Fillable_-_Exhibit_L.docx

EXHIBIT L

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE- FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

MEMORANDUM FOR: (OFFEROR'S POC)

FROM: (OFFERORS ADDRESS AND POINT OF CONTACT)

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s)

1. We are currently responding to the Vicksburg Consolidated Contracting Office Request for Proposal W912EE18R0012 for the Operation, Maintenance, and Repair of Facilities, Equipment, and Government-Owned Property at the Lindy Claiborne Boggs Lock and Dam, the John H. Overton Lock and Dam, the Lock And Dam No.3, the Russell B. Long Lock and Dam, and the Joe D. Waggonner, Jr. Lock and Dam on the J. Bennett Johnston Waterway in the State of Louisiana. This RFP specifically requires that we, as an Offeror, do the following:

Send out and track the completion of the Past Performance Questionnaire on ourselves and proposed subcontractors for each of the Offerors relevant contracts. The responsibility to send out and track the completion of the Questionnaire rests solely with the Offeror and shall not be delegated to any subcontractors, team contractors, or joint venture partners. The Offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure that at least two Points of Contact per relevant contract submit a completed Questionnaire directly to the Government not later than, 6 December 2018 at 1700 hrs. CST. Each of the Offerors POC's shall mail or email the completed Questionnaire directly to:

USACE, VICKSBURG DISTRICT

ATTN: Brent Hester, CEMVK-CT-S

4155 CLAY STREET

VICKSBURG, MS 39183-3435

EMAIL: Richard.B.Hester@usace.army.mil

2. We have identified subject contract(s) as relevant to this acquisition and you as our POC. As such, please take a few moments to fill out the attached questionnaire and send it directly to the address listed above. The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and CANNOT be released to us, the Offeror. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, please address them to the Government's Point of Contact above. Thank you for your timely assistance.

Sincerely, (OFFEROR'S POINT OF CONTACT)

ATCH

Contractor:

Prime or Subcontractor: Contract Number:

Contract Type (fixed price, cost plus fixed fee, cost plus award fee, etc): Period of Performance:

Contract Value: Description of Service:

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name ----------------------------------------------------- Office Symbol and Organization Phone: _ (Commercial)

Agency name and address: ----------------------------------------------

E-mail Address: --------------------------------------------------------------

Position Title and Grade: ---------------------------------------------------

Date Questionnaire Completed: ------------------------------------------------

The YES/NO questions should be supplemented with explanatory narrative if answered "YES". Please fill in the blank with the appropriate letter from the list below:

E - Excellent- Performance significantly exceeds all contractual requirements to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished without need for corrective actions.

V- Very Good: Performance meets all contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with only infrequent, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

S - Satisfactory: Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains occasional minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were acceptable.

M - Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects problems for which the contractor's proposed actions were only marginally effective.

U- Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problems for which the contractor's corrective actions were unacceptable.

MANAGEMENT

1. Overall Management performance. _

2. Subcontract management.

3. Effective communication. ---

4. Government property control.

5. Appropriate number of personnel for the services provided.

6. Appropriate experience/mix of skills for services provided. _

7. Appropriate employee competency levels. _

8. Ability to effectively control the entire contract effort. _

9. Contract start-up (mobilization) transition. _

10. Working relationship with the Government. _

11. Responsiveness to government requirements. _

12. Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel. _

13. Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines. _

14. Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority. _

15. Ability to identify problems in

(a) Management (relative to the contract)

(b) Personnel (quantity and/or quality)

(c) Scheduling Projects

(d) Quality Control

16. Willingness to resolve the above problems in

(a) Management (relative to the contract)

(b) Personnel (quantity and/or quality)

17. Ability to resolve the above problems in

(a) Management (relative to the contract)

(b) Personnel (quantity and/or quality)

18. To your knowledge, has contractor had any contracts terminated for default? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

19. Has your organization ever elected to not exercise an option due to contractor's poor performance? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

20. What do you think was the Contractor's strongest management attribute and why?

21. What was the Contractor's weakest management attribute and why? Did the Contractor correct, or attempt to correct the weakness?

QUALITY

22. Contractor's accomplishment in meeting the quality standards for Technical Performance. ---

23. Were modifications issued due to contractor failure to meet technical requirements and/or delivery cost schedules? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS'').

24. Has a cure notice ever been issued? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

25. Has a show-cause letter ever been issued? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

26. Quality of services. _

27. Compliance with accepted Quality Control Plan. _

SAFETY

28. Adherence to all safety regulations and accepted safety plan. _

29. Have there been any safety violations/serious accidents? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

30. Have there been any indications that the contractor has experienced financial problems?

(If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

31. Has there been any indication that the contractor failed to plan/obtain adequate funding for your contract? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

COST

32. Ability to meet the terms of the contract within the contractually-agreed price(s). _

33. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

34. Have contract concessions/changes ever been made due to contractor's failure to accurately estimate costs? (If YES, please explain in "REMARKS").

GENERAL

35. Contractor's overall cooperation. _

36. Contractor's overall performance. _

37. Would you award similar contracts to this contractor? (If NO, please explain in "REMARKS").

REMARKS: