ATTACHMENT_C_-_Sample_Task_Order_27Nov2017.docx

Performance Work Statement Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study Munitions Burial Trench Munitions Response Site and Environmental Contamination Assessment of Building 500 Former Camp Swampy (fictional) Victoria County, Texas 14 April 2017 Revision: 1 Revision Date: 27 November 2017

Revision 1 – Summary of changes to PWS released on 14 April 2017 (Changes are in red, strikethrough and/or underlined) Section 2.2 – Trench dimensions were clarified, list of suspected munitions has been updated, ‘removals’ changed to ‘investigation’ and additional description was added for TNT Washout Facility.

Section 3.1.6 – Task 9 was removed from TPP Process.

Section 3.2 - EBA Project Planning Documents were added to Objectives. Clarified Acceptance Criteria for RI/FS QAPP and EBA QAPP.

Section 3.4 – Added HTRW to the Objectives. Corrected CSP to ESP.

Section 3.5.6 – Changed MEC Risk Assessment Process.

Section 3.7.3 - Clarified Acceptance Criteria for Final Proposed Plan submission.

Section 3.7.6 – Clarified version of Proposed Plan for public review period.

Section 3.10.6 – Minor adjustments to Specific ask Requirements.

Table 4-1 – Corrections of oversights.

Attachment A – Updated as needed to reflect the above changes.

1.0 OBJECTIVE: This task order has two objectives.

1.1 The first objective of this task order is to perform a Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (RI/FS) and achieve acceptance of Decision Documents in compliance with Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, and Department of Defense, Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and State Regulations and Guidance to include Interim Guidance and Data Item Descriptions (DID) at the Munitions Burial Trench Munitions Response Site (MRS).

1.2 The second objective of this task order is to perform an environmental contamination assessment of Building 500 in accordance with Engineering Manual (EM) 385-1-97, applicable laws, regulations, and guidance documents.

2.0 BACKGROUND:

2.1 Work under this Performance Work Statement (PWS) falls within the Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) for Camp Swampy, a formerly used defense site (FUDS). The Contractor shall perform all work in compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the National Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR Part 300. All activities involving work in areas potentially containing explosives, chemical, and health and safety hazards are regulated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, USACE, Department of the Army (DA), Department of Defense (DOD), and the State of Texas.

2.2 Camp Swampy (fictional) is a 127 acres Formerly Used Defense Site located in Victoria County, Texas. Two sites are included in this Task Order, Munitions Burial Trench MRS and a TNT Wash out Facility, Bldg. 500

2.2.1 Munitions Burial Trench MRS: Based on review of historical records, activities at the former Camp Swampy, Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) are suspected to be buried in a trench within the 3 acre MRS. Aerial photographs of the site are not available however a detailed memorandum indicates the types of munitions buried and the size and depth of the burial trench. The Memorandum indicates that as a part of closure and cleanup of the facility, Discarded Military Munitions (DMM), munitions debris (MD) from range clearance, and 3 leaking 55 gallon drums of motor oil were dumped in the burial trench which measured approximately 70 ft Long x 15ft Wide x 12ft Deep. The area outside the munitions trench within the MRS shall be included in the RI/FS to insure no contamination lies outside the burial trench and no additional trenches are present at the site. The following are suspected to have been disposed in the burial trench:

· 105 mm HEAT projectiles (practice),

· 120 106 mm recoilless rifle HEAT projectiles (practice) M34,

· 30 mm cartridges,

· 5” Zuni rockets,

· Davy Crockett 20mm spotting charge (DU)

· 90 mm AP projectiles,

· AIM-9 (sparrow sidewinder) warheads (practice),

· BDU-33 practice bomb,

· M38 100lb practice bomb

· BLU-106,

· BLU-107 (Durandal warhead).

2.2.1.1 For pricing purposes the contractor shall assume the following:

· The Offeror shall anticipate 1 acre of vegetation removal to support removals investigation and up to 2 acres to support remainder of the RIFS.

· No road construction will be required to access the project burial trench site.

· The Offeror shall anticipate up to 5 BIPs and 15 consolidated demolition shots.

· The Offeror shall assume up to 2 tons of MD requiring recycling from the burial trench sites.

· The Offeror shall assume 10 intrusive investigation excavations per acre from the area around the munitions trenches and 10 pounds of MD requiring recycling per acre from the area around the munitions trenches.

· A commercial offsite borrow source is available (assume a 5 mile one way haul distance).

· Ground-water is located at 50ft bgs and is flowing to the southeast.

· There are no underground utilities within the project area.

· The Offeror shall state any additional assumptions in their proposed plan.

2.2.2 TNT Washout Facility: Bldg. 500 was a 1000 square foot (sf) TNT washout facility. This building is suspected to have explosives, asbestos, and lead and/or PBCPCB paint contamination. There are two 15 ft bays and an 8x15 ft shower area. There is a 2ft wide concrete floor trench covered with grating that runs the length of the bays in which remain 2 - 4 inch pipes capped flush with the grating. The floor drain in the shower once drained into a small septic system starting 20 ft from the building. Septic tank has a removable access opening. No equipment remains other than the two pipes in the floor trench. Outside the building the 2 – 4 inch pipes run for 100 feet to a leaching pond. These pipes remain open to the leaching pond. All Piping and septic system shall be sampled however no soil sampling is required.

3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

3.0.1 Contractor Methods: This is a performance based task order. The performance objectives and standards included herein are the basis of the task order requirements. The technical approach and level of effort expended to achieve task order objectives and standards are solely up to the contractor to select and adjust as necessary through the life of the task order.

3.0.2 Quality monitoring and measurement: The contractor will be evaluated periodically during performance of this task order to ensure compliance with the proposed and accepted performance goals, regulations, guidance and DIDs, and to document that acceptance criteria (AC), delivery schedule, and the overall completion date are being met. This evaluation will be performed according to a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). Draft QASP will be prepared by the contractor. Failure to adequately complete any service or submittal to at least a satisfactory level of quality or timeliness may result in a repeat of the work and/or a poor performance evaluation, or both.

3.0.3 Performance Requirements. Performance requirements are addressed in each task and summarized in the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) provided in Attachment A. Performance metrics are provided in Attachment B. If discrepancies or ambiguity exists between the documents, the order of precedence is 1) the Task; 2) Performance Requirements Summary; 3) Basic Contract

3.0.4 Task pricing: A pricing schedule will be provided as a separate document.

3.1 Task 1, RI/FS Technical Project Planning (TPP): This is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.1.1 Objective: Implement the four-phase TPP process.

3.1.2 Performance Standard: Achieve the objectives of each TPP phase as listed in EM 200-1-2, EM 200-1-15, and applicable Interim Guidance Documents. Facilitate meetings in a professional and organized manner.

3.1.3 Acceptance Criteria (AC): Acceptance of TPP documents (meeting presentations, agenda, handouts, Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and memorandums) with up to one (1) revision. Meetings held are organized; accomplish requirements of the TPP process; and are conducted in a professional manner. The contractor receives zero formal grievances or letters of concern.

3.1.4 Measurement / Monitoring: A TPP checklist for each phase will be used to measure and document progress; guidance cited will be used to evaluate content of documents for acceptance / non-acceptance. The Government will attend and evaluate organization and facilitation of the meetings, and professional nature of the meetings.

3.1.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating/poor CPARS rating and/or re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.1.6 Specific Task Requirements: The contractor shall utilize the TPP process to obtain consensus on specific Data Quality Objectives (DQO), Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Draft Uniform Federal Policy for Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPP) worksheets. The contractor shall present DQOs necessary to achieve the performance standards in Tasks 4 and 9, which were proposed and accepted at the time of task order award. The Contractor shall plan for meetings to occur as follows: first meeting, with USAESCH and the District resulting in DQOs, CSM and Draft QAPP worksheets; second meeting, pre-QAPP with entire Project Delivery Team (PDT), resulting in DQO, CSM and Draft QAPP worksheets consensus, and TPP Memorandum; third meeting, to finalize QAPP with resulting TPP addendum; fourth meeting, verify all data gaps have been filled and finalize Remedial Investigation Report. Second TPP meeting shall not occur until DQOs, CSM and Draft UFP-QAPP worksheets are accepted by the government The contractor shall organize and coordinate all meetings; identify and involve all stakeholders, upon approval by the Government; and be responsible for the logistics of these meetings to include, but not limited to, providing a facilitator, obtaining meeting location, and sending invitation letters (pending government review and acceptance). The contractor shall prepare meeting material to include handouts and presentation, TPP worksheets. All meeting materials shall be provided to the Government for acceptance prior to the TPP meetings. The Contractor shall prepare, submit for review, and gain acceptance of a TPP memorandum or addendum for each meeting with resulting DQOs for the Remedial Investigation. If a site visit is planned prior to acceptance of a Work Plan, the Contractor shall prepare and submit for acceptance an Abbreviated Accident Prevention Plan (AAPP). The Contractor shall utilize statistical methods (such as Visual Sample Plan (VSP) software) to support the decision making processes used to characterize munitions constituents (MC). The contractor shall implement Green and Sustainable Practices throughout the project starting at the TPP using Interim Guidance (IG) 10-01.

3.2 Task 2, Project Planning Documents. This is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.2.1 Objective: Prepare, submit, and gain acceptance of a Project Management Plan (PMP), a RI/FS Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and QASP, an Environmental Building Assessment (EBA) QAPP and QASP and all necessary subplans that are detailed and comprehensive plans covering all aspects of site characterization, risk assessment and methodology, and project execution as required in Task 4 and Task 9.

3.2.2 Task 2a, Project Management Plan.

3.2.2.1 Objective: Prepare, submit, and gain government approval of a PMP that is detailed and comprehensive covering all aspects of the RIFS, EBA and processes. This document is a living document and shall be updated as necessary.

3.2.2.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the PMP in accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 5-1; AR 11-2; USACE PMBP Manual, PROC2000, PMP-PgMP Development, REF8005G; PMP-PgMP Content and Data Item Description (DID) HNC-012.01. In addition, USACE ADR-SEDD data requirements per HNC-005.01.

3.2.2.3 AC: Acceptance of PMP with one revision.

3.2.2.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Government review of PMP per guidance to verify that a document meeting all Performance Standards and Task Specific Requirements has been provided.

3.2.2.5 Task specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.2.2.6 Specific Task Requirements: The intention of Section 2.3 of HNC-012.01 is to discuss remedy reviews (e.g. root cause analysis, corrective action plans) to address QC/QA failures. Additionally, the contract shall populate the USAESCH PMP PDF form provided by the Government, coordinating with the USAESCH Project Manager as needed. In addition to Basic Contract Section C and DID project status reporting requirements, the contractor shall include a project kick-off meeting and in-progress review (IPR) meetings. IPR meetings shall include but are not limited to, regular feedback to the Government on the progress of its work through face-to-face meetings, electronic mails, regular scheduled teleconferences.

3.2.3 Task 2b, Remedial Investigation (RI)/Feasibility Study (FS) Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and QASP:

3.2.3.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of a QAPP and QASP that are detailed and comprehensive plans covering all aspects of site characterization, risk assessment and methodology, and project execution.

3.2.3.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the QAPP and all required subplans in accordance with HNC-001.02; EM 200-1-15; EM 385-1-1; DoD 6055.09-M; EM 385-1-97, errata sheets and changes; Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force Uniform Federal Policy (UFP)-QAPP Manual; USACE HTRW Guidance; and other Interim Guidance and DIDs as appropriate. For sampling and analysis ensure the QAPP is prepared in accordance with EM 200-1-15, DID HNC-005.01, Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force UFP-QAPP Manual, USACE HTRW Guidance and State regulatory guidance, as appropriate. Prepare a risk assessment work plan as part of the overall project work plan incorporating implementation of the risk assessment and methodologies per USEPA Risk Assessment Guidance (RAGS), State regulatory guidance and USACE EM 200-1-4, Volumes I and II, as appropriate. QAPP content shall also meet the requirements of DoD Quality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories (current version). The Draft QASP shall be prepared in accordance with EM 200-1-15 and shall include systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed to include monitoring Quality Control requirements in guidance, DIDs and the contractor’s Quality Control measures.

3.2.3.3 AC: Acceptance of QAPP with two revisions. One additional revision is acceptable to incorporate EM-CX comments. Draft QASP reflects requirements of the QAPP with one revision if required. As needed for applicable subplans, one additional revisions will be allowed to incorporate USATCES and DDESB comments.

3.2.3.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of QAPP and QASP to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided and meets applicable guidance.

3.2.3.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.2.3.6 Specific Task Requirements: If advanced classification is proposed:

- Prepare as a subplan to the RI QAPP an advanced classification UFP-QAPP in accordance with the most recent Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response (GCMR) UFP-QAPP template

- All ground truth shall be firewalled from all contractor personnel performing any aspect of the geophysical analysis or geophysical quality control. All ground truth requests by the contractor's geophysical analysts shall be made directly to the Government. No ground truth information shall be provided to the contractor's analysis personnel from sources other than the Government unless approved in writing by the Government - The contractor shall provide a firewall plan that assures all seeding and anomaly excavation results cannot be viewed or otherwise obtained by, or made available to any personnel performing classification activities or QC of classification activities (In order to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the remainder of the processes, regulation, guidance and DIDs, this section has been left blank)

3.2.4 Task 2c, Environmental Building Assessment QAPP and QASP

3.2.4.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of detailed and comprehensive QAPP covering all requirements of the Building Assessment in accordance with applicable USACE, Federal, state, and local regulations, DIDs and guidance.

3.2.4.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the QAPP and all required subplans in accordance with HNC-001.02; EM 200-1-15; EM 385-1-1; EM 385-1-97 including Errata Sheets and Changes; Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force Uniform Federal Policy (UFP)-QAPP Manual; and other Interim Guidance and DIDs as appropriate. For sampling and analysis ensure the QAPP is prepared in accordance with EM 200-1-15, DID HNC-005.01, Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force UFP-QAPP Manual, USACE HTRW Guidance and State regulatory guidance, as appropriate, Federal and State regulatory guidance, as appropriate. QAPP content shall also meet the requirements of DoD Quality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories (current version). The Draft QASP shall include systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed to include monitoring Quality Control requirements in guidance, DIDs and the contractor’s Quality Control measures.

3.2.4.3 AC: Acceptance of QAPP with two revisions. One additional revision is acceptable to incorporate EM-CX. Draft QASP reflects requirements of the QAPP with one revision if required.

3.2.4.4 Measurement/Monitoring: Review of QAPP and QASP to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided and meets applicable guidance.

3.2.4.5 Task Specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.2.4.6 Specific Task Requirements: (In order to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the processes, regulation, guidance and DIDs, this section has been left blank)

3.3 Task 3, Geospatial Data. This is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.3.1 Objective: Utilize a geographic information system (GIS) in the development of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and maintain and manage all project and geospatial data.

3.3.2 Performance Standard: Manage and maintain project data, and develop CSM in GIS IAW DID HNC-006.01, EM 200-1-2, EM 200-1-15 and applicable Interim Guidance Documents.

3.3.3 AC: Acceptance of CSM and GeoSpatial Data submissions, which also meet quality and formatting requirements.

3.3.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review by Government using cited guidance to determine acceptability.

3.3.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.3.6 Specific Task Requirements: (In order to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the processes, regulation, guidance and DIDs, this section has been left blank)

3.4 Task 4, RI/FS Field Activities. This is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee task.

3.4.1 Objective: Conduct a remedial investigation in accordance with CERCLA, as amended, characterizing the nature and extent of MEC, MC and HRTW meeting the project DQOs as defined during the TPP process. This task shall include all field activities necessary to execute this task. For MC and HTRW contamination, collect sufficient data that meets the project DQOs as defined during the TPP process, of known quality and quantity to determine the nature and extent of MC and HTRW to support and perform a human health and ecological baseline risk assessment.

3.4.1.1 Task 4a, Munitions Burial Trench MRS. This is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee task.

3.4.2 Performance Standard: Field work, data quantity and quality, and analysis of said data provides the following results in the RI report:

- Demonstrate that the work was performed in accordance with the applicable laws, regulations, and guidance documents;

- Meet the project DQOs as defined by the TPP process.

- Perform the RI field activities in accordance with the accepted PMP and QAPP.

3.4.3 AC: Conduct the RI in accordance with the accepted/approved PMP and QAPP, and CESP. QC data submitted meets requirements described in PMP, QAPP, regulation, guidance and DIDs.

- Sampling field work and data meets established criteria within the accepted PMP and QAPP and CESP.

- All final data and QC tests/documentation submitted. Government QA acceptance of QC tests/documentation gained.

- No more than 3 CARs/948s for non-critical violations and/or 1 CAR/948 for critical violation. No unresolved Corrective action requests.

- No Class “A” Safety accidents, contractor at fault, IAW AR 385-40.

- Major safety violations, <1 non-explosive Class C accidents; and <2 non-explosive related Class D accidents.

- Minor safety violations, no more than 2 safety violations.

3.4.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Periodic inspection/review of field work and data. Verify compliance with accepted PMP and QAPP and CESP. Quality control tests/documentation submitted per the QASP for government review.

3.4.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or re-performance of work at contractor’s expense. Failure to pass the pre-operation exercises or surveys on the first effort may result in issuance of a cure notice.

3.3.6 Specific Task Requirements: (In order to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the processes, regulation, guidance and DIDs, this section has been left blank)

3.5 Task 5, Remedial Investigation Report. This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.5.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of a RI report.

3.5.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the report in accordance with CERCLA, as amended, EPA 540-G-89-004, and EP 1110-1-18. The ecological and human health risk assessment shall be performed in accordance with the EPA Risk Assessment Guidance (RAGS) and USACE EM 200-1-4, Volumes I and II, as appropriate.

3.5.3 AC: Acceptance of RI with a Draft for Government agency review, Draft Final for back check and review by the EM-CX prior to release to the Regulators, Draft Final to the regulators, Final for Back check by all, Approved Final. One additional revision is acceptable to incorporate EM-CX, as required.

3.5.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of RI against guidance to verify that the acceptable content has been provided.

3.5.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.5.6 Specific Task Requirements:

- Recommend changes in delineation of MRS boundaries based on RI findings.

- Each MRS shall be fully discussed separately and in a sequential manner in the document. Multiple MRS discussions shall not be mingled within the chapters. This will require more chapters than indicated in the guidance and can be addressed as separate volumes in the RI Report.

- Use EPA MEC Hazard Assessment, not Ordnance and Explosives Risk Impact Assessment.

- Use FUDS Risk Management Process to assessment MEC risk rather than EPA MEC Hazard Assessment.

- Incorporate all RI data and data from previous investigations, historical documents, PA/SI into this RI report.

- Prepare, as a separate document, a new or updated Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol (MRSPP) for each MRS dependent upon RI findings using the MRSPP worksheets, http://www.lab-data.com/MRSPP/ .

- Level 4 validation packages are required.

- Appendices shall not be limited to those listed in EP 1110-1-18, but shall contain all supporting data to the RI Report.

3.6 Task 6, Feasibility Study and Report. This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.6.1 Objective: Conduct a feasibility study and prepare, submit, and gain acceptance of a FS report.

3.6.2 Performance Standard: Prepared in accordance with CERCLA, as amended, EPA 540-G-89-004, EP 1110-1-18.

3.6.3 AC: Acceptance of FS with a Draft for Government agency review, Draft Final for back check and review by the EM-CX prior to release to the Regulators, Draft Final to the regulators, Final for Back check by all, Approved Final. One additional revision is acceptable to incorporate EM-CX, as required.

3.6.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of FS against guidance to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided.

3.6.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.6.6 Specific Task Requirements:

- Advanced Classification shall be a screened technology, analyzed as an alternative, and included in comparative analysis.

- Each MRS shall be fully discussed separately and in a sequential manner in the document. Multiple MRS discussions shall not be mingled within the chapters. This will require more chapters than indicated in the guidance and can be addressed as separate volumes in the FS Report.

- The FS report shall document the results of the FS.

3.7 Task 7, Proposed Plan. This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.7.1 Objective: Prepare, submit, and gain acceptance of a Proposed Plan (PP).

3.7.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the PP in accordance with ER 200-3-1, EP 1110-1-18, EPA 540-R-98-031 and CERCLA, as amended.

3.7.3 AC: Acceptance of PP with a Draft for Government agency review, Draft Final for back check and review by the EM-CX prior to release to the Regulators, Draft Final to the regulators, Draft Final for Back check by all, accepted Draft-Final. One additional revision is acceptable to incorporate EM-CX comments, as required. Once the public comments period is over the Final Proposed Plan shall be submitted.

3.7.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of PP against guidance to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided.

3.7.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.7.6 Specific Task Requirements: After government and regulatory review, the revised accepted Draft-Final version of the Proposed Plan will be subject to a minimum 30-day public review. A public meeting shall be held to present the Proposed Plan to the public. This public meeting falls under Task 11, Community Relations Support.

3.8 Task 8, Decision Document: This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.8.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and obtain acceptance of a Decision Document.

3.8.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the Decision Document in accordance with ER 200-3-1, EP 1110-1-18, Attachment C, herein, EPA 540-R-98-031 and CERCLA, as amended.

3.8.3 AC: Acceptance of Decision Documents with a Draft for Government agency review, Draft Final for back check and review by the EM-CX prior to release to the Regulators, Draft Final to the regulators, Final for Back check by all, Approved Final. One additional revision is acceptable to incorporate EM-CX comments, as required.

3.8.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of Decision Documents against guidance to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided.

3.8.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and/or re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.8.6 Specific Task Requirements: None

3.9 Task 9, Environmental Building Assessment of Building 500. This is a Firm Fixed Prices task.

3.9.1 Objective: Perform an assessment of Building 500 with respect to asbestos, other regulated materials (to include LBP and PCB’s-in-paints, as required) and explosives contamination. Explosives contamination shall be summarized in accordance with EM 385-1-97. Building 500 is considered to have ‘significant’ explosives presence and equipment/piping in accordance with the guidance.

3.9.2 Performance Standard: Field work, data quantity and quality, and analysis of said data provides the following results in the Assessment report:

- Demonstrate that the work was performed in accordance with the applicable laws, regulations, and guidance documents;

- Demonstrate that the boundaries of all identified Explosives, Asbestos and Other Regulated Materials (ORM) contamination areas have been delineated.

- Demonstrate that data inputs from the Assessment into the Remediation will enable remediation cost estimates with an accuracy of +15%/-15%.

Additionally:

3.9.3 AC: Conduct the Assessment in accordance with the accepted/approved WP. No more than 3 CARs for non-critical violations and/or 1 CAR for critical violation. No unresolved Corrective action requests. All final data and QC tests/documentation submitted. Government QA acceptance QC tests/documentation gained. No Class “A” Safety, contractor at fault, violations during execution of work, <1 non-explosive related Class D, accidents, or <2 non-explosive Class C accidents IAW AR 385-40. Major safety violations, 1 non-explosive related safety violation. Minor safety violations, 2 safety violations. Zero letters of reprimand, grievances, or formal complaints.

3.9.4 Measurement/Monitoring: Period inspection/review of field work. Verify compliance with accepted QAPP. Quality control tests/documentation submitted per the QASP for government review. Boundary precision will be determined by evaluation of the sampling footprint as it relates to the reported contaminated/uncontaminated areas in question.

3.9.5 Task Specific Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.9.6 Specific Task Requirements: (In order to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the processes, regulations, guidance and DIDs, this section has been left blank)

3.10 Task 10: Assessment Report. This is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.10.1 Objective: Prepare, submit and gain acceptance of an assessment report summarizing all assessment efforts after completion of assessment field effort and receipt of any required analytical results.

3.10.2 Performance Standard: Prepare report documents in accordance with the applicable DIDS and all applicable Federal, State and local regulations presenting.

3.10.3 AC: Acceptance of all report documents with two revisions.

3.10.4 Measurement/Monitoring: Review of reports per guidance to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided.

3.10.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.10.6 Specific Task Requirements: The Contractor shall provide a final report after completion of the project. The final report shall include a detailed description of work performed, lessons learned, a summary of the contamination found per building and disposition of all project debris materials. Copies of certifications will be included. As part of the final report, the contractor shall provide a cost estimate and schedule for completion of the remediation effort that will be required. In the event that contamination is extensive enough that remediation and demolition are inseparable, the cost estimate and schedule shall include the demolition of the facility along with foundations. In which case, site restoration costs and schedule shall be included as well.

3.11 Task 11, Community Relations Support: This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.11.1 Objective: Successfully complete public meetings and support the District with community relations.

3.11.2 Performance Standard: Contractor attends and participates in meetings. Meeting materials are accepted by the government as required. Meeting transcripts for PP meeting are accurate and prepared by a professional court reporter.

3.11.3 AC: Acceptance of meeting materials with two revisions and acceptance of PP meeting transcripts in one revision. Meetings held are organized; and professional in nature. Contractor personnel in attendance are thoroughly familiar with the project. The contractor receives zero formal grievance or letters of concern.

3.11.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of required materials for meetings. Government will attend and evaluate the contractor’s attendance, participation and professional demeanor.

3.11.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating.

3.11.6 Specific Task Requirements: Work shall be executed in accordance with the accepted Community Relations Plan (CRP). The Contractor shall attend and participate in three (3) public meetings. These meetings are different from and in addition to TPP meetings. These meetings will be held near the project site; specific location to be determined as part of the CRP development. Support shall include, but is not limited to: preparation and delivery of briefings, graphics, maps, posters, and support of question and answer sessions during public meetings, supply printing services. The Contractor shall also obtain the meeting site, provide sound equipment as needed, perform public notification and prepare any correspondence necessary to meet the objectives of this task. The government shall approve all correspondence, public notices, and all other materials prior to being presented/distributed to the public. These actions are independent of the field activities that involve interaction with the community. The meeting for the Proposed Plan shall be covered under this task. Transcripts of the public meeting for the Proposed Plan shall be included without editing or deleting anything from the official document with the exception of redactions to protect Personally Identifiable Information (PII) if needed and shall be included in the Administrative Record and placed in information repositories.

3.12 Task 12, Community Relation Plan (CRP): This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.12.1 Objective: Prepare, submit, and gain acceptance of a CRP.

3.12.2 Performance Standard: Prepare the CRP in accordance with ER 200-3-1, EP 200-3-1, and EM 200-1-15, guidance provided in the FUDS Public Involvement Toolkit, as appropriate, and the DENIX UXO Safety Website, http://denix.osd.mil/uxo/.

3.12.3 AC: Acceptance of CRP with two revisions.

3.12.4 Measurement / Monitoring: Review of CRP against guidance to verify that the minimum acceptable content has been provided.

3.12.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.12.6 Specific Task Requirements: This effort shall include, but is not limited to: preparation and delivery of stakeholder surveys, review and presentation of survey findings, completion of stakeholder interviews, determining a list of local, state, and federal representatives for the area, determining proposed locations for public meetings, determining best methods of communicating to the public (radio, television, mail outs, etc). The government shall approve all correspondence, survey content, and all other materials prior to being presented/distributed to the public. These actions are independent of the field activities that involve interaction with the community.

3.13 Task 13, Administrative Record: This task is a Firm Fixed Price task.

3.13.1 Objective: Establish and maintain the Administrative Record for each MRS throughout the period of performance of this Task Order.

3.13. 2 Performance Standard: Establish and maintain in accordance with the guidance in EP 200-3-1, Chapter 4 (Establishing and Maintaining Administrative Records) and Standard Operating Procedure for Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Records Management, Revision 5, (dated January 2008, or most recent version at the time of task order award).

3.13.3 AC: Administrative record will be evaluated against guidance for compliance with requirements, accuracy and completeness of the record, with up to one uncorrected deficiency remaining during the period of performance.

3.13.4 Measurement / Monitoring: The government will visit the administrative record’s location, at least once, and check for completeness and compliance with referenced EP; electronic submissions will be evaluated randomly upon receipt as data is entered into the record.

3.13.5 Incentives/Disincentives: Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

3.13.6 Specific Task Requirements: Secure a location such as a public library for a place to house the Administrative Record in the local city or community for each MRS. This task requires close coordination with the District and USAESCH to secure all required documents to support the Administrative Record. Provide copies of all final documents posted to the Administrative Record on CD/DVD to the District and USAESCH, 2 copies each. These files shall be suitable for placement on the FRMD web site per the above SOP.

4.0 SUBMITTALS:

Even though draft and draft final submittals are requested, the term “draft” shall not reflect upon the quality of the submittal being provided by the Contractor. Submittals shall include all supporting materials including supporting data whether electronic or hardcopy. Submittals not meeting the requirements of referenced guidance or Data Item Descriptions or missing supporting data may be rejected and revised by the contractor at the contractor’s own expense.

4.1 The Contractor shall deliver the specified number of copies shown in Table 4.2 of each report listed in Table 4-1 to the following addressees (addresses to be verified by Contractor):

(Not provided for Contract solicitation)

4.2 Submittals and Due Dates.

The Contractor shall submit 1 copy of the entire submittal on a CD with each hard copy of a submittal (Reports, Plans, etc) in accordance with DID HNC-006.01. Hardcopies shall be printed on both sides of the paper whenever possible.

Table 4-1 List of Submittals

4.3 Submittal Quantities

Provide the number of submittals shown in Table 4-2 to the addressees given in Section 4.2. No draft documents shall be released to the regulatory community until reviewed by the government.

Table 4-2 Submittal Guidance

4.4 Review Period: The contractor shall include at least a minimum 14 calendar day review period for USAESCH, 21 calendar day review period for the EM-CX, and 30 calendar day review period for the regulators.

4.5 Period of Performance: The Completion Date for this Task Order is 4 years from date of award.

5.0 MILESTONE PAYMENTS: Milestones will be considered met or completed when the required QC documentation has been submitted, QA completed and the submittal and/or product is accepted. Any payment vouchers submitted that do not coincide with the final accepted milestones or do not have the appropriate QC documentation will be rejected. All payments will be made utilizing an agreed upon Payment Milestone Schedule. The Contractor shall provide suggested milestones for payment. Milestones for payment shall be shown on the project schedule.

5.1 The following is a list of potential milestones for payment:

- Final Submittals: upon government acceptance, for example: Final QAPP

- Field Work: for defined units and activities completed and QA review and acceptance, for example: Final DGM data package with dig sheets.

- Meetings: after completion of meetings with government acceptance of meeting minutes, for example: Final PP meeting transcripts.

6.0 REFERENCES:

6.1 Refer to “Base Contract.”

6.2 Data Items Descriptions – all applicable DIDs shall be implemented.

6.3 Site Specific References – (Fictitious site, no documentation will be provided)

7.0 GENERAL CONDITIONS: See the Base Contract Section C, Section 10 General Conditions and the following addendums:

7.1 This is a performance based task order.

7.2 Government acceptance of the proposed technical approach and/or price does not relieve the Contractor from full responsibility for the viability, productivity, and efficiency of the approach used to meet the performance requirements of the PWS at the price proposed. The task order is for the provision of services that ultimately meet the performance requirements of this task. If the contractor must adjust its technical approach or perform more field work than anticipated in order to achieve the proposed performance goal then the contractor will do so with no change in task order price.

7.3 If the Government at its sole discretion chooses to modify the performance standard the parties to this task order will assess the impact on the estimated amount of field work required to achieve the new performance standards and will negotiate a price adjustment.

7.4 The Contractor attests that it applied due diligence in the research and development of its proposal has priced reasonable estimates of the site conditions and the associated risks into the price. The Contractor accepts full and sole responsibility for identifying and considering all factors that may affect the cost to execute the work. The act of signing this task order signifies that the Contractor has been given ample opportunity to assess the conditions under which the work will be performed and the Contractor either fully understands those conditions or has factored the risk into the price.

7.5 The Government provided the Contractor with historical documents and documents from previous site activities. The Contractor attests it interpreted the data utilizing an experienced understanding of how the data of this type is collected, analyzed, interpreted, and presented.

8.0 ARMY CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING:

8.1 Implementation.

8.1.1 The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) operates and maintains a secure Army data collection site where the contractor will report contractor manpower information (including subcontractor manpower information) required for performance of this contract. The contractor shall submit all the information required in the format specified at the following web address: https://cmra.army.mil/default.aspx

8.1.2 The Contractors shall fill in the required information on the website, fields are shown below:

- Contract Number

- Delivery Order Number (if applicable)

- Task Order Number (if applicable)

- Requiring Activity Unit Identification Code (UIC)

- Command

- Contractor Contact Information

- Federal Service Code (FSC)

- Direct Labor Hours

- Direct Labor Dollars

- Location Information (where contractor and subcontractors (if applicable) performed the services

8.1.3 Reporting period will be the period of performance not to exceed 12 months ending September 30 of each government fiscal year and must be reported by 15 October of each calendar year.

8.1.4 If your particular contract crosses fiscal years, 2 entries must be made to capture the data for the contract period; for example if the contract start date is 1 January 2007 and ends 31 December 2007, the data for the period from 1 January 2007 through 30 September 2007 shall be entered not later than 15 October 2007 and the period 1 October 2007 through 31 December 2007 shall be entered not later than 15 January 2008.

ATTACHMENT C

SAMPLE TASK ORDER

Attachment A Performance Requirements Summary:

A.1 The Contractor shall meet the following performance requirements. Performance requirements are addressed in each task and summarized in the following Performance Requirements Summary. If discrepancies or ambiguity exists between the documents, the order of precedence is 1) the Task; 2) Performance Requirements Summary; 3) Performance Metrics

Table A-1 Performance Requirements Summary

Satisfactory or greater Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating/poor CPARS rating and/or re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.

Acceptance of PMP with one revision.

Satisfactory or greater CPARS rating/poor CPARS rating and re-performance of work at contractor’s expense.