Army_Phase_2_ProjNetResponses.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Army Phase 2 Review: Army Ph2 Pre-bid RFIs (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 44 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 7173985 General pg 17 Paragraph 1.19 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Paragraph 1.19, pg 17 Payment Requests/Invoices (Page 17 and 18): With recent changes to the invoicing system, the process has slowed considerably and is much more complicated. Paragraph 1.19 is requiring to include the daily safety meeting documentation with each invoice for each RM and service order. This will significantly slow down the process further. Can the government remove the requirement to provide safety documentation with each invoice and provide alternate means to meet requirement? Such as review of this information in the daily reports submitted to government.

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No, daily safety meeting documentation shall be submitted with the invoice.

On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173991 General Appendix A, Para

3.1 pg 35 PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Appendix A, Para 3.1, pg 35 states "Service orders over $150,000, if approved, will follow process in". Can HNC provide the completion of the sentence or is it correct as it stands?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . See forthcoming amendment. The text will be revised for correction On: Oct 19 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173993 General Para 4.3, pg 36 Appendix A PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Appendix A, Para 4.3, pg 36 details what the service order fee can be applied to. When we self-perform work, we employ our own people to research the statement of work, develop the quote, research prices for material, order the material, receive the material, and all of the other tasks associated with Service Order development that a standard subcontractor would employ. There is an associated cost for those tasks to be remotely profitable when self-performing, which offers a lower price to the Government. The Service Order Fee does not include these costs.

If it did, the service order fee would need to be increased but then it would be too high when we deal with a subcontractor. Can you modify this paragraph to allow normal costs associated with a company self-performing service orders?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No, modifications to the application of the service order fee will not be made.

On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173994 General pg 87 Appendix E, Table 1.5 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Appendix E, Table 1.5, pg 87: Site Map and Petroleum Schematics are mentioned for the first and only time. It is safe to assume any mapping/schematics will be performed under a Service Order?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Page 1 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

10/19/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReport...

Government Response. . Site map and petroleum schematics will not be executed by service orders.

Site map and petroleum schematics will be completed by modification On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173995 General pg 24 3.9 Incidental Repairs PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, 3.9 Incidental Repairs pg 24 – states: The contractor is authorized to perform up to $10,000 in repairs incidental to the maintenance tasks listed in Appendix G during each maintenance visit. If authorized to spend up to $10k for repairs during each maintenance visit, will a NTE request and additional approval be necessary before initiating these repairs or what is process?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No. Incidental repairs up to $10,000 per RM event are authorized. All information required to justify the cost of these repairs shall be submitted as a completed NTE package IAW PWS Appendix A. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173996 General Pg 32 Appendix A, Paragraph 1.0 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 1.0 General, Pg 32: states that all SO are considered FFP does this also include NTE and Emergency SO?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Yes. All service orders are firm fixed price. The price on all service orders including completed NTE and Emergency SO's will be evaluated for price reasonableness and negotiated if required. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173997 General Pg 6: Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, Pg 6: States that the contractor has to provide (2) positions as task order specific with no other duties. PM and QCM. There is no guarantee that SOs will cover 100% of the cost of these two task order positions, thus putting the contractor at risk. If so, which CLIN should this pricing be provided in?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price these costs. On:

Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7173998 General Pg 6 Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, PWS, Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, Pg 6: States that the contractor has to provide (2) positions as task order specific with no other duties. PM and QCM. Is it the intent of the government for the contractor to provide fully burdened rates in this pricing proposal for 2080 hours for each of the two full time task order only positions?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price these costs On:

Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174001 General Pg 6 Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 2 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

PWS, Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, Pg 6: The government has provided a basis of bid requiring the two full time positions but has not allotted a place in the bid form to validate these costs. In addition, what percentage of the two positions should be allocated for RM vs. SO work?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price the positions On:

Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174002 General pg 5 Section 1 – General Requirements.

Paragraph 1.2.6. PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 1 – General Requirements. Paragraph 1.2.6. pg 5 (ISV) If simultaneous Kickoff meetings occur at multiple sites, will the government allow more days to conduct ISVs (10 calendar days presently)?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No. The initial site visit shall be performed 10 calendar days after the kickoff meeting at each site. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174003 General General Page 28 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Solicitation Page 28, last paragraph states "4. Offerors shall submit the following with their proposal: 'Submit the RFP SF1449 attached to this request to the Contract Specialist's name under block 7a.'" Should the offer be submitted to the Contract Specialist via email in addition to being submitted via AMRDEC SAFE?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . All proposals shall be submitted via AMRDEC SAFE. The SF 1449 should be submitted as part of the package in AMRDEC. Proposals should not be submitted by email On: Oct 19 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174004 General General Page 26 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 26 of the RFP states, "(e) Multiple offers. Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions, including alternative line items (provided that the alternative line items are consistent with subpart 4.10 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation), or alternative commercial items for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. Each offer submitted will be evaluated separately."

Page 28 of the RFP states "1. Offerors shall submit only one (1) offer in response to this RFP."

Can an offeror submit multiple offers?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Multiple offers will not be accepted. See forthcoming amendment. On: Oct 19 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174005 General pg 5 Section 1 – General Requirements.

Paragraph 1.2.6. (ISV) PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 1 – General Requirements. Paragraph 1.2.6. (ISV) pg 5 Will HNC permit service orders to conduct

ISV?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Page 3 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . No. ISVs will not be performed by service order. ISVs are part of firm fixed price. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174006 General Pricing Worksheet Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the Pricing Worksheet, Service Order Fee Breakdown sheet, the formula in cells C16/D16 is the sum of all fees in rows 9-15. By adding each percentage, it inflates the service order fee %. As an example, if an offeror is proposing 10% profit on the total project (on all labor, subs, materials), the formula would indicate a minimum 30% service order fee rather than a minimum 10% service order fee. Is acceptable for an offeror to alter the formula in cells C16/D16 and use its own calculation/formula for the service order fee? Will this offeror-provided service order fee be used in the price evaluation

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, it is acceptable for an offeror to alter the formula. If alterations are made to the formula, it must be displayed on the spreadsheet. Yes, the service order fee will be used in the price evaluation. See forthcoming amended pricing worksheet. The service order fee in cell C16 and its sub-elements will be used in the pricing evaluation. The Total Service Order Fee in Cell C16 is the ONLY allowable markup on service orders, with the exception of the emergency SO fee where applicable On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174007 General pg 13 Section 1 – General Requirements.

Paragraph 1.10.2 PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 1 – General Requirements. Paragraph 1.10.2. pg 13 What constitutes a significant conference, meeting, discussion, verbal direction, telephone conversation?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . This requirement applies to all scheduled meetings and conversations where direction is given. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174009 General Pricing worksheet Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Solicitation Page 42 under 3.a.1. "Separate tabs have been provided for separate location labor rates." The sheets CLIN 1 Qtr RM, CLIN 2 SemiAni RM, and CLIN 3 Annual RM provide one line per site, but does not breakdown by site. Should the offeror replicate the Svs Ordr Labor Rates sheet to provide rates for each location?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No, only one set of labor rates will be accepted On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174010 General pg 3 Section 1 – General Requirements.

Paragraph 1.2. "Scope and Authority" PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 1 – General Requirements. Paragraph 1.2. "Scope and Authority" pg 3, Define Ancillary Equipment?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . This is any equipment that directly supports the wetted fuel system On: Oct 19 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 4 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

7174011 General Pg 18, Para 1.20 Warranty:

Section 1.20, PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.20, Pg 18, Para 1.20 Warranty: Will the Contractor be reimbursed for time and materials when responding to a warranty covered repair where it has been determined the deficiency was caused by operator error or neglect?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Warranty issues will be handled on a case by case basis after award On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174012 General Pg 84, Appendix D, Section 14, PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix D, Section 14, Pg 84, Individual Clearance: Will the government be providing a list of security clearance requirements for each site?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is the contractor's responsibility to coordinate with each site regarding specific requirements for access On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174013 General Page 42 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Solicitation Page 42 under 3.a.2. "...include breakdowns showing types of materials, unit costs, and extended unit costs." Should the offeror create an additional sheet that provides the breakdown by material, unit costs and extended unit costs?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . The costs should be broken down as displayed on the pricing worksheet. See forthcoming amendment On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174014 General Pg 18 Paragraph 1.19 Payment Requests/Invoices, PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Paragraph 1.19 Payment Requests/Invoices, Pg 18: Can the government provide clarification for "...however, once reviewed by the government it may need to be resubmitted until accepted"

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . This process will be further defined after award. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174016 General Page 43 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Solicitation Page 43, under 5. Total Price Proposal. "Each Offeror's labor and price components will be applied equally across the service orders to determine the effects of how the Offeror's labor rates and fees will potentially forecast future Service Order prices." Will the Offeror's price narrative and service order fee calculation be a guide in how to apply the Offeror's labor rates and fees so that fees are not doublecounted? For example, if the Offeror's narrative and service order fee calculation indicates that G&A is included as part of the Service Order fee, will the application of the Offeror's fees include the Service Order Fee and exclude the G&A percentage so that G&A is not doublecounted?

Page 5 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . The burdened labor rates and service order fee will be utilized in the price evaluation. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174017 General pg 24 Section 3 -Incidental Repairs. Paragraph

3.9. "Incidental Repairs" PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS Section 3 -Incidental Repairs. Paragraph 3.9. "Incidental Repairs" pg 24, Should contractor seek NTE approval prior to initiating repairs during RM event?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No. Incidental repairs up to $10,000 per RM event are authorized. All information required to justify the cost of these repairs shall be submitted as a completed NTE package IAW PWS Appendix On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174018 General Pricing Worksheet Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

On the Pricing Worksheet, are Unburdened Labor Rates on the Svs Ordr Labor Rates sheet and Base Direct Labor Rates on the Labor Markup sheet being solely used to evaluate compliance with FAR 52.222-6 and 52.222-41

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . The unburdened labor rates will be used to evaluate compliance with FAR 52.222-6 and 52.222-41. Additionally, these unburdened labor rates may be used at the government's discretion On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174019 General Pricing Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How does Huntsville want us to handle the different rates for the Prime and our Subcontractors for all of the labor categories on the pricing worksheet? Should we submit multiple tables for the Prime as well as subs?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price these costs.

Please note that subcontractor rates for minor repair work will be evaluated at the service order level, as subcontracted work under service orders is required to be competively bid On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174024 General Pricing Worksheet Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the Pricing Worksheet there is a tab for SERVICE ORDER FEE BREAKDOWN, though in the Solicitation on Page 31 section C, the sections for Volume 3 are listed but the Service Order Fee Breakdown is omitted. Does the SERVICE ORDER FEE BREAKDOWN need to be included in the Offer, Volume 3 – Factor III: Price?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . The Service Order Fee Breakdown needs to be included. See forthcoming amendment. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174028 General Pricing worksheet Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 6 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

In the Pricing Worksheet the Labor Markup tab has "Base Direct Labor Rate" and then adds Overhead, should the "Base Direct Labor Rate" be inclusive or exclusive of Fringe?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No, base direct labor rate should be fully unburdened On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174031 General Pricing Worksheet Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the Pricing Worksheet on the "SERVICE ORDER Fee Breakdown" there is a line called "Indirect Rate (applied to Direct Labor)", is it acceptable to include all of the Offeror's indirect rates that would apply to direct labor in accordance with the Offeror's cost estimating practices (ex: Overhead, Fringe, and G&A)?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . See revised pricing worksheet in the forthcoming amendment On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174033 General Page 33 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

On page 33 FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation indicates "All non-price factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price." Is there a formula for weighting each of the evaluated components?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No. See ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS beginning on page 34 for details on how proposals are to be evaluated On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174035 General Service Order Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding the service order fee calculation, the table and formula requested for total service order fee as applied does not appear to be correct. The table sums all elements in that column and the resulting value does not correlate to an accurate depiction for evaluating proposers costs since these elements are not calculated together to derive individual cost build-ups in the price model. What is the intent for depicting the service order fee calculation this way?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . The intent is to display and justify the calculation of the service order fee. See revised pricing worksheet in the forthcoming amendment On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174036 General Page 29 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

On page 29 of 87 the Government states "The electronic copy of the pricing proposal must be in Excel format."

Given that the Price Proposal consists of two parts the Tab A - Pricing Worksheet already in Excel format and Tab B

- Price Narrative that would typically be prepared in a word document – will the Government accept the submission of the Price Volume in two parts similar to the requirement as Tab A in Excel and Tab B in pdf?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is acceptable for the Price Narrative to be submitted in PDF. However, the attached Pricing Worksheet in Excel must be provided On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174037 General PPQ

Page 7 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the Government accept PPQs submitted by subcontractors on previous Huntsville proposals within a 12 month period?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, PPQs can be reused if they meet the requirements of the solicitation On:

Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174038 General Service Order Fee Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the Service Order Fee Breakdown tab on the pricing worksheet, the fees are additive in the formula at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Does HNC expect the bidders to utilize all the markup rate categories provided (i.e. M&H Handling Charge, profit in M&H, Subcontractor Handling, Profit on Subcontractor, etc.)? How will HNC determine the total cost of the service orders using the rates provided in the worksheet?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . See forthcoming amendment for pricing worksheet update On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174039 General Service Order Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the acceptable or expected range of the Service Order Fee value? Depending on how HNC evaluates the Overall Proposed Price (see previous question), this Fee could change for each bidder?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price the Service Order Fee. There is not an acceptable or expected range of the Service Order Fee value. The Service Order Fee is a fixed percentage proposed by the Offeror On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174040 General Service Order Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How will HNC evaluate the total cost of proposed price components (fees, labor rates, etc.) for MR service orders using the estimated value of $2.1 million/option year and $1.05 million for the 6-month extension? Please explain the process and provide the formula (or formulas) how the rates we propose are going to be calculated to determine the total MR service order cost for the period of performance to determine the Overall Proposed Price.

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Multiple evaluation techniques will be utilized and applied consistently across all Offerors On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174041 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In PWS paragraph 4.5, please explain why Travel costs are not be included on a routine service order unless otherwise approved by the contracting officer or his/her representative?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Travel costs must be approved by the contracting officer or his/her representative as described in PWS paragraph 4.5. On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 8 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

7174042 General Price Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

How will HNC evaluate travel costs associated with CLIN 0007 to determine the Overall Proposed Price? Please provide the formula and process.

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Travel costs will not be evaluated at this time On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174043 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In PWS paragraph 4.6 (Contractor Price Certification), who does HNC expect/require the contractor authorized representative to be that certifies/approves the pricing submitted on each service order?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the Offeror's discretion to select an authorized representative On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174045 General Pg. 4, Section 3.3, QASP Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

QASP, Section 3.3, Pg. 4, Deficiencies and Compliance: If a deficiency is found during a warranty period, will a "determination" also be made if the deficiency was caused by operator error or neglect?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Warranty issues will be handled on a case by case basis after award On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174046 General Pricing Sheet (Excel) In row 40 of the "Summary" Pricing Sheet

(Excel) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Pricing Sheet (Excel) - In row 40 of the "Summary" tab of the pricing sheets that were provided, the Prime Contractor's Service Order Fee is shown as a dollar amount. Should this be a percentage instead?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, the Service Order Fee should be displayed as a percentage. See forthcoming amendment On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174047 General Pricing sheet (Excel) Service Order Fee Breakdown Pricing sheet

(Excel) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Pricing sheet (Excel) – Service Order Fee Breakdown (Tab) A breakdown of our proposed service order fee is already included in our pricing narrative. Can an example be provided of what the government is asking on all Routine Markup Rate headings if needed?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . The sub-elements of the Service Order Fee are at the Offeror's discretion. See forthcoming amendment to the pricing worksheet On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174048 General Service Order Fee Breakdown

Page 9 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Pricing Sheet (Excel)

Pricing sheet (Excel)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Pricing sheet (Excel) – Service Order Fee Breakdown (Tab) The government asking the contractors to breakdown their fee. The percentage for M&H Handling Charge Rate, Profit on M&H, and Subcontractor Handling would not be in the fixed percentage all of the time. Each of the items listed do not necessarily apply to all service order costs (self-perform vs subcontractor). Is the government just looking for a breakdown of the % of the Prime Contractor SO Fee proposed only?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . See forthcoming amendment to the pricing worksheet. The government's intent is to see a breakdown of the Prime Contractor Service Order Fee On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174049 General Pricing sheet (Excel) Service Order Fee Breakdown Pricing sheet

(Excel) Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Pricing sheet (Excel) – Service Order Fee Breakdown (Tab) In row 16, the Total Service Order Fee is calculating as a summation of all of the percentages above. This is not an accurate representation of the Service Order Fee due to the percentages included in the sum (e.g. Profit on Labor, Profit on Subcontractor, etc.) do not each get applied to all of the service order costs. Can this breakdown be deleted in light of the information that we include in our Pricing Narrative that spells out how we arrive at our Service Order Fee?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No, the breakdown cannot be deleted. These items are required to justify your Service Order Fee. It is acceptable to adjust the calculation to represent how your service order fee is calculated. If alterations are made to the formula, it must be displayed on the spreadsheet. See forthcoming amendment On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7174068 Environmental Engineering PWS 151 Appendix H

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are you able to provide a more detailed list of equipment that indicates whether the tanks are specifically aboveground or underground storage tanks?

On: Oct 03 2017.

Government Response. . No, all available information has been provided On: Oct 19 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 10 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User