A.07.23_Question_&_Answers_from_Industy.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Technical Evaluators Report Closed Inquiries

Project: MFSS IIa (Restricted) Review: Questions/Answers (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 24 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

8041954 Contracting Solicitation

Section 52.222-24 Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation, F. Proposal

Content, Volume I, Factor I -Technical Experience.

Tab B.

"Projects may include medical projects with the Federal

Government, State or local Governments, or commercial customers."

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: Section 52.222-24 Preaward On-Site Equal Opportunity Compliance Evaluation, F.

Proposal Content, Volume I, Factor I -Technical Experience. Tab B. "Projects may include medical projects with the Federal Government, State or local Governments, or commercial customers."

Question(s): We have several key personnel with experience performing O&M in medical environments. Alongside our contract experience, will the government consider including Key Personnel experience of as past performance/corporate experience? Will the government provide an equal or a less favorable evaluation for key personnel?

On: Jun 10 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Past Performance will be evaluated on the projects submitted in Volume 3 of the proposal.

Key personnel experience will be evaluated as part of Volume 2 Management Approach of the proposal. Key Personnel will be evaluated using the combined management approach risk ratings provided in the Solicitation, table of FACTOR II - Management Approach, reference pg. 51 & 52 and Evaluation Criteria pg. 58 & 59. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 17 2019

1-1 Government Response. Past Performance will be evaluated on the projects submitted in Volume 3 of the proposal.

Key personnel experience will be evaluated as part of Volume 2 Management Approach of the proposal. Key Personnel will be evaluated using the combined management approach risk ratings provided in the Solicitation, table of FACTOR II - Management Approach, reference pg. 51 & 52 and Evaluation Criteria pg. 58 & 59. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8041958 Contracting Solicitation Section 52.212-2

Evaluation Commercial "All projects included for consideration must have been completed within five years from

Page 1 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

6/27/2019https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicAdminClosedR...

Items, Factor I – Technical Experience.

the closing date of this solicitation and be similar in scope and complexity to be considered relevant."

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Reference: Section 52.212-2 Evaluation Commercial Items, Factor I – Technical Experience. "All projects included for consideration must have been completed within five years from the closing date of this solicitation and be similar in scope and complexity to be considered relevant."

Question: Can existing projects (projects we are currently operating) be used as a recent and relevant corporate past performance/corporate experience? Will the government provide an equal or a less favorable evaluation for existing projects?

On: Jun 10 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Past performance for the projects submitted must have sufficient information gained from the PPQs or CPARS to determine the offeror's record of past performance. In general, the project must be completed to obtain an overall performance rating. If no recent/relevant performance record is available or if the offerors performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will be given a neutral confidence assessment rating.

Past performance rating will be evaluated as described in the Solicitation, table of FACTOR III – Past Performance, reference pg. 60 & 61. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 17 2019

1-1 Government Response. Past performance for the projects submitted must have sufficient information gained from the PPQs or CPARS to determine the offeror's record of past performance. In general, the project must be completed to obtain an overall performance rating. If no recent/relevant performance record is available or if the offerors performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will be given a neutral confidence assessment rating.

Past performance rating will be evaluated as described in the Solicitation, table of FACTOR III – Past Performance, reference pg. 60 & 61. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8041965 Contracting Solicitation Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Question(s): Is the Government planning on scheduling a proposal conference to introduce project requirements and expectations? If not, will the government consider putting together a webinar or proposal conference for prospective bidders?

On: Jun 10 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The Government will not conduct a proposal conference or a webinar. Comments and questions will be facilitated through Projnet until 14 June 2019, Page 2 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User in accordance with the solicitation, reference pg. 4. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 17 2019

1-1 Government Response. The Government will not conduct a proposal conference or a webinar. Comments and questions will be facilitated through Projnet until 14 June 2019, in accordance with the solicitation, reference pg. 4. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8041999 Contracting Volume 4, Tab C Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For Volume 4, Tab C, in the case of a normal prime-sub relationship with a key sub (over 20%) is a teaming agreement required to be submitted to satisfy the Contractor Team Arrangement (CTA) requirement? Or is the prescribed Letter of Commitment sufficient?

On: Jun 10 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. A Letter of Commitment would be sufficient for a key subcontractor in a normal prime-sub relationship.

KEY SUBCONTRACTORS. Throughout the Solicitation, "key subcontractor" is defined as a subcontractor who will perform at least 20% of the total contract effort. A letter of commitment shall be provided for each key subcontractor, reference Paragraph "d."

Proposal submission pg. 48.

Contractor Team Arrangement (if applicable). Provide a letter/agreement for contractor team arrangements identifying who will be acting as a potential prime contractor and who will be acting as its subcontractor(s), letter/agreement must be signed by all parties.

The letter/agreement shall clearly identify the prime contractors NAICS and size standards. , reference Solicitation, pg. 52. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate

- CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 17 2019

1-1 Government Response. A Letter of Commitment would be sufficient for a key subcontractor in a normal prime-sub relationship.

KEY SUBCONTRACTORS. Throughout the Solicitation, "key subcontractor" is defined as a subcontractor who will perform at least 20% of the total contract effort. A letter of commitment shall be provided for each key subcontractor, reference Paragraph "d."

Proposal submission pg. 48.

Contractor Team Arrangement (if applicable). Provide a letter/agreement for contractor team arrangements identifying who will be acting as a potential prime contractor and who will be acting as its subcontractor(s), letter/agreement must be signed by all parties.

The letter/agreement shall clearly identify the prime contractors NAICS and size standards. , reference Solicitation, pg. 52. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8042004 Contracting Section 1.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.2.1 states "The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract (which will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract) labor categories shall ensure personnel meet the minimum qualifications outlined in section 1.2 of this PWS.". Later, Page 3 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

Factor IV – Price states: "Future task order solicitations will direct the offeror to propose labor rates for the place(s) of performance."

Is the Government's intent that the proposed rates for the IDIQ establish a nationwide maximum and that no task order rates proposed for a specific location can exceed those proposed for the

IDIQ?

On: Jun 10 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Yes, the maximum rates are for the United States, Hawaii, Alaska and other U.S. territories. These rates shall be the maximum allowable rates for task orders issued during the ordering period of the IDIQ. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 17 2019

1-1 Government Response. Yes, the maximum rates are for the United States, Hawaii, Alaska and other U.S. territories. These rates shall be the maximum allowable rates for task orders issued during the ordering period of the IDIQ. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8048790 Contracting Solicitation Proposal Submission Page 48, d. Key Subcontracotrs Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Key Subcontractors: a "key subcontractor" is defined as a subcontractor who will perform at least 20% of the total contract effort.

QUESTION: Can a subcontractor be included that may not be considered "key"?

On: Jun 13 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The offeror may include a non-key subcontractor in describing their management approach. However, experience and past performance will be evaluated on the prime and the key subcontractor/s only. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. The offeror may include a non-key subcontractor in describing their management approach. However, experience and past performance will be evaluated on the prime and the key subcontractor/s only. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8049076 Contracting Solicitation

Section A. Proposal Submission, Section F.

Proposal Content, Volume 4, Factor IV - Price, RFP

"The offeror shall submit in an excel spreadsheet the cost of each service (labor category) per CLIN. Submission of the Excel pricing model to the Government shall not be in pdf format."

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the Government please provide a template Excel pricing model to ensure all submissions are easily compared?

Page 4 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Jun 13 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Offerors shall mirror the exact template provided on pages 54 through 56. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On:

Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. Offerors shall mirror the exact template provided on pages 54 through 56. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8049093 Contracting Solicitation

Section A. Proposal Submission, Section F.

Proposal Content, Volume 2, Tab A, RFP page 52

"The offerors shall provide a brief but pertinent resume of the key personnel."

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government please confirm that resumes for key personnel are not included in the 15-page limit for Volume 2, Tab A?

On: Jun 13 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Resumes shall be limited to no more than 12 pages total.

This is in addition to the 15 page limit allowed in Tab A. The Request for Proposal has been updated to add additional time. This change has been made on page 50 under Volume 2, Tab A. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. Resumes shall be limited to no more than 12 pages total. This is in addition to the 15 page limit allowed in Tab A. The Request for Proposal has been updated to add additional time. This change has been made on page 50 under Volume 2, Tab A. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8049122 Program Management Extension request Submission date

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the government consider a two-week extension to the submission date?

On: Jun 13 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. An extension will be provided due to the to the amended

RFP and attachment update.

Proposal submissions are due 10 July 2019, 1400 Central time. Pages 1, 3 and 46 By:

Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. An extension will be provided due to the to the amended RFP and attachment update.

Proposal submissions are due 10 July 2019, 1400 Central time. Pages 1, 3 and 46 On:

Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 5 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8050641 Contracting Solicitation Volume 1, Factor 1 Page 51, Volume 1, Tab B Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Volume 1, Tab B: The offeror shall provide five projects/task orders similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS.

QUESTION: The PWS outlines 7 support services (1.2.3 – 1.1.9). As a small business set-aside, it is difficult to provide examples for these seven services with only 5 projects allowed within the proposal. We respectfully request that the project allowance for submittal be increased to 7 in order to sufficiently relay our team's capacity to perform all services within the PWS.

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. It is the offeror's responsibility to ensure projects submitted demonstrate relevant technical experience. Projects may represent more than one type of service.

Per Factor 1 instructions, "The offeror shall provide five (completed within the past five years) projects/task orders, similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS in the format presented in Attachment 0001 ERF. If the offeror submits more than five projects then the Government will only review and consider the first five projects listed." (Page 51) By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. It is the offeror's responsibility to ensure projects submitted demonstrate relevant technical experience. Projects may represent more than one type of service.

Per Factor 1 instructions, "The offeror shall provide five (completed within the past five years) projects/task orders, similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS in the format presented in Attachment 0001 ERF. If the offeror submits more than five projects then the Government will only review and consider the first five projects listed." (Page 51) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8050644 Contracting Solicitation Attachment 0001 Item f Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Attachment 0001 Experience Reporting Form, f: Type of System installed (e.g.UMCS, HVAC, ESS, FAS, and SCADA)

QUESTION: Is the type of system installed relevant to the services outlined within the PWS?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. A revised Experience Reporting Form has been provided as part of Amendment 2 dated 27 June 2019. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1

Page 6 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. A revised Experience Reporting Form has been provided as part of Amendment 2 dated 27 June 2019. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8050648 Contracting Solicitation Volume 3, Factor 3 Page 52, Volume 3, Factor 3-Past Performance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Volume 3, Factor III-Past Performance: Offerors shall provide CPARS or PPQs for only the projects submitted in Volume 1.

QUESTION: Can we provide a PPQ for a project that was completed and obtained for another submittal within 90 days?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Offerors shall provide CPARS or PPQs for only the projects submitted in Volume I. Offerors shall NOT submit PPQs on projects with Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings; but shall provide the associated CPARS ratings rather than PPQs.

Per Factor 1 instructions, "The offeror shall provide five (completed within the past five years) projects/task orders, similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS in the format presented in Attachment 0001 ERF. If the offeror submits more than five projects then the Government will only review and consider the first five projects listed." (Page 51) By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. Offerors shall provide CPARS or PPQs for only the projects submitted in Volume I. Offerors shall NOT submit PPQs on projects with Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings; but shall provide the associated CPARS ratings rather than PPQs.

Per Factor 1 instructions, "The offeror shall provide five (completed within the past five years) projects/task orders, similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS in the format presented in Attachment 0001 ERF. If the offeror submits more than five projects then the Government will only review and consider the first five projects listed." (Page 51) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8050655 Contracting Solicitation Location Page 2, Location Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Location: Locations will be specific in each task order and include Department of Defense installations in the United States, Hawaii, Alaska and other U.S. territories.

Page 7 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

QUESTION: Will projects included in our submittal that meet the services outlined in the PWS but are not within the locations outlined be weighted less in the evaluation?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Projects/task orders shall be similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS. Information should clearly demonstrate the offerors capability to perform multiple task orders simultaneously in various geographic locations. (Page 51) By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. Projects/task orders shall be similar in scope, size, and complexity to the efforts described in the PWS. Information should clearly demonstrate the offerors capability to perform multiple task orders simultaneously in various geographic locations. (Page 51) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8050657 Contracting Solicitation Factor I-Technical Experience

Page 58, Factor I-Technical Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Factor I – Technical Experience: Offerors must demonstrate technical experience in performing MFSS related activities in private or Government medical facilities similar to the effort identified in the basic PWS.

QUESTION: Will Government medical facilities projects be weighted higher than private medical facilities in the evaluation?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Experience may include medical projects with the Federal

Government, State or local Governments, or commercial customers. (Page 51) By:

Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. Experience may include medical projects with the Federal Government, State or local Governments, or commercial customers. (Page 51) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8050659 Contracting Solicitation Factor I-Technical Experience

Page 58, Factor I-Technical Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

REFERENCE: Factor I – Technical Experience: Offerors must demonstrate technical experience in performing MFSS related activities in private or Government medical facilities similar to the effort identified in the basic PWS.

QUESTION: If government projects are weighted higher, will Department of Defense past performance be weighted higher than non-DoD federal experience?

Page 8 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Experience may include medical projects with the Federal

Government, State or local Governments, or commercial customers. (Page 51) By:

Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. Experience may include medical projects with the Federal Government, State or local Governments, or commercial customers. (Page 51) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051187 Contracting Reference

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are Key Personnel also expected to be priced in addition to the staffing labor categories shown in the tables on pages 54 thru 56?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. Key personnel should be part of the ODCs. By: Stephanie

Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019 1-1 Government Response. Key personnel should be part of the ODCs. On: Jun 27 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051768 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

When Task Orders are issued for competition among the awardees of the MATOC, are we required to use the rates bid in response to W912DY-17-R-0028?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract. (Page 6) By:

Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract. (Page 6) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051771 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

When Task Orders are issued for competition among the awardees of the MATOC, can we use local prevailing wages at the time the Task Order is issued?

Page 9 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. When the Government requests proposals from the MATOC contractors, there will be instructions on how prices shall be proposed. The rates proposed for the MATOC will become maximum binding rates for task orders placed under this contract. (Page 6) By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. When the Government requests proposals from the MATOC contractors, there will be instructions on how prices shall be proposed. The rates proposed for the MATOC will become maximum binding rates for task orders placed under this contract. (Page 6) On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051773 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

When task orders are issued, will there be line items for Other Direct Costs, such as vehicles, supplies, equipment?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. There will not be a separate Contract Line Item Number

(CLIN) for Other Direct Costs (ODC) for vehicles, supplies, equipment, etc. The format of the cost proposal at the task order level should be based on the offeror's accounting process. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. There will not be a separate Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for Other Direct Costs (ODC) for vehicles, supplies, equipment, etc. The format of the cost proposal at the task order level should be based on the offeror's accounting process. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051775 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If there are no line items in Task Orders for Other Direct Costs, such as vehicles, supplies, equipment, how are bidders supposed to capture those costs?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The format of the cost proposal at the task order level should be based on the offeror's accounting process. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. The format of the cost proposal at the task order level should be based on the offeror's accounting process. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 10 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051779 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Since this MATOC covers United States, Hawaii, Alaska and other U.S. territories, how are we supposed to arrive at one wage rate for all areas covered? Wage Determinations, market rates, State Unemployment Taxes etc. vary significantly.

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract. (Page 6) The offeror may choose to offer lower rates at the task order level. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract. (Page 6) The offeror may choose to offer lower rates at the task order level. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051780 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

When creating the fully loaded labor rates for the CLINS, please specify exactly what those rate should include. For example, fee, G&A, home office overhead, vehicles, equipment etc.

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The fully loaded labor rates should be based on the offeror's accounting process. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT;

(2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. The fully loaded labor rates should be based on the offeror's accounting process. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051784 Program Management

Task Order Mgmt Price

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Since this MATOC covers United States, Hawaii, Alaska and other U.S. territories how will the Government determine, fairness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). Wage Determinations and market rates vary significantly across the areas served.

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. The FAR allows various methods for the Government to determine fair and reasonableness. The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract. (Page

Page 11 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User

6) The offeror may choose to offer lower rates at the task order level. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. The FAR allows various methods for the Government to determine fair and reasonableness. The Contractor labor rates proposed for the base contract will become maximum binding rates for orders placed under this contract. (Page

6) The offeror may choose to offer lower rates at the task order level. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8051963 Program Management

Attachment 0001 Attachment 0001 Attachment 0001

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In regards to Attachment 0001, ERF:

f. asks for "Type of system installed (e.g. UMCS, HVAC, ESS, FAS, and SCADA)

The projects we are submitting are service related and do not include a system installation.

Are these types of projects acceptable and if so, is N/A acceptable for this field?

On: Jun 14 2019. Forward request by email.

1-0 Evaluation Concurred. A revised Experience Reporting Form has been provided as part of Amendment 2 dated 27 June 2019. By: Stephanie Davis; Contracting Directorate - CT; (2568951596) On: Jun 27 2019

1-1 Government Response. A revised Experience Reporting Form has been provided as part of Amendment 2 dated 27 June 2019. On: Jun 27 2019 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 12 of 12ProjNet: Logged In User