technical experience was subcontracted, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of that subcontractor as it relates to work the subcontractor will be performing for this requirement. Using Attachment 2, provide a letter of commitment from that proposed subcontractor.

A Letter of Commitment is defined as a letter from the subcontractor on official Company letterhead (1) addressed to the prime contractor, (2) identifying the work they intend to perform, and (3) stating that they are willing to be bound to perform the identified work if the prime receives this contract. Failure to provide a letter of commitment from a proposed major subcontractor will cause any non-priced factor to be rated Unacceptable, if applicable.

NOTE 3: In accordance with the non-substitution clause in Section 00800 Limitations on Substitutions for Certain Positions and/or Subcontractors, a major subcontractor is defined as any subcontractor that is critical for successfully completing the project and whose experience is submitted as part of this proposal and is also identified in the clause.

NOTE 4: A joint venture entity shall submit the designated number projects for Factor 2 for the combined Joint Venture). If submitting a proposal as a joint venture, the experience of each of the joint venture partners can be submitted for the joint venture entity. These projects will be evaluated separately; however, the overall evaluation for demonstrated corporate technical experience will be combined to form one overall evaluation rating for the joint venture.

W912EP19R0021 00100A-7 Amendment 0003

NOTE 5: Any demonstrated corporate technical experience (to include subcontractors) provided for consideration in Factor 2 shall also have a corresponding submission in the Past Performance Factor. If Past Performance information is not provided for a demonstrated corporate technical experience that demonstrated corporate technical experience will not be evaluated.

The technical evaluation team will evaluate each of the projects submitted to determine if they are similar to this project and whether or not these projects demonstrate that the offeror has the knowledge and experience required to meet or exceed the terms and conditions of the specifications, and the ability to successfully accomplish and complete the project within the required timeframe, as defined in specification Section 01 11 00, Summary of Work.

Offerors must receive a demonstrated corporate technical experience rating of Acceptable in order to receive a rating of Technically Acceptable for Factor 2.

Ratings for the Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience factor are shown below:

Factor 2 Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

3. FACTOR 3 – PAST

PERFORMANCE SUBMISSION

REQUIREMENTS

Offerors shall submit one NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), (see Attachment 3), completed and signed by an Owner of the Project (Client) point of contact or “POC” for each of the projects submitted under Factor 2. If a project submitted under Factor 2 was completed by the Offeror’s major subcontractor, the Offeror is responsible for coordinating with their major subcontractor and submitting a completed NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire on their major subcontractor’s behalf.

All pages of each NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire must be initialed and dated on the bottom right-hand corner by the POC. Failure to provide a completed and signed NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire for each project as described above may result in this Factor being rated Unacceptable. If a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record is available for any of the projects submitted under Factor 2, the CPARS record may be submitted in lieu of the completed

W912EP19R0021 00100A-8 Amendment 0003

Past Performance Questionnaire or an official Performance Evaluation from a non- Federal agency.

The Owner of the Project (Client) or “POC” is defined as the entity that took ownership of the project after construction was complete. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from the Owner of the Project (Client), before the proposal receipt date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the Questionnaire (Blocks 1-8) that contains contract and client information for the submitted project. NOTE: it is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the client’s point of contact information is current and correct.

The client point of contact reflected in (Blocks 1-8) should also be familiar with the past performance they are being asked to verify and informed that they will be contacted by the Government to verify past performance.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detail, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with each offeror. Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), CCASS, CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other databases for the Offeror or the Offeror’s major subcontractors.

The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum solicitation requirements. This assessment considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant past performance information in supplying products/services that meet the solicitation requirements. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation.

The first aspect of the past performance evaluation is to evaluate whether the offeror’s submitted past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. If a demonstrated corporate technical experience submitted in Factor 2, is determined to be Acceptable, it will also be determined to be relevant and recent in Factor 3.

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Definition Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

W912EP19R0021 00100A-9 Amendment 0003

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed a demonstrated corporate technical experience submitted in Factor 2.

This will be determined by utilizing the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire at Attachment 2, CPARS records or official performance evaluations from a non-federal entity.

The offeror must receive a past performance rating of Satisfactory* or better to be considered acceptable.

*A Satisfactory Rating is defined in the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire.

Once relevancy has been determined and past performance ratings have been verified, a rating of Acceptable of Unacceptable will be assigned based on the results. Offeror’s must receive a Past Performance rating of Acceptable for ALL submitted demonstrated corporate technical experiences to receive and overall rating of Acceptable for the Past Performance Factor.

Ratings for this Factor are defined below:

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort (i.e. the offeror received a rating of Acceptable on Factor 2 and received a rating of Satisfactory or better from an offeror provided POC) or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See notes below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort (i.e. the offeror DID NOT receive a rating of Acceptable on Factor 2 or the offeror DID NOT receive a rating of Satisfactory or better from an offeror provided POC).

NOTE 1: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful

W912EP19R0021 00100A-10 Amendment 0003 past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, shall be considered “acceptable.”

F. OTHER GENERAL REVIEW

1. System for Award Management (SAM):

Failure to have an active and completed registration in SAM: http://www.sam.gov/ database will determine an Offeror ineligible for award and removed from competition. An Acceptable offer with incomplete or expired registrations at the time of award may not be eligible for a contract. In such instances, the Government will award to the next Acceptable offer who is eligible for award.

Information contained within an Offeror’s registration must be current and valid. The responsibility of maintaining current information contained in an Offeror’s registration rests solely on the Offeror.

2. Debarred List:

Offerors will be checked against the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Non-procurement Programs. Any offeror who is listed will be eliminated without further consideration.

3. Bid Bonds:

Bid bonds will be reviewed for acceptability. Any offeror whose bid bond is unacceptable, will be eliminated without further consideration unless the Contracting Officer later determines that discussions are necessary and decides that the offerors proposal should be included in the competitive range

4. Joint Venture:

Contractors submitting an offer as a joint venture must provide a written copy of the joint venture agreement with the initial proposal. The joint venture agreement must be signed by both parties and will be subject to review by District Office of Counsel. The offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively. In addition, the joint venture must be registered in System for Award Management (SAM) as a joint venture in order for an award to be made. Also, the SF 1442 as well as all future documents (modifications, bonds and etc.) must be signed by both parties

W912EP19R0021 00100A-11 Amendment 0003 http://www.sam.gov/

-5 -5

-5 -5

-5

-4

-4 -4 -4 -4 -4

-3 -3

-3

-3-3-3

-3

-2-2-2-2-2-2-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1111111111112 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

333333333333

4 4 4 4 4 4 4

444444444

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

C -0

M A

T C

H L I N

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W I N

G C

- 0

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-0

BISCAYNE BAY

K

H O

L

ID

A Y

W

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-03

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L A

N

S T

A

T

O S

T A

Y=537991.5 X=937654.4

Y=538092.2 X=937543.2

STAGING AREA 1.3 ACRES

N

20' 40'0

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

(SEE NOTE 1)

STAGING AREA = 1.3 ACRES

SITE PLAN STA 5+00 TO STA 8+60

ASPHALT PARKING LOT

EXISTING

R E

V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

A

A

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

4. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

SEAWALL BETWEEN STA 4+00 TO STA 12+00.

3. LIGHT POLES ARE PRESENT EVERY 110' TO 120' ALONG THE

VEGETATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND STAGING AREAS.

2. SEE EXISTING CONDITION DRAWINGS FOR TREES AND

CONTRACTING OFFICER AND SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE.

BOUNDARY. LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY

1. STAGING AREA SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-03

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

S E

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

TURBIDITY BARRIER

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

CONTRACTORS FIELD OFFICE

PROPOSED LOCATION FOR

FIELD OFFICE

CONTRACTING OFFICERS

PROPOSED LOCATION FOR

BASIN

DRAINAGE

EXIST.

BASIN

EXIST. DRAINAGE

LIGHT POLE

CONCRETE

EXIST.

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST.

LIGHT POLE

CONCRETE

EXIST.

LIGHT POLE

CONCRETE

EXIST.

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

SILT FENCE

-6

-5

-5 -5 -5

-4

-4 -4 -4 -4 -4-3-3-3-3-3 -2-2-2-2-2-2-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011

111111112 2 2 2 2 2

222 2 2 2 2 2 2

33333 3333333

4 4

4444444

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-0

BISCAYNE BAY

M A

T C

H L I N

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-0

N

S-03

A

PARKING LOT

EXISTING

SEE NOTE 2

BASIN

DRAINAGE

EXIST.

LIGHT POLE

CONCRETE

EXIST.

EXIST. DRAINAGE BASIN

LIGHT POLE

CONCRETE

EXIST.

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

C -0

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-04

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

SITE PLAN STA 8+60 TO STA 12+00

S T

A

T

O S

T A

A R

E V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

4. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

SEAWALL BETWEEN STA 4+00 TO STA 12+00.

3. LIGHT POLES ARE PRESENT EVERY 110' TO 120' ALONG THE

75% OF THE DESIGN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH.

REMOVE COFFERDAM ONCE THE CONCRETE HAS REACHED

COFFERDAM FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE C.I.P. HEADWALL.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN THE TEMPORARY

S-03).

WITH SCHEDULE 20 STEEL PIPE, (SEE SECTION A ON SHEET

EXISTING 48" DIAMETER RCP STORMWATER OUTFALL PIPE

STORMWATER OUTFALL PIPE THROUGH SEAWALL. SLEEVE

CONCRETE HEADWALLS IN FRONT OF EXISTING 48"

1. CONSTRUCT 8 FT CAST-IN-PLACE, SHEET PILE ANCHORED

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-04

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

TURBIDITY BARRIERCONSTRUCTION LIMITS

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS

(SEE NOTE 1 ON SHEET C-01)

SEAWALL ALIGNMENT

(SEE NOTE 1)

EAST) INV. EL. = -3.60

(OUTFALL PIPE FROM

EXIST. 48" RCP

6" CURB

EXIST.

A

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

SILT FENCE

BASIN

DRAINAGE

EXIST.

-6

-6 -6

-6

-5

-5

-5

-5

-4 -4 -4

-4

-4

-4 -3-3-3-3-3-3 -2-2-2-2-2-2-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0111111111111

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

333333333333

4444444444

5 5 5 5 5 5

666666

7 7

7 7

7 7

M A

T C

H L I N

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W I N

G C

- 6

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-4

BISCAYNE BAY

N

PARKING LOT

EXISTING

EXIST. PARKING LOT

A R

E V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

C -0

GRASS

O N E

W

AY

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-05

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L A

N

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

SITE PLAN STA 12+00 TO STA 15+60

S T

A

T

O S

T A

ASPHALT PAVEMENT

EXIST.

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

1. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-05

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST.

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

TURBIDITY BARRIER

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

SILT FENCE

(SEE NOTE 1 ON SHEET C-01)

SEAWALL ALIGNMENT

EXIST. 6" CURB

EXIST. CONC. LIGHT POLE

EXIST. CONC. LIGHT POLE

6" CURB

EXIST.

ARM AND BOX

EXIST GATE

EXIST. 6" CURB

EXIST. METAL SIGN

BASIN

EXIST. DRAINAGE

-6 -6

-6 -6

-5 -5

-5

-5

-5 -4

-4 -4

-4 -4

-4 -3 -3

-3 -3

-3 -3

-2 -2

-2 -2-2-1 -1

-1 -1

-1

11111

2 2 2 2 2 2

2 2 2

333333

4444444 5 5 5 5 5

66666666

7 7 7 7 7

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

(SEE NOTE 1 ON SHEET C-01)

SEAWALL ALIGNMENT

BISCAYNE BAY

N

EXISTING PARKING LOT

EXISTING PARKING LOT

LIGHT POLE

EXIST. CONC.

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

C -0

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-0

GRASS

HEDGE HEDGE HEDGE

GRASS

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-06

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L A

N

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M

S T

A

T

O S

T A

SITE PLAN STA 15+60 TO STA 18+80

EXIST. ASPHALT PAVEMENT

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

R E

V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

A

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

1. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-06

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST.

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS

TURBIDITY BARRIER

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS

SILT FENCE

EXIST. 6" CURB

LIGHT POLE

EXIST. CONC.

LIGHT POLE

EXIST. CONC.

EXIST. 6" CURB

A

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-0

.8

-6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6

-5 -5

-5 -5

-5

-4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -3-3-3-3-3-3 -2-2-2-2-2-2-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0111111111111

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 22 2 2

33333333333

444444444444

5 5 5 5

666666

C -0

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-07

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

S T

A

T

O S

T A

SITE PLAN STA 18+80 TO STA 22+40

A

R E

V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

A

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

3. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

75% OF THE DESIGN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH.

REMOVE COFFERDAM ONCE THE CONCRETE HAS REACHED

COFFERDAM FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE C.I.P. HEADWALL.

2. CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN THE TEMPORARY

S-03).

WITH SCHEDULE 20 STEEL PIPE, (SEE SECTION A ON SHEET

EXISTING 36" DIAMETER RCP STORMWATER OUTFALL PIPE

STORMWATER OUTFALL PIPE THROUGH SEAWALL. SLEEVE

CONCRETE HEADWALLS IN FRONT OF EXISTING 36"

1. CONSTRUCT 7 FT CAST-IN-PLACE, SHEET PILE ANCHORED

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-07

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST.

SEE NOTE 2

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

TURBIDITY BARRIER

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

SILT FENCE

(SEE NOTE 1 ON SHEET C-01)

SEAWALL ALIGNMENT

EXIST. TREE (TYP.)

M A

T C

H L I N

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

- 0

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-0

Y=539254.1

X=938629.3

Y=539224.9

X=938655.3

N

S-03

A

BISCAYNE BAY

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

EXIST. HELICOPTER PAD

EXIST. PARKING LOT

(SEE NOTE 1)

INV. EL. = -4.16

FROM EAST)

(OUTFALL PIPE

EXIST. 36" RCP

GRASS

GRASS

GRASS

EXIST. ASPHALT PAVEMENT

PAVEMENT

EXIST. ASPHALT

SIGN

SIGN

ELECTRIC

EXIST.

SIGN

EXIST.

EXIST. SIGN

EXIST. DRAINAGE BASIN

6" CURB

EXIST.

EXIST. 6" CURB

EXIST. DRAINAGE BASIN

EXIST. CONC. LIGHT POLE

WV

D

E

W V

W V

E

G P

G P

-6 -6

-6 -6

-5 -5

-5

-5

-4 -4 -4 -4

-4

-3 -3-3-3

-3

-2-2-2-2 -2

-2-1 -1

-1

-1

-1 -1

0 1

2 2 222 2 2

2 2

3 3

4 4

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

C -0

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-09

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L

SITE PLAN STA 26+00 TO STA 29+40

20' 40'0

S T

A

T

O S

T A

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

R E

V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

A

A

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

6. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

SEAWALL.

INSTALLATION OF THE SHEET PILING IN THIS SEGMENT OF THE

PROVISIONS OR MODIFICATIONS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH

STA 32+25. CONTRACTOR MUST INCLUDE ANY SPECIFIC

ADJACENT ASPHALT SERVICE ROAD BETWEEN STA 28+00 TO

TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE EXISTING SEAWALL AND

5. ALL PROJECT BIDDERS SHOULD PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL OFFSITE.

OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

4. FROM STA 28+00 TO 32+25 THERE IS A NOTABLE AMOUNT

NEAR THIS PORTION OF THE EXISTING SEAWALL.

CAUTION WHEN OPERATING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

SERVICE ROAD AND THE GUARD RAILING BEHIND. EXERCISE

BADLY DETERIORATED AS WELL AS THE EXISTING ASPHALT

3. FROM STA 28+00 TO STA 32+25 THE EXISTING SEAWALL IS

DOCK.

THE TB IN ORDER TO NOT BLOCK THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST THE FINAL LOCATION OF

CONFLICT WITH OR SEAWARD OF THE NEW MSMC SEAWALL.

1. REMOVE EXISTING MSMC SEAWALL WHERE IT IS IN

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-09

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

TURBIDITY BARRIER

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

SILT FENCE

(SEE NOTE 1 ON SHEET C-01)

SEAWALL ALIGNMENT

EXIST. WATER VALVE

EXIST. 6" CURB

CURB

EXIST. 6"

VALVE

EXIST. WATER

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST.

EXIST. STORM MANHOLE

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C

-1

M A

T C

H L I N

E S

T A

S

E E D

R A

W I N

G C

- 0

Y=539541.3 X=939018.6

Y=539572.3 X=938995.4

N

EXIST. DRAINAGE BASIN

EXIST. CONC. LIGHT POLE

EXIST. DRAINAGE BASIN

EXIST. TREE (TYP.)

EXIST. UTILITY POLE

EXIST. UTILITY POLE

VALVE (TYP.)

EXIST. WATER

EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT

BOX WITH METAL LID

EXIST. CONC. PULL

BISCAYNE BAY

C-14

ED SULLIVAN DRIVE

GRASS

GRASS

GRASS

GRASS

GRASS

C O

N C

W A L K

W A

Y

GRASS

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

EXIST. ASPHALT PARKING LOT

EXIST. BUILDING

E X

IS

T A S P

H A L T P

A V E

M E

N T

EXIST. CONC. WALKWAY

GP

G P

E

E

E

-6

-6

-6 -5

-5

-5

-4

-4

-4

-4

-4

-3

-3

-3

-3

-3

-2

-2

-2

-2

-2

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

SEAWALL

EDGE OF EXIST.

SEAWALL

EDGE OF

POLE

EXIST. CONC.

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

TURBIDITY BARRIER

LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION

SILT FENCE

GAP PLUG SEE C-15

24"x48" CONCRETE

EXIST. 6" CURB

EXIST. 6" CURB

EXIST. GUARDRAIL

EXIST. 6" CURB

GATE

EXIST. METAL

ARM BOX

EXIST. GATE

GUARDRAIL

EXIST.

EXIST. 6" CURB

EXIST. METAL GATE

EXIST. NEIGHBORING WALL

M A

T C

H L

IN

E S

T A

- S

E E D

R A

W

IN

G C -0

Y=539728.0

X=939244.6

Y=539757.2

X=939370.4

Y=539751.8

X=939466.7

Y=539809.0

X=939393.1

Y=539806.0

X=939439.6

Y=539793.4

X=939438.9

Y=539791.8

X=939468.9

(SEE NOTE 1 ON SHEET C-01)

SEAWALL ALIGNMENT

N

BISCAYNE BAY

C-15

GRASS

GRASS

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

EXIST. PARKING LOT

EXIST. ASPHALT PARKING LOT

EXIST. ASPHALT PARKING LOT

EXIST. ASPH

ALT PAVEM

EN

T

O

F F S

E T F

R O

M C

L

SCALE: NTS

KEY MAP

C-

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R E

Y

M P

R

IF

T I

K

H O

L

ID

A Y 4

-M

S S

R -C

S .D

G N

C-10

C

IV

IL

S

IT

E P

L

T

A

T

O S

T A

.1

SITE PLAN STA 29+40 TO STA 32+25.14

GENERAL SHEET NOTES

A

A R

E V

IS

E D T

O A

C C

O M

P A

N Y A

D M

E N

D M

E N

T N

O

-2

-2

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES).

SECTION 01 55 26 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECTION 01 50 02

DAYS AFTER NOTICE TO PROCEED (SEE SPECIFICATION

GOVERNMENT FOR APPROVAL NO LATER THAN 30 CALENDAR

OR BLOCK PARKING MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE

7. REQUESTS TO TEMPORARILY MODIFY HOSPITAL TRAFFIC

SEAWALL.

DAYS OF COMPLETING AN ADJACENT SEGMENT OF THE

GENERAL) CAUSED BY SEAWALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 30

PARKING AREAS, TO SERVICE ROADS, AND TO THE SITE IN

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR DAMAGE (TO ASPHALT

STA 32+25.

ADJACENT ASPHALT SERVICE ROAD BETWEEN STA 28+00 TO

TO THE POOR CONDITION OF THE EXISTING SEAWALL AND

5. ALL PROJECT BIDDERS SHOULD PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION

REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL OFFSITE.

OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

4. FROM STA 28+00 TO 32+25 THERE IS A NOTABLE AMOUNT

NEAR THIS PORTION OF THE EXISTING SEAWALL.

CAUTION WHEN OPERATING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

SERVICE ROAD AND THE GUARD RAILING BEHIND. EXERCISE

BADLY DETERIORATED AS WELL AS THE EXISTING ASPHALT

3. FROM STA 28+00 TO STA 32+25 THE EXISTING SEAWALL IS

ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DOCK.

THE TURBIDITY BARRIER IN ORDER TO NOT BLOCK THE

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST THE FINAL LOCATION OF

(BETWEEN STA. 31+70 AND STA. 32+00).

CONFLICT WITH OR SEAWARD OF THE NEW MSMC SEAWALL

1. REMOVE EXISTING MSMC SEAWALL WHERE IT IS IN

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-10

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

A

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

B

C

D

E

F

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

SHEET ID

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

/2

/2

F

IL

E N

A M

E

D R

A W

IN

G D

A T

E pw:\\COE-SAJPWP02JAX.saj.ds.usace.army.mil:SAJPW\Documents\CAP Projects\Mount Sinai Seawall Repair\080 - Plans\05 Civil\C-11 A003

A N

S I

D

N /A

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E D

IS

T R

IC

T

S

A N M

A R

C O B

L V

D

J A

C K

S O

N V

IL

L E F

L

P T

E M

B E

R

M

IA

M I-

D A

D E C

O U

N T

Y F

L O

R

ID

A M

O U

N T S

IN

A I S

E A

W A

L L R

E P

L A

C E

M E

N T

C O

N T

IN

U

IN

G A

U T

H O

R

IT

IE

S P

R O

G R

A M S

E C

M O

U N

T S

IN

A I

M E

D

IC

A L C

E N

T E

R

W E

P -1

-R

K

H O

L

ID

C O

W D

R…